If Only This Did Happen….

September 2, 2007


But if you know yer NeoCon Fascistii you know it’s not going to happen.

So..

Get active and visit our ‘For a Blue Majority Now!’ page and help elect people who use their brain for something besides propaganda and getting drunk.


We Report…You Decide…

July 16, 2007

Vice President Cheney, beloved of the populace would seem to be a candidate for Shutting His F$%&ing Pie Hole! But, he always has been and remains…..

one very dumb individual as well as having the conscience of a conservative.


John Edwards is a Winner!

June 22, 2007

His healthcare plan will win against the Big Pharma lies and never mind the haircut bullshit……

He whips him some ReThugs too.

Which if you follow the link you will find The Hill and ‘Bama do not.

So…if you want you a Progressive President with all capital P’s get on over to ‘For a Blue Majority Now!‘ and give some dough. Remember early $$$$ count a lot.


Hmmmmmmmmmmm…….

June 17, 2007

This post by OPOL at dKos sounds awfully familiar.

Lemme think for a minute….

Oh Yeah!

Now I remember.

Yeah, it’s all coming back to me now!

Funny how the conventional wisdom has changed.

Ain’t it.


The Voice of the People…..

May 23, 2007

Just back from a rousing meeting of D/L Oakland. The hardcore were there in force and they were pissed. You know why. The Democrats Caved as I explored in my last post. But…

Enough about me. What do the people say? From Congress.org we have this from an irate citizen in Florida:

You are an embarrassment

To:
Sen. Harry Reid

May 23, 2007

I am embarrassed to have supported you, Sir. You and other Democrats have rolled over and allowed George Bush to get exactly what he wanted: all the cash for the War-Based-on-Lies with no accountability at all.

What are you afraid of? Is this wimp of a president that much of a bully to you? He folded his arms and had a tantrum like a petulant child in a supermarket, and you gave in. Shame on you.

Perhaps you don’t remember why the Democrats won the last election: TO END THE WAR.

Would a Republican congress have caved in to a Democratic president the way you did? Of course not.

You should have continued sending the SAME BILL back to Bush over and over. If he chose to veto it, it would have been HE who stopped funds to the troops.

You should have forced him to accept it.

Here’s what you should have said:

"This war has been a huge disaster. We are not going to allow this disaster of a war to continue endlessly. We’ve approved funds to the troops for now, but we’re going to make sure this disaster ends soon. TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT MR PRESIDENT."

You may want to write that down and rehearse it for August when this discussion begins again.

The American people want us OUT. The Iraqi people want us OUT. You were elected with one simple directive: Get us OUT. You have failed.

Cutting funds to end a war has been done many times. It should have been done by now.

Davie , FL

From a rather irritated voter, I assume anyway, in San Francisco:

Shame on You!

To:
Rep. Nancy Pelosi

May 22, 2007

Shame on you for enabling Bush to continue his insane war! Your spin that this is the beginning of the end to the war is bogus. Bush and Cheney are laughing their asses off tonight at what you wimpy Dems have done! The message from Nov. 06′ was ‘end this war’ ,not play political football with American lives. 100+ deaths per month continue because you SOLD OUT!!

San Francisco , CA

Ah, hell who cares what those Dirty Fu#$in’ Hippies in SF think anyway. Right?

Wait, wait, wait a minute…Here is a letter from someone in OH to Mitch ‘I like Bush’ O’Connell Senate Minority Leader. Read this and see what Republicans are saying, some of ’em anyway…..

TIME OUT! Congress Should Determine the Outcome in Iraq…BIG LET DOWN!!!

To:
Sen. Mitch McConnell

May 22, 2007

Democratic leaders have decided to drop their insistence on a timeline for withdrawing US forces from Iraq;
I just KNEW this was going to happen. What a waste! Thanks for nothing.
Don’t worry. We won’t forget.
RON PAUL IN 2008!!!

Garrettsville , OH

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm. dat Ron Paul dude struck a nerve…and a populist one too. Who’d a’ thunk it? And from the ReThug House Minority Leader John Boehner we get….

George W. Bush, you are being paid millions of dollars to support this war.

To:
Rep. John Boehner

May 20, 2007

President Bush,

This war should not be.
Iraq posed no threat to us.
No weapons of mass destruction.
No yellow cake uranium from Niger.
No ties to Al Qaeda.
No ties to 9/11.
All LIES that you fabricated in order to convince the American people to support a war designed to make hundreds of Billions of dollars for the oil companies and defense contractors that funded your election campaigns and millions of dollars in kickbacks for you (for making all those hundreds of Billions possible).

3,422 of our brave soldiers have returned home from Iraq in boxes…
packed in ice…
cold and blue…
Why?
So that a bunch of greedy oil executives, greedy defense contractors, and greedy politicians like you could become multi-millionaires.

You are not fighting terrorism in Iraq. You are creating more of it according to the National Intelligence Estimate released by your administration in April 2006.

How did the British defeat the IRA?
Did they launch a full-scale military invasion of Ireland with tanks, aircraft carriers, bombers, artillery, battalions of troops??
No.
They poured all of their resources into Intelligence and SWAT teams.
They found out where the terrorists were training, busted down their doors, and put them in chains.

As a very wise man named OSHO once said, in reference to fighting terrorism, "Sometimes where a needle is useful, a sword may not be of any use."
A needle means a precision strike on a terrorist training camp, based upon valid intelligence and with the use of a SWAT team or a Tomahawk cruise missile.
NO DEAD CIVILIANS.
(Especially not hundreds of thousands of them, George.)

The sword (full-scale military invasion) is of no use against terrorists.
However, the sword has proven very useful for one thing… making hundreds of Billions of dollars for your campaign contributors and millions of dollars in kickbacks for you George (for making all those hundreds of Billions possible).

If I had the power to do so, I would exhume every last one of the 3,422 soldiers that you have so carelessly cast into Eternity, and I would carry their corpses in my arms one by one to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and I would pile all of your murder victims on the south lawn and I would force you to stare at that mountain of skeletons in order to make you aware of the crimes you have committed.

West Chester , OH

Holy jumpin’ crawdads malcontent this ‘ignorant’, ‘low-information’ voter knows about military Keynesianism and what it implies for him. Damn, maybe that ‘low-information’ thing is getting tired.

Now if only the assholes running for President on the ‘Democrat’ ticket wher half as fuking smart, huh?

Sadly, they are not.

Not even close.

So, regular_guy, malcontent, tekstone, SAS, I am thowin’  down the gauntlet. If this quick and dirty sample of opinion shows that the citizenry, across the political spectrum gets what  the ‘Demcrat’ Party caving is really about….

Can we get it together and make some noise, apply some pressure to….

Push Back!


I’ve been invited to Blog against Theocracy…And I didn’t have to be asked twice…

April 7, 2007

I’m going to talk about ‘theocracy’ as one of the two ways Wikipedia defines it. I’m going to talk about it from a political perspective not a cultural one. I am not a member of the patriarchy; I do know what it is and will leave the sundering and burning of that vile conspiracy to others. Remember, please, that the political is personal.

Wikipedia says that theocracy is:

‘It’s religious institutional representative(s) (e.g., church, temple), either replacing or dominating the organs of civil government as clerical or spiritual representative(s) of god(s).’

I chose this definition because I think that’s what the fundamentalist backers of George W. Bush and the Republican Party are trying to make come to pass….At least that’s what they tell their fundamentalist followers whose support, cash and votes they are asking for in exchange for implementing an American Theocracy. The reality of BushCo. and it’s wholly owned subsidiary The Republican Party’s attempt to institute a Fascist regime is fodder for another day and something that the Xtians are now becoming aware of.

So…

Read the rest of this entry »


John Bolton as Guest on CNN

April 5, 2007

Okay, I know that CNN is the ‘good cop’ to the Fox Network’s ‘bad cop’ – it may seem better, but they are on the same team.  But I can’t help getting pissed off when they do something so blatantly stupid and biased as they did yesterday.

I was watching AC 360 briefly as I was eating lunch or breakfast or whatever, and saw that substitute host John Roberts had John Bolton on as his ONE and ONLY guest.  Way to go to get several sides of an issue and present a “fair and balanced” story… NOT!

This is only days after John Bolton appeared on the Daily Show with  Jon Stewart (can parents STOP naming their kids John or Jon for a couple decades please??) and the very next day, Jon did what right wingers must consider similar to a splash of holy water in the face of a vampire: the dreaded “Fact Check”!

Here is the Daily Shows fact check that proves that John Bolton has NO IDEA what the fuck he is talking about.  Further, it shows how Bolton will state facts with great authority and seeming gravitas as if he knows without any doubt that what he is saying is fact… despite the fact that he is totally full of shit.

So CNN has this retarded armchair politico on to get his important opinion on the handling of the British hostages in Iran.  Roberts asks Bolton questions such as “does that prove that quiet diplomacy is the correct way to approach Iran?” “If you were Britain, how would you have approached this crisis?” then repeats the same question again to “propel the propaganda” in the words of the worst president ever.

Here is the sickening transcript.  Bolton goes on to refute Roberts’ claim that “no one has yet proven that they [Iran] are actually trying to acquire nuclear weapons” by saying, “I don’t think there really can be any doubt what Iran’s intentions are.”

I think Jon Stewart proved that John Bolton spits lies like a … well, like a … like a Republican.  Makes sense I suppose, because that is what he is: a LYING piece of shit Republican.


Now just who are you going to believe? Me or your lyin’ eyes…Or maybe the ‘Tehhahist’ Luvin’ Democrat Party?

March 25, 2007


‘Thas
right boy ya doin’ yerself proud there…’

Is there, as ‘Abu Graib’ Gonzales, or ‘Smiler’ as I like to call his punk ass, insists, a perfectly reasonable explanation for Purgegate? I guess there might be, but there are sure an awful lot of reasons to be skeptical. Here’s a list off the top of my head:

1. Prior to the purge, DOJ lawyers quietly inserted a clause in the Patriot Act that allowed them to appoint new U.S. Attorneys without Senate approval. Why did they do this when their own emails show that the existing system hadn’t caused them any problems?

2. They fired eight USAs at once. This is wildly unprecedented. Why did they feel the need for such an extensive sweep?

3. None of the eight were given a reason for being fired.

4. DOJ initially lied when asked why they were fired, chalking it up to “performance reasons” even though five of the eight had previously received reviews placing them in the top third of all USAs. Why lie if there’s an innocent explanation?

5. Five of the eight were either aggressively prosecuting Republicans or else failing to prosecute Democrats to the satisfaction of local politicians. Coincidence?

6. David Iglesias reported that he received case-related calls from Heather Wilson and Pete Domenici shortly before the midterms. He believes the calls were intended to pressure him into indicting some local Democrats before election day. He didn’t, and a few weeks later he was fired.

On a similar note, the day after Carol Lam notified DOJ that she was planning to expand the Duke Cunningham investigation, Kyle Sampson emailed the White House and told William Kelly to call him so he could explain the “real reason” he wanted to get rid of Lam. What was the real reason that he didn’t want to put in email?

7. When DOJ released thousands of pages of emails last week, there was a mysterious 18-day gap from a period shortly before the firings were announced. This seems like precisely the period during which there would have been the greatest amount of email traffic. Where are the emails?

8. The email dump contained virtually nothing from before the firings discussing the reasons for targeting the eight USAs who were eventually fired. Surely there must have been such a discussion?

9. DOJ has now had weeks to come up with a plausible story for the firings and they still haven’t. This is truly remarkable. Why not just tell the truth? That doesn’t take weeks to concoct.

All this from one blogger Kevin Drum.

Makes ya wonder don’t it?


Libby found guilty on four counts (…so what)

March 6, 2007

In case you haven’t already heard, Irving Lewis “Scooter” Libby was pronounced guilty on four out of five counts by the jury at 12 Noon EST today. From the RawStory.com link provided above, the verdicts per charge are as follows:

  • Obstruction of Justice: GUILTY
  • False statements to FBI (Russert conversation): GUILTY
  • False statement to FBI (Cooper conversation): NOT GUILTY
  • Perjury to the Grand Jury (Russert conversation): GUILTY
  • Perjury to the Grand Jury (Cooper conversation): GUILTY

DKos blogger, Marcy offered the following updates from the courtroom:

  • Pre-sentence investigation will be conducted. Report due May 15.
  • Libby will need to make arrangements with probation department. [Court] will give counsel until May 25 dispute with probation.
  • Wells makes a formal motion to have appeal period extended.
  • Libby is sitting back from the table. ABSOLUTELY no reaction.

…whatever.

I simply cannot get excited about this verdict. For those of you that believe this will make a difference in the way our government is run, the manner in which our surreal foreign policy which is employed in our names, the circus which is our current domestic “security” environment, the integrity of our original “Constitution for the united states of America” and the Bill of Rights, and/or the quality of our lives…well, good luck.

Your Democratic Party “leadership” has not substantially changed the military course we are on in Afghanistan or Iraq, there is no indication they will hold anyone accountable for breaking international law by attacking these two countries in the first place. Nor have they shown any collective fortitude to take up the fight for my rights.

This trial has been theater, a sideshow, a farce.

I’ll say it again, “we need real leaders, and that means you and me.” Fortunately, there are a few rational people politics in Washington, but they are clearly the minority. This goes beyond the Sirota meme, which A.Citizen loves to trumpet: “The People Party” vs. “The Money Party.” We have to make more noise about more issues that we feel are important to us. We cannot continue to let politicians play us for fools, who will eat up the pablum they spoon feed us, while they greedily pocket lobbyist checks and corporate profits, without real oversight or approval.

Are you more prosperous, safer, better educated, in better health than a year ago, …a decade ago? …two decades? Do you feel comfortable saying what’s on your mind? How secure is your retirement? How much faith do you have in the public education system in your community? WHAT HAVE ANY YOUR REPRESENTATIVES DONE FOR YOU LATELY? This question stands for Democrats and Republicans, alike.

These are the things which are not being tended too, while we watch this play acting in Washington, D.C. which has nothing to do with you or me. Goddammit, these people need to do something for us, the American people. Stop playing politics like it’s an episode of “Survivor.” I don’t care who you throw off your little political island. These people are always given a friendly exit interview on the “news” or “punditry” show du jour and they always land on their feet, in corporate America.


MISTRIAL – Lt. Ehren Watada case thrown out

February 8, 2007

Just in case you haven’t heard (AlterNet), An Army judge has declared mistrial in the court martial of Lt. Ehren Watada, who can’t be retried for the same charges.” More from the article below:

When the Army judge declared a mistrial over defense objection in 1st Lt. Ehren Watada’s court martial on Wednesday, he probably didn’t realize jeopardy attached. That means that under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution, the government cannot retry Lt. Watada on the same charges of missing movement and conduct unbecoming an officer.Lt. Watada is the first commissioned officer to publicly refuse orders to deploy to Iraq. He claimed those orders were unlawful because the war is illegal and he would be an accomplice to war crimes if he followed them.

The judge refused to allow me and others to testify as expert defense witnesses on the illegality of the Iraq war and the war crimes the Bush administration is committing there.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice sets forth the duty of military personnel to obey only lawful commands. Article 92 says: “A general order or regulation is lawful unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the law of the United States ”

Lt. Watada said at a June 6, 2006 press conference in Tacoma, Washington, “The war in Iraq is in fact illegal. It is my obligation and my duty to refuse any orders to participate in this war.” He stated, “An order to take part in an illegal war is unlawful in itself. So my obligation is not to follow the order to go to Iraq.”

(The article continues…)

Justice, for now.


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started