What might drive us to put ourselves in harms’ way to save the lives of others? Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
CNN reported, that in the major violent crimes, the instincts of most people is to flee the scene, but there are those who, disregarded their own safety, and ran toward danger, to attempt to stop the assailants in these violent attacks to save the lives of others. Experts point out, there’s only around ten-percent of total population who would show these sorts of heroic, behaviors.
why it’s believed that true altruism doesn’t exist, from five years ago, off of YouTube
The background of this report by CNN is based off of the Australian Bondi Beach shooting, how more than one civilians had, attempted to subdue the gunman, resulting in two deaths and one wounded.
The article didn’t mention other examples, and it’d made me recalled the random attacks on the MRT in Taipei on the nineteenth, a fifty-seven-year-old man, Yu as the attacker started stabbing at random, he’d blocked the assailant from attacking others on the trains, and he’d died. In the two cases of the beach massacre and the attack on the Taipei MRT trains, the victims weren’t law enforcement, but they’d decided to step in to help save others’ lives.
Psychological and scientific studies showed, that these kinds of altruistic behaviors are rare. The broadcasting of these altruistic behaviors from social media made the public misbelieves, that these kinds of life-saving actions are frequently occurring, but in reality, when most people are faced with violence without warning beforehand, they will freeze up, or run away to escape, due to our survival instincts, or we would, stay by, and observe, this is the bystander effect.
The neurology department by C.I.T. research suggested that some may offer a helping hand in time of crises, due to three key requirements: first, they knew that someone is in immediate danger, and felt empathy toward the victims; they instinctively believe that intervening “might help the situation”, that it wouldn’t be to no avail; they’d quickly made the decisions to step in, to help, “allowing their actions to surpass their own fears of the situations.”
The professor from Cal-Tech stated, that only ten-percent of total population have a stronger empathy, and are more than likely to offer a helping hand in times of crises, but this doesn’t mean, that others won’t be heroes.
why altruism is motivated by selfish reason…off of YouTube
Experts remind us, understanding of the heroic mindset isn’t to encourage that ordinary citizens should put themselves at risk. The civilians in these situations of crises who weren’t trained to respond to these situations, should never pursue the suspect, gather around and record what was happening, start screaming, and other behaviors that may cause harm or dangers to the, self.
And so, this is on how the acts of altruism may only be from our instincts, because we see someone getting assaulted, attacked, and we feel that drive inside our own bodies (the adrenaline rushes, etc., etc., etc.) that we rush up to stop the assailant, and, we put our lives in harm’s way, and that is the definition of altruism: to help someone, despite how the risk of harm may come to oneself, and yet, most of the times, we fear that we won’t answer to our own good conscience, if we don’t help, so the motives of helping out is still, selfish, and that would not be, altruistic at all!




You must be logged in to post a comment.