Tag Archives: Death Penalty

If CASTRATION is Considered “Cruel & Unusual”…

Here’s one, on “Cruel and Unusual Punishment”, the EIGHTH amendment???

If CASTRATION is considered “cruel and unusual”, then, how ‘bout them, VICS who NEVER consented to getting PENETRATED by you, huh?  If CASTRATION is considered “cruel and unusual”, then, WHAT sort of punishment would be fitting to those, RAPISTS, whom we KNOW will continue to offend, even AFTER they’d passed those, 12-Steps (like in AA???), huh?  Would that NOT be, considered, “cruel and unusual” for the victims of their sexual assaults, to LIVE in constant fear?

If CASTRATION is considered “cruel and unusual”, then, the only WAY to prevent this, “cruel and unusual” punishment is by you losers, keeping your DICKS, inside those, trousers of yours, but, you can’t, because your DICKS are, connected straight to your, FRONTAL lobe, which are UNDER DEVELOPED, for whatever reasons there may have been, so it’s always us women, who will, get, PREYED on.

a most humane method that the convicted can DIE…photo from online

If CASTRATION is considered “cruel and unusual”, then, what about not allowing us women, to have our, abortion rights, huh???  I mean, it IS, our bodies, and yet, we don’t got no choice (so???), not according to the new constitution of Uncle Sam…

And, what the FUCK would Uncle Sam know, he’s a dude too, does he have the monthly cycles with the cramps, hot flashes, headaches, joint aches, etc., etc., like we do?  Or, is Uncle Sam, the LEAST capable of, going through, how many hours had I been in labor again (exactly!), to PUSH, PUSH, P-U-S-H, this nonexistent baby girl out of me, huh?

That would be all, for this, lesson in the CONSTITUTION, for now…

Leave a comment

Filed under Basic Human Rights, Cost of Living, Issues of the Society, Perspectives, Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime, The Constitution, White Picket Fence

The Son Died from Getting His Neck Slashed, the Parents Voiced Out, “We’re Against Doing Away with the Death Penalty”

The DDP and Tsai’s visions of this country being without the death penalty is too, unrealistic, and justice would NOT be served to the victims’ families, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

Last year, a male student was stabbed to death by his classmate in a middle-high school facility of Hsinbei City, the news shocked the society, the families are still going through the griefs from the funeral processions, and from the outside, came the questioning, there were even the news of someone using the student’s name to get the donations going, the families issued a public statement, that the events were a repeated trauma from losing their young, that the parents used the status of “heartbreaking parents” to reiterate, to call, out, of the claims, includes keeping the death penalty intact.

The families told, they were once, an ordinary, but happy family, with a pair of children, and, although the daughter was handicapped, but the younger son always, helped his sister, out.  And yet, this unfortunate event, caused the death of this, understanding, empathetic child to depart; the family isn’t affiliated or supportive of any political parties, they’re calling out, as those who’d lost a dear son, hoping that their son, sacrificed this time, can keep the tragedies from, recurring.

The families issued a statement yesterday, including how people online had, exploited their misfortunes, used the false account names, to raise funds, they’d felt awful, and heartbroken over this, and begged the police to help; they were law-abiding citizens, never broken any laws, nor made any, enemies, that if the untrue claims in words, footages keep on spreading out online, they will, take legal actions; after they’d lost their son, the family was in mourning, and spent all their minds on planning the funeral, that these unfounded claims had already caused them irreparable, damages.

As “heartbroken parents”, the parents called out four points, including they will assist the law enforcements in all ways they can, to have the trial to be publicized, just, and open, that those who’d murdered their son, and the one who asked the murderers to murder both be punished by the law; begging the government to review over the juvenile court age requirements, to make the amendments that protected the families and the victims; and continuing enforcing death penalty, to NOT allow the minority population to think they can get away with murder; the review over the entire spectrum of the lacking in campus security, the holes in the counseling systems in school, to help the instructors find fitting and effective means to discipline the students.

Based off of investigations, currently, the Hsinbei District Attorney’s Office is not ruling out bringing the charges of murder and manslaughter to use to prosecute.  The justice department employee disclosed, that the perpetrator was a third-year middle school student, that his parents may need to shoulder the responsibilities for his actions too, that the sentencing, the amount which they are to pay the victim’s family can’t be too low.

And, this, is on how when you commit a crime, you won’t get sentenced to death, and that just makes all those, psychokillers think that it is okay to kill, to murder, to MASSACRE, because at the most, they can only get life in prison, and after a few extra years of “good behaviors”, then they’d be out on parole, and that would cause there to be more criminal behaviors, because at the most, you can get, for premeditated murder (or any kind of murder) is life in prison, and you get paroled out on good behaviors, or if the prison is too full!

Leave a comment

Filed under Awareness, Cost of Living, Crime & Punishment, Legislature, Messed Up Values, Observations, Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime, Values

If the Death Penalty IS, “Cruel & Unusual” Punishment

Yeah uh, this is still, BULLSHIT, if you ask me, buy hey, who asked Y-O-U!!!

If the death penalty IS, “cruel and unusual” punishment, then, what of the severe methods those perps had, tortured their vics, before they finally put them out, of their miseries, what of the perp that cut off a woman’s genitalia, after raping her, and then, murdering her, huh?  Wouldn’t that “constitute” as, “cruel and, unusual” too?

And yet, these “human right’s activists” from all around the world kept preaching on how we all need to, do away, with the death penalty, and should we now???

I mean, if the world’s completely without the death penalty, then, the EIGHTH amendment of the U.S. Constitution would be, struck, off of that, thousand year old, document, wouldn’t it???

And, consider this, IF it were, your loved ones who were, tortured, and brutally, raped, then, had their genitalia CUT off, just because the perp C-A-N, would you still feel, that death penalty was, “cruel” or, “unusual”???

If it’s, cruel and unusual, to hand down the death penalty and, enforcing that, then, wouldn’t BE, tortured by ones’ own, guilty conscience for what one has done to another, be even more, crueler?

So, do NOT bullshit about things you hadn’t weathered through there, higher up officials of every single country.

Leave a comment

Filed under Basic Human Rights, Belief in a Just World, Holes in the Justice System, Messed Up Values, Perspectives, STUCK in a Cookie Jar, Stupidity, The Constitution, Values, White Picket Fence

Asking for the Death Penalty & Eliminating it, are Both, the Emperor’s New Clothes

Observations of the recent murder of police officer, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

It took only SIXTEEN short days, to close the case on the dual-deaths of officers in Tainan killed in the line of duty, the D.A. asked for the death sentence for the murderer, this was the second case of the district attorney’s asking for the punishments of death penalty of the major crimes after the execution-style murders in Nantou, but, this was ironic, against the president, Tsai’s claims of “so long as we set up a protective security net in the society, then, we no longer need to threaten the criminals with the death penalty anymore”, the government’s ambiguousness of the values of whether or not to do away with the death penalty, is exactly WHAT cause the debates of death penalty.

The cases of the two police officers being murdered in Tainan had gotten the debates of death penalty all around recently, the government’s shift towards doing away with death penalty is clear, but, toward the broiling of the people’s opinions, the higher up government officials are evading their responsibilities thereof, which made the outside world believed, that if death penalty is still in place, then, it can resolve all the problems of violence in this society of ours.

As people feel more and more upset over the matter, the two cases where death penalty would be proper by the Tainan and Nantou D.A.’s Offices, all used the large volumes of news to declare why the death penalty is absolutely needed: there were the clear and precise descriptions of how the cruel measures of the murderers being used, stressing the seriousness of the murders, that without death, justice can not be served.  This seemingly was to soothe the people’s mind, to respond back to the needs of the public opinions, but it is more like the “emperor’s new clothes”, the means to deceit the ordinary people of this country.

The two consecutive cases of asking for the death penalty, most of the legal experts believed, that the courts would swiftly arrive at the decisions of death penalty, like how there are still thirty-eight death row inmates currently, awaiting their, executions, the head of department of justice, Tsai claimed that there’s the rules of “cases not reviewed over by the grand justices can’t assign the death penalties to” clause, and yesterday, toward the D.A.’s asking for the death penalty again, he’d read off the scripts again, that if the verdict of death is warranted, then, the strict rules of evaluation would be employed, afterwards, the death penalty shall be, carried out.  Translated to plain words: we may not execute anyone.  Using these words, does the justice department think, that laypersons such as we, are easily, fooled?

Seeing how Tsai, the president had already declared, that so long as the system of the country is set up safe enough, if we have a complete social security net, then, we no longer need to threaten the murderers with death penalty.  Then, why can’t the government set the society to be safe enough, so we can live in an environment, without the NEEDS to have the death penalty as a punishment for the criminals?  And, why does the government on the one hand stated that death penalty can’t scare the criminals from not committing the crimes, and stressed how, death penalty is the only way that justice would be served, for the victims?

And, we the people, are living under this, ambiguousness of the country’s not ridding itself of death penalty completely, with the lacking of the existence of death penalty, it’s a wonder, we’re all, so, confused, and harder for we the people to trust the system of justice.

And so, this is how the DDP uses their ambiguous statements, to try and fool the people into believing that hey, they’re doing something about this matter, when they’re actually, just giving the people the runaround, because that is what this DDP government does the best, with Tsai at the helm, leading the rest of her party members.

Leave a comment

Filed under Abuse of Power, Blindly Following the "Leaders", Crime & Punishment, Follow the "Leader", Government, Policies, & Politics, Legislature, Perspectives, Properties of Life, Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime, White Picket Fence