Recent rulings indicate that the high court is leaning toward expanding the type of presidential power that is more emblematic of dictatorship than democracy.
Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas look on during the 60th presidential inauguration on Jan. 20, 2025, in the U.S. Capitol in Washington.
Chip Somodevilla/Pool Photo via AP
Research shows that Supreme Court justices affiliated with the group are more consistently conservative than other justices, meaning they seldom deviate from their voting behavior.
Jeff Sralla, left, and his partner of 28 years, Gerald Gafford, wed in 2015 in Texas.
AP Photo/Eric Gay
President Donald Trump’s second term and the Supreme Court’s conservative activism have lit a fire in Republicans, who are targeting same-sex marriage as part of a broader attack on LGBTQ+ rights.
Clarence Thomas shakes hands with Joe Biden, then-chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, before Thomas’ Sept. 10, 1991, confirmation hearing to be an associate justice of the Supreme Court.
Arnie Sachs/CNP/Getty Images
Joe Biden’s imprint on the federal judiciary goes far beyond his naming of the first Black woman justice to the Supreme Court.
President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. and his Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson and Vice President Kamala Harris just before the investiture ceremony for Jackson on September 30, 2022 in Washington, DC.
Supreme Court of the United States via Getty Images
A scholar of the Supreme Court and its relationship to the people of the United States says that President Joe Biden’s proposed term limits for justices can restore the court’s eroded legitimacy.
How blind can the justices be?
SimpleImages/Moment via Getty Images
Are concerns about Supreme Court justices’ ethics an old problem, a new one, political gamesmanship, or something more serious? Yes to all of it.
Winning on Election Day is the best path for any political party to remake the Supreme Court.
Photo by Scott J. Ferrell/Congressional Quarterly/Getty Images
When it comes to the Supreme Court, progressives are now in the position where conservatives found themselves for many years. They’re on the outside looking in.
Lawyers write too much. That’s why the Supreme Court and other U.S. courts impose word limits on them.
siraanamwong/ iStock / Getty Images Plus
Lawyers submitting briefs to the Supreme Court in the Trump Colorado ballot case must file a ‘certificate of word count.’ Why? As one judge put it, lawyers’ briefs are ‘too long, too long, too long.’
Will the federal law prohibiting the possession of firearms by someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order survive?
iStock / Getty Images Plus
The Supreme Court’s decision to eliminate affirmative action programs sent shock waves across the US and is expected to impact racial diversity throughout society.
President Lyndon Johnson delivers the commencement address at Howard University on June 4, 1965.
Travis Knoll, University of North Carolina – Charlotte
President Lyndon Johnson’s commencement address at Howard University in 1965 offered a compelling argument on the need for affirmative action. His policies have been challenged ever since.
Activists call for ethics reform in the Supreme Court at the U.S. Capitol in Washington on May 2, 2023.
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Courts have no army or police force to enforce their decisions. Their power rests on their legitimacy in the public eye. How does scandal affect that?
Thurgood Marshall, left, had a very different view of the purpose of the Supreme Court than his successor, Clarence Thomas.
U.S. Supreme Court via Wikimedia Commons
Throughout Thomas’ tenure on the court, he has pushed the Supreme Court to replace Marshall’s vision with one more amenable to the powerful than the powerless.
Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas speaks at the Heritage Foundation in 2021.
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
Most Americans believe that racial inequality is a significant problem. They also believe that affirmative action programs aimed at reducing those inequalities are a problematic tool.
The Respect for Marriage Act will reverse the 1996 law that defines marriage as one between heterosexual couples.
Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images
The Respect for Marriage Act provides exemptions for religious groups, excludes people with disabilities – and could still lead to state-level discrimination laws.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas at the White House on Oct. 26, 2020.
Jonathan Newton /The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Black conservative Clarence Thomas’ improbable rise as a powerful US Supreme Court justice today was unimaginable during his controversial confirmation hearings in 1991.
The U.S. Supreme Court Building is shown in September 2022.
Sarah Silbiger for The Washington Post via Getty Images
Major Supreme Court decisions and reversals last term are leaving some people, including this scholar on constitutional politics, wondering – what’s going on with the court?
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen behind security fencing on June 28, 2022.
(AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)
The combination of crumbling democratic norms in the U.S. Supreme Court appointments process and an ideological court out of step with mainstream America raises questions of how it could be reformed.
A demonstrator outside the Supreme Court building expresses fear that other precedents will fall, too.
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana
The justices who decided to overturn the abortion rights precedent of Roe v. Wade explained their reasoning, and signaled other precedents could be reversed as well.