The federal government is more likely to fund curiosity-driven basic research, while industry is more likely to support research that has a clearer eventual payoff.
The NIH is a node in an interconnected system producing health and medical advances.
Anchalee Phanmaha/Moment via Getty Images
Taxpayer-funded investment supports basic research that can yield crucial medical advancements down the line and make lifesaving drugs and technologies affordable for everyday people.
Many of the world’s best and brightest STEM researchers have long moved to the US. But now that brain gain is at risk of reversing to become a brain drain, with science funding and visas in chaos.
A scholar reveals the ins and outs of how research gets funded, including the checks and balances that ensure high scientific standards and financial integrity at every stage of a grant’s lifecycle.
The Trump administration has terminated hundreds of federal grants that support engineering, biology, geology, computer science, STEM education and much more.
Brain organoids, pictured here, raise both many medical possibilities and ethical questions.
NIAID/Flickr
There are several steps between research on seemingly esoteric subjects and breakthrough medical treatments. Ethical oversight at every stage ensures science and society ultimately benefit.
As charismatic animals, sharks can stimulate interest in science, research and technology.
Florida Museum (Kristin Grace photo)
Basic research that doesn’t have a specific industrial or experimental application still adds value outside the lab by engaging people with exciting research.
Without federal support, the lights will turn off in many labs across the country.
Thomas Barwick/Stone via Getty Images
Since 1971, the US has led the world in funding cancer research and developing new treatments that have driven down death rates. This may soon no longer be the case.
Divesting from the next generation of researchers means cutting the lifeblood of science and medicine.
J Studios/DigitalVision via Getty Images
The National Institutes of Health has been integral to scientific progress in treating countless human diseases. Without its support, patients will ultimately pay the price.
Collaboration is key in science – DEI programs intend to foster inclusivity in the field.
sanjeri/E+ via Getty Images
Trump’s DEI-related executive orders may affect early career scientists and researchers who study representation in science, but most research grants are unaffected.
National Institutes of Health indirect costs, which are under the knife, go toward managing laboratories and facilities.
Fei Yang/Moment via Getty Images
It costs money to maintain the various facilities, utilities and personnel that allow scientists to conduct research in the first place. Without federal support, institutions are left scrambling.
Of the tens of thousands of grant applications submitted to the National Institutes of Health, only around 1 in 5 is funded.
Sean Gladwell/Moment via Getty Images
Director, Engagement at the Australian Academy of Science and Associate Professor (hon) at the Centre for Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University
Previous Vice President of the Academy of Science of South Africa and DSI-NRF SARChI chair in Fungal Genomics, Professor in Genetics, University of Pretoria, University of Pretoria