As you see from the title, this blog article is about hope, but please note that it is only about hope in the here and now. Hope for or in the “afterlife” is certainly of great importance, but this post is only about the hope we have, or don’t have, in this world at this time.
Hope is a widely used word and an appealing concept. I
have long been an ardent advocate of hope, in spite of not always being
optimistic.*
Often, though, hope is just a word expressing what we desire:
we “hope” it won’t rain on our picnic planned for the weekend or we “hope” our
team wins the game we have tickets for. But such hope is nothing more than wishful
thinking and has negligible impact on what we will do or not do.
In a more robust sense, hope means to work for and to wait
for something with the confident expectation and anticipation that it will at
some point, sooner or later, be fulfilled. In that sense, hope is grounded in a
positive view of the future that we believe is conceivable.
Challenging circumstances sometimes siphon off hope, but
then through determination one can cultivate new hope. In fact, “New Hope” is
the name of two churches that are very meaningful to me.**
In numerous ways and at numerous times, having hope is a
good and positive mindset, one to be affirmed and promoted.
When we no longer have hope, we feel hopeless, and
that is usually an uncomfortable state of affairs.
In his book Die Wise (2015), Stephen Jenkinson
writes, “Hope is very often a refusal to know what is so, and steadfastly it is
a refusal to live as if the present moment is good enough and all we really
have. Hopeless is the collapse of that refusal, and it looks a lot like
depression.”
So, feeling hopeless is often a negative state of mind and
one we want to avoid as much as possible. But, realistically, sometimes it is necessary
to give up hope and to deal with what is rather than what we would like to be
otherwise.
For example, when a terminally ill person’s loved ones give
up hope, they put that loved one on hospice, seeking to make them as
comfortable as possible for the remainder of their days, no longer hoping that
they will miraculously regain their health.
Some who see the current ecological crisis most clearly think
the struggle to save the environment is hopeless. Thus, Guy McPherson avers, “The
living planet is in the fourth and final stage of a terminal disease. . . . it
is long past time we admitted hospice is the only reasonable way forward.”***.
There is a close relationship, then, between hopelessness
and being hope free.
Why can being hope free be considered a good thing? Well,
hope can be, and perhaps often is, a refusal to accept reality. In that way, it
is ill-founded and detrimental. To be hopeful in spite of clearly having a
terminal illness is not helpful.
In January of last year, I made a blog
post about the “serenity prayer” attributed to theologian Reinhold Niebuhr.
That prayer begins, “GOD, grant me
the Serenity to accept the things I cannot change, Courage to change the things
I can; and the Wisdom to know the difference.”
Perhaps some of us have mostly emphasized the second part: the
prayer for courage to change things. But maybe the first part is more
important: the prayer for the serenity to accept things that cannot be changed,
thus, to be hope free.
That doesn’t mean being constantly depressed as when we feel hopeless. Rather,
as is expressed in the longer version of the prayer, it means “Living one day at a time; enjoying one moment
at a time; accepting hardship as the pathway to peace.”
Accordingly, hope free advocate McPherson, who thinks “near term human
extinction” is certain, writes, “I recommend living fully. I recommend living
with intention. . . . I recommend the pursuit of excellence. I recommend the
pursuit of love” (Only Love
Remains, p. 175).
Amen.
_____
* Some of you may remember my Oct.
30, 2021, blog post titled “Hopeful, But Not Optimistic.” (Click
here if you would like to read it again—or for the first time.)
** You may want to (re)read this
blog article I posted about those churches nearly ten years ago.
*** McPherson (b. 1960) is Professor Emeritus of Natural Resources and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology at the University of Arizona, where he was a tenured professor from 1989 to 2009. The words cited above are from his 2019 book Only Love Remains: Dancing at the Edge of Extinction (p. 199). He is also the author of "Becoming Hope-Free: Parallels Between Death of Individuals and Extinction of Homo Sapiens," Clinical Psychology Forum, No. 317, May 2019.
