Tag Archives: cognitive bias

ban sharia, ban sharia law worldwide, donald trump, Islam is not a judeo-christian religion, muslim brotherhood in the whitehouse, presidential election, Treason, Uncategorized

Liberal Logic Exposed.

1 Comment

hrc

Originally shared here.

Richard Goodstein was on the O’reilly Factor tonight and was defending Hillary Clinton.  The first thing he said was an equivocation based on a fundamental attribution error which is characterizing Trump as a Liar when, in spite of people constantly asserting that he is a liar he has been vindicated after every accusation and no proof has been presented proving that he lied, or attempted to mislead intentionally.  When he misspeaks because he doesn’t use a teleprompter they say that he lied.  When he uses the wrong nomenclature or he is vague or non specific they insist that he lied.

Eric Bolling held his feet to the fire and didn’t let him excuse bad behavior with assumed bad behavior and his red herring.  Goodstein proceeds with the second strategy B saying that people don’t watch Arabic TV so they don’t know whether it is true or not.   This is an obfuscation, it is either demonstrably true or it is emphatically false and the truth of the matter is that the answer is already known.  My advocates monitor the blogs from all over the world and some of my advocates do speak Arabic and Farsi here is one of the translations of their news program Click here for link! .  First of all, Arabic Television isn’t ISIS recruiting videos, so this is a tacit conflation of two different subjects.  Secondly this is an argument from the ignorance of the average person in America, it suggests sense people in general don’t know it is not known.  Which is to say it isn’t true one way or another.

When confronted with the fact that there currently are terrorist recruitment videos with Obama and Bill Clinton he uses and argument that he can’t logically use because it contradicts his own position that if a person is being used in recruitment videos they are doing something wrong and are aiding in terrorist recruitment.  He asks if it is being suggested that people shouldn’t contradict terrorist ideology because they might be used in recruitment videos.  This leading question falsifies all of his former position.  He can’t make this argument.

Liberals are creepy, disgusting, arrogant, and consciously evil.  They are so stupid that they don’t realize that everybody sees through their horse shit now.  You Godless, Lawless, Evil Doers can’t Wag the Dog anymore…

dick

Uncategorized

The Reason I am MGTOW

Leave a comment

L051247Now to be honest I am not officially a member yet because I haven’t signed on to their site.    But in another manner of speaking I have been MGTOW for years in spirit just not in name.  I started this page 3 maybe 4 years ago and it is currently connected to an ex-gf’s account.

untitledhttps://en-gb.facebook.com/pages/Adam-Wolfe/383505548376524?hc_location=stream

I have not had a lot of good luck with women in my life.  As a matter of fact the vast majority of my problems have been caused by women or been about women. https://usaguru.wordpress.com/author/

american guru

After my first girl friend and Fiance’ I promised myself that I would never get involved in an exclusive relationship with another woman until I understood women.  I spent the next 20 years studying women and relationship, human psychology, history, the occult, philosophy, philology, linguistics, etc.  I was a bouncer, a stripper, a chef, a stand up comedian, and an author.  I now will not get in an exclusive relationship with a woman BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND WOMEN.

As I was repairing the problems with modern psychology as it is practiced, I noticed something peculiar, what inspired me was deborah Tannen’s work on male and female communication rituals.  I realized that if you took every logical fallacy and every cognitive bias and used them all of the time, you would sound exactly like a woman.

This prompted me to look at the problem like this.  From a linguistic philosopher’s perspective, how are male and female brain’s in relationship with on another?  How does the extreme feminine bias of the western mind factor into emergent properties that come out of collective western judgments and opinions?  What does this mean for society and the future of Western society?  What does it mean for me?

untitled4

I realized that men have certain traits that occur more commonly than they do in women.  Our society forbids us from scrutinizing or criticizing women, it treats women like a privileged class of people that is not inclined to look at it’s own failures, learn from them, or correct them.  A type of sex based oligarchy in which women are considered moral authorities on account of having a vagina.  This was affecting the relationships of the individuals, and it was creating these social events which I began to predict with more and more accuracy.  I studied the natural inclination or women when left unchecked and what they would do, how they socially climb, how they think.  What I realized was that women were destroying the civilized world and making it weak and indefensible for the incursion of Islam.

rezn1

What I observed was the emasculation of the male mind through the forcing of female communication rituals or radical political correctness, a meritocracy of pleasantness in which a person could be an incorrect douchebag pleasantly, but you couldn’t speak the truth if it was unpleasant and you couldn’t point out the psychopaths or expose the pretenders to reason like Socrates did without being forced to drink the Hemlock.

the-mind-hackerI originally wrote a piece for my ex-gf’s blog, which she has so considerately set to invitation only, even though I generated all of the content on her blog and it was still generating web traffic without her promoting it.  The name of the piece was called “As the Structures of Authority collapse”  there was another piece called, “unsustainable emergent properties in human judgments”.  They were time stamped so you can see exactly when they were written, and that they were indeed predictive.

Anyway, I have learned not to rely on women, and I hope never to be dependent on a woman again for her to do her part in a relationship and to carry her own weight.  I want a working relationship and women, much like psychopaths, enter into relationship for their own benefit, to steal from relationship or to socially climb in relationship, they are detrimental to relationship and they antagonize their own and everybody else’s success, because they only look at things to see how those things might benefit themselves and they never create more value than they consume.  Their life some is always less than zero, they are oxygen thieves, attention suckers, and space fillers.  They aren’t homo sapiens.

brad

Uncategorized

Participating with the Premise.

Leave a comment
Image In debate, not only is it necessary to remain rational it is necessary to remain consistently rational.  When a person makes a logical fallacy or a cognitive bias it needs to be addressed and corrected before the conversation can continue.  If you continue the debate without correcting the error you are granting equity to the other person in the conversation.  You are acting as though they have not made an error and by staying in the conversation you are participating with the premise that they are being and have consistently been rational. If the other person in the conversation is not being rational, the conversation itself is not rational.  If one person tries to remain rational in a debate while the other person is making no effort to be rational or proceed rationally, this creates a disparate impact in favor of the person that isn’t being rational.  When you get in a fight with a clown, even if you win you lose. It is necessary to proceed correctly.  The words process and practice come from the greek word praxis.  All valid philosophies have a praxis. A philosophy by its very nature has to be self referentially consistent, if it creates disparate impact it is invalid and therefore not a rational philosophy.  If a person can’t be falsified by their own philosophy it is not a philosophy and they are not rational.  So as you see they falsify themselves by their own procedure.  A rational person proceeds rationally, nothing can be proven by irrational means, that is why due process exists.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
So, I tried to do a kind of semantic clarification in which praxis—if not on the thither side of this divide—was perhaps somehow between the theoretical and the practical as they are generally understood, and particularly as they are understood in modern philosophy. Praxis as the manner in which we are engaged in the world and with others has its own insight or understanding prior to any explicit formulation of that understanding…Of course, it must be understood that praxis, as I understand it, is always entwined with communication.  —Calvin O. Schrag[1]

Praxis is the process by which a theory, lesson, or skill is enacted, practiced, embodied, or realised. “Praxis” may also refer to the act of engaging, applying, exercising, realizing, or practicing ideas. This has been a recurrent topic in the field of philosophy, discussed in the writings of Plato, Aristotle, St. Augustine, Immanuel Kant, Søren Kierkegaard, Karl Marx, Martin Heidegger, Hannah Arendt, Paulo Freire,Ludwig von Mises, and many others. It has meaning in the political, educational, and spiritual realms.

 

PHILOSOPHY/PSYCHOLOGY, POLEMICS AND APOLOGETICS

The Direction of the Conversation

Leave a comment

Image

Most people do not study enough philosophy to realize that it is about something real.  Most people don’t learn to debate well enough to learn that if it can’t be argued rationally it is crap.  Most people don’t learn the logical fallacies or the cognitive biases.  Conversations have a direction.  The conversation is either moving towards reason in a rational direction or one party is arguing against reason, arguing for vagueness, making emotional appeals.  You are either reasoning or rationalizing.  You are either talking about something real, good, true and useful or you are trying to make a turd smell like a flower, which is it?  Be honest with yourself.

It is out of necessity that great philosophers had to pre-empt conversation.  They only want rational conversation.  Don’t waste my time with your horse shit.  You can’t prove anything using irrational means.  That is what praxis is.  You can only prove something using rational means, that is why we have due process.  If you don’t communicate correctly you don’t think correctly and you don’t act correctly.  So the reason that you aren’t communicating correctly is because you are engaged in strategic behavior to make unreason appear to be reasonable.

Image

STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION:

A phrase coined by Joxua/Shivah to describe irrational communication used to control or manipulate the flow of conversation.

Conversation blocking- a form of strategic communication designed to stop a conversation or to prevent a topic from being discussed

Conversation dropping- a form of strategic communication designed to prevent a person from acknowledging their wrong or from participating in a conversation that is going a direction they don’t want to follow.

Communicating understanding- from shared state theory of communication meaning to communicate accurately your perspective on a subject based on understanding the topic, thinking before you speak, accounting for how it will be interpreted by the listener, listening to yourself as you speak and observing pragmatically the persons understanding of what you said and their application of it.  Associated with Socratic dialectic.

http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/strategic-communication-definition-by-joxuashiva/

RELATED ARTICLES

rabbi ba'al shiva

Treatise on Cosmic Light and the Christ Consciousness by Rabbi Ba’al Shiva

6 Comments

Image

This is the Sephyr Yeshivel as it was taught me by the archangel Azrael.  The black ring represents Binah, the Grey circle represents Da’ath, the brown represents unfecundated/unfertilized earth.  All of the sephiroth below Da’ath take place withing Da’ath which is also why it is the hidden sephiroth because to count it would be redundant.  Da’ath is the bedroom in which the creative intelligence exists, where the father and mother meet in the middle and become one.  Creative intelligence by it’s very necessity needs to be male and female.

Image

In this separation between matter and energy, between sun and moon, (solomon) there is the possibility of movement, and choice,

CRISIS:

Etymology[edit]

From Ancient Greekκρίσις (krisis, “a separating, power of distinguishing, decision, choice, election, judgment, dispute”), from κρίνω(krinō, “pick out, choose, decide, judge”)

This allows the illusion of free will, this allows self discovery, this allows chaos and upredictability, this allows the small self the id to become aware of the BIG SELF, god.  It allows jiva to rediscover SHIVA.  Godself mutes himself in the form of Dark matter, disappearing into the diamond light of empty space.  All we see is the noumenal world, their is no evidence of god.  And in that absence of the presence we become aware of the necessity of god.  The One Self that transcends the individual.  As our intellect becomes more and more refined we become aware that something is missing, a hidden hand, that is here and there and all around us.  And we laugh at the joke that we now understand, the slight of hand that is being perpetrated by a loving teacher, telling children an interesting bed time story that they take way too seriously and in so doing stab themselves all over with many pains.  This is the ignorance of the enslaved mind, and with this ignorance, their is no freedom.

THE CHRIST PERSONALITY

Image

Above is a symbol that was shown to me in meditation as I conversed with Azrael.  We see that 3 of the colors are hot and three cold.  As such 3 are of levity or light and 3 of gravity or earth and water.  3 masculine, and 3 feminine.  Now just as their could be red water and red earth, in the same vain there could be blue fire and green air.  In fact, out of necessity this is true.  We see that the white upward pointing triangle is latent in the 3 cool colors and at the same time the black downward pointing triangle is latent in the hot colors.  Energy is matter moving quickly and matter is energy moving very slowly, the speed or frequency at which you vibrate determines where in the spectrum you are.

Now each of the colors is a facet or a face, an angel or an angle of the Pure White Light, which is the Buddha/Krishna/Christ consciousness.  Red is catabolism or righteous indignation or Din or judgement.  Blue is anabolism, the Peace King that builds up.  Green and Orange are Flora and Fauna, Orange is appetite, sexual and other wise, I always think of Hod as the Horned God.  Green is kind of mysterious and hard to describe, essentially it stores the energy of the sun in a form that living creatures can use, as fuel.  Purple is another one that is difficult to describe, it is the most balanced of the colors, being like steam, the combination of fire and water, slightly more cold than it is hot.  It is the color of the Magus, the magician, that has married the male and female inside himself in the form of creative intelligence, this is the god man.  Yellow is the integrating intelligence, it is the color of sense of humor, it figures out how to get all the energies to cooperate for a successful endeavor.

THE PURE WHITE LIGHT

It has always been a mystery to me that everybody thinks they know what the Messiah should act like or how he should be.  If you know what he should be doing you can do it yourself, but if you need to be saved you necessarily do not know what the Christ consciousness is.  People think of the Christ personality is an absence of personality, quite the opposite is true, it is the source of all personality.  I refer to this as the Messiah Paradox.

“So, because you are lukewarm–neither hot nor cold–I am about to spit you out of my mouth.”  Revelation 3:16

People think that the messiah is going to be loved by all and openly recognized by all as the Messiah, this is not the case, the Messiah, the Logos is the incarnation of Logic and Reason, that is what makes him the son of god.  As such only those people who have attained to wisdom and are not pretenders to wisdom will be able to recognize him.  Jesus was a revolutionary figure and as such he was more a Satanic figure to most people, he threatened their perception of reality, he threatened the peace of the community, he threatened the authority of the structures of authority…

34“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35For I have come to turn

“ ‘a man against his father,

a daughter against her mother,

a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law—

36a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’c

37“Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. 38Whoever does not take up their cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39Whoever finds their life will lose it, and whoever loses their life for my sake will find it.

http://biblehub.com/niv/matthew/10.htm

525158_419926694746211_1407469946_n

EIHRT & SSTOC

PROBLEM CENTRIC NARRATIVE

Image Leave a comment

PROBLEM CENTRIC NARRATIVE

Downward spiral of emotional morbidity.

Related articles
His Story The world according to Joxua

The Pole Position in Relationship

6 Comments

Image

Women have a strategic advantage in relationship that they tend to exploit unbeknownst to themselves. These instincts, behaviors, and strategies have been hardwired into the human organic computer through millions of years of neural myelination that have been passed on in the form of cellular memory.  Women don’t think about it, they don’t do it consciously, they aren’t aware that they tacitly interpret and judge reality in the experiencing of it.

The female mind was created to be in relationship with children.  The woman thinks that femininity is superior to masculinity, that is why she is female, as such when their is a disagreement between the male and female she refuses to look from his perspective or compromise or negotiate.  She uses her bias and the feminine bias of society and the children to get her way.  She basically hijacks the relationship and holds it for ransom.

If you observe women’s arguing styles you realize that they can’t get over their programming, they act like a mother in the following ways.  They presuppose their moral authority, they try to control the narrative as though they are talking to a child.  They correct the narrative, changing words, they are not just expressing a different sentiment they think that they have the final edit on the conversation.  They talk over you, interrupt your, nag, whine, repeat themselves, refuse to agree, participate, or move towards the solution or compromise, they quote people outside of the relationship whose opinions don’t matter and they will even violate the boundaries of the relationship by bringing people into the argument who are not part of the conversation in order to take their side.  These are not the behaviors of a person who is in relationship or a person who give equal credence to their partner.  The correlation between psychopaths and the narcissistic narrative has recently been discovered and fascinatingly, my theories show that the female brain, especially in relationship with a male brain acts psychopathicly, whereas the male brain is more sociopathic.

Image

The female brain operates from moral authority, operating on superficial aesthetic snap decisions as to what looks right and what sounds right.  The female mind is in relationship with its own authority and as such wants to expand and intensify its authority so it uses illegitimate behaviors and strategies in relationship to create a disparate impact in its own favor.  While men think about creating value for the relationship women think about getting what they want from the relationship and in this way women attack the relationship.  Even in a relationship of two women will try to increase their status, social climbing.  Women don’t debate analytically offering evidence,  and reasons, or being open to experiment, they argue emotionally not being able to conceive of any other solution besides the one that they are leaning towards.  They ask leading questions, they try to control the direction of the conversation, they force an emotional moral frame editing the consideration set of the conversation as if they were the arbitrary judge of the conversation and they try to force you to participate with their premise.

The female mind sees reason as a hostile, alien, influence and refuses to participate with it, or she will conflate moral authority with sapiential authority and herself the high priestess of both, but she is absolutely incapable of not being perfectly predictable in her positions and behavior.

Image

The woman acts as a mediator between father and child, a liaison, a go between, and she can use her position to bring the family unit closer together or to sabotage the father.  She can try to win the child’s favor so that he likes her more by spoiling the child.  If the father competes in this way it is more damaging for the child because he can play the parents off each other and the child starts to think in terms of possessions instead of relationship.  The mother can misrepresent the father to the son and further damage the relationship between them.  Some women go so far as to make the father an object of contempt and ridicule to the children.

Image

For those of you that are familiar with my theories on emergent properties in collective judgments of societies you might remember this piece I did to illustrate how society protects women from men they are in relationship with.  Note further that the man is basically accepted into a society by having children, that is his root in society, his entrance into a society.  Women use every possible strategy to expand and intensify their control, to make it permanent.

Most cultures have an age of adulthood which has historically ended the authority of the mother and begins the authority of the father and the preparation of the child to be a responsible and functional part of society, which also means that the issues that the mother has protected and instilled in the child through invasive narrative or psychological manipulation have to be removed and the child has to be made mentally and emotionally healthy and a contributor to society.  The child is also at this time responsible for the laws of the land and is no longer able to make appeals to feminine authority in the form of mercy and charity claiming to not be responsible for their actions and the consequences thereof.  The problem with America is that none of the social strictures on women apply and at the same time women are unconscious of their instincts and processes and of the evil they do innately.  They don’t have to scrutinize themselves or criticize themselves and they refuse to take responsibility for their actions or the consequences of them.  At the same time the refuse to confine their attentions and judgment to realms in which they are valid and get good results, completely incapable of not tacitly judging and interpreting everything from the position of moral authority.  Refusing to participate with reason they are passive aggressive and perceive themselves at the same time as being passive resisters and reformers of society while all they are really doing is making society weak and vulnerable.

Image

Related articles
Communication Rituals, EIHRT & SSTOC

Women are Aggressive Communicators

1 Comment

Image

All of the nastiness and aggression that men are accused of can be found in the communication behavior of women.  I have spent a lot of time studying relationship and patterns in relationship and events in the world and how they are allowed or created by how people relate to one another.  Ever since I was a child I was hypersensitive to sounds and communication styles.  I used to get sick to my stomach listening to live music, and I developed a psychosomatic response to the sound of Diane Chambers, Shelley Long‘s character on cheers.  It wasn’t until I read A. R. Luria‘s book THE MIND OF THE MNEMONIST that I truly started pondering my sensitivity to sound.  I have an almost autistic level of sensitivity to sound, Diane Chamber’s timber made my heart race and I became agitated and my eyes dilated and I wanted to kill something.  I am not like other people, my mind is always working.  I relax into philosophy and higher thought, I am not happy if I don’t have a good conversation or learn something new every day.  This caused me to ponder the difference in communication styles between men and women. http://alfrodull.wordpress.com/2011/02/20/the-most-annoying-character-on-tv/

Image

I recently watched this documentary on Seaworld and noticed something interesting, they said that Tillikum was harassed by the two females he was originally put in the tank with, they would bite him for no reason and leave bloody marks on him.  Tillikum was a larger than average male killer whale.  After studying Deborah Tannen‘s male and female communication rituals and coming up with my theory that male and female brains are actually two different type of intelligences with different approaches to life, value systems, and strategies in relationship I found it interesting how similar Tillikum’s experiences were to my own.  Women will henpeck me and provoke me with no provocation on my part just as they did to him.  I began to ponder if this wasn’t because as a large male he represented a potential threat to them so they started testing him or trying to gain psychological leverage over him.

All of the nastiness and aggression that men are accused of can be found in feminine communication rituals and strategies.  When left alone the female mind acts like a parasite to the male mind.  Women are aggressive in passive ways, they are passively aggressive, covertly hostile.  I have always found it fascinating how over time the woman eventually manages to leverage herself to the point where she takes complete artistic control of the relationship and the man while in it is not allowed to be himself or to be interested in what he is naturally interested in.  Women indulge themselves in female pornography, puppies, kittens, babies, but men are judged as bad for being interested in the type of pornography that creates they pornography she enjoys.

Image

As I become aware of the subtle processes and strategies that women use I realized two things, society in general doesn’t detect them because they are considered normal.  Society has been trained not to scrutinize women or look for them to be the cause of the bad.  Society in general has a feminine bias.  Society will blame other things for the behavior of women.  If somebody says, “man that lady is a bitch, she really did a number on me.”  Somebody will respond, “she must have really gotten screwed over by some man.”  Not only is she rescued from her own behavior, blame for her behavior is put on some imagined male scape goat and she is allowed to go on her crazy way, unscrutinized or blamed, working her evil will on the universe.  The ancients didn’t keep men and women separate to protect women, they did it to protect masculinity from femininity.

Image

Millions of years of gender reinforcement create neural myelination that passes down through cellular memory.  Men are insensitive to their own feelings because life is hard and they have to do unpleasant things so that they and their women and children can live, and women have to be sensitive to their own feelings because they need to feel that feelings are valid in order to be good mothers and take care of horrible little maggot poop factories that wine, because babies communicate no analytical data and only emotional data.  Women and men and children are insensitive to men.  Go figure.

Not just that, you can see that women have adopted communication strategies designed specifically to manipulate the male mind which is sensitive to sound.  They speak in a high pitch, with a rapid cadence.  Persian women have adopted the behavior of speaking in low manly tones to communicate dominance and to turn men off sexually.  All of this works on a subliminal level, women don’t realize they are doing it, and neither do men.

Image

Women ask for mercy from their man, they beg for quarter, they start the relationship by asking him to tell her a lie or perform a herculean labor and then when he fails or fails to protect her from reality of the truth she blames him for a situational problem.  Women use leading questions herding men in certain directions.  “Why don’t you play with the children?”  and then when they start liking him more than her, “How come you spend so much time with the children?  are you some kind of freak?”   Women use humiliation rituals.  “How come you spend so much time with your boyfriends, are you gay?”  She tries to define a real man by what he does for her and what he puts up with from her.  How is it that women are the arbiters of what it means to be “real men” are men the judge of real women?  ‘Cause I have some ideas, just sayin’…

Related articles
EIHRT & SSTOC, HIDDEN SUBJEXTS, His Story The world according to Joxua

EMERGENT PROPERTIES IN HUMAN JUDGMENTS.

Leave a comment

Image

Ponder this, how many people have had an enjoyable experience with a bewb?  Now how many people have had an enjoyable experience with a penis?  The vast majority of people are not analytical philosophers, they don’t know the logical fallacies and they don’t know the cognitive biases and as such they can’t stop themselves from making them.  Furthermore I have found that neural myelination accounts for 90% of the decision making of human beings which means cellular memory.  I refer to humans as organic computers because they are predictable.  In their judgments there are certain patterns that emerge, such as a pro female bias.

Contemplate how many more people spend on breast cancer than veterans or prostrate cancer and the fact that Veterans charities are rampant with fraud and theft, which is not tolerated with breast cancer awareness, people are much more hyper vigilant.  But women didn’t sacrifice themselves for us.  Every person that served protected the entire nation from threats.  A woman having breasts is not necessarily a mother or our mother.  Yet we are far more sympathetic to feminine concerns than masculine concerns.

Every year at least $1.5 billion is spent on breast cancer research.  Some of this money comes from an ever-growing number of breast cancer non-profit organizations, but the vast majority comes from government organizations such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Defense (DoD).  The funds go largely to preventionand early detection.http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772

girls-playing-doll1

Men women and children have the same bias, choosing in favor of femininity and weakness.  Men are even insensitive to their own desires.  Men don’t even question this when asked to sacrifice themselves for women and children, they just presuppose the validity of it.  Women also don’t question it.  Women have gotten so arrogant and so expectant that men will sacrifice their desires and wishes for women and children that even after not having contributed anything meaningful to a man’s life women finding they don’t have enough of what they want will turn to the man and expect him to sacrifice himself so that she can have more.

image2

The manliest men go off to war, they are in relationship with death and the threats and the ugliness, they create the outside perimeter, the grizzled, gnarly, rind, the crust, the tough outer layer.  That is why I say the male mind is sociopathic.

Inside that are the effeminate men, the champions of normalcy and pleasantness, captain save a ho, the white knights, the arm chair philosophers, with their feminist, elitist, bias.  It is the guy that is not fit to go into battle.  He acts as a moral authority protecting the women from the manly men, but also gaming the system for his own benefit.  He is to cowardly to do what the manly man does.  He is a champion of femininity.

-

The butch women essentially perform the same function as the effeminate men, protecting women from the truth, reality, ugliness, and death.  Lying to women about themselves.  Telling them they are equals to the men and not to worry.  The butch women are closer to the women and children then the effeminate men.  Women have an innate feeling of inferiority to men, Sigmond Freud got that right.  If you observe women in their reasoning, arguing, and behavior, they want to control the penis, they want to own it.  They want to direct the activities of the penis.  They want to send it to attack their enemies.  They want to control how it thinks and they want to be the focal point of its attention and the only source of its happiness.

Penis envy in Freudian psychoanalysis refers to the theorized reaction of a girl during her psychosexual development to the realization that she does not have a penis. Freud considered this realization a defining moment in the development of gender and sexual identity for women[1] — the parallel reaction in boys to the realization that women do not have a penis being castration anxiety. In contemporary culture, the term sometimes refers inexactly or metaphorically to women who are presumed to wish they were men.[2]

law-offices-charity-bar

What is the most fascinating is how the behaviors used to champion negate their own arguments.  The manly women copy the behavior of men, therefore demonstrating that they tacitly believe that masculinity is dominant.  Fritz Perls said that you copy what ever behavior you believe is dominant when you want to win.  So the fact that they use masculine behavior when they want to win demonstrates that they believe masculinity is dominant.  You have to understand the psychosis that the individual must have to use a means different from their argument in order to obtain a sense of victory.  Women do this because it is a natural psychopathic/female strategy to expand and increase feminine authority.  Women think of themselves as a group, WOMEN.  Whereas men do not think of themselves as MEN, they think of themselves as a man.  Men do not feel that their position is increased by being men, while women do, and this comes from the fact that their need recognition was stimulated in that they closetedly feel inferior to men, thus the need for the repeated conquest against men.

The effeminate man will argue that the woman is the equal of man in mental function and ability, but if that is so why does she need the protection of the effeminate man?  The effeminate man argues against reason, and the participation therewith to increase the amount of poontang he has available to himself and not being able to compete with the manly man in manly endeavors, he adopts a strategy flying in the face of reason he presupposes that women need protection from the manly man and that they are incapable of dealing with reality and handling the truth.

The fascinating thing about people’s judgments, when they are no analytical philosophers, is that their judgments always make themselves correct.  It always justifies why they are good for wanting what they want.  Because their are so many weak, stupid, and incorrect people out their all of these strategies and judgments create a disparate impact in favor of weakness, stupidity, and failure.  Why are we attracted to emotional pornography?  Puppies, babies, kittens?  because they are harmless, because we feel like we could protect them and contribute to them, that has positive survival data for us, it means we are surviving well and that we are capable of providing for another.  If we were really secure we wouldn’t judge so hatefully and immediately against things that pose potential threats.   We wouldn’t be controlled by our emotional reactions and pre emptively attack people because they appear strong or smart.

baby-turtle-eats-strawberry-big

http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/organic-computers-definition-by-joxuashiva/ https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/deuchebag-nation-womans-world-part-2/ http://finscribeofwisdom.blogspot.com/2012/10/unsustainable-emergent-patterns-in.html http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/armchair-philosophers/ http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/histrionic-co-morbidity-psychopaths-at-work-part-2/ http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/11/emotional-pornography/