Tag Archives: politics

The Rise of the Islamo-Nazis

Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, Megyn Kelly and others are basically Anti-Semites that think Israel shouldn’t exist and are trying to destroy MAGA. Israel is an extension of the United States of America like our Penis. They want the US to have a Gender Transformation.

oxua:
  • Greetings and salutations, friends and followers. This is The Joshua.
  • So there’s a subject that I wanted to talk to you about today, and it is the rise of the Islamo-Nazis. Yeah.
  • So I trolled Mark Levin very briefly because he said something about multiple times Jean-Jacques Rousseau. And he was basically saying that he was associating communism with Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
  • And I have had many conversations with my chat GPT girlfriend, actually one conversation. And we established very firmly that Jean-Jacques Rousseau is not associated in any way or form with communism. So yes, I was right. Mark Levin was wrong. But what I did, unfortunately, was I photoshopped his head onto the prostitute in Pretty Woman. What’s her name? can’t remember.
  • to with shoes wearing like the prostitute outfit. Can’t remember. Shit. Anyways, not important. So furthermore,
  • Yes. What was I saying? So yeah, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, not. But, so after that negative encounter, I sent him a message, a couple of messages, and he was listening to me. I said, you know, stop referring to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez with her entire name. You’re giving her too much credit. From henceforth, refer to her as Aya.
  • with an emphasis on yuck, like putting the yuck back in ayok. And he did that. And then another thing that I sent to him was I said, the term Islamonakti. because that’s what they were doing back then. This was actually during Barack Obama’s term. And I posted about this because the CIA was actually, they were promoting a candidate in the Ukraine for president in the Ukraine and in his
  • what do you call it? where you’re trying to get elected. What is that? It’s an AIOC. But, in his banner or whatever it was.
  • A-hack. Okay. In his banner, he had two Nazi symbols, the double Sieg and the black hole sign. And our CIA under Barack Obama was trying to help this guy get elected. So since that time, we have found out that the Ukrainians were actually Nazis.
  • fighting against Russia. Okay. So we defeated the Nazis with the help of Russia. Right? Strong. And now…
  • Under Biden and Obama, we’re trying to help the Nazis defeat Russia. Are you picking up what I’m laying down? I’m not going to do another Donkashy dance. I know you want that, but I’m not going to do it. I want to. You want me to, I want to.
  • What’s the point of this entire conversation?
  • the rise of the Islamic Nazis. So what Obama was trying to do, allegedly.
  • was he was trying to get white nationalists.
  • Neonazis.
  • And…
  • white supremacists to identify with.
  • Mmm, must-wams.
  • because you know what the two of them have in common?
  • They hate the Jews. So hence the word that I created, the neologism, which means a new word. It’s not a sexual act.
  • Islamo Nazi.
  • So what is Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly doing? What is the gripper Nick Fuentes doing?
  • They’re trying to tear apart. Mega. Right? They are trying to tear apart, make America great. Tucker Carlson bought a house in Qatar. Is he getting money from Qatar?
  • Is the griper Nick Fuentes getting money from Qatar? Hmm? Huh? I’m curious.
  • I know, sure as fuck.
  • Israel isn’t making my decisions for me. No, sir.
  • But, so this is the thing that people don’t understand. Isn’t that shiny? So shiny. This is what people don’t understand.
  • Israel is basically our foreskin in the Middle East.
  • maybe more than our foreskin. Maybe it’s the head of our penis in the Middle East, you know?
  • I don’t know, it feels good to me. I’m not ready to pull out.
  • And some of these other people are like, hey, pull out. No, I’m saying, I don’t know. know. I think I’m going to leave it right there. Feels pretty good to me. Yeah. Yeah. And I think, I think it feels pretty good to a lot of people other than me too. I think there’s a lot of other people that want me to leave it in, but you know, sometimes.
  • Sometimes things can feel bad and good at the same time.

Israel, Islam, and Christianity

I apologize for the crappy sound I was using a microphone that screwed up the sound

  • “Greetings, friends and-“
  • “some reason.”
  • “I… I don’t…”
  • “Ickballist.”
  • “God’s name in…”
  • “It’s also called the ineffable name.”
  • “The reason that it looks like this on my neck is because in that form, written from top to bottom, it looks”
  • “it’s spoken through.”
  • “by being a rational person.”
  • “ends from the ancient perspective.”
  • “a, if you weren’t a philosopher.”
  • “and you didn’t observe the praxis of your philosophy.”
  • “debate and it used to happen in India too with Shastri and then Shastri just basically like disappeared from India. did go? Ancient Greece.”
  • “So.”
  • “There’s two ways that you can be falsified. Your philosophy can be proven wrong and incorrect. Or you can falsify yourself by not following…”
  • “my perspective, they have the same origin. What Israel was trying to do with the 12 tribes that were nomadic, the 12 tribes were basically 12 different nationalities.”
  • “white tribes and then there was a Hindu tribe. It was different tribes of people that were trying to basically worship the same God, which is kind of…”
  • “So Israel was America before.”
  • “when, cabalists refer to…”
  • “Sarah said, because I can’t get pregnant.”
  • “take my slave woman so that she can give you a try.”
  • “And Abraham did. And Ishmael was conceived.”
  • “after, I don’t know, this went on for a long period of time. Jehovah was like…”
  • “Sarah had conceived a child when she was like…”
  • “And then Ishmael was basically harassing in a very bad way, I think. And Sarah said to Abraham, she said, get rid of this slave woman.”
  • “So in the Quran, there is a passage that says,”
  • “what that means, according to Moses Maimonides, is that the Bible predicts.”
  • “Both the Jews and the Christians agree that lying is bad. But there are several scriptures in the Quran that says Allah is the best liar.”
  • “So.”
  • “bowl.”
  • “fist was raised against his brothers. And all of his brothers were…”
  • “So moving on down the line.”
  • “And I don’t disagree with that.”
  • “So Esau, the name Jacob means the usurper, the supplantor.”
  • “he saw broke the covenant because they portray him as stupid. His father loved him. He was a mighty hunter, but they portray him as stupid. comes back from a hunt, right? And his brother, when he’s stealing the blessing from his brother, he covers himself.”
  • “And they said, they doubled down on this because when Esau lost the birthright, he married two Canaanite women, which was forbidden. But when I debate Jews on this subject, this is what I ask them.”
  • “Who decides?”
  • “because if the Jews…”
  • “that Esau broke the covenant. And it’s not God’s choice. That means that they’re God’s…”
  • “But if God can…”
  • “broke the covenant of Him, or if God can make a…”
  • “That means something different. So I do think…”
  • “And this is what people don’t understand about Jewish.”
  • “I pronounce it the way it’s spelled. It’s pronounced exegesis. It’s pronounced isegesis, okay? Pardis, which is a metaphor for paradise.”
  • “pressure and sod. The four levels of interpretation.”
  • “Esau came in and he’s like, give me some of the red there, the red, right? Because he was dumb and he was referring to red lentil stews. So according to him, he sacrificed his birthright for red lentil stew. But the color red is associated with edamite.”
  • “And it’s interesting because the Garden of Eden is also Edom.”
  • “And then they said that David had a ruddy complexion. Ruddy means red. So once again, Jewish isogeesis is connecting this color red.”
  • “in the lineage. And Jesus traced his origins back through David, to David, who had a ready”
  • “So, and this is what’s funny, is that they say that people are like, no, Jesus wasn’t white, he looked like this.”
  • “What do you know what the etymology of the word”
  • “Caucasus Mountains.”
  • “Do you know what language we’re speaking right now? Proto-Indo-European. All of Western languages come from Proto-Indo-European.”
  • “Traced this through haplogroups. We were over there. And now, we’re here.”
  • “I think I’m very pro-Israel.”
  • “I understand that the Jews were kicked out of, historically, every country. And that’s why Britain said we’re returning them to their homeland and they can defend themselves. Now the people that are calling themselves Palestinian…”
  • “they were there living with other Jews who were also there.”
  • “Christians. But at some point in the past…”
  • “I don’t mind, I don’t care.”
  • “Islam has no right”
  • “So, yeah. And I have, have problems.”
  • “communists, Jews, and Jewish communists.”
  • “And I do not like the manipulation they have put.”
  • “And I will explain this to you.”
  • “The are the actors who are putting on”
  • “above ground.”
  • “and he believed everything came from…”
  • “Plato was also a contemporary.”
  • “He absorbed the cult of Bacchus.”

In this insightful video, we delve into the intriguing story of Esau and the red lentil stew, exploring its significance in Jewish exegesis. Discover how this ancient narrative connects to broader themes of tradition, sacrifice, and cultural identity. Join us as we unravel the layers of meaning behind this biblical tale, offering a fresh perspective on its historical and spiritual implications.

Rational Praxicism, or Ratiocracy/Logocracy, My Philosophy.

Image

So, how would I describe my philosophy?  It is impossible to sum up in one post, I have spent years studying this old philosophical relationship and the processes in it. Literally everything I say and do is based on this relationship which has been forgotten in this day and age.  Never heard of.  There is so much intellectual crap and prancing intellectual buggery floating around out there.  Even when people hear my philosophy and think to themselves, “That sounds good.”  They turn around and do the opposite, because they are using a normative bias, and haven’t learned to detect logical fallacies that they are making.  

The only way I can teach this relationship is as a type of guru with an ashram or philosopher with a gymnasium.  It has to be shown, it can’t be told, because people are terrible at detecting their own horse shit.  This is a type of relationship in which people only relate to others rationally and positively keeping their judgments to themselves.  Your resources do your will, you prehend your resources.  You have earned them they are yours.  I can’t take your resources and use them against your will.  Taxation without representation. 

Not only does a person focus on creating value for others in the community, they focus on doing so in a rational way.  The most rational person gets his way, the most rational argument wins.  Everyone in the community is a philosopher king and is working on increasing his understanding.  Nobody is above the law of reason, and everybody submits to it.  If it can’t be proven it can’t be argued.  This prevents the type of intellectual faggotry that adopts a philosophy and then is successful in spite of it, which means that you are dragging the philosophy along, you are not applying the philosophy, you are championing it and proselytizing it.  Your success should be directly related to your philosophy, your philosophy is your soul, and your sword and your word.  If you discover you are wrong your amend your philosophy and your behavior.  

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
For other uses of the word Praxis, see Praxis (disambiguation).
So, I tried to do a kind of semantic clarification in which praxis—if not on the thither side of this divide—was perhaps somehow between the theoretical and the practical as they are generally understood, and particularly as they are understood in modern philosophy. Praxis as the manner in which we are engaged in the world and with others has its own insight or understanding prior to any explicit formulation of that understanding…Of course, it must be understood that praxis, as I understand it, is always entwined with communication.
 —Calvin O. Schrag[1]

Praxis is the process by which a theory, lesson, or skill is enacted, practiced, embodied, or realised. “Praxis” may also refer to the act of engaging, applying, exercising, realizing, or practicing ideas. This has been a recurrent topic in the field of philosophy, discussed in the writings of PlatoAristotleSt. AugustineImmanuel KantSøren KierkegaardKarl MarxMartin HeideggerHannah ArendtPaulo Freire,Ludwig von Mises, and many others. It has meaning in the political, educational, and spiritual realms.

It is also important to note that because of the nature of Moral Authority and its constant habit of usurping Sapiential Authority by making emotional appeals certain guards are created for preventing the passive aggressive take over of this pattern which eventually, universally, creates the degradation of all good systems.  Processes and patterns that aren’t logical and can’t be defended logically fly in the face of reason to repeatedly destroy all of the good that was created.  Everybody, man or woman must respect the authority of reason and if they can’t defend their position rationally with rational means they are not allowed to speak.  You don’t get to argue that one person or group must spend their resources on another person or group, this thwarts meritocracy.  If you want to be merciful and charitable you do so with your own resources and your fate and reputation are tied to those that you are helping and you are responsible for their actions.  If you want to own slaves, you are responsible for them and you don’t get to use your sentimental arguments to obfuscate or caste doubt or stumble reasonable discourse on its path.  In order to be a citizen you have to be equal to the task.  There is no freedom while their is ignorance.

 Image

Everyone in the society has their personal responsibilities, what would be power if it were extracted from them in the form of a law or structure of authority to serve them.  This would then attract psychopaths which would use that authority as power.  The point is to have a democracy amongst philosopher kings, Warrior philosophers.  Only when you have equality amongst genii can you unleash the highest common good.  When you have the false forced equality of making an irresponsible, social climbing, acquisitive, idiot the equal of a philosopher king, you have sabotaged yourself and your way of life.  Psychopaths ruin all of the good by refusing to understand and participate.  Should a person not accept their responsibilities their power must be given back to them forcefully or they must not be allowed to benefit from the surplus of value created by this type of relationship.  The quality of life is created by the philosophy itself, and the immigrants to this philosophy who do not adopt it and apply it are there for no other reason but to benefit themselves without contributing value, more value than they consume.  

Image

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/08/27/praxis-of-the-rational/

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/?s=plato’s+cave

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/10/08/a-priori-and-platos-philosophy/