US/Department/War

From Wikispooks
< US(Redirected from US/Department/Defense)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Group.png US/Department/War   Campfire Wiki ModernHistoryProject NNDB Sourcewatch WebsiteRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
United States Department of Defense logo.svg
FormationAugust 10, 1949
HeadquartersPentagon.jpg The Pentagon
LeaderUnited States Secretary of Defense
Type military
Subgroups•  Defense Intelligence Agency
• NSA HQ.jpg National Security Agency
•  Defense Information Systems Agency
•  National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
• NROorgchart.jpg National Reconnaissance Office
• DARPA Logo.jpg Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
•  Defense Logistics Agency
•  Missile Defense Agency
•  Defense Threat Reduction Agency
•  Pentagon Force Protection Agency
•  National Defense University
•  National War College
•  U.S. Special Operations Command
•  National Guard Bureau
•  Office of the Secretary of Defense
•  Joint Staff
•  Office of the Inspector General
•  Office of Net Assessment
•  Office of Special Operations
•  Influence and Perception Management Office
•  US/Department/The Navy
•  US/Department/The Army‎
Interest ofPentagon Pizza Report
Sponsor of Center for European Policy Analysis,  Abt Associates
The action arm of the Military-industrial-congressional complex, whose functionaries are rewarded in rough proportion to their ability to stifle dissent and channel funds to arms manufacturers.

See also US/Military.

The United States Department of Defense was formerly referred to as the US War Department, and is the coordinator of the US/Military.

Concerns

The department has assisted the growth of the US deep state, for example through the Office of Special Operations. It overexaggerated the military readiness of the USSR in the Cold War and has spent a steadily larger and larger fraction of the US government's income on weapons, irrespective of the lack of real military threat to the USA. It cannot be understood in isolation from the Military-industrial-congressional complex spoken about by President Eisenhower.

History

President Harry Truman signs the National Security Act Amendment of 1949

The United States Congress created the War Department in 1789 and the Navy Department in 1798. The secretaries of each of these departments reported directly to the President as cabinet-level advisors.

In a special message to Congress on December 19, 1945, President Harry Truman proposed creation of a unified department of state defense, citing both wasteful military spending and inter-departmental conflicts. Deliberations in Congress went on for months focusing heavily on the role of the military in society and the threat of granting too much military power to the executive.[1]

9/11

Full article: Rated 4/5 9-11

On June 1, 2001, the DoD changed the rules for military assistance relating to aircraft hijackings, the first time since 1997, to state that for all non-immediate responses, assistance from the DoD must get personal approval from the Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld.[2]

Criticism

In 2009, the DoD faced criticism after referring to "protest" as "low-level terrorism".[3] It has also faced criticism about its program of distributing surplus military equipment to US police forces. In 2014, Los Angeles Unified school police officials returned three grenade launchers to the military, although they kept the M-16 rifles and the armored vehicle.[4]


 

Legal Case

NamePlaintiff(s)Defendant(s)StartEndDescription
Hedges v. ObamaDaniel Ellsberg
Chris Hedges
Noam Chomsky
Jenifer Bolen
Kai Wargalla
Birgitta Jónsdóttir
Alexa O'Brien
Barack Obama
Leon Panetta
John McCain
John Boehner
Harry Reid
Eric Cantor
Nancy Pelosi
US/Department/War
Mitch McConnell
US
13 January 201228 April 2014The plaintiffs challenged the 2012 NDAA contending that indefinite detention on "suspicion of providing substantial support" to groups such as al-Qaeda and the Taliban was so vague as to allow unconstitutional, indefinite detention of civilians based on vague allegations. The Court of Appeals struck down an initial agreement, and the US Supreme Court concurred, arguing that the plaintiffs could not prove they would be affected by the law, so had no standing to contest it.

 

A Document by US/Department/War

TitleDocument typePublication dateSubject(s)
File:Defense Strategic Guidance.pdfreportJanuary 2012US/Military
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References