Members' Research Service By / February 2, 2024

Compulsory licensing of patents for crisis management [EU Legislation in Progress]

To secure the fast deployment of critical intellectual property in a time of need, the Commission is proposing to introduce a regulation on Union compulsory licensing of patents for crisis management (CLCM-COM).

© intheskies / Adobe Stock

Written by Hendrik Mildebrath with Hugo Carmona Bas (4th edition, updated on 13.10.2025).

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted both the need for a resilient healthcare system and for quick access to inventions and technologies in challenging situations. Following this experience, EU lawmakers negotiated a compulsory licensing scheme intended to facilitate rapid use of patents while preserving strong patent protection as an incentive to innovate.

Views on the original European Commission proposal diverged. Civil society organisations supported broad application of the compulsory licensing scheme, while industry advocated a narrow scope. Stakeholder positions diverged more sharply than those of the co-legislators.

Parliament and Council reached a provisional agreement on 21 May 2025, largely amending the Commission proposal in favour of rights-holders. The compromise would: (i) exclude semiconductor crises, emergencies relating to gas supply security and defence-related products from the regulationʹs scope; (ii) preserve confidentiality of protected know-how; (iii) significantly lower the maximum fines and penalties the Commission may impose on licensees for non-compliance, and remove rights holders from the sanctions regime entirely. By consensus, the co-legislators rejected the Commission’s proposal to cap licensing fees. In line with the Parliamentʹs position, the competent advisory body must invite an observer from the European Parliament to relevant meetings.

Complete version

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compulsory licensing for crisis management and amending Regulation (EC) 816/2006
Committee responsible:Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI)COM(2023) 224 final
27.4.2023
Rapporteur:Adrián Vázquez Lázara (Renew, Spain)2023/0129(COD)
Shadow rapporteurs:Tiemo Wölken (S&D); Kosma Złotowski (ECR); Laurence Farreng (Renew); Sergey Lagodinsky (Greens/EFA); Mario Furore (The Left)Ordinary legislative
procedure (COD)
(Parliament and Council
on equal footing –
formerly ‘co-decision’)
Next steps expected: Second-reading vote in plenary

Second reading

Related Articles

Be the first to write a comment.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Epthinktank

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

EPRS Logo
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.