Posts Tagged ‘editorial

22
May
25

Good Music Is Doomed to Drug Ads?

***

We have to stop the drug ads, especially the ones with familiar songs turned into craptacular jingles. If we don’t stop them, all good music is going to be eliminated from our minds, from our pleasure centers. We will cease to know good vibes if we let drug companies turn our treasured songs into pitch trash.

There. I said it. Now, get on with your lives, like the actors in those commercials, people who are definitely not taking pills.

‘Stupid drug ads. Go take your own damn pill and disappear.

16
May
25

The $100,000 Tropical Vacation Game Show

***

Do you love game shows as much as I do? I can’t get enough of the $100,000 Pyramid, the latest celebrity version. Do you want to know why? I’m telling you, anyway. It’s because it’s a $100,000 pyramid scheme. Every game they ask the “civilian” what they would do if they won “the big money.”

Now, first, I think the celebrities want to laugh just at that concept, the big money. $100,000 isn’t exactly big money to them, usually, not unless they’re looking haggard and haven’t had a paying gig in a while. Even then, I wonder.

Then there’s the big disappointment that follows asking the big question. I’m sure a few people actually win $100,000. But, the majority I’ve seen, who don’t win, go away with what I can only imagine is a fractured dream. You ask them what they will do. They say they want to open a new club or restaurant or get a beach house. And, instead of giving them hope, you offer them a trip to Mexico or Antigua.

So, you might as well say, “We can’t give you real estate or rental property, but we can give you an over-priced tropical vacation for a few weeks. If you want to blow $100,000 south of the USA border, we can cover that. But, if you want to start a new business, go to Shark Tank.”

16
May
25

Can We Ban Bad News on Holidays?

***

I understand “news happens daily” and that there are “things you need to know.” But, does that include reports of crime, murder and other violence…on a holiday?

Well, to be fair, if you’re watching the local or international news on a holiday, something is probably wrong, anyway. I mean…why would you?

Who am I to judge? Some people like their news the same way some people like their coffee or soda…daily…maybe even more than one time each day. That’s not me, though. I would rather go without it, most of the time, because it just upsets or rattles me. Hearing about every crime or damaged property in town isn’t exactly helpful news. I’ve said it once and will say it, again; that sort of reporting is for private communication and police reports. If you need to get in on police action, I think there are radios for that. If you are involved in a crime or disaster, do you want it plastered all over every TV screen and network? I wouldn’t…most likely. Give me a case when it’s a good idea to be a disaster or victim on TV.

I know some people who will watch the news any day on TV and come away from that with a head and heart full of discontent and/or grief. Who needs that? And, who needs those viewers to pass on that unpleasant feeling? Not me. Don’t throw your anger and tears at me, after you wasted your time absorbing all the bad news. That’s just…foul.

Now, to consider the above on a holiday…you might as well cancel every party and not sell any supplies or food. My stomach is already turning for the next holiday. It could be weeks or months away. But, if I’m going to turn on the TV and see bad news or hear about it, second hand, screw you self-proclaiming news networks. You’re sick in more ways than one. You’re puppets in a warped system. You’re bleached smiles are more unwelcome than a snarling guard dog who doesn’t know when to be quiet. You sicken me. And, every time you feel the need to fill a commercial break with one of your “this is me, part of the local news team” ads with some corny song, I’m just going to like you a little less. So, you’d better hope I DON’T watch you as regularly as you advertise or hope.

On that note, if there is ANYONE who actually longs to meet their local news reporting team after being exposed to daily disaster and tragedy, those people are also very warped…or oblivious…or both. Yes; let’s kiss the hands and ask for autographs from people pressed to pour out daily tragedy and misfortune. Even certain meteorologists get on my nerves with how they deliver bad weather with a smile…as if they get a little sick pleasure out of telling you roads will be a hazard tomorrow.

I vote no news–other than weather reports, methods of transportation, possible public activities to join and discount offers–on holidays. The world will be just fine without you…I’m pretty sure.

Mic drop.

Picking the microphone back up, once more.

Oh. And, no horror movies/stories on holidays, either…except, maybe, Halloween. You want frights and gore? Go find a secluded space you can enjoy your sick interest. I don’t need to turn on the TV for enjoyment and find some twisted nightmare during my holidays. Flipping channels on a holiday, just to find crime stories, “shocking news reports” and horror movies…is enough to make any lonely or stuck-at-home person want to do something very unpleasant. And then you hit those people with anti-depressant and other drug ads (not to mention other unrelated ads which are equally distressing and/or unsettling). That is a crime so foul that I cannot adequately put it into words. I just want to go on a TV-smashing rampage…and then go trash some drug labs.

Can you fashion a drug that helps YOU deal with my rage when I unleash it upon your sick skulls? Good luck with that. [Actually, I’d probably just destroy your equipment and only leave you with a headache bad enough to make you regret your life choices.] I’m not ill. YOU are.

Mic drop.

02
May
25

When Did Tacos Become a Snack?

****

I’m not someone who grew up regularly eating tacos with family.

My first experience with tacos might have been from a Taco Bell when I was roughly nine or ten years old. Taco Bell was relatively new in my area, and my family, who you may say has perpetually been pinching pennies when they aren’t being reckless with money, felt they could afford something new and “Mexican.” We called it dinner. We had tacos, and I think I ordered the “taco pizza.” And, we called that dinner.

Yet, if you look at the average crossword puzzles I’ve been solving, tacos always fall under “Mexican snack” or some variation of that clue, often using a name or word I’m supposed to recognize as “from South America, as if that’s supposed to be enough to shout, “It’s TACOS, you idiot!”

When did tacos become A SNACK?

Please fill me in so I may be better educated.

Are there homes, somewhere, where, instead of asking for or making a PB-and-J sandwich after school, they throw together tacos? Do these same households then eat something less portable or bigger for dinner? Are tacos not fit for being considered dinner?

[I cannot say the same for just about any other “snack.” I cannot call popcorn or chips and salsa dinner.]

I’m not entirely sure, but perhaps there is research I could do on the subject. It might be easier than getting a response in this chilly, vacant writing space where visitors and comments are more scarce than that one Pokémon you can only find once in each game. But, if you, reader, happen upon this entry to my blog and have useful information on the concept of tacos as a snack, please share it in the space below. I put this thought out there in the “cyberverse.” ‘Food for thought…or…thought for food?

17
Apr
25

Can We Cut Out the Unnecessary Services and Gratitude That Contribute to Fear?

***

Oh. Let me start by saying…

Thank you for your service.

Who or what am I thanking…and why? No one, at the moment. But, those words get thrown around quite a bit and almost seem expected when in the presence of certain people. Yet, the same could be said for non-human things that perform similar…services. And, as technology changes in certain directions, we may be pressured to say it in those directions instead of human faces.

Think about this.

Military troops perform certain actions we call service, and we’re prodded to thank them for those services. We don’t know exactly what they do or did. But, we’re told it’s for our protection, our safety. Well, God bless and thank those people for keeping us safe…..from what exactly?

Oh. Sure. You can think up some things that you’re not facing yourself. War seems to be the common one. But, I bet if you actually went “on duty” with some of the troops, you’d see things differently. And, you’d know the truth…maybe. [I’m not even sure the troops know the whole truth, and that’s why so many suffer after serving.]

But, you see…we’re thanking people for “services” without any knowledge of what service they perform(ed). [And, you may feel pressured to cough up money.]

Imagine being at a restaurant and just finding a plate of food. Then someone walks by in a “uniform,” and you reach out to say, “Thank you for your service.” You don’t know if that person did anything to prepare that food. You don’t know if they were just in some back room getting freaky with another coworker instead of helping a customer. You know nothing…except that they’re wearing a uniform. [And, maybe they stole that uniform.]

[Don’t even get me started on thieves and murders who misuse uniforms.]

So far, I’ve just scraped the surface of questionable service, just the more common perspective of analyzing the military. [I often find myself questioning the military.] But, what about so many OTHER “services” we are forced to contend with and the fees that go with them? Yes. Now, you’re getting a clue. Right? I’m talking stuff that often comes with paperwork and phone calls. Services you just don’t even give much thought before you comply, only to hear later about bad luck stories which only create more doubt and fear than you already have. You’re an easy target, and so many take advantage of that.

There is SO much talk about “protecting your personal data.”

[Even if you live “off the grid,” surely you hear some of this. You may think you’re smart by staying “offline.” If you can handle every aspect of your modern life without any dealings with one of these pathways that seems risky to personal information, I salute you…and wonder how you do it. There sure seems to be plenty of pressure to get in line and submit information and other things, one way or another.]

But, why should we need to protect our data when we aren’t doing anything intentional to endanger it? And, why should anything we do to protect something cost money? If I shield something with my own body, is that costing me money? And, what exact amount of money is going to guarantee what I want to protect will be spared from destruction or theft? [I don’t think anyone has a good answer.]

Sure; we may need to buy something made by someone else to improve our defenses. Back in “the day,” people would invest in armor, shields, etc. to defend themselves. If you’re roaming the countryside, some vandal might try to assault/rob you, and it’s good to be protected. But, isn’t it better to make those decisions/investments without fear of what MAY happen? If you’ve never had a problem with vandals on your road trips, why stop now to buy something you’ve never needed? And, if you take a hint/warning and make a better path choice, couldn’t you avoid the problem that would otherwise require investing in better protection? Also, if you acquired the proper knowledge/skill, couldn’t you gather your own supplies and construct your own protection?

[Instead, we’re teaching people how to code and cheat everything under and beyond the sun.]

[Insurance companies all over the place will be flailing their arms, right now. How inconvenient it is to have to make wiser decisions when you could let someone else, at cost, manage those issues (and still not adequately resolve all concerns).]

Once you start investing in what COULD happen, you give up control over reality and living in the moment. Are we always supposed to live in fear of the unknown? Don’t therapists (get paid to) curb such fears, telling us not to project what is not actually there?

[And, insurance companies make it their business to get you thinking about them. So, I guess, being afraid of “what if” helps…er, pays someone. Do therapists ever thank insurance companies? I wonder.]

Isn’t this like “growing up” and ceasing to tremble at the thought of what might be lurking in the dark or under the bed?

If you are using personal data to achieve something, why should there be any obstacle course or threats lurking in the shadows? If you go to your refrigerator to get something to eat, do you need to defend yourself from fridge pirates and gobble-ins? [See what I did there?]

Why does it seem like every basic function we want to perform is threatened by something we must then fear…but not fear if we invest in things that “protect us.” We are being steered like cattle into scary situations for no damn reason other than the benefit and profit of the “mongers” who do this crap to us.

And, before I get into more of the little or not-so-little things we contend with, I’ll address the question that’s bound to pop up.

Well, what can we do about all of this?

I wish I had an Einstein-worthy answer that resolved everything. It sure would cure my fears. I really don’t know what can be done to fix the big problem. I just know there seems to be as many people out to cause a problem as there are those who wish to live without one. And, it’s also possible that there are many of us contributing to the problems of others without intent simply because we’ve been coerced to go along with various procedures. Your compliance could be giving other people grief.

My fear wouldn’t be nearly as troubling if I had and saw more people acting with confidence (not exaggerated), being friendly (not flustered or rude) and doing what needs to be done without submitting to those things that I suspect (if not know) are contributing to the problem. Seeing someone do something you just know is going to cause more distress is like living a nightmare. And, my life has been riddled with nightmares. [Sweet dreams? What are those?] If I was with someone who was living life wisely, even if they were working hard at it instead of relying upon all the latest conveniences, I’d probably sign on with them and forget what’s troubling so many. [I wish I could say being a farmer was the solution.]

I will say this. Convenience seems to be a HUGE contributor to the problem. Whenever someone says their service to you or their product/invention is convenient in any way, proceed with caution and do not be swayed by the reduction of “you need to do something to make this work.” I’m sure many of us would rather go without work, without laboring at anything. From the dawn of time, humans have been crafting tools to reduce work and strain on the body. But, we’ve shot past the simple tools that are the bones of physics lessons and gone right into excessive ways to manipulate people. We’re putting the screws and levers to each other instead of that stone block we want to move.

[Yet…the opposite of convenience shouldn’t be torture or any form of manipulation. Just because something isn’t as convenient as it could be doesn’t mean it has to be troubling or abusive to the mind and/or body. We don’t have to feel mistreated or heckled for doing something “the hard way.” You might say this is like doing math on paper next to some jerk with a calculator. They do the math in a fraction of the time and then stick their tongue out at you, saying something unnecessary and cruel while you deal with your equation(s). Can’t we just do the math, use our brains effectively and efficiently, and not be taxed or intimidated?]

Technology that should be making communication and cultural interaction more…er…convenient…has become more intimidating and taxing than it ever should be. And, every aspect of life seems to be getting steered right into the digital unknown and bringing various financially-laced demands (like a masked thief with a gun) with it.

We’re told to protect ourselves, yet we’re getting “held up” by faceless people doing the very thing we’re supposed to avoid.

—-

Hey. You. You’d better protect yourself from ____. Now, hand over five percent of your money so nothing bad like that happens to you.

—-

Insurance. Service fees. Shipping and handling. Fees for things we failed to notice or read (sometimes because forms and policies are written by wordy individuals who get a sick thrill out of making pages exhausting and cryptic). [I often get accused by family for being one of them…but that is not my intent. And, I don’t get a sick thrill out of confusing or vexing anyone.]

There are those services and fees we SHOULD be aware of and consciously repaying…and then there are probably way more that we don’t know and shouldn’t have to face or fear. When you work with someone, face-to-face, and they do something for you, you may feel inclined to repay them somehow…and that’s how it should be. But, to pay someone for something you don’t know they did for you…that’s like a child hustling a parent for money before they do a chore.

—-

Can I get five bucks? I’ll mow the lawn for you. I just need five bucks, now. Why? Just cuz. You know I’m good for it.

—-

That kid could easily just go get a snack or do something he/she shouldn’t be doing with that money. You don’t know…unless you throttle them for more information and wreck the bond you have with that person.

[Now, imagine that “kid” is someone sending you a notice that says you need to pay a certain amount of money to get something you want, including an amount for something you don’t fully understand. They COULD just say you owe one amount…but why stop there when you can vex someone with other fine print and things that magically get people to cough up more money for things they don’t understand? You’re not just paying for the service/object you want…there are other “fees” you need to address which go with getting what you want. This is “convenience” yet not convenient for you but for those who collect the money.]

Insurance companies make their business out of WHAT IF, which is so often the thing therapists and sage individuals continually tell you to avoid. Well, how can we avoid pondering the “what ifs” if we are roped into insurance policies? They say the policies, which require constant supply of money to maintain (and, too often, to get the things we need them to do, which is too often additional money, not the initial/scheduled cost), take care of those “what ifs,” so we don’t have to worry. But, we still worry! And, crap still happens which sometimes doesn’t get resolved so easily by the insurance we fund. [Crappy service. Right?]

[Lawyers advertise their services like vultures waiting for someone to be hit with a financial problem, promising to make resolving the problem easy and “free” (until they win for you). I’m sure there are decent, respectable lawyers who truly want to serve people and improve order. But, there are others who suck up commercial space and time with what I can only imagine is rubbish. Can you imagine driving down a road and seeing some guy in a suit waiting on the side for you to have an accident? As soon as you do, they rush in with a briefcase in hand and papers to fill…for your benefit…right? As if.]

What makes matters more complex is that we have gone past the age of dealing with people face-to-face, rolled right past “snail mail” and fallen into the zero-gravity space of internet business. We’re interacting with others we cannot see, sending all kinds of data across the void, not knowing who may receive or intercept that information along the way. I don’t think there was nearly as much risk of someone raiding a mailbox to mess with others when we only had envelopes and boxes to process our needs. I’m sure there were a number of thieves who did their best to break into mailrooms and vaults where financial papers were stored and addresses could be put to vile use. It’s this latest digital era that’s really opens the doors to the unknown and people seemingly trained to do us harm.

A computer (or similar device), one that requires the internet to reach someone, some business, you need to get what you want (and, lately, sometimes just to function as a sensible computer), has the potential to be very helpful if we know how to operate it. But, instead and more likely, we operate it somewhat blindly and fumble, at times, with what’s supposed to be so easy. And, as so many spend increasing amounts of time with such technology, they (we) seem to be getting…dumber. [It doesn’t take a genius (or idiot) to tell you getting dumber makes you more open to threats and those who would take pleasure in troubling you.]

Again, you may want to avoid this technological hazard. And, if you are able to live completely free of computer usage (and dealing with forms/fees beyond your comprehension), I salute you. But, it seems like an uphill battle to get past and resolve this concern. I don’t have the solution. I just know something needs to be done, and I’ll get to more of the WHY, soon enough (though it should be apparent in what I’ve already been saying).

There are schools (and surely “training programs”) that teach people about all the wondrous things you can do with computers, including the things we should never be doing with computers. [Oh. But, you can get away with it and put it to your advantage…it’s so tempting.] And, with so much being pressed to perform on a computer, whether you’re a user or someone paid to do something with a computer, that technology has become the new playground littered with bullies and peer pressure, so much unnecessary intimidation taxing our minds (and bodies). People are taught how computers can be so convenient and helpful…and then some, who either were born twisted or get twisted by bad decisions, use that knowledge to mess with and rob people.

Remember what I said about you possibly contributing to the problem? You could be part of the problem if you let some offer that brings you money sway you into signing or doing something that ultimately troubles other people (or could even come back to trouble you). There are forms (and policies) you likely fill out that promise “refunds” and other forms of money which you may be working (or laboring) to earn…then get taxed…and somehow get some back, which makes the whole taxing thing just a little confusing.

—-

Hey. You owe me ten bucks. Give it, now. Okay. Now, here’s two bucks back. Why? Call it a consideration. Now, the next time you have twenty bucks, give me ten, and I’ll give you five back. See? I’m saving you money.

—-

WHY is all of the above so important? Well, if it isn’t obvious, when we give up control of our own lives and let these various policies and money-laced procedures lead the way, we cease to exist, we give away our souls and become batteries of some system. [I’ve previously written various pieces on how humans can be batteries.] We might as well be jugs of fuel if we don’t take account of and control of our lives. We’re taught and told things that give our lives meaning and value, yet, at the same time, we are too often de-valued by things that confuse and pressure us to comply.

I could ponder this all day and drive in circles, trying to get a firm grip on the situation. I realize there are elements in play that all mix and, in some way, either respectable or vile, try to make sense of this existence.

Order

It’s a not-so-fancy synonym for peace. When no one is making you feel threatened or uncomfortable, when everyone seems to be getting along, there is order.

There are people who want order (not the kind you place to get something you want) and those who either opt to or are enlisted to produce order. And, in order to achieve that sense of order, actions are taken which, unfortunately, don’t appeal to or make everyone happy. [Why? Why can’t order please everyone? I suppose some could bring up that line: You can’t please everyone. But, wouldn’t true order do just that? And, how does anyone please everyone?]

People talk about “living in balance” or “a balanced life.” But, that balance seems to always be in question. Other species continue to be a subject of concern. What do we do about the insects and wildlife getting in our way?

Economy

Economy is just how people in control (or who take command) and seeking order attempt to establish greater control and/or order. If people pay and trade fairly, they won’t fight or cause other trouble. By the sound of the word, you’d think it was for the benefit of all. By definition, it deals with the distribution of wealth. Well, why does wealth have to come into any equation?

I think “wealth” is part of the problem because it seems to instill thoughts of greed. If you have wealth, if you have control of some source of value (maybe all of the oranges), why part with them? Why share with other beings? What is it about “wealth” that does this to people? If we used a different word, like resources, maybe we’d be more considerate. Resources sounds like something we all should have. Wealth sounds like something one person stashes in a vault for eternity. If you have a wealth of safe drinking water…I imagine plenty of others are dying of thirst. Is that a pleasant thought?…you having all of the safe water, alone? When do we reach a point when we realize there is benefit in sharing resources? [It’s harder to share wealth, I imagine, because then it ceases to be wealth. Things lose perceived monetary value when everyone has them. But, that doesn’t reduce the OTHER value of those items.]

If we say Economy deals with the distribution of RESOURCES (versus wealth), I would say we are far FAR from having an adequate system of properly, fairly sharing. And, what’s extra tragic is how some places are flooded with resources and not necessarily greedy people in control of all of them, while other places are starved for those same resources (while, possibly, being “rich” in other resources).

Distribution is definitely a problem. But, money isn’t solving it. Money just delays people from being helpful when they feel they should get more for their assistance. If you didn’t have to think about money, if so many people weren’t pressing you to make and then give away that money (which still doesn’t guarantee you get all that you need or want), you could focus your eyes on the real resources and maybe consider helping to distribute them.

This is sort of like dealing with a “natural disaster.” You COULD get kind people to lend a hand and help prevent tragedy. But, it would cost money, because people have to step away from their money-managing lives to do something else, something that isn’t paying them. And, it would be risky to help, which goes against the insurance plans and such that people agree to pay. [Why would anyone take a risk if it’s going to cost them more, later? Suddenly, being helpful in a crisis becomes uncomfortable, intolerable, because it comes with a financial threat.] There is probably enough ____ to resolve the crisis, but there is so much added and potentially unnecessary pressure to consider the “cost” before providing or delivering what is needed. When we require money to make the world go around, being helpful becomes less convenient and almost impossible.

Sadly, I don’t think anyone, yet, has a good sense of maintaining an economy. There is too much temptation to take more than is right and cheat the system. If you’re not stealing, you’re the victim of it. That does not sound right, in my mind, for what economy should be. [Personally, bartering has always sounded better than dealing with money.]

When we place a value upon and give people a need to amass money, they turn away from the true purpose of getting what is needed. When people start believing amassing money is important, they seem to do anything they can to get more, which sounds like crime. Yet, it’s not the money that’s doing anything other than intimidating or troubling others. Money itself isn’t feeding you or keeping you alive. It’s just a tool of the economy someone has been trying to use to establish their idea of order. Money could go up in flames, tomorrow, but there will still be natural resources and a need for them. [Money is sort of an illusion standing in the way of equitable sharing of resources.]

Convenience

Some might say this goes back to the Garden of Eden. The “forbidden fruit” was so conveniently placed and held so much “wealth.” Convenience is a deceptive path to an easier life which too often is abused or misused. What is convenient for one will likely be inconvenient for another. Your convenience could upset another person or species. It’s convenient how we can claim land and drive out the native population. It’s just as convenient for insects to invade your home or some other wild animal to threaten your sense of peace and order. In a way, convenience is our human excuse for getting our way. It sounds very comforting…but at the expense of others. Yet, to give up convenience…wouldn’t that make life torture? Or, just labor?

Control

Control is a shade of Order, laced with Convenience. Order itself is not always convenient; you often work to establish Order. But, when you have Control, you can conveniently command Order (but that doesn’t mean you’ll easily get what you want or satisfy what is likely a ceaseless growth of want). Ironically, positive/motivational speakers (and modern “influencers”) are good at provoking you to “take control of your life!” And, rightfully, we should. But, how does one take control without affecting others? Thus, are we taking control of our own lives or tangling the strings of others?

Controlling parents are looked down upon for doing some questionable things to maintain their own sense of Order. Some, if not most, do what they do just to ease their own minds (and, often, dismiss responsibility). Parents can enjoy the things they like to do alone if they can just get their kids to stop making noise and demanding food. [So, why did you become parents?] Some people get infected with the notion that only they know how to do something right…and then whip that into the hides of their children.

People take roles/jobs that come with a certain measure of control. Their job is to help establish order. But, I think, too often, the drive or element of money is what makes decisions instead of a genuine desire to improve the peace of all living things (not just other humans). Even if you take such a job with good intentions, there are countless others in similar positions pressuring you to bend a certain way to get something they or whoever they serve wants.

[Is that sensible Order? Who is really in control of anything? How do we maintain control without upsetting a peaceful sense of order? Or, how can we stop trying to control and co-exist in peace?]

Population

We seem to have little to zero control over the size of any population. If you attempt to establish control, you’re an inhuman monster. But, Population is the driving force behind most if not all of the above. Quantity of living things (as well as the non-living stuff we accumulate) impacts decisions we make. It affects how we hoard or feel free to share resources.

[If you have a sandwich and are with one other person, you might feel kind enough to split that sandwich into two. But, if you have four other people around you, how can you all get enough of the sandwich to feel content?]

Other species go about daily conflicts, battles and wars of their own kind, under our human noses. We neglect to see what is happening as we process our too often financial concerns. But, they’re out there, competing for resources and eating each other. In a way, that’s what we’re avoiding and trying to avoid. Yet, that would seem to be natural order, in some sick, twisted way that only upsets the modern human stomach.

I’m not saying we should live exactly like other (savage) animals/beings, but is it possible even those other species wouldn’t seem so savage if everyone was able to get what they needed?…if communication and distribution was clear and fair?

[Now, we have to take into consideration that some species, no matter how some humans may protest, are meat eaters and/or eat other species to survive. I don’t think it’s possible to steer every species into a “vegan” lifestyle. And, if you did, I am sure, eventually, the plants would get a brain and revolt. And then, what would we have? A discussion for another day! That’s what. None of us decide what species eats what, no matter what you think you can achieve with science. And, if you attempt to mess with nature, you get nasty side effects, anyway.]

Bringing this all back to its initial point, we are being treated like cattle with bottomless wallets. We are living in fear that is not our own. It’s one thing to live your life, encounter something that is naturally a threat, experience fear and deal with it. It’s a whole other thing to have others prod you with their sticks, constantly, and tell you to do something OR ELSE. Those pressures to comply and submit funds you acquire however you get them are only complicating and depleting the very lives they want to milk.

So, there’s a bit of irony for all of you greedy manipulators. You are killing the cows you want to milk forever by injecting them with fear. Yes, fear can make a cow cough up milk…but it won’t always or likely be the best milk. When people feel good about what they are doing, they are more likely to perform better. An athlete afraid of hurting someone or his/her self is not going to perform with confidence and will likely get injured…then think about what that injury will do their financial security, not to mention functioning as a human being.

[Then, if you can handle thinking on yet another level, you take into account how certain people make their business, their means of profit, from managing people’s fears, their woes and concerns. And, as other people become troubled with the need to make money, they look for jobs. Sometimes, those jobs seem only available at businesses making money off of people pressured to pay to avoid the things they are coerced to fear. Wherever there is a job someone is less interested in taking, there is someone in such dire need of a job that they will get steered toward and take it. So, now, you have people subject to fear working for what I can only call “fear mongers.” Either the employees become like their bosses and start injecting others with pressure to cough up money (for their personal obsession to amass money/wealth) or labor away just to get through life, trying to ignore what their jobs are really doing (if they even know). That is a really tragic, messed-up vision of economy.]

Isn’t there a better way to get what you need and not intimidate/confuse others? Fear is merely the weapon of bullies who take sick pleasure in watching others wail and/or suffer. I don’t know what breeds such sick mentality, but it exists. [Some would call it evil.] If you benefit from others getting confused or scared (or hurt), I don’t have any nice words for you. You’re just wrong. Maybe it starts out as a fun prank. But, if you keep at it, you’re a monster, and not the kind people seem to be turning into cute collections.

I don’t have a concrete or satisfying conclusion to this statement. So, I’ll just leave it here for your consideration. Food for thought. Now, help make this world a better place for all. Please.

26
Feb
25

Old Cartoons and Their Modern Movie Equivalents Are Unfair.

Looking back at some old cartoons and the modern movies that have tried to embody them, I feel horribly discouraged by the whole business.

Some of the best old cartoons were the three made by the same people to encompass land, air and sea, Thundercats, Silverhawks and Tigersharks. They were not much for plot and didn’t have the best animation/art quality (though it was better than almost every cartoon that came before the 1980s) but had amazing arrays of characters. Even some of the bad guys were valuable assets. Others were just obnoxious and often cackled too much. [Imagine a script in which your lines are ninety percent laughing like a madman.] But, while the three shows had more than thirty characters, each, they only had ten or fewer voice talents for the entire series! Ten voices for an entire series, playing every part. I’m pretty sure each series had only one or two women playing every female role, which is why Bluegrass has to face off against Melodia in Silverhawks instead of Steelheart, because…yep. She’d be facing herself and probably losing her mind in the sound booth.

Now, compare this with cartoons made by Hanna-Barbera, and you’ll see a stark difference. Some HB series, which may have only lasted a season, had FORTY voice credits. FORTY! That’s insane, even if they were only in one episode, each. Maybe they were cameo villains…but they appear in every episode’s credit list. And, still, that’s forty voices for a cheaply drawn cartoon, compared to Silverhawks, Thundercats and/or Tigersharks, which had wide arrays of characters played by a fraction of that many voice talents.

Unfair.

Now, you see movies being made that are supposed to be tributes or representations of those old cartoons. And, what do you get? Plots that are not same and characters that get warped. Rewriting cartoon history…madness. It’s like some legal battle that’s never going to be won by justice.

It’s enough to make you give up looking at any form of entertainment.

Next stop, mindless slavery to the machine.

No?

Then rebel with me. Please.

Let’s set these new-fangled movies straight and give those old cartoons the proper respect and representation.

26
Feb
25

Current Misunderstanding of Music and Talent

****

[I know I’m going to sound like a progressive grown-up turning into his parent (if my parents could type this well), but…]

There’s a distinct misunderstanding of musical talent that has become commonplace in recent years…probably since 2008. I’m talking specifically about female singing “talents.” There have been so many sharp rises from YouTube debut to scantily clad stage show that I’ve lost count and have ceased to enjoy most music from female “artists.” I can’t call them artists when they’re parading in their underwear. I could call them runway models…but not artists.

It’s difficult for me to appreciate a woman’s talent(s) when she’s trying to be sexy. That’s also why women have fantasies of sexy utility workers. The former are not interested in the labors of the latter; they’re just starved for sex and crafting fantasies. Well, sexual fantasies may be creative…but they’re not musical talents.

Unfortunately, we are drenched in attractive women, most of which feel the need to perform scantily clad, which pleases the men (and some women…and some in-between) in the audience. But, that doesn’t give me any drive to attend a concert or buy an album. If I’m buying the album to see the most attractive performer, I’m buying an adult magazine…not a record of great music.

What’s even sadder is when performers of a previous generation, someone like Jennifer Lopez or Shakira, who have matured (not aged in some horrifying, miserable way), feel a need to compete with these younger models. Jennifer Lopez is perpetually looking like someone desperate to be told she’d still hot. I’ve never thought she was unattractive…until she looked desperate for attention.

I just saw Shakira at an awards show with her two sons…who are close to teen age…and she’s doing her familiar belly-dancing on stage. You don’t talk about your family and then go do that on stage in front of them. It just feels…wrong. If my mom, who’s not bad looking, got up on stage and did that…I’d be nauseous if not also confused. [It also would have been nice to hear Shakira sing in English after giving her acceptance speech in English, but…]

If you’re concerned about the competition or no longer being considered attractive, you can take a big sigh of relief because I still think you’re hot. But, trying to be like these younger gals…is not smart. Followers are never trendsetters…they’re just the confetti left behind the parade. Even if you’re not so unique that you shine like the brightest star, you’re still good for who and what you are.

[I know Shakira is an Aquarius, and that often means she’s concerned about being compared to others. Aquarius types want to stand out and be unique. If you tell an Aquarius woman she reminds you of someone, she may get annoyed. Well, you’re not being unique dancing in your underwear and shaking your hips on stage, and that’s not making me interested in your music, which you’re promoting. Honestly, I find Shakira more attractive than talented because I have yet to see past her stunning face, even if I do hear beauty in her voice. I’ve struggled to understand most of her songs; so it’s hard to appreciate the music.]

I thought we were making progress in how we identify and respect all genders, including women. I thought women were finally supposed to get respect and equal billing. How does performing in your underwear and posing for similar photos achieve that?

[Let me sidestep to address one other performer in particular, Taylor Swift. Now, I’ve seen her wear some odd and occasionally skimpy outfits. But, more often, she performs with class. She also has that crazy way of crafting with numbers, often related to her birthday. If anyone is an artist, it’s her. I just don’t care for much of her music because…well…you know. ‘So many bad relationship songs. There ARE other things to sing about (than just your latest ex). And, no matter what anyone else says, I think she’s a little young to be doing a tour of eras. That sounds like something Cher kept saying she was going to do closer to retirement, not when she’s hosting a TV show with Sonny Bono.]

You’d think all of these smart, talented women would grasp this concept. [You’d also think, after so many years, some other “artists” in other music styles would give up singing about drugs, alcohol and wealth to stop people from submitting to crime, both sexual and financial, as well as other bad habits.]

I’m sorry, ladies. Many of you are very attractive…but you’re not artists worthy of any trophy…unless you’re competing for Miss Universe or the front cover of Victoria Secret’s catalog.

Mic drop.

25
Jan
25

Pardoning Your Own Riot Squad Is Not Your Decision to Make

***

It has begun!… [Insert Mortal Kombat music.]

Donald Trump’s second chance–unbelievable–at being the president of the USDA…I mean…USA.

And, among the first things I hear of him doing…he’s PARDONING rioters from the infamous January 6th incident?!

Sir, if I can even be that polite, you don’t get that right. It’s not your place to do this. You incited that riot. Regardless what you say, what responsibility you accept or do not accept, for that day, you do not take away the responsibility of all those violent and lawless people.

You can’t pardon the pilgrims for slaying Native Americans, either. But, that is what this resembles. You stir a pot of violence, like a Boston Tea Party but with people getting critically hurt in the rebellion, and then professionally excuse the participants, as if they did nothing wrong (even if “wrong” only means some people are upset while others are happy about what happened). The participants of the Boston Tea Party were not responsible for the entire USA or the British Empire. They were not the (first) president, who had to hear and satisfy both sides if the states were to remain UNITED. Abraham Lincoln’s actions led to a civil war, regardless who thought he was right or wrong. Are you willing to engage in the same? Your decision does not satisfy both sides and does not UNITE the USA.

Even if the rioters could be seen as another Boston Tea Party rebelling against some British Empire trying to restrict them, neither they nor you, however you want to label yourself (as, essentially, the man behind the plan, even if all you did was suggest a response to a vote you felt was wrong), has the right to excuse or deny someone else retaliation, whether that retaliation is a legal decision or something more hostile (like a war/revolution). The participants of the Boston Tea Party didn’t attack anyone. What they did upset business and angered their former homeland. That lead to more conflict. If you don’t want more violence or retaliation, you have to, at least, take responsibility for what you did, not deny it.

[Did Abraham Lincoln survive the Civil War and simply tell the surviving members of the Confederacy, “Sorry you had to lose all those people, who didn’t agree with the North. But, I had no part in that. And, all of the Yankees who killed your friends and family are totally innocent, too, because I forgive them.”]

By pardoning rioters who acted on your behalf, you remain guilty of being one of them, even though you did not tear anything down or hurt anyone with your own body or weapon (other than those words you like to so casually throw around at the expense of others). You do not start your second and utterly shocking second chance at being responsible for one of the biggest and most powerful countries in this world with a pardon for violence. Are you going to pardon ISIS as well? You should. I mean, they are just as wrong (or right) as your rioters. Both could be considered hornet nests who act out of anger, out of disapproval, and who damage lives as well as property.

You would rather fire staff and replace them than pardon them…but you’ll pardon people who attacked the very place you now call your office, people who acted recklessly on your behalf. [It’s astonishing anyone is willing to serve you.]

I cannot be polite or respectful in any way with you. You’re being…very stupid. [I guess that is a polite way of putting it.] I’d say you’re an idiot, but I don’t think I am too paranoid or dumb to say you’re probably not making these decisions alone, by yourself. Someone (cough) is steering you. And, it surely isn’t your wife.

Are you strong-arming some Democratic assembly? Is this a hostage situation? Are you holding someone at gunpoint until they let your soldiers go free? What other threat may you be holding in your hands?

You might as well be the leader of a terrorist unit demanding control of the country. Please excuse your gun-and-other-weapon toting radicals after they scare enough people with their violence. You are now back in control and making all demands public.

Did Johnson pardon the shooter (or shooters) who killed JFK? Did Abraham Lincoln pardon the Confederacy (instead of engaging in a civil war)? Did anyone pardon JWB for shooting Lincoln at the theater? Did anyone pardon Adolph Hitler for just being an angry artist who didn’t like enough of the people he had to live with on this planet? Did anyone say, “You know what, Dick. You had your hands deep in that Watergate scandal. But, why don’t you come back and lead this country as if nothing happened?” Did anyone pardon the terrorists behind 9/11 or any of the more recent mass-shooting disasters? ‘None of the above.

[I don’t fully understand the annual pardoning of turkeys, either, but that’s a subject for another day.]

Are you going to pardon those who looted the homes of wildfire victims in California, too?

So, how can anyone pardon your riot squad?

If anyone would be permitted to offer such pardon, it would be your replacement, provided they are not your ally because I don’t trust any ally of yours, either. If Joe Biden pardoned the rioters, I’d say he was being too kind…way too kind. But, he could do it, if he chose that route. Maybe Kamala Harris would have pardoned them if you let her win. You’ll never know.

Yet, regardless, forgiveness shouldn’t precede accepting responsibility. If someone breaks a window and doesn’t, at least, admit to doing it, they are a cowardly outlaw. The owner of the window may forgive the one who broke it, but the responsible person cannot excuse the damage done. Famous outlaws of the Wild West didn’t kill people to remain anonymous.

These January-6th rioters wanted to be seen and make a public statement. They did. And, if someone deems them criminals for what they did, the rioters deserve some kind of punishment. They cannot excuse themselves (completely). And, if you are in anyway responsible for them being so violent…well, I don’t need to repeat myself.

If you tell someone to punch another person–and they do that for you–you are, in some capacity, responsible for the punch. If you choose to get drunk and careless behind the wheel just because you’re feeling lousy about life, are you free to drive into a building or some other person without deserving some sort of punishment? Is a crime only okay when you say it is?…when it benefits you?

No one is unaware of you, at least, inspiring the rioters you are now pardoning. The whole world may know you are excusing violent criminals. What does that say about you making the USA great again?

I went to school (or, rather, a poor excuse for a school) with reckless idiots like you. [Yeah. Now I’m calling you an idiot, as you so casually like to call other people who just don’t agree with you.] They thought they could do as they pleased because their parents paid for the school, because their parents were affluent, wealthy. Damaging school property and speaking very rudely to school staff didn’t concern them.

You could erase the national debt and still be responsible for what happened (but, at least, the country would appreciate your donation). And, if you think money can wash away the crime of those rioters (or any terrorists), you’re nuts.

This case will never be dismissed until you all accept responsibility (and, maybe, atone?).

But, when you do, what then? How do we punish you? Honestly, I have no idea what punishment fits the crime. No fee or prison time is going to change how you and your rioters feel about this country and the election system (other than maybe intimidate a few people, weaken their resolve).

If you don’t want a violent revolution to upset your “party,” you shouldn’t kick the hornet nest. You had your revolution moment. Are you willing to accept others acting out in response? And, even if you are, should the USA suffer for this situation?

I’d say I’m speechless…but I think I just gave an angry speech. Ha. [And, I don’t deny it.]

If we ever cross paths and I feel compelled to punch you so hard in the face that you feel pain or need surgery, I hope you’ll pardon me, too, because I’d sure like to skip out on responsibility for that crime. I would assume you’ll accept my violent retaliation as common courtesy for you being so rude and reckless with so many lives and laws. At least, I didn’t use a gun.

25
Jan
25

Making “Local” News Out of Nothing

***

[After watching enough local news to see how reporters are grasping at straws for something to report and are being stuck so often in hazardous scenes, I am motivated to craft some of my own “local news reports” to show just how pathetic and/or ridiculous TV news can be. I considered making a series of this, but, even in an attempt to parody, to joke about local (and other news) reports, I cannot even process enough of the proper dialogue and find myself drained just trying to turn “nothing” into something. I don’t know how they do it…I just know it’s annoying and deflating, which is why I usually don’t watch (any news reports).]

ALWAYS: Good evening and welcome to Thunderhead News, your local news leader. I’m Always Here, filling in for Never Around, who is currently on vacation in the Bahamas with her family.

We’ve got Alexis Keravnos in the weather room with the latest on mood swings and some hit-or-miss disappointment. Jersey Shore has the latest on wastebasket ball in sports news.

But, first, tonight’s top story: Someone left lint in the dryer filter, and it nearly started a fire, today. We go live to Mom in the laundry room. Mom? What’s happening in there?

—–

MOM: Well, Always, it’s the same story, every day. Someone doesn’t properly clean this dryer vent. And, it could lead to a costly household fire. Luckily, the family here has been able to avoid that. But, anything could happen in a powder keg like this place. I will keep you informed as details unfold. Back to you at the main desk.

—–

ALWAYS: Alright. Thanks, Mom.

In other news, local police were summoned to the scene when three young boys couldn’t get along and their father, who is almost always glued to a screen, was incapable of being an adequate parent. Sources say it got very loud at the house until neighbors complained. It turns out police were not necessary. But, with wealthy neighbors on watch, it was inevitable someone would be sent by to have a look. And, although none of this makes sense–and we can only show you so much–we’re going to show you some shocking imagery, repeating the images as we fill time with more words, and make pained faces before we call this a wrap and move on to our next segment.

Now, let’s check in with the latest mood report from our own Alexis Keravnos. Alexis? What can you tell us?

—–

ALEXIS: Well, Always. We continue to live in a temperate zone with all of the seasons constantly in flux. So, it’s unpredictable, as usual, though the growing trend is perpetually discouraging. But, I’ll be checking back with you, periodically, to inject recycled words when you need to pause from the other pressing stories for the week. Back to you.

—–

ALWAYS: Yes. Okay. Thanks, Alexis. Now, let’s go to Jersey Shore with today’s sports. Jersey? What have you got to say?

——

JERSEY: Good evening, Always. We’ve got a heck of a game going as our writers compete for the most crap shots into this central wastebasket, here. All two of our staff have been at it for a while, considering neither has come up with anything more exciting to report, though excitement shouldn’t be as important as what affects the general public. Yet, we will continue to talk about every situation that involves police and fire departments, as well as legal cases that are all restricted on how much they can disclose to the public. I have no idea what that has to do with sports, but I’m saying it, anyway. Back to you, Always.

——

ALWAYS: ….. I’m sorry. I think we lost contact with Jersey, there, for a moment.

—–

JERSEY: No. You just stopped listening and zoned out after a wh–

—–

ALWAYS: Well, that’s going to do it for now. We thank you for– What? We still have five minutes? Well, we’re going to go to commercial. We’ll be back in a bit with final thoughts. [Can I just go now? Have Alexis wrap this up for me. Okay?]

—–

WordPress thanks you for watching this broadcast of Thunderhead News, your local news leader with an audience of one. We don’t look anything like those other stations, which don’t really exist except in your imagination. Just continue to look at the faces of this station and listen as they fill commercial time with ego-inflating nonsense. Continue to wake up and love your day…with us in your face, along with that annoying lawyer-vulture and his mashed-potato hair.

And, in other world news, which is really just USA news, while fires rage across every part of California except the wealthiest bubbles, including Anaheim, home of Disneyland, which is still open, running just fine and welcoming all to the happiest escape from reality money can buy, and while hospitals struggle to stay afloat with so many diseases running rampant, the wealthiest men among humankind are competing for who will send the biggest metal penis into orbit and who will lay claim to a satellite-based internet service. And, in government news, the entire US staff is being replaced with people of questionable credentials. Yes. The world is doing just fine and is in good hands. You can all sigh with relief.

08
Jan
25

The Demi-Moore Moment and Other Golden Globes

****

I stuck to my word. I refused to watch another awards show…and only caught bits of this most recent one. I didn’t exactly cave, but it snagged me as I passed through a room with that channel on the TV. I was more interested in the antics of the hostess, Nikki Glaser, than the awards themselves, which I knew would annoy me inexplicably. [From what I saw of her jokes, she was on fire. I didn’t feel the uncomfortable tension I’ve felt from other (male) hosts.]

Among the biggest buzz about this latest Golden Globes is Demi Moore getting her very first acting award? It seems impossible until you hear how someone refers to her as a “popcorn actress,” which I am roughly translating as someone who might fill a theater but won’t be respected as a high-class star. Often blockbusters like Star Wars and superhero films get seasonal attention but don’t get nominated for much other than musical score and/or sound. [And, popcorn sales go up during the (summer) weeks those movies run in theaters.] Or, rather, that was the way, but changes seem to be happening.

I had to know what earned her this award.

[I’ve seen a number of Demi’s films and wouldn’t call most of them “popcorn” films. Her early films of the 1980s had a certain share-popcorn-with-your-friends-while-you-relate-to-this vibe but were equally unsettling, emotion-evoking, in a way. None of her films seem easy on the stomach, not even Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttle (which may be the only film I’d consider a “popcorn film”). Ghost is probably the most potent. I personally don’t crave popcorn when a woman like her is being sexy, fierce or emotionally wounded. I’ll take a drink, though; I get dehydrated when visuals make me shudder or tremble. Can I call her a soda actress?]

movie-theater_reddecor1

And, upon seeing a sampling, I feel this and a number of other awards given to women of a certain age bracket are pity awards, like pardons given to criminals who have been detained too long. [The Substance looks and sounds like a shock-intended statement piece, a sort of art film (which I never heard about until this awards show). So what does that tell you?]

I think some of the tears in Demi’s eyes were a sort of embarrassment, of humiliation, for having to wait so long. Sure, there was gratitude, too, like a starving artist selling a rare painting. But, she looked sort of sad…yet stunning in that golden, molded dress. [The earrings were lame, but the dress was glorious.]

And, that’s the real Globe for Demi, her dress…and a second–perhaps more vital–Globe for her speech about identifying your own self-worth instead of letting some company or organization or the press or your agent evaluate you. You don’t have to be an egotistical snob and demand more of people trying to assist you, but you can hold your head up and evaluate yourself rather than let others decide your fate. [If only that speech would have come after a more significant role; but, when you’ve waited this long just to give a speech, what can you expect?]

I will take that golden Demi moment with me as far as I can carry (or recall) it. It turns the page on that one past award show in which an award-starved Sally Field cried out, “You like me. You really like me.”  [I thought Susan Lucci was the one who said that until I looked it up.  Susan has been another award-starved actress.]

[Demi’s acceptance speech reminded me of my own life and how many times I’ve had to watch others get notice and awards while I got nothing except, maybe, a can of nuts or crappy candy. It also reminds me of when I was pursuing art school and had an admissions guy essentially dismiss my life’s work, my portfolio, before praising his own depressing painting on an office wall, before he took me and my parents on a tour of a very lewd and horrifying artworks made by students. I threw away my portfolio, in anger, and swore I’d change, somehow, to find a better well of talent within myself. That experience changed my outlook on a career in art, yet I am still an artist looking for my proper place in this world. So, though it wounded me (and made me wary of compliments), it didn’t end me.]

Maybe the lesson is that the real stars, the actors, actresses and production crew that deserve the honors don’t often get the trophies because the trophies come with shady behind-the-scenes deals for other projects. By not getting an award, perhaps Demi was spared this freight train of deceit and allowed to pick roles that suited her. I’d say she is a rare face that wasn’t exactly type-cast; wouldn’t you?

[If I was Demi, I’d go to the next award show in sweatpants and a T-shirt. Just be casual and cool, forget the fortune you are pressured to wear (and risk) and ignore the awards until she gets summoned or is asked to speak on someone’s behalf. It’s unfortunate some people have to be “dolled up” and dragged to so many of these events just to watch others get so much attention and trophies; it’s torture for those who don’t win and don’t just come to enjoy the company/atmosphere. It’s hard to enjoy the latter when there is so much focus on the former.]




Unknown's avatar

Archives


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started