Posts Tagged ‘gallery

28
Apr
22

Art Space Unlimited…Except for Some; the Unfair Balance in the World of Artists

****

Back in January, I posted a piece about artists living a cursed life. In short, most artists get insufficient respect during their lifetimes and an insane amount of attention after they die, which often enough turns into crazy appraisals of artworks without the stories behind the works and, in the case of someone like painter Bob Ross, questionable merchandising.

I recently watched part of a PBS (TV) special featuring various “artists” who were making an effort to share their artwork with the world. Let’s just leave that as the simple summary of the program. Now, I watched three segments before I lost my cool.

The first featured a white-haired man with an accent I couldn’t quite identify. Apparently, though I’ve never heard of him or seen any of his (exceptionally large) work, he has filled some rather spacious plots of land and museums with spectacles worthy of Willy Wonka. One of his creations involves a set of conveyor belts transporting bricks of soft, melting wax to a big pile/mess of the stuff. [That’s art, ay?] Another–I presume in the same building–involves a corridor flooded with the same reddish wax. He was also featured with what looked like a giant apple-shaped building and the metallic bean which I have actually stood beside in Chicago, Illinois. [Is that his work? I guess I didn’t pay close enough attention; I was too bewildered by the sheer amount of space and liberty this guy has to create and feature his work. Also, he apparently has a small army of “oompa loompas” to craft things somewhat toxic for him. Is that an artist at work or the architect of the pyramids?]

There was something oddly unsettling about this segment. The guy kept featuring pieces with a distinct vertical crack, a reddish gash with a dark mysterious void at its center, a shape that sure seemed to resemble a certain part of the female anatomy.  This prompted memories of a horrid art-school tour I took in my crucial teens, when I was looking for direction with my own artistic talents. The place was littered with obscene works. And, my own portfolio, a sampling of my yet limited life’s work, was carelessly brushed aside by the guide. [If there was ever a moment to turn Hitler, that was it. You can thank your lucky stars I didn’t start the next Holocaust, sending unworthy artists and careless consumers of art to the gas chambers.]

The second segment featured a (brown-skinned) African gentleman** whose “portfolio” was far smaller and less jaw-dropping than that of the previous man. This more modest and humble artist had what seemed like a fraction of the time and space to discuss matters of social justice, primarily pollution of a particular environment where “minorities” reside. His gallery space included a number of movie/flat-TV screens no bigger than a home-movie screen. His entire presentation was like a whisper in a crowd. It was small and not the least bit awe-inspiring.

**I feel a strange need to be specific, considering people no longer meet a single description for any nationality.

The third segment, the one that really popped the cork on my infuriation, was about an older woman who likes to collect pieces of debris from demolition and disaster scenes and turn them into simplistic pieces of what she calls art. Essentially, she’s putting a hunk of cement, pipes and wiring (the size of a T-Rex) on a few supportive pegs, splashing it with paint and other questionable decorations and sticking this enormous piece in a spacious museum chamber. What a wonderful use of museum space; filling an entire gallery with one hunk of some other building that no longer exists which no longer looks as it originally did, which might be considered historical preservation of a relic. She’s not contributing to one of those museums you find in Europe, housing fragments of ancient Greece. No. She’s splashing colors on hunks of unnamed structural damage and taking up space which could be used to house countless other sculptures, paintings, etc.

I take you back to the story I have heard about the famous Pablo Picasso. The guy supposedly filled houses with artworks and relocated when one was full. He didn’t create things that took over buildings or portions of cities and/or parks. He created works you could put on walls and sit in a small room where you might read a book and enjoy the colorful company. But, if he filled houses with his work…does that mean he wasn’t spreading the love of art? Was he just hoarding it all because he didn’t think anyone was worthy of looking after it until he just could no longer protect everything like a pharaoh in his tomb?

Now, there is no way I’d ever want to do what the third featured person did. I see no logical or creative reason to “recycle” a hunk of demolition/destruction without breaking it down into simpler elements and crafting something you could fit through the average household door…not require a crane and probably a construction crew to transport to some spacious warehouse/museum facility.

And, I don’t see myself ever doing what the second person did. As much as I might inject matters of social justice into my own work, I wouldn’t just make a simple video documentary and fill a dark room with screens. I’d use metaphors and a pinch of creativity/humor here and there…something you might see from an author like Roald Dahl, the BFG. I’d craft an experience with impact yet without overwhelming dread and/or despair. No one needs to go through the bleak experiences of another to understand what happened; I don’t need to simulate losing an ear to imagine how dreadful Van Gogh’s life must have been.

But, a small part of me cannot help envying the first guy. How does any artist achieve such status? How does he acquire an army of crafters to fashion what he imagines, risking their lives, not his (as I watched some work with gas masks while he stood elsewhere just talking at length about his “genius” like a pompous windbag. [I seriously think the guy was a bit perverse with an ego overly inflated by some underhanded dark influence.]

How does this stuff happen? How does the world get so twisted (yeah, upside-down, even) that you might think suicide is a wise decision? How does anyone get the permission to amass an army of laborers to craft questionable, useless objects which are probably visible from outer space?…while other artists are left to rub coins together, cut off body parts and live miserable, otherwise unproductive lives in solitude?

It boggles the mind. And then, it blows what’s left out every portal of the human anatomy.

10
Jul
14

Do You Attach Your Face to Things You Do Not Like/Use?

Have I already told you how much I get irked by advertising and any spokesperson/”news anchor” who seems locked into either only saying good things about everything they are forced to pitch** or spreading foul gossip? It just happens to be something that has built up an intolerance in me at this time. Thus, I am taking this moment to release some mental debris.

[You like picking your way through other people’s thoughts; right? If so, have at this lot. But, you may want to bring along a snack and/or beverage as I get a little “windy.”]

**You’re honestly going to see every movie you mention whether it suits your interest or not? Sure you are. Maybe if someone pays you a favorable sum just to do it. But, I guarantee you won’t like every last one. Still, you will sit with a fabricated smile upon your plastic face and tell the world how great they all are because, for some twisted reason, your paycheck depends upon such nonsense.

[Some would say I have too much free time if I let such things bother me. They don’t watch TV or don’t see what I do. They say I give such things too much thought when they and/or others just let them be. And, perhaps, they use them without thinking as much. To each their own.]

In a magazine, newspaper or one of the many lame “flash” slots you find on a PC/tablet/phone screen, you may only get a static image of someone modeling for a product/service. And, there’s a good chance the model’s image has absolutely nothing to do with the product (other than, perhaps, the environment in which the product may be used).

[“That woman is dressed for the office. That product must be good for my suffocating work station. Surely, it will make me feel better at the end of my shift.”
OR
“That man is dressed for the office. I should add that (potentially addictive/hazardous, ridiculously small and ineffective sample size) product to the (senseless and wasteful) swag bags for all of my employees at the next company function and shake hands with the representative/s for the manufacturer to boost revenue/merger/buyout potential.”]

In some hastily assembled cases, the ads use images snatched from web sites/online photo galleries (with proper permission/payment, we assume). Does that model truly support or use the product advertised with their face/body? Probably not. More likely, the model needed money and was willing to pose in some outfit they did not pick themselves before their image was used for all sorts of merchandising and questionable services in the hands of countless “businesses.”

How low it must be to buy/borrow/steal these models and slap them in some ad like a common hand or package. Sure, maybe the models signed themselves over to partake, but does that mean those seeking representation have to morally cheat or buy up every/any “prostitute” in town? What if the product/service is assuredly bogus/worthless or corrupt? How sad it must be to see your face on an ad for a product/service you don’t personally approve. I personally would not want my face/artwork/image in one for something toxic like sex “toys,” cigarettes or pills of any kind promising benefits at the expense of retirement/daily necessity funds and baffling side effects. How sad it is to see what people will do for a buck only to cost countless others their bucks for no good reason/result.

With “televised” commercials, it’s quite similar if not worse. I think it’s worse to invest more time exposing oneself as a spokesperson/representative of a product/service one doesn’t support (or filming a scene without knowing what it will be used to support/promote). How sad to be a struggling actor/actress forced to take on such a mindless role in hopes of proving oneself worthy of licking the lint off the wardrobe of some “bigger name” who offers a “better” job. I don’t think I’d feel so good about my fame and limited fortune with some undesirable commercial (or “porn”) in my history book. I sure don’t want to end up on some talk show where the host thinks it’s positively amusing to dig up that soulless garbage.

I see an add for some “tragic” disease or ailment attributed to the use of some form of modern medicine, and it features a young man or woman with his/her head in their hands. I can only imagine the photographer telling this individual to look depressed/hopeless in order to boost sales of the “cure.” If the person is genuinely afflicted by the ailment, I suppose there might be some “justice” in getting the word out. Yet, those who know the person might pester them more often rather than be of any help/support. If the person is just an actor/model…who wants to be the poster child for a potentially fatal disease?!

Every now and then, I imagine myself being “famous” and trying to be selective about what talk shows I visit while some agent insists I have to make an appearance on some crappy one lest I take a dive into fan bankruptcy. If forced to appear before some immoral/amoral host, I tell myself not to partake in their misguided amusement and verbally/publicly speak out against them if they cross my boundaries. I’d rather save the trouble of scandal and lawsuit, skip the chicken feed to maintain my overpriced and exceedingly large mansion in range of brush fires or other natural disasters and keep all relationship details hidden away like a hermit.

The more I hear of actors/actresses not wanting to watch themselves on film, seeing therapists and/or being stalked by paparazzi, the less I like the idea of “fame.” I’d like to kick all those “camera mosquitoes” where the sun doesn’t shine for harassing/disrupting the lives of these “celebrities” whether the latter ask for more attention or not. And, if they ask for cameras to risk blinding them or stealing every shred of privacy for tabloid bull crap, how sick is that? What body part do they sacrifice first to ease some twisted part of their brains? What separates the side-effects of fame from the closet habits of other mentally troubled souls who resort to “cutting” and eating disorders?

In recent years, it’s been made easier. You don’t need an agent. Just make your own or get someone to set up a plot in cyberspace and fill it with all sorts of mental dust bunnies. Do you really need to know what I eat for breakfast or what I am wearing to get through your day/life? Not unless you’re taking notes on how to be a stalker.

Seriously, what is the sense of all this excess information tracking? How is this helping people to interact peacefully or to simplify their lives? How is this beneficially entertaining unless you are actual friends with these people, sharing this information when you meet for (lunch)? In an ideal world of people struggling to ask each other out on dates, I suppose such detailed “bios” might grease the wheels with surprises of one’s favorite this or that. But, from my observation, the odds seem to be in favor of abusing/misusing provided information. At least, the “water” seems too polluted with gossip, scandal and threats to one’s life to be of any serious benefit…unless you somehow feed/live off of such vices.

But, I suppose, I could save breath, and we could all just stop exposing our eyes (and ears) to advertising/video as a whole. Ay?

Suppose, many years from now, we all want to laugh and/or cry for investing in all of these all-in-one gizmos designed to do everything from light the dark spaces under our furniture to manage our daily activities and bank accounts yet fall apart at great expense in the clumsiest of hands. Suppose we learned sooner than later not to put all of our eggs in one expensive basket and lived without tools that still rely on batteries and risk radiation poisoning with consequences yet to be fully understood/seen. Suppose we did something about filling landfills with trending garbage and sacrificing our dignity/privacy/health to false quick fixes. Suppose we said “adios” to all things internet and televised/advertised/radio-broadcasted and started focusing on producing what we needed in peace and harmony with the rest of nature. I imagine that would have some gloomy side effect of its own, unleashing some other unpleasant, dark cloud upon the masses for not submitting themselves to the questionable imagery and sales pitches.

[Now, suppose I wrote all of this for nothing and didn’t have digital/internet space to fill with these thoughts. I suppose I’d share it the old way, face-to-face, with whoever I found willing to share such thoughts in my proximity.]

If anything is to be learned from superheroes and related kids shows, it’s that–no matter how you dress it up–there will perpetually be some scum out there we have to either elude or fight off til the next crap maker comes along to pester us. The enemy doesn’t wear colorful or stereotypical costumes and/or fully disclose their diabolical plans to the world. Nor are the creatures that lurk in the shadows as dangerous as what humans can and often do inflict upon themselves/their fellow “man.” We “citizens” have to be more aware and make better decisions to save ourselves in more ways than we care to ponder.

24
Jun
14

If I Created Everything That Entered My Imagination…

 

 

…I’d quickly run out of space and run the risk of exhausting the world’s resources. 

 

I have countless “seed” ideas for movies, books/stories, cartoons, bird houses….you name it.  Give me a niche that needs filling, and I’ll likely fill the gap with something refreshing/mind-blowing (provided you like what I invent).  But, I can’t see how I’d ever complete every project I think of all by myself…nor where I’d store them all.

I see plenty of talents creating larger and larger portfolios/galleries of work.  And, I can’t help wondering where they put it all.  How much it costs them.  And, who lovingly supports/accepts them and all their “clutter.”  What a different world that seems to be from what I’ve had to contend with…and how I now look at crafting/creating anything.  I look in a direction more practical and beneficial than I once did as a kid.  Yet, so many others seem free to be kids and create as they please without any fear of consequence or making the errors they consistently make.

Am I “old,” “wise” or something worse?




Unknown's avatar

Archives


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started