Posts Tagged ‘intelligence

20
Dec
24

My Response to Four Months Into… (Ask Carolyn)

***

Ask Carolyn (Hax) column originally titled “Four months into rekindling, partner recalls why they broke up.”

In this letter, Dumb and Dumber, the younger female half of a heterosexual couple (you have to be specific, these days) addresses her concern and guilt for restarting a relationship that she previously ended, claiming her chosen partner wasn’t smart enough. She never confessed her reason for the breakup. The older male half of the couple is described as a very sweet, loving and oblivious guy, basically a cuddly dog who won’t stop humping and licking you until you fully embrace him and admit he’s adorable.

Essentially, the woman (in her 40s), feels lousy for both falling back in love with “Puppyman” (my nickname for further reference) and for being unsure how to reclaim the distance she had established the first time she cut ties. Imagine finding a stray dog that makes you “awww” until you decide you cannot adequately care for the animal. You need to let the wannabe pet go, but it pains you to remove the leash and shove him out the door (especially when he won’t stop coming to the door and howling for you). That is the situation.

Carolyn says “Dumb” needs to respect the man’s need to feel loved and accept the decision she previously made rather than let an inadequate lie linger. She also makes a minor suggestion to try retaining the relationship as friends who occasionally date versus a steady relationship…but I fear that might only extend the discomfort.

While I agree this reformed relationship needs to end (again), peacefully, I think there is, at least, one option Carolyn missed.

————–

Dumb and Dumber, I think I like you…AWLOUGHT. [Have I already used this movie reference in response to an Ask Carolyn letter?] Knowing myself from past experience, that’s probably a bad sign and a misguided feeling. This may be my equivalent of favoring the “bad girl” though I don’t have enough information to peg you as the rebel without a clue.

You sound like someone who would be an intellectual equal (and, thus, a worthy partner)…or rival, the latter not being a good person. No one needs to feel dwarfed by your ego (nor mine). And, I’ve met my share of girls and women who can easily make me feel small and inadequate. Some of your words–like “discuss deeply”–strike a positive chord with my soul. I see myself holding hands with you, letting our minds intertwine. Then I read “he doesn’t read” and “his thoughts are simple.” And, suddenly, I don’t feel so comfortable, even if I don’t think my thoughts are “simple.” [I’m also not an avid reader, even though I’ve become a rather wordy guy with a growing vocabulary and fussiness about grammar.]

Perhaps, the only thing saving you from being deemed a completely careless, insensitive person is your desire to change your own outlook/behavior to salvage this relationship. But, that sounds like one of those soulful journeys life makes you take on your own, which can only be understood and completed in your own head. A columnist in any newspaper is not quite the same source of sage advice as a god or wiseman you might find atop some distant mountain…unless a higher power opts to speak through such a vessel. Maybe you need to sit down with someone and hash this out, face to face. A short letter cannot suffice.

Indulge me while I take the long road to my suggestion. I hope someone as intellectual as you can appreciate the length and depth of my thoughts. Maybe something in my words will bring you the epiphany you need. Hopefully, I don’t waste time by repeating what Carolyn and/or I have already said.

You’re a cat person dating a dog…again.

For visual reference, look up the cartoon series Animaniacs and watch an episode or two of Rita and Runt. You are Rita, and this guy is Runt. Rita cannot find the male cat of her dreams as long as she puts up with Runt. But, because Runt is such a reliable friend, in his own sad, pathetic way, she cannot part with him. Runt doesn’t seem to have the capacity or desire to pursue anyone other then Rita, who he sees only as a constant companion (and a fellow dog because he’s…not very bright); as long as he stays with her, he can never be alone. Occasionally, Rita wishes she had some alone time to sort out her feelings. Runt doesn’t understand or respect that; his primary motivation is to stick with Rita, a good dog.

I think respect(1) works with understanding. Someone cannot feel properly respected if another person doesn’t understand them. Following the Golden Rule, doing to others what you would want done to you, is a good general path to respect but isn’t the sort that should make anyone feel special. It should be common, for everyone. If I am providing a service to you, it’s respectful to address you with kindness and consideration for any concerns you may have. Without knowing you, individually, specifically, I can only respect so much and may still upset you.

So, if your Puppyman truly respects YOU, he must understand you…and that suggests intelligence.(3) If your “simple” boyfriend is truly compassionate(4), wouldn’t he have to understand you well enough? Wouldn’t that suggest intelligence? [Maybe you’re confusing respect with harm-free adoration; he’s not doing anything to make you feel hurt or violated while applying heavy affection. Or, maybe this guy is just more respectful, in general, to everyone he meets, more than anyone else you know.]

You hold yourself in high regard without mentioning any potential flaws (or even a weakness other than being completely honest with someone you value at a crucial time)…yet you can turn any positive this guy has into a flaw for him; you can spoil all of his assets with one line. You enjoy him being your devoted cheerleader but cannot think clearly (or brightly) enough to voice the truth. That is a lack of respect and compassion fueled by fear. Fear is not the flaw; it’s fuel for what you did (and may still do) wrong.

[If you cannot see or admit your own potential flaws, how can you hope to change your outlook? If you’ve done nothing wrong, what can you possibly correct?]

Is living with a lie intelligent? Isn’t being able to be completely honest with your chosen partner part of being respectful and compassionate? Expressing concern for someone’s well-being doesn’t have to be “gaslighting.” And, while the truth may hurt, a withheld truth hurts even more because it comes with wasted time and deception.

Let me hold you by the biceps and say…no one is forcing you to stay with this guy, even if it pains you to put up with his obliviousness and to be honest with him. You can’t teach an old dog cat tricks. You could spend a fortune and lifetime in therapy trying to find a moral loophole that would burst the bubble of distress in your heart.

You want someone who lights your fire and keeps you on your toes, a bit. Right? [See. How can I possibly get your answer unless we’re in the same room or exchanging messages more freely?] You want a man who knows his place, can read the room and who isn’t pawing at your door because he can’t stand to be alone while you take some time for yourself. You want stimulation of the mind, body and soul…in moderation, when you want to be stimulated. You want someone who won’t intentionally hurt or mistreat you yet someone who will not bend to your every whim like a limp banana peel. What you want, honestly, is not without risk. Unfortunately, the guy you currently have can only offer warmth of the heart and risks being, eventually, hurt by you.

You want to change yourself so you can get past the very thing that irked you enough to end the relationship the first time. That’s like asking the world to become a cube after being a sphere for so long. And, from personal experience, by the time you even attempt to achieve this arduous goal of self-discipline, something could happen which throws a wrench in your plan, giving you another reason to feel lost and out of place. You’ll lose twice as much precious lifetime by the time you resolve round two.

People who place conditions on change typically don’t change. If you change for someone other than yourself, you risk reverting to your old self when that person fails to meet some standard or leaves you. It’s only fair that you pick up your old habit after getting hurt. [Not.] If you’re going to change your nature, you will likely have to work that out on your own. You change, already, based upon your experiences. Apparently, something inside you did not change between the time you cut ties with this guy and his return.

However, if you can afford the risk, you could let this restarted relationship run its course, just to see if you or the guy would change in some satisfying way, a natural way of adjusting your outlook on the situation, rather than making a hasty decision from a difficult position and a ticking biological clock.

——-

Self-analysis detour…

If interested, I have a moderate confession following the core of my response. You can just scroll down to (2). Not everyone wants to hear someone preach or preach about oneself. So, it’s your choice. I’m trying something new by reducing content for maximum attention retention, leaving meandering and branching thoughts for optional additional reading at the tail end.

——-

Die-hard romantics would say something special brought you two back together. But, you don’t sound convinced.

You say you never told this guy why you broke up with him. You didn’t say anything because, probably, he wouldn’t be able to process the information (or you know you’d be devastated if he said what you were thinking). And, he’s clearly not “smart” enough to ask or get the true answer. [Or, maybe, he’s just as afraid of the hard truth as you.] If you play a game with someone who never gets upset when they lose (while you do, do get upset when you lose), you’ll only get more upset with the situation when you finally have to quit. And, how maddening is it to get upset when someone right next to you is oblivious to the reason for your frustration?

How can you possibly keep that knife in a drawer while you indulge a second helping of something that doesn’t fully satisfy you? Even if you managed to change your behavior and/or mind in some way that could miraculously tolerate this guy better than you did before, the history/evidence remains. Can you really forget the first breakup and its reason?

You want a quick resolution of this internal conflict? Have Puppyman read the column you just built with Carolyn Hax. See what he says in response. And, if he is not hurt by the details, by your own words (probably because he’s too nice or “simple”), you should have your answer. Right?

Dating Puppyman, casually (as Carolyn suggests as a weak option), won’t make life any better because you’ll still be wanting that ideal partner while you entertain a human pet. Can you really date two (or more) men and manage to keep Puppyman at a safe distance, so he doesn’t get the wrong idea or mess with your head and heart (again)? Ideally, you could arrange a male harem, so Puppyman would have a steady place in your life. [That’s not the suggestion I was going to make, but it’s an outside-the-box possibility.]

[I can totally see the 80s movie/sitcom, now. It’s like Bosom Buddies, except there’s only one woman and the two very different guys standing behind the sofa upon which you recline. You are played by someone like Jennifer Grey or Bridget Fonda. One guy is a total “hunk,” wearing a brown suit and blue tie, while the other is a stout “goofball” in some ill-fit, black-and-white striped shirt and tan cargo pants. Hunky guy is all charm though he claims to be intelligent; at least, he has a job. The goofball is surprisingly smart and charming in his own odd way. Insert a sappy anthem with the line “days go by,” and it’s a wrap.]

Try explaining to the guy you really want why Puppyman is always around and more than a casual friend. Even if Puppyman remains a dear friend, I would expect the next Mr. Right to be, at least, somewhat bothered by his presence, from your description. If a more intellectual guy treats Puppyman poorly, flaunting his own “smarter” ego, you might feel twice the pain you already do. Or, you might unconsciously slight or ignore Puppyman, letting your passion take control as you focus your energies on the “smarter” guy.

If a guy can meet your intellectual-equal standard and be completely okay with you being close friends with Puppyman, I question his intellect and wonder if he isn’t simply pretending to be a steady partner while keeping his eyes and schedule open (if you grasp what I’m suggesting). Of course, the ideal guy would be highly intellectual, witty and nice enough to entertain any male friends you may have without engaging in secretive affairs. But, I don’t know that guy.

Okay. ‘Enough dancing around the subject.

Ask this beloved friend (of a one-sided sort) to be the “friend” who helps you find the man you really want while you find him a woman who can take him off your hands and make him as happy as he tries to make you. Find him someone who suits his personality and needs (if you are aware of those). Do him that final favor. No one should be using all of their energy to smother someone else with affection that is not fully respected or appreciated. [Hopefully, you have better luck than I did.]

Keeping a painful secret isn’t smart, in my opinion. I would not consider you bright nor compassionate for that. [I would question my own intelligence.]

I think both you and Puppyman need compassion. But, neither of you is getting it, right now. Your compassion is laced with fear of hurting someone so blind that he cannot tell when you are hiding something he should know. Those unpleasant feelings came back for a reason, just as he did. If you think this means you need to change for him, I’d suggest coming clean with him and then taking a solo journey somewhere like Tibet where you could meditate on the situation; get some higher power to touch you on the forehead with better insight/motivation.

How can you feel safe with someone denied the truth about your feelings? How can HE feel safe with YOU?

Now, if you have read all I have to say…and, oy, did I have to edit myself a few times to keep this from becoming a hundred-page novel…I respect your effort. I’d like to talk with you if you’re interested. Who knows. We might get along. I’m sure you can find the way to reach me.

========

(1) How do I define respect? Initially, when you first meet someone, respect is your example of good manners; ideally, it’s how a person applies the Golden Rule. It may be inaccurate and, thus, feel disrespectful. But, that’s because the other person doesn’t know you, yet. However, a blatant lack of respect is apparent when you advise someone how to behave and they don’t listen. Later, respect entails knowing boundaries and maintaining them until a mutual decision is reached between two individuals to breach those boundaries. Respect is knowing what someone cares about and not saying or doing anything to wound those feelings. Occasionally, an emotionally wounded individual may lash out and violate respect.

Certain members of my family seem to get pleasure out of disrespecting boundaries, boundaries that have been stated multiple times. I say what shouldn’t be discussed during mealtime, and, yet, these daring jerks will upset my stomach just to get a reaction when the mood strikes them. When that happens, it’s hard to love and/or respect that person, even with my hardy sense of humor. I’d be inclined to question their intelligence, too. But, there is a darker force at play.

Respect may be confused with admiration, however. People may say they respect you when they actually admire you the way a religious person admires their god or mentor. People consumed with awe will often throw out the word respect.

=========

(2) I, unlike you, may be paranoid (in the opinion of some people) and aware of my own potential flaws, willing to admit, on occasion, when I’ve done wrong. I have been told I am very smart. When I used to believe that, I made foolish decisions which cost me and nearly killed me. I now filter compliments and prefer to say I am intellectual and probably give certain matters more thought than the average person does (to the extent some complain I think/say too much), even if my level of intelligence has been tested and rated “average.”

I’ll admit I am more thoughtful but not necessarily better than most people I’ve met; I consider myself a good listener but have been losing my focus as I age without adequate companionship. I used to be very patient, to the point of being a doormat; but circumstances have changed me. I have a fast temper that is rarely violent and fairly quick to extinguish itself if the problem doesn’t persist. I can see when I have said too much, when my “audience” is not being receptive. I may not always be aware of when I hurt someone with my words, but I like to think I have a pretty good radar, regardless. And, when someone says I have hurt them, I may not be quick to admit the blame but I am not so heartless that I don’t feel guilt or discomfort from what I did.

I can accept? that I will never be able to please everyone all of the time. And, those who cannot handle my words, who retain hurt when it is not intended, are just not meant to be partners. I cannot be nicer just to prevent someone from getting hurt. I often try too hard to be nice just to accomplish nothing. I can only be as nice as I am able to supply at the time. Others need to be understanding of and receptive to that, too.

Like you, I am seeking someone who can “read the room,” as I say, and who won’t simply smother me with mindless affection. Loving is great, but I need brains to come with that love. And, that person just has to click with me. There’s no math problem to solve or spell to cast or lucky charm to buy that can make that happen. Saying “sorry” is never enough. [Saying “sorry” more than once in any situation is annoying, even with a redhead I once thought was worth kissing at a young age.] And, sometimes, no matter what I or anyone tries to do to atone for what hurt they caused, the relationship cannot be saved. We have to accept defeat as a way of saying it wasn’t meant to be; if it was meant to be, it would work itself out.

I once tried to change my own mind to fully accept a woman as my partner. She came into my life when I was feeling really low and quickly vowed to be the friend no one else was. We had an unconventional long-distance relationship for a few months before finally meeting in person (at my financial risk).

I had reasons to both love and dislike her. The former included an undeniable aura which made her appear like a strong equal, something I highly value, not someone I’d have to reassure every day or who would make me feel like a complete loser (in comparison). I tried to get past the latter (reasons to dislike her) and even told her as much when I felt pressured to explain why I wasn’t jumping onto the marriage train.

She vowed to make changes in her own (unhealthy) habits, which suggested potential, though I felt she didn’t have to change just to make a relationship work. There were signs that also suggested she wasn’t going to change so easily, and I had to contend with that…just as she had to contend with my reluctance to change. Ideally, we would have been okay with each other, as we are, and the relationship would have grown from there.

Even when I tried something new outside my comfort zone, I was never charitable enough. [Experience and family have diminished my generosity.] We had different opinions on entertainment and sentimental collections, which was enough to suggest I was going to be pulling teeth just to share something I enjoyed. I’m sure she felt the same about some of her interests. We both had our ideas of thoughtful gifts and felt slighted when the response wasn’t ideal. Within a year, she secretly found an old flame who swept her off her feet; the news hit me like a train, even though she GENTLY informed me.

[Presently, she wants to remain friends, but it’s a tough sales pitch to make, considering we came close to having something…and then it was off the table. Every time I get the feeling I want to hold her and/or open up to her, I feel pressured by my conscience to withdraw. That’s not my place, anymore. If I had someone who swept me off my feet, we might meet on common ground and mind our distance. But, until that happens, there are barriers to friendship.]

I once said, if we couldn’t be eternally happy together (because I wasn’t sure this woman was “the one”), we’d help each other find our soulmates and attend both weddings. Her (second) wedding came before I could meet the guy, who I did not get the chance to approve; so I couldn’t exactly jump into a tux and fly down to her place. Still, I cried over being a lousy friend (and she did not).

I think the lesson was I should have trusted my gut, which wasn’t fully satisfied with what little I knew about the woman from the time we had together, even though I believed it was just a matter of warming up to someone who was a bit hasty with her own affections (and expectations). I was seduced by her kindness and inner strength. When she cried, I couldn’t get her to talk with me. She wanted marriage before I could even say “I love you.” Sometimes, timing matters, and we don’t always get as much time as we’d like with someone we consider a possibility.

=======

(3) Intelligence may be innate but it also comes with learning; when you retain what you learn, you become more intelligent. I guess that makes me fairly intelligent. But, I’m no Jeopardy champion. [Ha. ‘No way I’d ever win on that show without sheer luck.]

========

(4) When respect, fueled by proper mutual understanding, becomes affectionate, when it feels nice and warm like a generous hug, that’s compassion. Compassion goes beyond common respect by showing great depth of understanding, and it typically requires two people sharing a form of kindness. Respect keeps two people within a safe range of behavior. Compassion proves any range can be safe because there is great mutual understanding. Compassion is respect beyond mere words or heeded boundaries. You detect or sense respect in your mind. You feel compassion in the depths of your heart and, possibly, your soul.

Sometimes, compassion feels like a violation. A person claims to know you well enough and decides they need to do something to change your current situation. You feel like they just took your clothes, your dignity. I’m not the best judge of this. But, if the other person takes action for your benefit, it should eventually feel right in your heart. If you persist in feeling violated, even when someone is trying to help you, there is no compassion. However, if you can take the wild ride of uncertainty and admit you feel better, afterward, you might reward the compassion you received with some of your own (not to be confused with passion).

There’s a difference between unconditional love and being fully understanding of someone’s needs (and boundaries). Compassion is a two-way street that involves understanding each other, knowing when to be affectionate and when to mind your distance, knowing what makes another person happy rather than simply doing something with the intent to create happiness. Compassion is not mindless loving or denial of a person’s current mood.

02
Nov
24

Human Imagination Is Responsible for AI Crisis

****

It’s been said that technology first appearing in a Star-Trek TV show is gradually being made a reality. What was once science fiction is becoming real.

I think the same may be to blame for what I consider an AI threat/crisis. Where did this notion for a computer that answers everything for us originate? Well, just look at the cartoons and other colorful TV shows I watched in my youth. What do the heroes do when they don’t know their next step?…they consult some “super” computer for a ridiculous solution.

[How many times does the “brilliant” Batman slight Robin and turn to the Batcomputer for help? Even Superman and Wonder Woman suggest using a supercomputer in the animated Super Friends and in the 70s Wonder Woman TV show, respectively.]

Boom.

AI is born and gradually running amok, because, even in an “immature” cartoon, humans (and superhumans alike) forfeit use of their own minds to let a machine do the task.

[In ancient-Greek-myth-and-legend terms, isn’t that the sort of thing that would eventually upset the gods?…not using your head?…even if creating the object that “does the thinking” seems like an intelligent effort. Wasn’t Odysseus heralded for using his head?…while Sisyphus was punished eternally for how he used his to “cheat.”]

What was it my old teachers used to say about calculators?

Exactly.

Now, if only I could explain another critical crisis this world is facing. It involves the perpetual pressure and temptation to have something you currently do not. It comes in music (particularly rap and hip-hop music) that speaks of riches and ease of dealing with women and in ads for phones/phone plans and insurance which always seems to have something you currently do not have yet should want. Some would say this is just how an economy is maintained, and, to those fools, I say I will beat you senseless (if you aren’t already).

03
Nov
23

Thoughts on the AI Uprising, 11-3-2023

***

I sit at my computer, wondering what’s the point in saying anything online unless it’s selling people something.  That’s the state of mind I am in after recent events, including things happening at this blog space and around the world.  What is the point?  And, how long before my thoughts and words are replaced by “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.”

As I ponder that concept, I recall something recently said by a female artist.  She said there has to be some soul in every work you do and/or create, as an artist, if you wish to continue having a living, genuine existence.  If you let the AI do the work for you, you are just a tool, a cog in a machine.  And, eventually, there is no creativity left.  You just work in tandem with the AI.  I suspect creativity, thinking outside the box, will just become practical functions, producing what is needed to function without any wit or originality other than, maybe, what is coded in each person’s DNA, remnants of past lives who had the spark.

Okay, if you’re too dense to process all of that, she didn’t say ALL of the above, just the first bit about losing soul in your work if you give too much power/credit to the AI.

And then I think about how some people, including myself, are not exactly warming up to the idea of anything in the hands of AI.  It’s one thing to fantasize about a sexually attractive android who loves and works with you.  It’s another to cope with the idea of a computer of any kind suddenly tapping into your ways of doing everything and deciding what will be done to satisfy those…desires?  Is the AI really working to please the user, or is it programmed by another person who wants their creation to be the ultimate service machine?

Now, if I have any reasonable experience from working with other people, I know it’s very rare if not impossible to find a coworker who responds to your every need and doesn’t irk you somehow.  And, if I have any knowledge of the latest assisting technology, I have heard more than my fill of jokes about assistants performing poorly.

Is it still human error, considering a human designs and programs these things, or do we blame the AI?  [Think about that for just a moment…once this AI ball really gets rolling, do programmers/designers take the blame for their runaway machines or do they point the finger at the creations and say, “They did it!”]

And, breathe.

So, this whole rant started with a tiny “Hmm!”  I was thinking about what that artist said.

When I, as an artist, use any tool, a pencil, pen, computer framing tool, etc…I am commanding something to perform a function.  I don’t make the image with my fingers, alone.  I am directing the pencil or whatever to create something.  Is there a big difference between using a graphite pencil and using a light pen or mouse to point-click-create an image?  If I use a computer program to help make the image, is that giving too much to AI?  Is that even AI at work?  Or, am I still in full control?  But…if I give a computer directions to produce an image…which just thinking about makes me a bit nauseous, because I have never been able to give those directions to anyone and get a respectable result in return (so how could I possibly trust a computer to satisfy that direction/need?)…am I still working a tool…or is the tool working me out of existence?

How much do we let our eyes twinkle at the thought of such convenient assistance before we cease to have any originality and brain function?  It’s bad enough, at my age, in current conditions, to perform certain mental functions.  My memory isn’t what it used to be, and struggling to remember things is really, really discouraging and scary.  I used to excel at math; not anymore.  My teachers would snarl and fuss if they knew how often I’ve turned to a calculator and online help.  It’s sad.

Okay, I’m rambling again.

I just was thinking…what if we change the term from ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, which sounds rather unsettling and suspicious, like a red-haired spy chick who slips into your space and steals all of your assets when you trust her to be the maid, to ARTIFICIAL ASSISTANCE?  Now, of course, first, we would still have to have good reason to trust the ASSISTANCE; it cannot be that ol’ INTELLIGENCE still capable of hacking our lives and reducing humanity to fleshy screwdrivers and clock gears.  But, wouldn’t it be nice if the ARTIFICIAL whatever truly was working beside us, like a holographic friend?

Sadly, I cannot bring myself around to believe in such notions.  It’s a hoop dream, like creating the internet to bring all corners of the world together.  As much as commercials for all the latest “phones” and software might pitch the world coming together in smiles and harmony, reality sure looks far darker and less pleasant.  Most people I know are not tech-smart and, if they get along at all with technology, they seem slave to it.  They say, “Just get used to it.”  Gee.  That sure sounds encouraging, bending to the power of the technology thrust upon you.  Nothing scary about that, at all….  PSH!  Reality check.

Oh, a small part of me still thinks like a Tony Stark or a Dr. Kisaragi or a Dr. Light, and thinks I have to be the inventor of my own personal assistants.  But, that level of thinking is beyond the present me.  And, by the time I think I’d evolve enough to think at that level, I fear the rest of the world will already be enslaved by the over-produced and mass-marketed AI.  It will hit us like a nuclear bomb, and who knows if even the ones who set off the bomb will survive the blast.

Yep.  I think I just obliterated any final thoughts/words I could have.  ‘No great way to wrap this up.  I leave you with the above as food for thought.  It may be the last food I leave here.

18
May
23

We Have the Technology…

****

We have the technology. We can make it better, stronger, faster…

You’ve likely heard this, before. [If you ever watched the Six-Million Dollar Man, you know it.]

There is quite a buzz about technology, lately, as if we’ve kicked into some sort of industrial revolution, again. Talk of AI and 3-D printing is all the rage. But, there is discontent among the buzz. And, that’s got me thinking….

We’re putting quite a lot of time and money (and other resources, I’m sure) into this fabricating technology when we are lacking in areas that better serve the planet and our own species.

At least, I’m seeing less improvement in the world from the latest technology and too much novelty.

I see countless videos and other displays of toys and kits (toys to assemble) made with 3-D printing.

We don’t need another robotic pet that’s just a bit smarter than the last one we foolishly purchased for the grandkid. We don’t need an elaborate printer to make jointed dragons in every color of the rainbow just to drape them on boxes of wasn’t-that-cool-last-week. And, we don’t need computers or androids to pose as humans unless we’re rich and desperate for a realistic sex partner.

Isn’t that what this is all about? Someone must be trying to simulate a partner, and all other people who participate in the production line get to play around with less-than-ideal machinery to produce all sorts of unnecessary stuff that just piles up in landfills like all the stuff we thought we could recycle infinitely.

Well, there’s also that eerie possibility that someone wants to preserve the capacity of their brain in some computerized form, as if the thing will update itself infinitely and never become obsolete. That’s a scary thought outside the range I’d prefer to think. ‘Way too many creepy stories about that sort of thing.

It makes sense…in a really crappy way. The concept of marriage has become skewed and highly flawed. No one seems to maintain one unless they’re just that damn lucky with love to find the one in however many are on the planet…or they just are die-hard workers who will put up with anything and go down trying.

Yet, the rest of it, the handing down machinery to tinker with excessive novelty…that’s dumb and wasteful.

But, that’s the going trend. Isn’t it? What you see going around as something relatively inexpensive to make and play with for a minute…is just a mask, a street market for what’s really getting focus in a more elite environment.

So, we risk adding to the planet’s garbage heaps to offset expenses seemingly required to achieve some singular goal for an elite group or individual.

Couldn’t we be using this same level, this same quality of technology in a more productive way all could appreciate?

Surely, but then the elite wouldn’t be so elite…would they? I mean…what makes some more special than others if they don’t leave some trash for the human trash to collect?

Once upon a time, a calculator was considered cheating in math class. And, “cliff notes” were the way countless students got through writing countless term papers and book reports. It’s cheating.

Now, they’re putting out “bots” that can write a poem and other documents for you just by giving them a suggestion. Morning talk-show hosts applaud the technology for writing up grocery lists and such for them…as if they actually go grocery shopping. I bet they have someone do that for them, too. So, they’re just shifting from a real person being hired and paid to do something…to speaking with a “drone” service for the same task.

You know why teachers shunned calculators? Because they want us to use our brains, not hand over functions to a machine. Using your brain doesn’t kill you. But, not using your brain will surely leave you dumb, useless and helpless. When you don’t use your brain, you become careless and short-sighted. You do less, and less probably matters to you.

In a strange way, thinking less DOES push us back to being completely witless bodies of flesh and bone who wouldn’t have the sense to listen to a god when they tell us to stay away from a particular apple tree. But, are we really working our way back to Eden?…just to make the same dumb mistake because we no longer know better?

Couldn’t we use this drive for AI to create intelligent simulations, rather than machines that think for you and take over your life?

I think of all the video games I’ve played over the decades…yes, decades. And, no matter how much a game boasts its graphics and AI, there never seems to be enough real environment and interaction. The latest Pokémon games are amazing to me, being able to run through a nature-ish setting with “wild” creatures roaming about the land. But, even those games seem odd and disappointing when you close enough to the creatures. And, interactive (human) characters are too often limited to a line or two of dialogue and some annoying, repetitive body motion.

Yet…they offer inspiration.

I see games like the old Final Fight series in which background characters are not just blobs or GIF-worthy animations but figures that respond to sound, proximity (approaching them) and/or touch. And, you can move around them to see them from other angles. I see these games taking place in buildings once designated for such lousy games as paintball and laser tag. Imagine going through multiple rooms and interacting with both helpful assistant-type characters and potential opponents you then choose to fight or flee. [What I don’t see is the admission fees and maintenance for such productions…and I’d rather not think much about that. Yet, someone has to do the thinking and maintenance, right? I don’t think I want to hand those tasks to the machines themselves and expect what is considered human decency to prevail.]

I see museums in which, instead of finding lifeless statues and bodies treated like horror-movie victims in (sick) displays, we encounter life-size holographic simulations of animals, including humans, in simulated nature settings. We get to walk among elephants in Africa and tigers in Java, and they don’t just repeat the same three steps or make a sound every five seconds. We can hang out with some native tribe in their village/camp and sit around a campfire or share in a tribal dance.

I wouldn’t mind seeing doctors like the one on Star Trek Voyager…even if he could be a bit annoying, at times. I wouldn’t want a hologram as a “primary doctor,” simply because I don’t think I could fully trust such a thing to handle every task and still make me feel comfortable as a human being; but an assistant might be helpful to the primary. But, even a technological wonder like that (or Data) would lack something.

There’s also a little factor/detail so many seem to miss. While humans seem quite capable of producing anything they can imagine, we don’t seem to produce what we imagine in the time we imagine it. So, what we get, instead, in the time we are alive, is a sad, disappointing substitute. Wouldn’t you agree? So many of us get grand visions. And, there will be others who latch onto the visionaries and prod them to produce those visions. But, it seems to take several foolish attempts before one person’s great invention comes close to being as good as it can get. And, by then, the original thinker–without confirming they were the first to think of it–is dead.

That sends me back to thinking about those Pokémon video games. When you play a Pokémon game, you may be told you can befriend the creatures as pets, but you will have to force some of those pets to fight other creatures if you want to progress through the game. [I’ve been trying really hard not to fight in Pokémon Legends: Arceus.] I certainly don’t enjoy pitting my pets against other beings in battle for the sake of progress. But, that’s the nature of those games.

What if, in our effort to design something good for all, we pitch something misguided and corrupting which saps the relationships we want/should create with the other beings in our world (our universe)? How many mistakes must we make before we learn?

Sadly, I don’t think we’re learning much of anything. And, the more we think we can hand that task over to a machine, a machine WE have to first build, we’re just speeding up the excavation of our own graves and threatening countless other lives in the process.

03
Jan
20

Life Is Not Short, 1-3-2020

***

A rather common expression these days says life is short or even too short. I strongly disagree and get upset with anyone who says this. [So, if you happen to interact with me in person or online, please refrain from using this line.]

Life is–as I prefer to say–as long as it is granted to you, as long as the Fates allow.

You get what you get and really do not have any sensible, genuine idea how to prolong it, though certain lifestyle choices DO enhance the quality of life and may offer some minor extension…but there’s no proof. Surprises never cease, and those who think they are perfectly healthy can suffer some sudden shock to the system which blows the whole outlook.

So, don’t count…anything. Don’t count the days. Don’t count the calories. Don’t count the steps or miles you run every day; what are you? A hamster? Just live and do your best to let others live; be cooperative but not a doormat. And, if you find yourself in a position to dominate, don’t revel in it; don’t stomp on the competition. You could just as quickly be under the other foot when you foolishly overstep your bounds. And, you project a terrible example to others who could easily replace you.

I’ve recently been discussing the sensitive subject of drugs with my very little nephews. Their parents have “no time” to talk about such things. But, from my childhood experience, I know how little adults (in my family, anyway) make an effort to discuss serious topics and prepare kids for what’s ahead, rather than let some PSA or school program drill a single phrase and some silly video into their heads. I can still see the cartoon donkey telling me to avoid strangers, the YUCK face warning me about hazardous drug bottles and the owl advising me not to pollute. Ya know…those were all cute and fun in their prime. But, real kids either wise up fast or go a long time before something shocks the crap out of them. Guess which one I was? The kid who got the crap shocked out of him when “reality” presented itself. B-But, the school was exceptional with its education system!…or so reputation says. Whatever. Parents and other adults need to be the education system…and not scare the kids.

Just the other day, I tuned into a TV show about social animal species which gave considerable focus to dolphins, elephants and a few types of monkeys. I became irked every time the narrator said an insect’s brain was far too small to compete with that of a dolphin. Does anyone other than me grasp the concept of size being relative, the idea that the physical size of the creature does not determine its intellect? We already should know an ant can lift an incredible amount of weight; can it not be just as possible for an ant to have more intelligence than we currently possess?

What if even the creatures with a “hive mentality” simply devote their massive brain power to that collective instead of dividing their “gifts” on all sorts of meaningless economical concerns and mindless entertainment, as humans do? Maybe our measily ten percent of brain power would grow or achieve more if we were not so…distracted and divided. It would not surprise me if, years from now, we discover plants having brains and a language we simply did not notice…and countless vegans suddenly turn ill with guilt for consuming yet another intelligent life.

[We humans, as far as I know, are the only species to become conflicted with what seems to be primal nature. We are so withdrawn from nature that we are foolishly, blindly destroying it. The “perfume” is so thick, we can’t think clearly.]

As much as it agitated me to hear the repetitive talk about the sizes of brains, I was finding myself emotionally drawn to the elephants and dolphins. In a strange way, I envied their social structures. I wanted to embrace them and say, “Let’s go have fun, together. Let’s go have a picnic at the beach.” I felt the urge to book a trip to some far off place where I could ride an elephant or swim with a dolphin, become the creature’s friend and make sure they were treated properly. [I get very unfriendly when I see an animal mistreated by “the system.” I’m not the best zoo visitor and go crazy when I see so many scientists trying to use technology on other animals, hoping to make them more like humans or give up all their secrets to the insatiable probing of humankind.]

And then…I thought about going home, leaving those animals I just befriended…and how sad it would be, not knowing what became of them or having any say in it, really. I’d be lucky to get a letter from someone who knows the creature. [It’s not like my elephant pal Boris can keep in touch, himself. And, so far, even when people nod and tell me they will keep in touch, it rarely comes true, sort of like parents who promise to take you on some trip to give you a summer worth talking about with your peers or just to shut you up so you don’t drive them bonkers all year, trying to pass off a hamburger and fries as a substitute for Disneyland and summer camp.]

You know what is short (in my life)? Time with those for whom I care and who I grow to like. Time with people who, at least, seem to truly understand and sympathize with me. It’s so rare; it’s like finding a unicorn in the forest. And, just when I think I’ve found some gem of a person, something seems to snatch them away.

It’s no wonder I have such a delusional outlook on life, in general. I’m obsessing with fantasies instead of taking what is given to me in a content manner. And, even my fantasies can’t sustain me because I still desire some tangible piece to ground my thoughts and feelings. I still want a body to hold and love, not a cartoon or mannequin.

And, though it is a common driving force to pursue a single warm body for primal needs, I know, deep down, it takes a bit more than that to achieve the grander sense of happiness; it takes a circle of friends and good relations with family. Well, I can pretty much wrap up that last one as a failure; even if I kissed the ground my family walked upon and did everything they wanted me to do, I would not be happy with them…and I am sure a few would continue to be unhappy with me, which is probably where my perfectionist vices originated. As a student, I couldn’t cope with less than a perfect grade but didn’t understand why; I just assumed others would look down upon me somehow. Less than perfect became almost sinful, forcing me to seek the means to atone.

I don’t see great or even good options for paths to take. I don’t see the multitude of good people with whom I am to surround myself nor the means to cast out the negative few. The negative outweigh the positive and, in turn, cause me to emit negativity, apparently. My anger, frustration and despair from what I see and hear is giving me a stink as it stews in my pores. If my social anxieties don’t spoil things for me, I make a fool of myself when I think I am in the right and cross a line with someone I just met. All my lessons in manners and respecting other cultures goes out the window once I open my mouth.

As a child, I was raised to dress properly and sit quietly while adults were in the room. I was a trophy child, someone the adults talked about but rarely with, other than the occasional comment about how I was performing in school or my interests, particularly art which few adults indulged in, thus they had little to say. I was complimented and encouraged to perform better and better than better. It was only when I reached my teens that my mind advanced beyond what my body was doing and became highly self-conscious. At my lowest point, I found my voice and used it to save myself from premature death. I thought speaking out was a valian effort. But, what did it get me? What has it gotten me all these years? A few more compliments about my sense of humor, a few more bits of praise for my wit…and a ton of complaints from the majority of negative spectators who find my words foolish, unpleasant and/or excessively self-righteous.

So, I say it, again. What is truly short? The time I have with those who satisfy my spirit (and body). Not life. This life of mine goes on and on, prolonged by a higher power who has some greater…or worse…plan for me. It began abnormally and continues to survive abnormally. Thus, I can never call myself “normal.” I have come close to ending it myself, but some tiny flame resides in me which continues to believe all is not lost, even if time takes its toll on the mind, body and worldly resources that seem to be so important to having this life (when they have so little to do with nature and life itself).

If you outlive someone who literally loses their mind, the ability to speak sensibly with you and recognize your face, you may be discouraged and join the chorus who sing about life being short. But, realize you are still living; your life continues with the knowledge of someone else losing their full potential for life. You still have time. Do you use it to compare lengths of lives? Or, do you simply live it and understand loss of ability and death are part of it?

Cherish what you have. Don’t quest or chase for what may be too much. Take care of good friendships and other relationships. These should not be labors but natural constructs that you merely maintain and thank the heavens for having in your life.

And, breathe.

05
Jan
17

The “Smart” Future Looks Dumb and Bleak

*****
I only have to see five minutes of recent news headlines to get nightmares and palpitations.  If I had been asleep for some time and awoke to find this on TV, I’d likely go back to sleep or die on the spot.

One cause of palpitations:  Trump.  I think I’ll leave him at that.  But, I will say I see some of my worst aspects in him and too many faulty promises, like the parent that tells his/her kids too often they will do something for/with the child but never do.  And, seeing myself in him, I know I would not want to be president.  I’d rather be an advisor/assistant.

The other big mozza ball that chills me to the bone:  Rapidly advancing technology.  People are in such a rush to create artificially intelligent machines and way too many cameras.  So much talk about convenience and “smart” technology.

When I was a kid, I was told I was smart.  People still tell me I am when I doubt it.  But, there are different levels of smart.  And, I learned this the hardest way in my teens, entering high school and finding people who could do the same work in a fraction of the time.  Yes, people, not machines.  But, many of these smart people were from wealthy families that didn’t seem to care about anything; they just wanted to have it all and keep advancing without knowing what “it all” is or was before the next phase of advancement.  These were locomotives of intelligence going nowhere I could see.  For all my smarts, I was just getting trampled under their wheels.  Maybe their smarts were paid for with the highest approval for production while mine were scraped and taped together like the kid who makes his own toys instead of buying the expensive new spectacles.

If I have learned anything in the past 15 years–that may be longer than some who breast-feed off this stuff have been alive–it’s that technology that’s hot today could just as easily be pointless in ten years.  So, why invest in any of it?  Fools buy this stuff.  The smart people are the ones sitting back, buying and selling stock as the fools do all the salivating and tossing of money out windows.  But, even that comes and goes like the seasons.  It’s faulty gambling.

But, unlike some of the goofy gadgets that have come and gone, others that were only touching the tips of our fingers twenty or thirty years ago–again, perhaps beyond the age range of many who pack this stuff in their school lunch bags–are making steady and potentially hazardous progress.  Namely cameras that invade and robots, the stuff of the science fiction films I’ve been talking about for years, now.

And, where is the hot spot for showing this stuff off?  Not L.A.  Not “silicon valley.”  Not New York.  No.  It’s Las Vegas, the sleazy, I’ll-keep-every-one-of-your-immoral-secrets capital of the netherworld.  Can we say Nightmare on Earth Street?  I knew you could.

In the five minutes of a morning show I caught during breakfast, a guy is doing one of those crappy, quick displays of “feature products” at this electronics show.  And, one just happens to be a drone the size of a small pallet…you know…a shipping pallet…the sort you might see at an AMAZON.COM warehouse.  Yeah.  That marketing monster.  Skynet.  Darth Vader torn between the dark side and the light, but leaning toward the dark.

He’s talking about this drone like he approves of it at the same time he is spelling out in words plain as day that the thing is invasive and terrifying.  Companies sell this stuff to the masses as commercial entertainment.  The gadgets are the hit of every wealthy person’s social gala.  But, for every small investment in the flash-in-the-pan crazes, there’s one global step closer to these gadgets being sent out in masses to do other things we did not think were intended when we found them quaint.  Just as when the internet was ushered in as the grand means of bridging the global communication shortage, so began the madness of hackers, internet perverts and online crimes.

And, don’t get me started on all the push for online banking and “convenient” grocery shopping.  Let’s face it people, some majority taking action while the rest of you sit on your asses and let gadgets work for you–or do whatever you consider work for some tyran–er, tycoon–are taking advantage of your laziness.  And, if we go along with this madness, there will be nothing safe, secure or sacred left in this world.  You will be eliminated.  You will be replaced.  And, resistance may end up futile…or the movie you saw forty years ago but thought was just a silly bit of fiction.

Ugh!  I just have to let it out.  Wake up, Harold Cricks.  This is scary shit, people.

And, if we don’t get smart…I mean, really smart–not depend-upon-some-talking-gadget-to-answer-all-of-life’s-problems smart–you’re lives will be pointless.  Everything you think you are investing in or chasing will be a total waste of time, emotion, energy, etc.  You’ll just be a footnote in some robot empire, the slaves that built the “smart pyramids.”  If you want your lives to be worth more than the shit in your toilets…if you even bother to read these emphatic words written in a tiny hole of the internet like some message in a bottle…you’ll turn your backs to convenience and things that talk back and get your answers from people who were not built by Amazon or one of its ugly cousins.

Use your brains.  Show your work.  Stay off the grid.  Delete your Fbook pages.  Look up when passing others.  And, stay healthy.  For the sake of humanity, an investment that should be embraced and patched up when it falters, not discarded and replaced with robots.




Unknown's avatar

Archives


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started