Posts Tagged ‘PBS

17
Aug
22

Is the USA Truly Free of the UK, Free from Great Britain?

****

A few centuries ago, there was an infamous revolution which supposedly finally cut ties between Great Britain…England…and the “American colonies.” But, I am starting to think the whole historical scandal was a big dust cloud of deception, like one elaborate magic trick, like the (British) Pilgrims and the Indi–er, Native Americans. As a kid, I was fed the story of some pleasant Thanksgiving union forming between two bands of foreigners…only to grow up and hear other stories of slaughter and deception.

Since that time, there have been a few “British invasions,” though only one is really ever talked about on a regular basis. If someone says “British invasion,” many quickly think of music in the 1960s, of a group I personally don’t treasure or dare to emulate. Sure, they had some good songs, real thought-provokers. But, they also had plenty that lead to suspicion of other things, and that’s enough to turn me away, to raise my defenses.

But, there are other British invasions that slip past the average eye.

PBS television is translated as the Public Broadcasting…what is the S, again? Service? System? I forget, and it’s not mentioned as often as it was in my youth. Whatever PBS is, I’m inclined to say it’s more likely the lavishly Paid British Sideswipe of television. How much of PBS programming includes a British voice, location and/or actor/actress? I’d say at least half. I’m sure, if I closely look at the credits of shows/features without a distinct British voice, I’d find other British elements woven into the fabric. So, it’s not really some American invention; it’s the USA’s shade of the BBC.

In general, within the acting world, how many American-character roles are filled by British actors (including MAAAANY Middle-Eastern folks with distinctly British accents) forced to adopt American accents? SO many. That, alone, is an invasion. It’s blinding.

The “British Empire” has its hands in so many countries, including Australia. So, even the lesser appearance of Australian goods–a certain wafer cookie covered in chocolate and other flavored frostings and the recently promoted “Kinder Bueno chocolate bar” (which is more hazelnut ooze than chocolate and, thus, an insult to chocolate bars from companies like Hershey)–in American stores suggests British infiltration.

Ever since the wedding of Prince William and his beloved Kate, Haribo gummy candies have been widely advertised and more frequently seen around the USA. Coincidence? Hardly. [I grew up knowing names like Brach’s, Mars, Hershey, Jolly Ranchers, Cadbury (which is distinctly British, as well) and Jelly Belly. I never heard of Haribo until it was mentioned during the wedding proceedings; suddenly commercials are popping up everywhere.]

And, why is it I’m watching soccer games with distinctly British commentators calling the plays for teams with places of origin which sound rather familiar, rather close to USA soil? How DID the USA get Seattle, Washington…while some region I don’t even know “across the pond” also has a Seattle team? Where is this other Seattle (soccer team’s homeland)? And, did it’s origin precede the one in the USA? [And, isn’t it interesting both Seattles get the status of hosting sports teams. They could have picked one of the many other Washington state cities to be the home of the Seahawks and Mariners…but went with Seattle.] If so…could Seattle of Washington be merely a photocopy or dust cast from across the ocean? What if Seattle of Washington is secretly a British outpost within the USA?

So…land of the free? Huh. I don’t think so. All that patriotism and Fourth-of-July crap. Hooey. It’s no wonder the USA gets into so much conflict and crumbles its own house of cards. It’s Shakespeare’s other stage! It’s a show piece. It’s a TV-show set. It’s drama. Americans are frequently having troubles Upstairs and Downstairs; you don’t have to live Downton to see that. It’s comedy. The USA IS Seinfeld, a “show about nothing.” It’s coffee with celebrities, though the classification of “celebrity” has drifted so low that anyone who is seen online is considered one, now. You could just be a blip on someone’s sweeping camera-phone and become a celebrity overnight. You didn’t want to be famous, but someone made you…someone captured and used you.

The British could have instigated the Boston Tea Party. They could arm the USA, give the Americans all the push they need to start or enter a war with Russia or whoever, step back and watch the fireworks. Do the British get involved in every war? Why bother when they can watch the action on TV?…when they can program the world?

There’s a character in the cartoon universe of the Teen Titans, known as Control Freak, who likes to change channels and alter reality to suit is ever-changing interests. I’m inclined to think that’s what’s really “across the pond” from the USA, a deceptively controlling entity using every other nation for their amusement, allowing their own kind to feed off the remains of past conflicts and fuel the empire like one huge colony of ants.

There’s an expression that says “two heads are better than one.” I, for one, have enough trouble just managing my own head. Why would I want two? Yet, having a worthy partner who can complete your faulty sentences and help balance the load, so to speak, is certainly a blessing. But, in political terms…and possibly historical, mythical terms…two heads…or FACES might suggest something more sinister, more crooked, more evil.

Another expression tries to persuade you to accept “the lesser of two evils.” Why stop at two? Who picked that number? Isn’t that a perfect example of a trickster stepping back to let some fool take the blame for his or her mischief? It wasn’t me; it was her/him! And, point away from yourself.

We only get two hands. So, I suppose it would be hard to point at more than one target…well, we COULD point at two; couldn’t we? [Yet, magicians widely use one hand to distract while the other snatches something away, making viewers think it vanished.] So, why not say “the least of three?” Too messy? Or, maybe, “Great Britain” doesn’t want to split the prize three ways. It’s easier to focus on one pawn than it would be to juggle two. A bully doesn’t target more than one prey in any situation, even if he/she has many prey to pester.

The British use a gesture of two fingers, the middle and index fingers, to insult someone who offends or otherwise irritates them; it’s some historical reference to archers preserving their fingers at a time when others were losing their digits to savage opponents. The American variation just uses the middle finger to “flip (someone) the bird.” Now, while some would think it’s better to be number one than number two, isn’t a number two, a poop, more widely known and discussed than a number one, a tinkle? [Pardon my vivid choice of words.] A number-two pencil is the most widely used, at least, by kids in school. And, wouldn’t that make number two more popular than number one? Why is it GREAT Britain while the United States are just loosely UNITED (barely unified on anything other than an a really old contract, like so many marriages that can barely hold together if they don’t shatter painfully)? What did THEY do to get so GREAT? And, if the USA is so proud to be American, why isn’t it the Grand United States or Amazing United States (considering how much the word “amazing” is thrown around without genuine feeling)?

On Star Trek: The Next Generation, who is “number two?” Picard, the BRITISH Captain (with a supposedly French name?) holds top rank, followed by Jonathan Frakes as “Number One,” William Riker. But, who is number two? I’d have to guess Data, who is technically not human but widely used in the series. He steals more scenes than Riker, who makes quite a name for himself, especially when Troi is around. I’d say Data is more popular than Riker; wouldn’t you? And, Data is not “Number One.”

If you so much as wave a red, white and blue flag that features fifty stars and think you’re something special, you’re not. I don’t need to tell you that. There are countless British intelligence agents waiting to make a fool out of you…or already have. You’re nothing but a Baboo waiting to be deported somewhere because of a mistake in paperwork. And, I’m right there with you, feeling like quite the little fool.

God bless America? Who came up with that unfulfilling bit of wishful thinking? A Brit, I bet. Humph.

Let this be a lesson to ye all. The greatest isn’t the one in the spotlight; that’s just the pawn, flashing gilded lies, false trophies. The true master (defined as controller, not a title of respect) lurks in the shadows, unseen, reaping the benefits.

I say, old chaps. I’m not the master of my domain, but I’m going to try and Thames my fury with a cup of tea. Jolly Good soda. Right?

Smoke me a kipper. I’ll be back for breakfast. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

28
Apr
22

Art Space Unlimited…Except for Some; the Unfair Balance in the World of Artists

****

Back in January, I posted a piece about artists living a cursed life. In short, most artists get insufficient respect during their lifetimes and an insane amount of attention after they die, which often enough turns into crazy appraisals of artworks without the stories behind the works and, in the case of someone like painter Bob Ross, questionable merchandising.

I recently watched part of a PBS (TV) special featuring various “artists” who were making an effort to share their artwork with the world. Let’s just leave that as the simple summary of the program. Now, I watched three segments before I lost my cool.

The first featured a white-haired man with an accent I couldn’t quite identify. Apparently, though I’ve never heard of him or seen any of his (exceptionally large) work, he has filled some rather spacious plots of land and museums with spectacles worthy of Willy Wonka. One of his creations involves a set of conveyor belts transporting bricks of soft, melting wax to a big pile/mess of the stuff. [That’s art, ay?] Another–I presume in the same building–involves a corridor flooded with the same reddish wax. He was also featured with what looked like a giant apple-shaped building and the metallic bean which I have actually stood beside in Chicago, Illinois. [Is that his work? I guess I didn’t pay close enough attention; I was too bewildered by the sheer amount of space and liberty this guy has to create and feature his work. Also, he apparently has a small army of “oompa loompas” to craft things somewhat toxic for him. Is that an artist at work or the architect of the pyramids?]

There was something oddly unsettling about this segment. The guy kept featuring pieces with a distinct vertical crack, a reddish gash with a dark mysterious void at its center, a shape that sure seemed to resemble a certain part of the female anatomy.  This prompted memories of a horrid art-school tour I took in my crucial teens, when I was looking for direction with my own artistic talents. The place was littered with obscene works. And, my own portfolio, a sampling of my yet limited life’s work, was carelessly brushed aside by the guide. [If there was ever a moment to turn Hitler, that was it. You can thank your lucky stars I didn’t start the next Holocaust, sending unworthy artists and careless consumers of art to the gas chambers.]

The second segment featured a (brown-skinned) African gentleman** whose “portfolio” was far smaller and less jaw-dropping than that of the previous man. This more modest and humble artist had what seemed like a fraction of the time and space to discuss matters of social justice, primarily pollution of a particular environment where “minorities” reside. His gallery space included a number of movie/flat-TV screens no bigger than a home-movie screen. His entire presentation was like a whisper in a crowd. It was small and not the least bit awe-inspiring.

**I feel a strange need to be specific, considering people no longer meet a single description for any nationality.

The third segment, the one that really popped the cork on my infuriation, was about an older woman who likes to collect pieces of debris from demolition and disaster scenes and turn them into simplistic pieces of what she calls art. Essentially, she’s putting a hunk of cement, pipes and wiring (the size of a T-Rex) on a few supportive pegs, splashing it with paint and other questionable decorations and sticking this enormous piece in a spacious museum chamber. What a wonderful use of museum space; filling an entire gallery with one hunk of some other building that no longer exists which no longer looks as it originally did, which might be considered historical preservation of a relic. She’s not contributing to one of those museums you find in Europe, housing fragments of ancient Greece. No. She’s splashing colors on hunks of unnamed structural damage and taking up space which could be used to house countless other sculptures, paintings, etc.

I take you back to the story I have heard about the famous Pablo Picasso. The guy supposedly filled houses with artworks and relocated when one was full. He didn’t create things that took over buildings or portions of cities and/or parks. He created works you could put on walls and sit in a small room where you might read a book and enjoy the colorful company. But, if he filled houses with his work…does that mean he wasn’t spreading the love of art? Was he just hoarding it all because he didn’t think anyone was worthy of looking after it until he just could no longer protect everything like a pharaoh in his tomb?

Now, there is no way I’d ever want to do what the third featured person did. I see no logical or creative reason to “recycle” a hunk of demolition/destruction without breaking it down into simpler elements and crafting something you could fit through the average household door…not require a crane and probably a construction crew to transport to some spacious warehouse/museum facility.

And, I don’t see myself ever doing what the second person did. As much as I might inject matters of social justice into my own work, I wouldn’t just make a simple video documentary and fill a dark room with screens. I’d use metaphors and a pinch of creativity/humor here and there…something you might see from an author like Roald Dahl, the BFG. I’d craft an experience with impact yet without overwhelming dread and/or despair. No one needs to go through the bleak experiences of another to understand what happened; I don’t need to simulate losing an ear to imagine how dreadful Van Gogh’s life must have been.

But, a small part of me cannot help envying the first guy. How does any artist achieve such status? How does he acquire an army of crafters to fashion what he imagines, risking their lives, not his (as I watched some work with gas masks while he stood elsewhere just talking at length about his “genius” like a pompous windbag. [I seriously think the guy was a bit perverse with an ego overly inflated by some underhanded dark influence.]

How does this stuff happen? How does the world get so twisted (yeah, upside-down, even) that you might think suicide is a wise decision? How does anyone get the permission to amass an army of laborers to craft questionable, useless objects which are probably visible from outer space?…while other artists are left to rub coins together, cut off body parts and live miserable, otherwise unproductive lives in solitude?

It boggles the mind. And then, it blows what’s left out every portal of the human anatomy.

24
Sep
21

Outlook on the Future of Fashion Modeling

****

So, I am watching this PBS special about “The Future of Work” and see, among other things, a model concerned for the future of her career choice when a photographer–who looks like a blend of a certain chubby late-night-talk-show host, Benny Hill** and Andy Warhol–is turning images of real, living models into “avatars” and CG presentations.

[I’m also first hearing about something called a “digital nomad” which appears to be nothing more than a photographer and YouTube/Instagram video maker who totes a “smartphone” and a rather large digital camera to capture everything he/she does while traveling the world. How exactly is that a career, and who pays the salary? How are you not just “working on commission?” How do you process tax papers with that line of work; where’s the W-2 form in that?]

**Eesh! I’m realizing people under 40 probably have no clue who Benny Hill is. Oh well.

I ask what is the point of turning real models into digital mannequins. It’s too much license to mess with what the artists are calling realistic synthetic modeling. I mean…does that even make sense; realistic and synthetic in the same sentence? Isn’t this the mouse and the cookie? If you make a digital figurine, you’re going to want to augment him/her and get sucked into perfecting the art.

Women are already struggling with being accepted, equated with their male coworkers. Models and gymnasts, for examples, are beaten into submission to maintain a certain dimension of physique, which is why NOW we are first seeing rebellious models who defy the old standards. And, just as that’s happening, we’re going to turn real models into CG replacements?

Don’t you think viewing digital models will mess with people’s already fragile self-esteem? Now, people will envy a fake person instead of a real one (who may or may not have had her/his image altered with an airbrush tool and/or other computer applications). That’s no different than seeing a white plaster mannequin in a department store (which is already going the way of the dinosaurs). That’s not a realistic figure wearing the clothes I want to buy; I’m not going to look like that in that outfit. It’s a dummy; and, last I checked in the mirror, I may be foolish at times, but I’m no dummy.

I understand one possible explanation if we take into account present circumstances. Right now, in this “pandemic,” travel and being hands-on with other people is a bit of a taboo. It’s risky to get that close to anyone, especially if you’re traveling and interacting with numerous people. So, if you need to keep modeling but cannot travel, for whatever reason, you supply a digital representation of yourself to stand-in for that role; you essentially lend an alternative you to perform certain tasks.

[Buuut, shouldn’t that virtual model still look like you? If it’s another person, entirely, what’s to stop someone from cutting your check a little smaller, each time, until you get paid nothing? Did YOU make the digital model of yourself? Or, did some “agent” take full care of that task?]

But, again, that’s not the real you. You get away with never worrying about adding an inch to your waistline and pretending you’re always that pretty. But, it’s not you. And, the more you get comfortable with “faking it,” the less you’re going to like/accept reality. I don’t know about you, but that sounds like yet another recipe for a not-too-slow burn to suicide.

Why do so many stories about stage plays involve actors and actresses who turn bitter toward stand-ins? The “stars” don’t want to be replaced; they don’t want to lose their careers just because some newcomer got a free audition on their shift. But, in modeling, the new CG model WOULD be a replacement, a stand-in. Sure, real models could potentially claim ownership of their digital counterparts, but, somehow, I expect some “legal loophole” to appear that just as easily takes away a real model’s rights and puts all the power in the hands of the CG artists.

If you think about this another way, what’s the difference between painting a portrait and taking a photograph of someone? A painting is an investment of time and testament of skill with the hand (or whatever you might use to paint) and, usually, very fussy materials, producing one image of a real object or creature on a “canvas.” A photograph (one that is not later edited, to be specific) represents one’s skill with composition and their eye for details, like lighting, in the blink of an eye, a precise moment of attention focused on a subject.

Now, take away the time it takes to make a painting and the skill of the hand. Just give me a button to push and watch me turn something into a painting. What skill did I hone? What did I learn? Nothing. Someone else made the thing that made the painting for me; I just pushed a button. I might still get some money for my “work,” but not as much as the guy (or gal) who designed the instant-gratification tool.

[And, if you don’t mind the labor, look at the other option. Take away the quick-action cameras and force yourself to paint a photograph. How long will it take you to make the image look as clear and real as what you see with your own eyes? Go ahead and share your struggles; I’ll be patient (or impatient) with you.]

Here’s my…um…solution?

If everyone’s idea of “work” is getting a radical makeover, due to this “pandemic,” then it’s about time we start thinking of models as not just people posing for a camera (and worrying about the condition of their bodies) but people who act, think and speak as MODEL HUMAN BEINGS, as well. Let’s tear apart the outdated fragility and simplicity of modeling and turn it into an empowering art form.

Models don’t have to just be “perfect” photographs and runway candy. They can be MUSES who inspire not just career and fashion choices but lifestyle choices and outlooks. [If you’re a pretty face and, yet, a “bitch” and/or someone with a bad habit perpetually caught on camera, you might attract someone’s attention for a minute or be prodded to misbehave for someone’s amusement…but you won’t likely be “loved” for your behavior/foul attitude.]

Actually, can we just be totally honest for a minute? Have fashion models ever shown someone they can look as good in an outfit? If you’re lucky, you’ve got a figure LIKE a particular model; you might have the same skin tone, waistline or whatever, but you’re never THAT model. The clothes won’t fit your body exactly the same way. What size are you? It doesn’t matter. You could be two women who wear the same size dress and receive differing opinions in that dress. Nothing a model has to offer visually truly reflects what you will have, see or be if you try to copy that model. The model, in essence, remains an inspiration (or idol/ideal), not a proven or guaranteed test result.

Instead of dragging yourself down into thinking you need to eat like a bird and put up with abusive management to look good, let anyone who wants to appear in photos (and other forms of media) be a model of what they view as good, moral behavior. Let’s curb our bad habits and vices by being honest about our weaknesses while portraying ourselves as the people we want others to emulate. [Don’t fake anything.]

[And, for crying out loud, let’s get over this hump of making every public appearance into a job interview, praising our coworkers/bosses and trying to perfect a “resume” or “portfolio.” If you have issues with your coworker or boss, be honest about it! Let’s stop slapping red ink on people for voicing their discomfort and/or disapproval. You’re not unfit to work someplace just because your last boss was a jerk (in your opinion) or you were involved in a scandal; that does not adequately reflect your value nor your limits.]

If you weigh over 150 lbs. and have “baggage,” you could still be a model if you felt your “comfortable” lifestyle was worth mentioning. Tell the world how your choices have brought you success and/or happiness (without fabricating and/or exaggerating just to impress). Model your achievements and contentment. [If you are NOT content/comfortable, then you might reconsider modeling because you’re never going to look naturally “good” in photos; your discomfort will show.] Be a ROLE model.

If you truly eat right, stay active and generally feel good about your life, show it off (without boasting/flaunting). After all, what is the purpose of modeling?…to inspire others, particularly inspiring them to go after what a model displays, their fashions and/or physiques. If your choices work for you, and you’d like others to follow in your footsteps, display that.

[However, don’t try to convince anyone that your particular choices are going to work for them. Remember my previous dress analogy; what works for one person isn’t exactly going to satisfy another. It’s just a suggestion and what made one particular person “glow” for you.]

[Sadly, the current trend of “influencing” via “smartphones” is not sufficient for this task, contributing to laziness and low self-esteem; too many are sucked into the LIKE-ing and FOLLOW-ing system and staring mindlessly at small screens. I don’t think that is helping anyone. It’s a sort of vicarious living. We need to take the role-modeling–which, lately, seems to be glamorizing laziness and careless exposure–off the small screen and put it somewhere people can be inspired to act on their desires (without harming themselves).]

MODEL YOURSELF.

Show yourself off as you want the world to see you and find pride in that. [But, do not find the sort of pride that inflates your head to the point of stepping on others “below” you.] And, this way, anyone can be a model, not just a photographed “ideal” (subject to opinion…because–let’s be honest–beauty truly is in the eye of the beholder…and not all model photos are what I’d call tasteful nor respectable).

Does this endanger or improve the number of slots for models? You figure it out. [I just told you.]

Let’s turn MODELS into ROLE MODELS.

It’s a job upgrade, not down-sizing. You’re sure to get paid more because you’re giving more of yourself than just a perfected image. You’re not valued solely for your looks which are subject to aging. [And, if anyone tries to put/bring you down, you just stand up and let that fool bounce right off your impressive profile. That foul behavior is just one person’s opinion.] You’ll never outlive your career because it travels with you for as long as you live. You won’t be forgotten after turning a certain age (because you no longer match a photo from thirty years ago). You’ll be forever remembered by those who value you as a person.

[That’s how I value women like Tyra Banks and Heidi Klum. They’re not just “centerfolds” (and I wouldn’t even feel right displaying those photos). They have exhilarating personalities and, I’m sure (though I haven’t had much chance to “live with them”), more to capture my awe than just a pretty face. I’ll be honest, their faces, regardless of age, still have a certain sparkle. They could be couch potatoes who have the worst eating habits, and I’d still find reason to admire them because they’re “real” and outspoken, not afraid to speak their minds (though, occasionally, they appear a bit rude and/or insensitive). If all they had to offer were a few preened photographs, I’d toss them aside or hang them up with the other fantasies and never know their true worth.]

Some might say my idea is just as bad for self-esteem. Now, models have to be concerned with their way of living, not just their appearances on camera? Aspiring models might give up trying because they think less of themselves, because they can’t match the colorful lifestyles of the people they admire, because they don’t feel as if they have lives worth promoting?

Okay. Well, you could look at this as intimidation…or you could look at it as bolstering what makes you a model (worth respecting, instead of just marketing and scrutinizing).

If all you have to offer, right now, is your “face,” then maybe you get in the “pretty faces only” line and foolishly try to keep that face from losing its smooth luster. You can throw in another heap of insecurity as opinions of your “pretty face” continue to differ; you might get approved and work with one studio while rejected by another (or others). It’s a gamble (versus a sure thing: being you).

[Is plastic/cosmetic surgery, bent on imperfectly preserving your looks while walking the path of aging, healthy or natural? And, if you subject yourself to such surgery, are you fixing a one-time “incident,” trying to alter your nature or hoping to constantly remake something that refuses to take the perfect shape you never quite seem able to see?]

The legend of Hercules (or Heracles) didn’t happen in one day. Many tales were written about his life. His legendary status came from a lifetime of activity, of modeling his choices. He was a noteworthy celebrity and a role model in his own way (whether or not you think he was a real person).

Sure; you’ll have more competition. But, everyone is also free to choose what models they want to emulate, not just limited to a handful of this year’s “hot properties.” You’ll have greater freedom to live as you desire. And, ultimately, won’t that make us all feel better about this life?

Boom. Suicide and eating-disorder statistics reduced. The general health and well-being of modern human life improved.

14
Jun
21

Happy Birthday, Emily Graslie!

****

Today is June 14th and Emily Graslie’s birthday!

Who? Emily Graslie, a very nerdy, fairly charming, occasionally comical and perpetually easy-going gal; a big kid with long blonde-ish hair, blue eyes masked by big eyeglasses and an odd need to wear big dangling jewelry in some of the most rough outdoor places; a Gemini Earth Snake, essentially a desert dust tornado, who hosts the PBS show called Prehistoric Road Trip (among other projects).

EmilyGraslie-birthdaycard-prehistoricroadtrip-PBS-chicagofieldmuseumoffice-waxzoodinosaur_ap-CSPP-2020-7

I don’t know much about her, yet. But, she seems to be more of a paleontology/archaeology/geology enthusiast than an expert; she just likes talking with people about scientific matters and has an aura about her which screams, “She and Writingbolt would make great travel buddies!” She makes me unafraid of being completely at ease with myself. I may be wrong, but I feel like I could burp, fart or even pick my nose around her, and she’d just take it in stride. She reminds me of Laura Dern’s character from Jurassic Park, who was at ease digging through dinosaur poop. [Yet, underneath that goofy, smiling, earthy façade are some sensitive waters which could get a lil moody and leave victims in pain from her snake bite.]

EmilyGraslie-birthdaycard-prehistoricroadtrip-PBS-darkroom-sternfaced_ap-CSPP-2020-9B

That about sums it up. I only had to watch a few episodes (of Prehistoric Road Trip) to feel sufficiently comfortable in her company. And, as the comforting feeling grew, along with a remote attraction, I felt compelled to create this birthday post.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, EMILY!

You subtle charmer, you. Drop a letter in my mailbox, please. I wish to speak with you…and then some.

EmilyGraslie-birthdaycard-prehistoricroadtrip-PBS-hostess-cafesetting_ap-CSPP-2020-1

EmilyGraslie-birthdaycard-prehistoricroadtrip-PBS-beachydig-astro-writingboltandbullwinkle_ap-CSPP-2020-6F

EmilyGraslie-birthdaycard-prehistoricroadtrip-PBS-hostess-beachydig-writingboltandbullwinkle_ap-CSPP-2020-6E

15
May
17

Carmen-Sandiego-inspired! New and Old Lyrics to an Old PBS Delight

*****

So, about two weeks ago, SNL (Saturday Night Live) featured a Carmen-Sandiego-inspired mini-skit about a certain dubious political character.  It struck my funny bone so hard that I “geeked out,” reminiscing about the 90s and what was once a darn good PBS game show for kids (and geographically-challenged adults).  Not only did the show feature a mental challenge (and, for some contestants, a physical one); it also introduced a musical group known as Rockapella which, I think, sparked a serious a cappella movement (when they weren’t injecting humorous bits that may have flown over the heads of kids).

[I also heard about other projects through the grapevine.  There was some blurb about an adult Carmen movie?  Not sure I want to hear more about that.  And, there might be some kind of new Carmen Sandiego project, possibly a web series with Gina Rodriguez attached.  If it is a revitalization of that old PBS game show or the decent yet reasonably goofy cartoon series, maybe the creators would appreciate/respect my new lyrics.  Nudge, nudge, wink, wink.  😀 ]

So inspired was I, watching some episodes anew and inspired online videos, that I couldn’t help crafting a whole new set of lyrics to the show’s theme song!  I have left some bits in parentheses because I wasn’t sure how they fit.  [Input appreciated.]

AND (hearing myself sound like Lynn Thigpen as she described prize packages), some simple Carmen Sandiego calling cards.

Check ’em out and tell me whatchya think.  [I’ll also post my version of the original Rockapella lyrics.]

************

My own lyrics to add/fit in:

(first verse)

She got the cops on the run while Roman with the Coliseum.
‘Left them…on a walkabout as she strolled down to Sydney.
‘Dropped a Rio Grande in Vegas and then ran out of De Janeiro.
Tell me…

(Chorus/Hook)

Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego?
Whoa-oh, where can she be?

(second verse)

Say ciao to your leaning tower; kiss your Taj Mahal Mumbai.
(You) Can’t slow her down when she’s on…one of her crime sprees.
Teaching you a history lesson is the Big Apple of her aye-aye.
Tell me…

Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego?

(slow traveling section, IE Nashville to Norway, etc.)

She snatched the Red Square from Moscow, the Triangle from Bermuda,
While drawing circles ’round the pyramids of (Egypt and) Peru!

(scat sections)

Now, tell me where!
(softer second voice: …is Carmen Sandiego?)
Tell me where!
(softer second voice: …is Carmen Sandiego?)

Hire a henchman or two…!
To drop another clue!
That’s what you…didgeridoo…!
When Crimenet is after you!

(third verse)

She can bank on New Guinea, run off with Old Milwaukee,
Tear up Main Street and…shut down L.A.
What you’re left with is…right where it should be.
Tell me…

Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego?

(fourth verse)

She grabbed Java, Indonesia, had tea with the Queen,
Scarfed some waffles in Brussels…topped with whipped cream,
Before she pilfered Parma and some vanilla bean.
Tell me…

Where in the world i-I-i-Is Carmen Sandiego?!

(scat)

Where in the wor-orld!
(softer second voice: …is Carmen Sandiego?)
Where in the wor-orld!
(softer second voice: …is Carmen Sandiego?)
Where in the world! Where in the world! Where in the world!
(softer second voice: …is Carmen Sandiego?)

Until next crime, detectives.

carmen-sandiego-fromVILEcommand-WiTICS-PBS-circa-1995_callingcard-850450-ap-2C

************

And, lastly, the original Rockapella lyrics from the PBS game show.  [Pardon my variation of contractions, etc., if that bothers you.]

Well, she sneaks around the world from Kiev to Carolina;
She’s a sticky-fingered filcher from Berlin down to Belize.
She will take you for a ride on a slow boat to China.
Tell me…

Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego?
Tell me where in the world is Carmen Sandiego?
Whoa-oh, tell me where in the world can she be?

Steal their Seoul in South Korea;
Make Antarctica cry “uncle.”
From the Red Sea to Greenland, they’ll be…singing the blues.
Well, they never Arkansas her steal the Mekong from the jungle.
Tell me…

She goes from Nashville to Norway, Bonaire to Zimbabwe,
Chicago to Czech and Slovakia and back!

Well, she will ransack Pakistan and run a scam in Scandinavia.
Then she will stick ’em up down under and go…pick-pocket Perth.
She put the “miss” in misdemeanor when she stole the beans from Lima.
Tell me…

Botswana to Thailand, Milan via Amsterdam,
Mali to Bali, Ohio, OaHU!…….

The warrant!…The warrant…The warrant!…

Ooooh, the chaaase…ooh-woo-woo-woooo, the chaaase…

Monday through Friday at five!

Well, she glides around the globe,
And she will flim-flam every nation.
She’s a double-dealing diva with a taste for thievery.
Her itinerary’s loaded with moving violations.
Tell me…

Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego? (x5)
Watch your back!

 




Unknown's avatar

Archives


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started