Posts Tagged ‘thoughts

12
Oct
24

WTF Is Wrong with All of the Murder-Mystery TV?

****

I completely understand the current status of creative minds, the lack of new ideas anyone can adequately turn into something other than a half-baked dud. I get it. Creative writers are struggling. So am I. But, to turn out countless murder-mystery shows for television?…is insane. Throw in ads that are just as mental and local news stations dumping truckloads of crime stories on the viewing audience, and you have the recipe for nationwide disaster. You want a blood bath? A mental-health crisis of global proportions? You’re baking that cake, right now.

I can’t go a day without turning on the TV and finding either horribly recycled shows, from a time before my own (which I imagine only “fossils” are watching–no offense to “senior citizens” nearing the great beyond), or a thinly veiled murder-mystery show. On the odd in-between channels, they’re often recycled from previous decades or somehow “reality-based,” featuring some young troublemakers who got caught in the act and are now the lowest of the low to be considered entertainment of any kind. On the major channels, many under the Disney umbrella, somehow, you have the big-name-actor varieties, hosting every actor and actress who isn’t getting a more original role/story to feature and afford them the luxurious pay that helps fund their “red-carpet” appearances (which are really getting lame and old in their own way).

Don’t bother flipping the channels because they’re on every one…except the rare cartoon or sci-fi channel (if you can call it that). And, even the sci-fi channel feels a little murder-ish. Heck, I suppose the cartoon channel could be littered with murder mysteries if the dynamite and other hazards actually killed the victims of the traps instead of respawning them like a child-friendly (ha) video game.

How long does this have to last before the whole nation or world breaks down and loses its collective mind? Mankind cannot live or much less thrive on murder, alone. I could go without ANY murder mysteries for the next ten years, at least; and I’d be fine. I feel like all I’ve eaten for the past decade is bad BBQ ribs. One can only take so much of the same sauce before they puke. And, I am so ready to blow chunks for a long time. Summon clean-up crew because I’m ready to spew.

And, breathe.

I get it. We don’t need to watch so much television. [But, don’t tell the countless actors and actresses starved for roles that, people who don’t want to retire or fall hard on lousy ads for things that are gross and stupid to support.] We all need to get a life and be more extroverted with each other, without crossing any relationship, racial or gender lines. Well, instead of murder mysteries or forced racial casting, maybe the minds behind the screenplays could figure out how to help with that. I know I’m straining my brain, and I don’t have access to the resources or teamwork they do.

Now, some of you–if I had an actual audience here–might point out the exceptions, like the shows about firefighters. Oh, yeah; those are different (for sure). But, I get nothing out of those, either, because, one, I don’t ever think about firefighters in a way that makes me want to watch them in action…or in a bedroom/sex scene (as if that’s going to save your show’s audience). But, that’s where television is at, blending “real life hero” stories with injected sex appeal. Yawn. Lame. Tiresome. I don’t need to know who’s the latest magazine model in their prime. There are crappy “reality” talent shows for that.

I will do my best to be patient for the shows I actually DO like, like Ghosts (I really need to see more of the British cast, too) and Abbot Elementary. [Though, I’m not blind to notice Ghosts is, in a way, a show about death and murder, too. Think about that if you haven’t noticed.] But, those are definitely endangered species. They’re like some rare, prized fish in a sea of bass and sharks. They’re Nemo and Marlin. And, I’m worried for their safety, even though they’re not the best shows I’ve chosen to watch. [They’re just the best of what’s available. In other words, I need more comedy and uplifting television (which is not defined as melodramatic music played while people cry or make sad faces and hug each other after tragedy. That’s more like group therapy without the ability to actually hug anyone.]

Just, please, someone, explain to me why television has become so…bad. Are audiences REALLY favoring crime shows? Are they demanding more? Or, is this the lowest of the low struggling, probably disturbed by their own PTSD, minds can put out? Are we so starved for positivity and good vibes that the only writing we can produce is deadly? And, how is that supposed to nourish viewing minds? Oh, you’re right; those ads for anti-depressants at commercial breaks are a huge help…NOT. You know what’s increasing suicidal thoughts? Your crime shows (and horror movies)!

I think of those old war stories about brainwashing, forcing someone’s eyes open while they’re strapped down and watching some flashing imagery of violence and horror. That’s how television, today, feels. It’s so salty that I scream for a glass of fresh water.

12
Oct
24

No More Linkin Park…Controversy

****

It has come to my attention a band I grew to like very much is coming back from what should have been it’s death notice, after the grim end of the guy who was their lead singer for many years. They–no, let’s be clear–Mike Shinoda, one of the founding three members, has chosen a new lead singer, Emily Armstrong, who, no sooner than she’s chosen to lead, has been grilled by skeptics and critics and a member of the deceased singer’s family. They’ve also replaced the founding drummer with a new face. And, their founding guitarist has supposedly expressed a need to distance himself by remaining a creative force for the team but avoiding public performances.

[If I am getting any of the details wrong, please feel free to enlighten me with cited sources. Don’t just sound off on hearsay. Do that on your own blog.]

In short, I’d say the band is suffering from what it’s former lead vocalist started and made so popular…the darkness of the music. And, that darkness has not only lead to a death and disorder among the founding members but has also probably hounding the band from the start, when they were “Xero,” then “Hybrid Theory.”

In short, I became a big fan of the band around 2004 because, while the lyrics were often dark and tragic, I could understand them and liked the earthy, edgy beats the band made. If their music can be considered rap, it’s the first rap I could process without feeling lost in the rapid-fire lyrics and static beats (of other rap music). Every song feels like someone throwing paint at a wall, slapping together some crazy mural. When the music stops, you look at what you created and have an epiphany. I see movies unfolding when I listen to Linkin Park’s previous albums…and I don’t mean semi-unsettling, military-infused, Transformers wrecks.

In short (though not short), I suggest the band needs to do what it’s done more than once, already, start a new “thread.” “The band formerly known as Linkin Park” (as I shall call it and explain soon enough) is sort of like a phoenix (with someone going by that nickname in the band), peeling out of its own ashes, again and again. So, why not do it…again? Re-brand. Re-name. Start the next chapter.

Don’t leave yourselves in the ditch created by the lead singer you chose. Just as your new lead singer, a refreshing choice, doesn’t need to linger in history of controversy, either. A band drenched in horror stories while trying to restart the flame that made it so…eh…bright?…does not have a long future. You’re like a bad Christmas Carol bound by chains and locks. Your new lead singer comes from a band with the word “dead” in its name; that’s not a great start. Shed that crap and be reborn, maybe with a lighter sound. You wouldn’t be the first band to try that. Just as you’re not the first band to lose members and find new ones.

The nature of Linkin Park’s most famous–if not all of their–music is eerily grim, like the letters of a suicidal teenager. So, how does anyone really come away from that with a clear head and good sense? You don’t. When C.B. died, the band got hit by one of the bombs they sing about in their lyrics. I’d go so far as to say their music is prophetic. They sing about rebellion, anger, sadness, fear and death…and now they’re facing all of that. The (first?) bomb has hit. [Or, maybe the first bomb was when you had to take on the name Linkin Park to elude a lawsuit.]

Hybrid Theory went from a band name to an album title when a Welsh band called Hybrid raised an index finger (or two fingers) and made a big stink around the year 2000. New lead singer C.B. suggests the name Lincoln Park (or Linkin Park, before LinkedIn was a thing) because it’s a place he often passed on the road in Santa Monica, CA. The founding members liked the idea and made the name change.

[I’m not going to go into all of the details found online. You can do the paper trail yourselves.]

I think the best solution to the lingering problem is to start fresh with a new name yet retain the potency of the old music, which, in essence, comes from the combination of beats and lyrics. You say screaming is a key part of the appeal?…I’m not so sure about that.

If that was the former lead singer’s “signature move,” who says that has to be the heart of the band’s music forever? If you want to be the next AC/DC, go ahead. But, C.B. started the screaming, right? Before him…no screaming? So, you were a band before he joined…right? And, sure, the screaming apparently appealed to some fans. But, that voice died. And, if you try to replace it, you upset anyone who remains loyal to…a tombstone. [I have personal issues with anyone who ends their own life; it’s a very disturbing subject I try to avoid.] If you ditch the screams (and don’t keep performing the old songs), you risk losing lingering fans with new scream-free music. It’s a risk, but it’s also a major opportunity. Your screamer is gone…but your brilliance and other talents are not.

Mike, if you’re the mind behind the lyrics (or you worked with your pals Brad and Rob on all of the lyrics), keep it up. And, keep those beats flexing and flowing in new ways, in new songs.

I’ve got a few new band-name suggestions I’d like to throw at you. [You can’t use the word “Phoenix” because…well, that’s been done to death–ha. Phoenix Theory would be a major NO.]

You started as Xero. It’s been almost 30 years since that name began. How about Xero 2 Thirty? [Feel free to play around with the spelling on that, as you seem to like altering spellings. Oh yeah; and don’t even think Xero Dark Thirty. Avoid that.]

Think about Hybrid Theory; reflect on your old name/album. [I am not saying you should use it, just to be clear.] In a way, it’s rather prophetic, as you shift and tear through your career. You were not a singular, one-tone entity for long. You keep changing in some way, even if the past few albums have been consistently sharp, angry and dark. Hybrid cars are all the rage right now. How about a (new/better) hybrid band name, one without any risk of controversy? Is there a name that could honor/respect your band’s past while shedding a bright light on the future? A new park to focus your inspiration? A new “Link” in the chain? Linkin Chain Theory perhaps? Too complex? Well, work with that. Smooth it out.

Your new lead singer has a last name that sparks inklings of ideas, Armstrong. Run with that. Linkin Strong…Linkin Steel…Linkin Stone…Stronghold…Strongbox…Stronghouse (a haven for broken spirits still burning to craft new music)…Changelink (instead of chain-link or changeling).

Other band-name ideas…

Xerney (sort of a hybrid of Xero and Journey with none of the Phil Collins or Pokémon lawsuits). [No Google search finds for that one…that’s a good sign!]

Patchworx. No…wait…there is at least one company with that name. Well, try working on the spelling, maybe. Patchwerks. Patchward.

Hybrix…

If you feel hooked on remaining Linkin Park, which I wouldn’t entirely hate, I suggest you find a way to make new music and let the past lay in the albums you made. IF you go on tour/stage, and some fans would like to hear the old music, you have a choice. You can indulge them and take the risk without the singer who made those songs famous…or you can simply say, “No. Sorry. That sound isn’t available to perform. But, keep loving the old albums. We enjoyed working on them and are pleased to know you still love them.”

Not everybody can be the Foo Fighters or AC/DC; and what would Foo Fighters do without Dave Grohl? [And, didn’t he get his start in a band called Nirvana?…which he no longer is a part of…so…? Think about that.] I can only hope they endure long after their losses, they’re one of my other favorite bands. [It seems the music I like tends to get hit with tragedy. Yet, No Doubt is no more; but I still listen to a few of their songs. Coldplay keeps trying (most recently looking like a blend of other artists and remotely sounding like Linkin Park in a somewhat nauseating rap? song about prayer)…I don’t know why; I still don’t like them.]

Whatever you call yourselves, I hope the new music will be as enjoyable if not more enjoyable than your past albums, which tended to be too dark to play casually. Your past music wasn’t exactly group/party dancefloor music. It was more like…sit alone in your room and vent music. Catharsis. So, maybe try something that’s…eh…less anti-social? And, if not, if you keep it “the same,” I hope it’s as good without the old sound. [But, it’s kind of hard to shift from a male lead vocal to a female one without breaking a few eggs.]

A group that shall remain unnamed became timeless legends by constantly reinventing themselves, over decades, not years. They didn’t stick to one style of music or physical appearance. They kept changing. And, when their only members (no replacements) started to pass on, the music endured. Not just some of the music; all of it. Maybe past events were the sign you needed to see/experience to know it’s time for a change. But, change doesn’t mean you have to suck or forget the good stuff you made. It’s opportunity for new success (too).

[If you and Emily can sound like Koven in their recent track “Turning Point,” that blend of sharp vocals and a dance-worthy beat, at least, in small doses, you’re off to a good start. I think you can do even better than Koven and make a whole song, a whole album, that’s great, not just parts that get looped for some online video game’s benefit. And, knowing you, I won’t struggle to understand all of the lyrics.]

I haven’t been able to listen to any Linkin Park music without unsettling feelings since 2017. Maybe some members of the band feel the same way. The only real way to get over a death is to take a positive from it and get on with life. What did you learn? How can you grow from this? [And, how can I go back to enjoying the old music if I keep thinking about the tragedy that ended it?]

Now, lastly, if I may address all of the sudden critics and haters of the new arrangement, give the new girl a chance! Linkin Park wasn’t born in a day, and it was a hybrid of something invented by three high-school pals and one screeching lead singer. It’s month one, as of me writing this notice. She’s just dipping her toes in the tepid pool water. Give her time to find footing and, maybe, make her own suggestions which could be just as good as the old one(s) that made the band famous. [And, to be clear, fame is wide, public attention; it is not limited to one person or one band name.]

Keeping the name Linkin Park shouldn’t be an insult or any sort of crime against the deceased lead singer. [Now, if the band says it still has the same sound, that would be a bold-faced lie and wrong.] If you want to wage that war, could you take it up with every other band that lost somebody yet kept going? I doubt you’ll accomplish anything. If letting the band die and leaving the remaining members adrift because of the fateful decision of one man is the right thing to do, will you accept new music and a new name from Mike and his pals? Or, would you rather they stop making music and die, too? [That would be criminal thinking.]

If I may borrow from the famous collection of songs, “in the end, it doesn’t even matter” who the lead singer is, unless the band’s ethics don’t approve. It’s the band’s choice to pick the “Catalyst” who works best with their remaining parts to keep the whole pleasing to its audience. You who disagree can remain “Numb;” you can “Runaway” or suffer a “Papercut,” for all that I care. I know; you are “Faint,” “one step closer” and about to break. I’ll leave you “Crawling” in your skins while you sift through the ashes of what was. Well, even if the band changes, perhaps “breaking the habit” is a good thing; it may cultivate growth instead of beating a dead horse or ending up in rehab (or prison). One band member’s death doesn’t mean the whole band has to die or starve when they want to continue making music people enjoy. As long as they’re never “lying away from” me or twisting my brain into a suicidal pretzel, I’m good. At the very least, a new lead is “one step closer” to new music and the possibility of something better than the past, which was riddled with teenage angst and “Points of Authority.”

Oh, look at “What I’ve Done.” I used my creativity to cope with the upheaval of this band I like.

You know what they call something that never changes or improves and can only fit one role? Typecast. Mike Shinoda doesn’t need to be typecast just because one key to the van that drove Linkin Park (just one of the band’s names) is gone. The Foo Fighters rock on without their previous drummer; when Nirvana fell apart, Dave Grohl shed that skin and rose from the ashes with a new (and better) group. The Goldbergs didn’t die when it lost its no-pants-at-home father figure (even if that really did take some of the energy out of the show). Voltron didn’t die when Sven got sucked off by Hagar and her crew. The princess filled in and made the blue lion even better.

14
Aug
24

My Closing Olympics Feelings; Paris, France 2024

****

Buckle up, readers. This may be a long ride…for an event that comes and goes in two weeks.

Seeing the (Summer) Olympics shift energy from Paris (2024) to L.A (2028)….California…celebrity-capital-U.S.A….I am, once more, as I seem to be after every season of Olympics, torn. I shouldn’t even watch the closing ceremony because it just tears me up. I would both love and hate to be there, love to experience the relief of being able to mingle without the previous pressure to compete, love to get another helping of host-country culture and entertainment (if there is any), love to get one more chance to seal friendships before parting ways. But, also, hate to see everything end, hate to see the flame extinguished (isn’t it just supposed to pass on to the next host nation?…not go out and then start anew?). I get so emotional when THE END approaches…and arrives. I’m the guy who doesn’t enjoy parties much because they eventually end, and the fun, the joy, goes away.

[I’m also not much of a crowd person. Too many unfamiliar faces spoils my comfort. I need to know who is around me, and not knowing enough leaves me edgy; too many unknown variables.]

Consider what I’m about to say as my catharsis for coping with the end of a “good time.”

I’m feeling more of a France fan than I’ve been all my life. This small sampling of what is France has stirred my soul. I’ve been seduced by the simplest of artistry.** I think I get France, now.

——-

**If I may be blunt, France is no China or Japan (when those two are not suffering from a quarantine). France tries and has lots of creative potential…but it’s not the best composition that I have seen. The elements are there…just not the interwoven story and not quite the level of quality. I saw it in the opening ceremony; I see it, again, in the closing. A little too much Circus of the Sun and Moulin Rouge; the story comes off a bit weak under the weight of random movement and elaborate costumes without distinct, apparent meaning. A knight associated with ancient Greece? A cool female knight…but still a bit confusing. The Far East knows how to lay out a scroll and retell the progression of history, and, for that, I will always respect that region, even if some historical stories run a bit long (and involve too much combat).

Perhaps, France just doesn’t have patience for telling stories. It wants to get on with business. Make things happen, rather than sit around talking about it. So, you want a show? It will be short and lackluster. France wants to get busy with purpose. France isn’t a performer, a talker nor a celebrity of any kind. It’s a quiet, unassuming muse, an elusive unicorn. It wants to evoke something in the minds of others. It blows the smoke of inspiration in your face and then says, “Be creative.” You get it? Good. Now, enough talk. Let’s make something happen. The Moulin Rouge isn’t a Hollywood or Broadway theater; it’s a quick, flashy show before you get on with, before you pursue…other stuff. Entice with an appetizer, and then let’s go. You don’t eat a big meal in France.

[And, that’s why I like Italy. I can eat. France is a butterfly. Italy is a bee.]

——-

I used to think, as a teenager, France was weak; France was the coward that wouldn’t stand up and fight for what mattered. It only fought when thrust into a world war. France was the kingdom of the elves from Lord of the Rings; the French didn’t get involved in the matters of other races unless provoked, unless threatened. I thought the Statue of Liberty was a highly creative yet pitiful way of handing “the torch” of leadership to the U.S.A. It was “America’s” job, now, to be the global defender and champion.

[I wouldn’t say I think of the U.S.A. as the global defender or champion of anything other than boasting, right now. The U.S.A. has boasted so much for so long that it’s starting to alienate other cultures, it’s own immigrants (at least, those who aren’t sucked in, from head to toe, by the illusion of the “American dream”). Those chasing the dream take on a different path from the average American and never let it go. The U.S.A. has to spend so much time and resources amending for how it offended various peoples, and I’m just waiting in a very long line. It’s sick. It’s kind of like having your way with a prostitute and then trying to make the memory go away by dumping more and more money on someone. How do you get that money? Any way you can; sometimes an inconceivable “swagger” does all the business.]

Just one summer season of the Olympics in France has been enough for me to think otherwise, think more, of France. It’s still not top of my destination list. But, there is something primordially creative at its core which evokes artistry. It may be the cauldron of creativity. Just walking around Paris should be enough to spark the creation of countless books, plays, movies and all sorts of physical art. Perhaps it is the home of Hephaestus and/or Athena. Could it be there summer home? [Ha.]

France isn’t so much weak as it is graceful and reluctant to fight. It’s a bit vain. But, in being that vain and reluctant to fight, it has turned its energies to fueling creativity. And, that aligns with my own creativity. Creation in the mindset of violence or conflict is driven toward weaponry and defense. Creation becomes filling the armory when threatened. We want enough armor and tools to survive and silence the enemy.

France is a swan. A swan doesn’t get its gleaming white feathers dirty or bloody with fighting; it preens and cares for itself and bestows that grace upon those who align with that mindset. When the U.S.A. proved it was a friend in pursuit of peace and had its own creative potential, France gave the Americans a present and a “handshake” of friendship; not the sort of friendship you might want if you are a hot-blooded vanguard of righteousness.

So, in short, as a couple, the U.S.A. and France are not a happy couple. France wants calm, quiet, beauty and grace. And, the U.S.A. can’t calm itself enough to sit still for too long; it has to reach out, get dirty and take chances France won’t. It’s the stay-at-home wife and the adventurous extroverted husband. The U.S.A. tells France to get off its ass and mingle/fight. France tells its American partner to settle down and take it easy; find happiness in quiet moments. The U.S.A. isn’t listening.

Which is why the Olympics coming to the U.S.A., especially the over-glamorized region of modern California, feels really wrong. I don’t have any interest in watching those games. I’ve seen enough “celebrity.” The Olympics arenas of 1984 are not what they are or will be in 2028. You see how they introduce L.A. in the Paris games. There’s nothing humble or subtle, like Paris, in that. It’s typical modern American showboating, with a little subtle hidden message-ry coming from the Red Hot Chili Peppers. If only enough people had the brains to read between the lines.

I have nothing creative to offer L.A. I don’t feel for it. I don’t aspire to reach it, other than for a flimsy hope of having the good fortune countless celebrities have claimed to get from going there. It’s like ads for Las Vegas; so much COULD happen there, if you go…but will it? I’ve been duped before.

L.A. will certainly generate money for the Olympics. But, it’s going to feel so elite, spoiled and like a high-school popularity contest…my nerves pinch at the thought.

Looking forward to 2026 and the WINTER? games, I don’t picture Italy hosting the winter of anything. I thought people who hate cold weather ran to places like that, close to the equator. I don’t imagine Italy covered in snow except, maybe, right around Christmas when it’s time for that big holiday mass. And, even then, I don’t see the snow.

Having a sort of blood tie to Italy gives me another love-hate relationship. I don’t love how the Roman Empire stole from, copied and altered the name of everything Greek. That’s now how I want to be; that’s not me. But, in my blood, I am part Italian…and I have to acknowledge the good and bad of that. I am not easy to get along with, apparently, yet many I’ve met tell me I’m great…for something. When I believe in something, I tend to fight for (or endure and retain hope for) it more than the average person (and don’t always win). I’ve fought for friendship and defending my own feelings against bullies and hecklers. I’ve defended some of my artwork when people didn’t agree with or even remotely respect/approve it. When I encounter injustice at work, I speak up. When people in positions of power misuse their authority, I also make a fuss and/or rebel. [I think I’ve earned my Phrygian hat; wouldn’t you agree?]

I already am getting ideas for Italian artwork. Unlike L.A., it’s easy and feels…good. I may not love all of Italy, but there’s enough spice and flavor there to fuel a few revolutions. If Italy gave the Olympics season its all, it could flatten France. Italy could win on sheer passion alone. In a way, Italy is Ares, the more savage Greek god of war…except it’s not a warring nation, now. It’s driven by conquest; but you don’t see Italy taking down other nations. It doesn’t need to do that, anymore. It’s a self-sustained furnace, it’s own Olympic torch for eternity. I don’t know what keeps it contained and content…but it’s a relatively quiet volcano. Maybe it’s content because it has gorged on good food. Maybe it’s Aphrodite, who some say is the goddess of beauty while others say she’s the goddess of passion. But, while there is beauty in Italy, I wouldn’t say Italy is prettier than some other nations (too many to mention). Italy is passion; it is fire. If you mess with fire, you get burned. In a strange way, I respect and crave Italy’s passion for life. It’s a sustaining, motivating fire. But, that’s also a dangerous fire if it’s not properly attended. Lust is not healthy passion. Vengeance is not often if ever healthy passion (even if we sometimes feel it’s deserved when someone severely upsets us).

Italy evokes pizza and pasta. What does L.A. evoke? Spending money I don’t have? Looking at the excessively large and expensive homes of others? Listening to musicians talk of unhealthy obsessions and habits that no longer align with modern “woke” times? Wishing I was a celebrity? That’s an empty welcome to unhappiness. I will leave L.A. hungry and miss no one. The venue might be a relic surviving the passage of time, but it’s an empty theater that likely gets violated more often than it is respected. It’s a Motel 6 in a box, waiting to be used, again. L.A. and Hollywood get plenty of attention during the year, every year. Hosting an award show isn’t special. It’s just inviting bad habits and heartbreak. People call Paris the city of love, where many claim to fall in love but also where many claim to fall out of it. But, L.A.? I anticipate heartbreak there. The only love there is with wealth and flaunting it.

[I might just ignore the L.A. Summer Olympics, altogether. I don’t see the need for watching. I cannot even imagine that venue finding a respectable mascot. Just…pass.]

That brings my attention to something subtly deceptive about the Olympics. There are hints of something “rigged” in the air, all of the time. I get this feeling like something drives every Olympic event and season. And, no matter what pressure athletes put upon and endure themselves, it doesn’t impact what is already in motion.

A skateboarder gets the majority of attention in the games of Paris, right before he is welcome like a king in the next set, in L.A. It doesn’t matter what he does; he’s already golden in the eyes of the U.S.A. The same goes for certain gymnasts, who dominate broadcast TV time, along with all of the ads for AI that try to paint warm, inspiring pictures with little kids watching their stars perform, continuing the cycle of chasing the gold (not finding lasting companionship, chasing the gold), padded with images of people comforting the athletes, supporting them and tending their “wounds.” I don’t see it. I don’t have to see it. It’s decided. He’s the one. She’s the one.

If they disappoint, they were set up. Some other nation put up more money to tip the scales in their favor; that’s my suspicion. It’s all about money. The joining of nations in peace and harmony is secondary. The latter is anticipated as diversion by those working out the former.

Athletes aren’t just pieces of metal honed by their own passion and practice; they’re bought and sold and thinned to an elite group of sponsored race cars. The select get painted like movie stars on posters and other “merch.”

The current sort of Olympics is like going to McDonald’s (or Las Vegas); you are supposed to enjoy the music and setting, but be sure to put your money down on something (not entirely healthy) to ingest and try not to leave a mess before you leave. You’re not there to live in Candyland. You just need to be distracted and enticed enough to spend. Take your host-nation swag and go home; the cruise is over. Thanks for spending your earnings, if you did. Thanks for feeding the sponsors and tourism that pay for the athletes to compete to satisfy their financial support system. [‘Kind of sounds like buying a bookie to bet on race horses for us.]

You might view the Olympics as a more elaborate form of the Oscars. It definitely draws a larger crowd…to talk about awards. And, thankfully, there’s no big deal about what you’re wearing. Most likely, it wasn’t designed by a big-name fashion designer. Well, maybe the stuff from your sponsoring nation is; can you help that? Can you ignore it? Can you go without it? Nah. You have to represent; right? The evaluating entities of the Olympics hand out fewer gold prizes than the Oscars…but how does the hype and gossip compare? Which gets more talk about the prizes, the Olympics or the Oscars?

Talk buzzes around so many athletes I DO see, even though they don’t get the gold. I’ve seen some jaw-dropping and dazzling performances that didn’t get the coveted prize. I heard someone say that girl was the crowd favorite (she certainly dazzled me)…but she didn’t win anything she can hold in her hands.

[I know. I know! There are so many metaphors in my head, right now, for what she CAN hold in her heart and take with her, even if they aren’t physical objects made of metal and fabric.]

What did they accomplish by competing and risking their bodies? Shouldn’t that say something? Is one athlete really less for not winning a medal? But, how do you get so much buzz about three prizes and not slight those who were only nominated? And, if we don’t have the three prizes to chase, why do we compete?

Just having fun together doesn’t seem like something that compels people to invest, to spend. It sounds like a big, lavish party, and you might feel bad if you’re not able to come or even invited.

What do you say to people who invested in you and maybe put you in commercials…just to come home with nothing? Or, is every athlete put into commercials guaranteed some prize, in the end? Maybe they don’t get the gold, this round, but they get it in the “redemption” season. And, if that fails to work? What then? Does failure actually happen or are palms greased? I sadly really do wonder.

[I don’t think three prizes may be enough. I think other medals are deserved, as well.]

Yet, there is SO much talk about medal counts and getting the gold. It’s insanity. What a waste of time, talent and energy the Olympics becomes when we give so much to talk of the gold medals and the celebrities injecting themselves into the games. Why do athletes end up in therapy or crumble when they no longer can compete? Part of it, I imagine, comes from the separation, the filtering of what is Olympic magic/illusion and what is reality. The Olympics creates identity crises; not because it has always been that way but because of how “celebrity” it has become and how much technology has honed the attention of judges. What was probably once a more confusing and vague assessment of skills has become put under a microscope.

If we could just boil down the Olympics to its basics, its core, doesn’t it make sense that the medal chase may be the very problem that persists? The coming together of nations would still be there without the medal chase, but you’d also have less pressure to dislike people. You’d have less psychological aftermath. But, I suppose, this would be more of a world fair than a competition…wouldn’t it? If only…

I think the medals were intended to offer some measure of status, to identify who was the best in any given sport. But, I don’t think they were intended to be decided by millimeters and fractions of seconds. I don’t think they were meant to be taken away when an appeal for a better judgement of scores comes a few seconds later than stated in a document. Isn’t there a better way to hand out medals and keep athletes from self-destructing?

This might floor some people who, even like me, have become sort of hooked on the supposed intended spirit of the Olympics. But, I wonder if we even need the competition, anymore. The world is competitive enough, already. People fight for jobs like scraps of food. People lose jobs even faster over so many little (and some big) matters. Almost every day, we hear or see something that evokes competition. Even gaming cannot be as fun as it has become competitive. You hear people talk about being competitive…but do you hear them say they are fun or having fun, as much?

Of course, past Olympic athletes (at least, the former medal winners) pitch to keep the cycle going; they become commentators and/or probably get some kind of royalty pay from being connected to the games. They don’t have the same pressures put on their bodies when they felt they had to compete…but there are still pressures, thanks to their participation. When I hear a former competitor say they can’t get enough Olympics, I hear, “Keep investing money in what keeps food on my table and new clothes in my walk-in wardrobe or ample supply of luggage as I continue to circulate the globe like a tourist/celebrity.”

Hey, weren’t you…yep. Give that competitor some money. Support the Olympic troops. Is there a wounded veteran Olympian fund? You’re Joe Nameth; thy name is investor-funded civilian.

We need a global festival that brings people together. And, yes, we may need some form of activity to unleash pent-up stress. But, when that activity gets put under the microscope of advanced computer speculation, it loses some of its appeal. If I play volleyball and hear someone say I could have performed better if I just took a tenth of a step to the right when I served, I’d be annoyed. I’d lose all the fun of the game and give up, eventually.

Technology and speculation takes the fun out of everything. As does too much focus on competition and pressure to be “number one.” The saying goes around; no one remembers who came in second or third. They remember the gold winners.

I recall seeing a movie some time ago…or maybe it was Game of Thrones…when someone asked what had happened to the ancient gods. Why did the gods vanish? I think they lost interest in humankind when we could no longer give them reverence and got lost in our obsession with updating technology. [So…is Hermes or Hephaestus to blame?]

The spirit of the Olympics continues to be a flickering and waning flame. It’s not healthy. It’s not bright and full of rejuvenating life. It’s a sickly illusion of what was. It’s a good time for one IOE president to retire, as good of a guy as he seems ot have been. Retiring in the summer of Paris? How much better can one guy get? It’s a bed of roses for that guy. I don’t know what that means for the future; turning over jobs doesn’t seem to be going well in any area of existence. But, one can hope.

So, it makes sense that I get so emotional. It’s not just seeing something potentially great for everyone come and go so swiftly. It’s also secretly knowing, realizing something is still wrong, lingering, and needing repair. But, how do we do that?

[Right now, we’re NOT making the Olympics better, other than finding more possible camera angles and equipment to capture every move. We’re just kind of glossing over them as we get swept away in waves of technology and “feeds.” Even Alanis Morissette, looking really good right now, is, on one hand, giving a pitch for better communication as a species, and, on the other, selling cellphones that offer apps that alter how you communicate. Ironic…I think. Come on, selling cellphones, no matter what the companies pitch, isn’t improving the problem caused by cellphones. Just as no silver-tongued pitch for world unity is going to be improved by the very AI you’re actually selling.]

The following is less about the Olympics and more of a personal purge. But, at its core, is discontent with what is supposedly representing the epitome of world harmony, a time and place we can put our anger and unhappiness aside…if only it was.

What do I do with these thoughts of improvement I continually have? I judge and I judge and I judge…and I talk to myself because no one wants to hear it. What good is that kind of thinking? I see potential in what I’m shown and want to improve upon it…to dazzle the world much the way the best athletes do in these games…and I can do nothing or not enough to please myself. I am stuck; I am handicapped.

Part of me wants to run. Like Forrest Gump, I want to hit the road and not stop until I am utterly cramped up and exhausted. Hopefully, I have the good sense to get home before I collapse, as he did in the movie. Or, I want to take up break dancing and jerk and spin myself crazy until I am a lump of bones and flesh gasping for air on the ground. I am discontent with the state of the world (and my own little part, my family and lack of friends). I see illusions of happiness, like the grass greener on the other side, but also too many ugly truths coming out…squashing the fantasies.

Is it possible the majority of information bombarding my eyes and brain is directed toward some sinister goal of shutting humanity down in the most subversive way? Is some tech giant trying to shut me and everyone else this data hits down, to let technology take that place? I wonder…because I see so few sure-footed happy paths to take in life. I hear people talk about what will get me to happiness and fulfillment…but I don’t see the path, completely. So, I could, as I’ve done in the past, venture in this direction or that, and come to a decision I cannot confidently make. I’m not much of a gambler, alone.

What remains of the Olympic flame? Hope. Hope that “tomorrow” will be better than today; that’s what I retain as I venture on, searching for whatever it is that will make my existence feel complete. Others chase medals and hope that will finance happiness, after countless hours of training, repetition and anaylsis, scrutiny and self-torture.

I live in a place that occasionally has a festival for some particular culture. There are Italian, Greek, Polish and other festivals. But, they are little more than a meeting place for single people, double-dating couples and families who are desperate for eating out (not at home). You get a hint of music, a hint of culture and a handful of vendors selling food. It’s not much of a festival. Even our “state fair,” which combines all of those other festivals into one location and short stack of days, lacks something; it’s a lot of people crowded into a heated space, late in summer, dragging their feet in search of something to satisfy their needs. The music and theater of the state fair is better than the smaller fairs, but that’s about it, and even that theater seems to disappoint some. The Olympics seems like a bit more than a big assembly of vendors. It certainly is more culturally diverse. I’m just not sure, alone, what to do with it (and have yet to be present to experience one, other than watching it unfold and vanish on TV).

Hey, France (and any other nation that chooses to hear me). How about we organize an Olympics of artistry and forget the whole physical contest and concern for things like steroids. ‘Sound good? I am sure athletes, too, would benefit from the art therapy and not end up PTSD or physical-therapy spokespeople pitching every kind of pain killer under the sun.

Other than the icon on various pieces of equipment, I didn’t see what I expected of this “Marianne” around Paris…so this is what I envisioned.  A Marianne sampler (in addition to pictures I included in a previous post).  The first image has eyes on the next Olympics destinations.

Right now, people are studying a black hole, at the center of the universe, slowly sucking in everything we now, consuming and erasing it. What kind of life is that? We’re slowly losing sight of life and analyzing impending doom. That’s not very Olympian.

I don’t look for how to put out the flame. I look for how to keep the spirit of positive union going. United states? United kingdoms? United provinces? Bah. United nations. A united planet not self-destructing and looking for other worlds to colonize, to conquer. But, looking at how so many relationships crumble, holding onto such unifying thoughts seems…senseless. [Yet, still, I won’t devote my time to studying impending death nor live on “feeds.”]

I’m shutting up, now. 😛

09
Jun
23

A Strawberry Moon and an Unhappy Rabbit

****

I was outside late at night…or early in the morning, depending upon how you judge the time…when I saw an amazing sight in the sky, a reddish moon as big as a small cookie.  I could reach up and pick the pink wafer out of the dark blue.  The streetlamps had just turned off, signaling the end of night.  The scene was serene.  But, thinking about recent events, including weather/climate news, I couldn’t help thinking that red moon was a disapproving rabbit.  The year of the water rabbit/hare, 2023, has not started well.  Instead of new peace, there has been consistent discontent, uprising and–in terms of water–drought.  In the year of a water animal, there has been noticeable absence of useful water.  Fires are the talk of the nation.  So, what is going on here?  What is wrong, and how can it be corrected?

Food for thought as you bask upon my lucky photography.

strawberrymoon-closertohowIsawit-enhanced-june62023-356am-tripod-milwwi-crop-kodakblue-100_6328-4Bstrawberrymoon-june62023-359am-tripod-milwaukeewi-crop-kodakblue-100_6331-2

30
Nov
22

When Is Talking with Your Hands Okay?

****

I’m noticing people on TV, particularly the sports commentators for American football and the World Cup (at the moment), doing quite a bit of talking with their hands. You know what I mean? They cannot stand still and just voice their thoughts. They have to wave and swing their arms about as they speak loudly to the lights and cameras. …But, why?

I keep drifting back to things I’ve heard in the past.

When I was a kid, there was always some rule about when to speak, how to sit, stand, etc. And, more often than not, I was always in the wrong. Someone had to remind me. Someone had to put it to rhyme or in a “cleverly” coded PSA (public service announcement, like those ads for not smoking, not littering, drunk driving, etc.).

As an adult, “entering the workforce,” I was then told to “quiet” myself in interviews and whenever speaking with higher authorities. Don’t move any part of the body, maintain eye contact and speak with confidence. [As if.]

Why is it now seem okay if not encouraged for people on TV to talk with their bodies, especially their forearms? Why are people on camera so “loud?”

Some would say…what else are they going to do with themselves? They’re on camera. They have to be doing something…or they’d look stiff, just talking.

Others, with some knowledge of astrology, might wonder, like I do, if those people aren’t “Gemini-rising” types. I’ve read/heard a Gemini rising sign makes you want to talk with your hands (as well as act/be a performer). [I happen to have that rising sign. I cannot admit to being a very avid “hand talker.” But, yes, occasionally, my hands leap up when I talk…and it makes me very uncomfortable in job-interview situations. Are my hands talking? Am I being too “loud” or quiet? Bah!]

So, what is it, really? Tell me, ye who talks with your hands. Why do you do it? I must know. I must understand why some can be so “loud” with their hands and bodies when so many others have pressured me to “quiet” myself.

18
Nov
22

Do You Ever Feel Like Your Slot in this World Is Taken?

****

Do you ever feel like your slot in this life/world has already been taken by someone else?

Have you ever discovered someone with the life or job you desire and thought…they’ve got this. So, where does that put me? What’s left for me to do when someone else is doing that as well as anyone could want?

For example…how many people can really take up the space occupied by famous authors? How many of those authors being presently thrust into the spotlight…with talk shows throwing copies at audience members…do you expect to be remembered and heralded decades from now? Who do you see being the next Dickens or Wells? So, you wrote a children’s book or a novel liked by a few people you happen to know who took the time to flip through it. If you cannot even get on one of those talk shows, what are your odds of acquiring a respectable number of readers? How do you compete with other authors who put out a new book almost every year or every few years? Are you content just being published, even if your book ends up in the ghost town of clearance racks at Barnes and Noble?

You can’t do better than that other person. Or, even if you could, you doubt anyone would value you more than that other person, based upon popular opinion. And, most likely, you’re not popular. You never had the chance to become famous for anything. Everyone has beat you to it.

When you pursue a new job, you’re supposed to “sell yourself” and stand out from the others seeking the same job. Is that realistic? Or, do you just exaggerate and/or lie to enhance your spotlight?

Look at those speed-dating shows in which one man or woman is surrounded by twenty-or-more members of the opposite sex (or the same sex, whatever), and the former picks off the latter, one by one, until two fools are left with the slim hope of achieving more than those who went before them. How does one person stand out from the others without stepping on their toes and shoving them out of the way just to steal a moment of the star’s time? Is that what’s left? Pure, savage force at the risk of starting a brawl? Is this Planet of the Apes? You…jerks…you’ve ruined it…ruined my chances of finding happiness.

Now, imagine or consider actual one-on-one dating and what happens when your date decides to “see other people,” not just you. What if your date has a type, and you’re just one of that type. Now, some other person of the same type scores slightly higher than you for whatever reason. You’re out. What then? How does that leave you feeling? Do you just suck it up and try the same approach/routine with someone else?

So, where does that put you? What’s left for you in this life? A routine job and mediocre-at-best social life? Just joining the herd of laboring cows in this world?

Do you let your “friends” put you on the blind-date cycle and hope for the best? Do you start “swiping” and lowering expectations to the point you feel like one step from a prostitute? Do you steel yourself for a life of solitude and considering pets and the kids of other people as your own? Do you submit to becoming the “crazy cat” person?

I think I just got lost in a chain of questions. Swirling… Bitter food for thought. Hmm.

06
Oct
22

Big Brother USA 2022 Finale

***

Let it be known, speeches win games. At least, it worked for Taylor, this year. [I highly doubt it would work for me, no matter how “smart” or “educated” people label me. I don’t have the “racial/sexual resume” to get the votes. I’m a white mutt, and the world is sick of my kind.]

I should be happy she won. But, I’m not. I’m actually–I cannot believe it–sad for Turner and Monte. Monte worked his butt off to win when it mattered; he won competitions that would have tested my limits and likely ended in frustration. He proved he wasn’t just a handsome face. He saved Taylor because he thought Turner had a better chance of winning, equal value. Instead, he is bested by a pretty face who apparently swayed enough voters with her Miss-America speech. She was ready to throw in the towel after falling short in a key competition, when she was determined to EARN her seat in Final Two. Instead, a speech gets her to the top. Save it for the beauty pageant, m’lady.

I’m a bit shocked. But, I shouldn’t be. Again, it’s just one of those seasons, in which the person you think should win doesn’t, in the end. [Oh how the show likes to be “unexpected.”]

Turner voted for Monte…and no one else did? The martyr of the house…the weasel voted for the guy who sent him out at the end. Thanks, Heyzoos. Michael says you have to own your moves; Monte did, and still Michael voted for Taylor (because his girl Alyssa so obviously did; she said she was voting for “the sword,” the word Taylor used for herself). I don’t believe anything anyone says, anymore. You’re all bleach-toothed liars. Good luck remaining real friends without CBS financial support and cameras on you all of the time.

I think my hunch about Monte’s final comments also may have been a factor. When Turner asked Monte who should get his (Turner’s) vote, Monte stood by his decision and spoke on his own behalf (next to a woman who was so ready to railroad anyone in her way, once she avoided going out in third and long before that, all season long). If I was Turner and truly DID have such a solid agreement with Monte, I would have voted for Taylor; and Monte should have said, “Don’t vote for me, Turner; I cheated you out of the big prize.” Little did I know…that would likely have given Taylor the unanimous vote. Unbelievable. Monte, you hard-working fool. I hope your “man up” father shows a little more compassion when you go home.

And, the “ice queen” wins Favorite Houseguest?? No offense, Taylor (I adore you, in a way)…but it makes no sense!! You have to admit that. And, if you cannot, you are blind to your own ego. You walk away with the TWO (big) prizes, and all those who were snubbed before you get nothing. Ego trip extreme. [If my blog comments about Taylor being a personal favorite but unlikely to win had any impact on this decision (doubt it), oh well. Who knew?]

If I had to pick “favorite houseguest,” I’d have no clue. In a situation like this one, it should be the one person who endured the crap with the best attitude and who was a good friend to everyone. But, that’s not how it works. That’s not how any of this works. And, as nice as some people were, this year, all but maybe Monte showed other sides, as well, which proved irritating.

I think Monte was the least annoying and least offensive (though I cannot speak for the first four eliminated because I didn’t see most of those weeks). Considering so many speeches had to be given, there should have been a prize for best speech. Oh, wait, Taylor would have probably claimed that trophy, too, huh? Not Michael for his do-the-Daniel, say nothing exit. Not Turner for talking himself into and out of everything with everyone. Whatever.

One other thing…Julie welcomes back the four players who were eliminated before jury…only 4? I don’t think Nicole got one word in that whole time. And, Julie started asking the jury more questions, making the first four evictees wait even longer to speak, at all. That was rude.

I’m actually a little nauseous (and, again, feeling bad for those who lost…everyone but Taylor). I get the feeling, now that enterprising, resume-obsessed Taylor has claimed her crown and bonus and found out Joseph, the “meathead” is actually a lawyer (of some humble kind), she will brush Monte completely aside to jump that salary-earner. Up until he announced being a lawyer, she seemed sweet on Monte. And, Monte looked just a tad washed-out-to-sea after Joseph revealed the truth; he knew Taylor’s opportunistic feelings shifted.

Another nutty season with a cracked ending. Yayyy… As usual, I feel even more guilty for investing my time and attention. Buyer’s remorse.

Everybody in southern California and Florida who doesn’t have any talent to show off, sign up now. [Not.] Plastic plastic surgeons and secretive lawyers welcome. CBS needs all the legal help and plastic they can get.

I doubt I’ll ever get to play. But, if I did, I’d seriously do my best to say nothing and just roll with the dice. Forget getting caught up in the hype, the competition struggle, the alliance crap. Win what I can, enjoy the ride, protect my dignity…and, if I cannot win, enjoy the jury house (and not being on camera?).

The worst positions to be put in are first and last evictions. Beyond that, all is fair play. You can see that even hard word does not pay off. Some people can talk their way out of a grave.

17
Aug
22

Living in a Simulated World, 8-17-2022

*****

Sarcastic kudos to all the tech giants who have contributed something to turning every human being on this planet into some sort of mindless NPC. [That’s NON-PLAYABLE CHARACTER…to those who don’t already know the gaming lingo.] You are heralded for and exceedingly wealthy from your works, but the rest of humankind pays for your twisted genius, mentally, physically, financially…the amount of payment for the praise you take to the bank is overwhelming and often goes unseen by the average eye.

What am I ranting about, now? Well, let me tell ya, you wee blighters! And, ye be kind enough to listen, ay? [I don’t know why I just turned into a Scotsman.]

Since the dawn of the internet, people have begun to lose their bodily functions, their compassion and general awareness of others. Gluing eyes to glowing screens, more and more as those glowing screens promise, beckon and dazzle with increasingly complex and vivid arrays of…stuff, humans have begun degrading into mindless occupants of space. It’s amazing any of us can hold a job without being some Borg drone. [That’s a Star-Trek reference, folks, in case…yea, you’ve probably already exhausted your attention span and are now looking at another screen to absorb…something fleeting. If not, if you’re still with me, here, good for you; you’re still human.]

I’ve played a wide range of games, some better than others, some easier on the eyes and not likely to make me nauseous the way many of the fast-paced 3-D games do. And, I’ve encountered a variety of NPCs. But, the general rule with NPCs seems to be limited speech/interaction. They don’t do or say much, just a line or two and some repetitive movement to show they exist and do something. That’s better than a motionless image on a background, I guess. If you’re lucky, bringing something back to the NPC earns a new response; sometimes that’s the key to and/or the treat of the game. Your goal might be to figure out what excites or upsets the NPC and deliver that (for points, a prize or just the experience/reaction).

Recently, I’ve been noticing how people in my own “real” world are acting more and more like NPCs. You approach them, they greet you (if they’re human enough to be that kind) and if you are so inclined to confess something to them, the response is too often disappointing and static. Some, including family, repeat the same tiresome lines you’ve heard countless times; you don’t need that. Some, including family, barely acknowledge what you’ve said, like children absorbed in some TV show or video game; they might glance in your direction and/or make a sound, but they don’t have anything intelligent (not to mention kind) to say in response.

Some use phrases you’d expect to find in a book of famous and trending quotes. “You just take it one day at a time.” “All that matters is what YOU think.” You desperately want some compassion and understanding, but all you get is NPC behavior. So much for “love thy neighbor.”

Surely, if you’ve played as many video games as I have, you’ve encountered this, the background character who offers so little, even if they seem charming and inviting, like someone you’d want as a friend. It’s about as lousy as a game of The Sims, in which dialogue is reduced to a few repeating strings of nonsense voiced by one man and one woman in some recording studio. You get more out of the little bubbles/boxes that pop up to tell you someone is bored or upset. Imagine that. Imagine all human interaction being reduced to the grunts of cavepeople and glowing boxes that appear overhead to indicate what people are feeling…if they even feel anything once technology has taken over all life on the planet.

So, while science and especially PBS shows keep pitching crap about people looking to the stars with wonder, wondering about life on other planets, I’m inclined to wrinkle my brow in fury and say it’s all a lame cover for what’s really happening, submission to the overly wealthy tech giants, the select few who will ultimately wipe out all other organic life on the planet, eventually including their own…which doesn’t upset them in the least because they’ve already probably submitted to some evil robotic entity that promised them eternal virtual life as part of some database, some matrix. Those who refuse to convert to “tech-mindedness” absorb pressure upon pressure until they break, one way or another, including myself. How much stress can they take before they (we) explode or commit suicide?

……Sorry. I’m not sure what else to say, at the moment. I sort of burnt out my rant supply. I’d say this is just food for thought, something to ponder as you pick and poke among the online materials available…which gets me thinking…if there ARE still genuine human beings out there, somewhere, they probably don’t even look at the internet. So, all of my philosophical words are sort of wasted, here…typical. The REAL ears are hidden away, somewhere, like an ancient race of elves slipping through the dreary parts of this world as they go about their magical lives, oblivious to the tragedy. I just haven’t found a secret doorway to their ideal world, yet.

Uhp. Here come the tech overlords. Everybody who still has a heart and conscience, look blank-faced and limit your words to a single phrase, so you won’t be assimilated. [And, ya know, you can’t spell “assimilate” without ASS. There sure seems to be enough ASS to go up the crack in our universe and back, again.]

19
Aug
21

The Logic Circle; Where Only the Involved Understand

*****

Have you ever partially tuned into a conversation between two people and found yourself completely clueless, unable to understand the terminology and/or context of what they are saying?  Congrats on finding yourself OUTSIDE the LOGIC CIRCLE.

INSIDE the circle, everything should make perfect sense.  You and your companion are discussing a shared interest.  So, even if you find your mind drifting into space, you’re still understood and understanding.

OUTSIDE the circle, those INSIDE appear like insects or other animals, speaking a foreign language.

Vulcans are typically OUTSIDE the circle, probably because they are hesitant to being emotional.

spock-illogical-demotivationposter-1

Well, you can put your stubborn criticism in a box, mister!

spocksboxofillogicalthoughts-handicraft-woodenkeepsake-forsale-1

This may not be a new or novel concept to you, but I have become more aware of its existence in recent months, particularly in quarantine, noticing how matters make more sense when I am speaking with someone sharing my interest and/or outlook and less when I am with someone confrontational.  It’s not simply a disagreement or willingness to understand; it is not denial of logic.  It is a special space in which the matter at hand is logical and concepts can be perceived more clearly.

Here’s another good example.  Have you ever been exposed to the multitude of random, quick “tic tock” videos of anything?  Well, to the person who captured the video, the subject matter is amusing or worth sharing.  You, the viewer, however, might look and wrinkle your brow, trying to understand why the video needed to be shared.  You are OUTSIDE the LOGIC CIRCLE.  The inane owners of all those cellphone cameras are INSIDE their own LOGIC CIRCLES.  [Seriously; why are so many of these videos being made and shared with the world when only those INSIDE the LOGIC CIRCLE understand them?][And, why are cats scared of cucumbers?  Cucumbers do not look like snakes.  There has to be some ancient myth to the fear.]

04
Jun
21

Global Equality and Happiness; Philosophical Meandering, June 4, 2021

*****

thinker-statue-fadedforestbackdrop-closeup-2

I caught something on TV the other day about Elon Musk’s girlfriend? promoting a form of communism.  She said something about eliminating work, using more AI to run the planet and everyone benefitting from this shift.  And, someone responded by saying they could see some logic in the young woman’s presentation.  [Though I couldn’t help raising an eyebrow to the markings on her face (pre-surgery, I presume) and wonder what in state her mind actually was.  When you’re prepping for surgery, your mind can say and do strange things.]

This wasn’t the only stimulus for today’s pondering (or meandering).

I’ve been bombarded with so many thoughts in the past few days, some of which have sparked ideas for rants that never took shape.  I’ve also been feeling exceptionally distressed and depressed for no particular/new reason.  

Now then…

Can you imagine a world in which no one has a job or requirement to pay taxes and such and can simply live off the land as everyone pleases?  I’ve seen something close to that on certain versions of Star Trek.  And, sure, we forget some of the details of “reality” when watching just about any movie, TV show or, the current trend, online videos which could be uploaded by just about anyone for any reason and altered with a variety of computer/video tools (to mess with our heads).  But, is such a world possible?  That’s, essentially, my question.  And, feel free to contribute your thoughts below.

While I aspire and long for such a world, I have lingering doubts it could ever exist.  And, I will tell you why in a minute.

The longer I live, the angrier I get at humanity as a whole.  I know it’s not good to throw all your apples in one basket.  There ARE good apples…as well as bad ones.  But, it’s difficult to sort them out and getting more difficult each day.  Just when you think you have a good apple, something crazy and/or disappointing happens.  And, there are a number of possible reasons/influences for this.  [But, I won’t overload your brain with those, now.]  But, bad apples spoil the bunch and make life miserable for everyone, including themselves once they hit a discouraging dead end, a point when all the gold in the world isn’t making them happy, whether they admit it or not.  Or, they just die and hand over the wealth to the next generation of entitled fools.

Actually, that ties into what I’m about to say.  

Why is a peaceful world enjoyed by all, equally, so impossible to achieve?  And, why are all our efforts to achieve…well…anything “good” in vain?  Because there will always be a “sense of entitlement” or some other variation of that phrase that drives certain people to be less charitable than others.  At least, I don’t see how it can change for the better.  

You’ve probably seen some of this in movies, too.  Someone comes up with a solution for the fossil-fuel problem, and, whether or not it becomes public knowledge, someone in a high seat swoops down on the invention to “capitalize” it.  One minute, you’ve got fresh air for everyone; the next, the air is being bottled and sold at your “convenience.”  It’s not convenient to turn the world into one big outlet store.  It’s not convenient to slash a price from $400 to $40 when the item isn’t worth anything other than what humans stamp on it, when the item is available to all if we’d let it be.

Right now, bottled water is all the rage.  Every cotton-picking flavor and type imaginable is being advertised.  And, everyone has their gimmick to sell it.  SELLING WATER.  Isn’t that the beginning of the end?  Isn’t that one step from The Lorax?  Come on, people!  Wise up!

The world is perpetually one step away from a Moonlight Madness Sale.  Someone presents a crisis or craze, and the sheep, cattle, dogs, rodents…all of them go running in all directions, trying to get a piece of the action.  Someone shouts fire or virus, and people panic.  Someone shouts FREE ___!  And, people rush to get the bargain or catch the T-shirt or jump through flaming hoops to get a prize which requires some paperwork and payment of taxes. 

THIS is sharing?  Well, you might say, “Nooo.  That’s not it.  That’s not the level of equality we can yet reach.”  But, I think it is.  I think those without the status and power to delegate and trickle down the benefits from their high seats are always going to be chasing and wasting and competing with others, regardless of their status.  And, even those “at the top” surely have their competitions for “more” and some false sense of security.  Because, let’s be honest, does ANYONE really feel anymore secure than they can justify with some artificial support?  Doesn’t everyone boast some nest egg or financial support system of some kind to secure their status, their lifestyle, whether you are a welfare case or living at Park Place?

Now, you might be of the mindset that you are a good person.  But, how good are you in that mob scene at the big sale on some holiday weekend?  What are you doing there if not running with the bulls to get a rare bargain?  What do you have to experience to be reduced to the mentality of something like The Hunger Games?

If you take a long, hard look at yourself, you might find a darker shade to your light.  I’ve seen it, myself.  I try to be a good guy.  But, there are moments…  And, I cannot guarantee something wouldn’t eventually turn me. 

But, if you DO take that long, hard look…and you only see good…well, either you are full of yourself (and something soft and brown and smelly) or you are one lucky individual.  Well, luck is subject to opinion and definition and could just be the enemy of the ego…but…

So, how can the world ever be free of its current state of quarreling rights and economies if we all cannot part with our “status” and “entitlement” and share the world’s resources? 

And, by share, I don’t been buying shares of a company.  I don’t mean sharing the burden by paying more fees and taxes to have some of what the other guy has.  I don’t mean renting the services and resources we need the rest of our lives just to slave away to feed some higher, wealthier ego and then listen to the praises of said ego and his wealthy status. 

Oh, please, sir, tell me more of your mansions and car collection and plans for universal domination.  NOT!

Here’s today’s philosophical metaphor for ya.

If you had a big, frosted cake and had enough for everyone in the world, would you divide it evenly and be satisfied?  Or, would you–even for a second–think you should stash away more of that cake for yourself and divide the remainder among the rest of the world?  Could you be content with your own equal-size piece?

But, here’s my cynical, skeptical kicker, right below that.  If someone told you they were giving you a piece of the cake everyone is sharing equally, would you believe they were giving you your fair share?  See.  That’s another problem…or shade of the same problem.  Trust.  There is very little trust in the world.  And, those who DO trust too often get swindled.  I’ve been swindled quite a bit, and it has made me so bitter; my own obtuse family gets tired of me.

Yet, it’s possible someone could offer you your fair share and be holding out on you.  But, how would you know?  And, how would you verify…anything?

Now, you see?   You see why I cannot take my heavy egg-shaped head off my tense fist and rigidly bent knee.  

If you need me, I’ll be on the stump…er, toilet…ridding myself of today’s crap.  ‘Got any Thought Paper?

  emptyTProll-650x400-2

 

 




Unknown's avatar

Archives


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started