GENIUS LOCI
LASZLOVSZKY 60
edited by
Dóra Mérai
and
Ágnes Drosztmér, Kyra Lyublyanovics,
Judith Rasson, Zsuzsanna Papp Reed,
András Vadas, Csilla Zatykó
i
Genius loci
Laszlovszky 60
edited by
Dóra Mérai
and
Ágnes Drosztmér, Kyra Lyublyanovics,
Judith Rasson, Zsuzsanna Papp Reed,
András Vadas, Csilla Zatykó
Budapest 2018
The publication of this volume was generously funded by
ISBN 978-615-5766-19-0
© by the Authors and Archaeolingua Foundation
2018
ARCHAEOLINGUA ALAPÍTVÁNY
H-1067 Budapest, Teréz krt. 13
www.archaeolingua.hu
Copy editing and language editing: the editors
Layout: Zsanett Kállai
Map: Viktor Lagutov, Zsuzsa Eszter Pető, Mária Vargha, István Gergő Farkas
Front cover design: Eszter Bence-Molnár
Table of contents
Tabula gratulatoria v
Kiadói előszó vi
Publisher’s Preface viii
Köszöntő x
Salutation xi
Boundaries, Frontier Zones / Határvonalak, határvidékek
ALEKS PLUSKOWSKI – ALEX BROWN – SEWERYN SZCZEPANSKI – ROWENA BANERJEA
– DANIEL MAKOWIECKI
What Does a Frontier Look Like? The Biocultural Dynamics of the Lower Vistula
Borderland in the Middle Ages 2
STEPHEN POW
The Mongol Empire’s Northern Border: Re-evaluating the Surface Area of 8
the Mongol Empire
IAN WOOD
Two Roman Frontiers and Their Sub-Roman Afterlife 14
Crossing Borders / Határokon át
SZAKÁCS BÉLA ZSOLT
Gyulafirátót, avagy a rendi építészeti hagyományok átjárhatósága 19
CRISTOPHER MIELKE
A Queen’s Crusading Connections: Yolanda of Courtenay, the Fifth Crusade,
and the Military Orders 25
BÁRÁNY ATTILA
Angol keresztes a magyar végeken: Robert de Champlayn 28
CRISTIAN GAȘPAR
Trespassing Pigs, Sons of Whores, and Randy Dogs: Marginalia on a Medieval Document from
Caransebeș/Karánsebes 32
VADAS ANDRÁS
A kecskeméti marhahajtók megpróbáltatásai és egy végvár jóllakott őrsége 38
LÁSZLÓ KONTLER
Borders and Crossings: A Jesuit Scientist in the Whirlwind of Enlightened Reform 41
PAUKOVICS GERGŐ
Hajsza az örök fiatalságért. Dr. Voronoff és a dübörgő 20-as évek 45
PINKE ZSOLT – STEPHEN POW
A Gangesz-deltából a globális porondra: történeti ökológiai szempontok a kolera kórokozó (Vibrio
cholerae) elterjedési területének átalakulásához 50
MARCELL SEBŐK
Tangible Cultural Heritage: The Early History of Blue Jeans 55
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S
Inhabiting the Landscape / Élet a tájban
SÓFALVI ANDRÁS
A Barcaság határai és 13. század eleji településképe a Német Lovagrend adományleveleiben 60
NIKOLINA ANTONIĆ
The Hospitallers’ Estate of Čičan and its Neighbors: Spatial Analysis Yields New Information 64
ÜNIGE BENCZE
The Abbey of Meszes: New Insights on the Site Location 68
MÓGÁNÉ ARADI CSILLA – MOLNÁR ISTVÁN
Kísérlet a bárdudvarnok-szentbenedeki premontrei prépostság
környezeti rekonstrukciójára 72
BEATRIX ROMHÁNYI
Monasteries along the Danube 77
PUSZTAI TAMÁS – P. FISCHL KLÁRA
A dél-borsodi síkság bronzkori és középkori településstruktúrájának összehasonlítása 82
VIZI MÁRTA
Komplex régészeti kutatás egy egykori dél-dunántúli mezőváros területén 89
BATIZI ZOLTÁN
Fagyosasszony és Kammerhof 95
PÁLÓCZI HORVÁTH ANDRÁS
A középkori Kenderes településszerkezete 99
SZŐCS PÉTER LEVENTE
Adatok Nagybánya és vidéke középkori egyházi topográfiájához 103
ZATYKÓ CSILLA
Eltűnt berzencei malmok 108
SZABÓ PÉTER
Középkori cseh erdőgazdálkodás a choustníki uradalom erdőszámadásainak tükrében 113
ANDREA KISS
Before and After the Great Heat and Drought of 1540: Multiannual Trends of Grape and
Grain Harvest Dates in the Vienna Hospital Accounts 117
LÁSZLÓ BARTOSIEWICZ
“Kleine Fische, gute Fische” – But Sturgeon is Great 121
LYUBLYANOVICS KYRA
Vad háziállat, házi vadállat: Számi rénszarvastartás a középkori és kora újkori Norvégiában 126
JUDITH RASSON
Mountains in the Lifeways and History of Northern Macedonia 138
JEREMY MIKECZ
Crossing the Abyss: The Apurímac Canyon at the Time of the Spanish
Invasion of Peru (1533) 142
Busy Places / Nyüzsgő terek
PETROVICS ISTVÁN
Újabb adatok Pécs késő középkori történetéhez 147
URBÁN MÁTÉ
Lokális búcsújáró helyek a késő középkori Nyugat-Dunántúlon 151
BALÁZS NAGY
The Marketplace of Csütörtök – A Local Market in Fourteenth-Century Hungary 156
KATALIN SZENDE
The Sopron Fish Market 159
GERHARD JARITZ
The Craftsman’s Voice and Words in Late Medieval Austrian Urban Space 165
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S
ANA MARIA GRUIA
Healthcare in Cluj in the Sixteenth Century: Overlapping Professions 168
ANA MARINKOVIĆ
John Capistran’s Mantle and the Early Propaganda of Franciscan Observant Cults
in Dubrovnik 171
SABINA MADGEARU
Ceremonial Space in Front of Medieval Buda: An Illuminated Fifteenth-Century French Vision 175
VÉGH ANDRÁS
Óbuda látképeken 177
Layers of the Past / A múlt rétegei
KODOLÁNYI JUDIT
Templomok és temetők a visegrádi Sibrik-dombon 181
ROSTA SZABOLCS
Egy új lehetőség kapujában – tatárjáráskori védművek a Kiskunságban 186
BOTÁR ISTVÁN
Árpád-kori edényégető kemence Csíksomlyón 193
PETAR PARVANOV
Fire and Stone: Placing Flints in Graves in Late Medieval Kaliakra 197
GYARMATI JÁNOS
Kumpi Wasi. Textilműhely egy inka tartományi központban 201
ZSUZSANNA PAPP REED
Post It: Notes from Thirteenth-Century St Albans 207
VALERY REES
The Salt of Genius: Marsilio Ficino on Food, Spices, and Nutrition 213
ROSSINA KOSTOVA
The Mother of God Monastery near Varna, Bulgaria: More about Missionary Monasteries in
Bulgaria in the Ninth and Tenth Centuries 217
DANIEL ZIEMANN
The Imperial Abbey of Corvey in the Ninth and Tenth Century: At the Crossroads of Power 221
VIRÁGOS GÁBOR
Kartal vagy Cyko? Kísérlet egy középkori nemesi család történetének rekonstruálására 226
TÓTH BOGLÁRKA – BOTÁR ISTVÁN
A sepsikilyéni unitárius templom tetőszerkezeteinek kormeghatározása 244
RÁCZ MIKLÓS
Egy tiszazugi újkori négyosztatú ház – Dokumentálás és építéstörténet 248
Objects beneath Our Feet / Tárgyak a föld alól
LANGÓ PÉTER
A Tiszakeszi-Szódadombon talált kora Árpád-kori kereszt 254
RÁCZ TIBOR – NAGY BALÁZS
Tatárjárás kori kincslelet Jászkarajenőről 258
SZENDE LÁSZLÓ
Lehetett-e hadijelvény a csajági kereszt? 267
NÓRA UJHELYI
Thoughts about Medieval Book Fittings from the Castle of Visegrád 270
MÁRIA VARGHA – THOMAS KÜHTREIBER
Treasures of the “Lower Ten Thousand”? Hoards of Iron Objects 273
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S
K. NÉMETH ANDRÁS
„Sarlóját ez okért bősz fegyverré köszörülte” Késő középkori kiegyenesített sarló
Kospa falu helyéről 280
MAXIM MORDOVIN
A Collection of Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century Cloth Seals from Szolnok 285
TÜNDE KOMORI
Ottomans in Pest in the Light of “Luxury” Ceramics: Four Cups from Kígyó Street 289
WICKER ERIKA
A 17. századi rácszentpéteri kincslelet 294
Marking the Place / Helyek és jelek
CSERNUS SÁNDOR
Keresztes családtörténet és kőbe vésett emlékezet 300
LŐVEI PÁL
A pilisszántói keresztes kő legendája 305
MÉRAI DÓRA
Sügérek a Nyárádmentén: Sigér Mátyás síremléke leporolva 311
VESZPRÉMY LÁSZLÓ
A bambergi lovas szobra és Szent István 316
TAKÁCS MIKLÓS
A pétervárad-tekiai reneszánsz kőfaragvány 321
ANNELI RANDLA
What and Whom Should We Remember? The Case of the Teutonic Order’s Church and
Castle in Pöide, Livonia 325
Heritage Sites, Sacred Places / Örökségi helyszínek, szent helyek
ALEKSANDAR PANTIĆ
The Ambiguity of Heritage Interpretation: A Late Roman Tomb in Brestovik, Serbia 330
GYÖRGY ENDRE SZŐNYI
Rocamadour: Monastic Center, Pilgrimage Place, Art Historical Interest,
World Heritage Site 335
KATEŘINA HORNÍČKOVÁ
A Penitent Judas Iscariot: An Exemplum of Christian Morals on the Eve of Hussitism? 339
JAMES PLUMTREE
Buddha, Lenin, and the Prophet Muhammad Approaching the Landscape and
Cultural Heritage of Issyk-Ata 343
ROBERT SHARP
The Thames Estuary: The Cultural Heritage and Memory of the Thames Estuary at
Southend-on-Sea 349
ESZTER SPÄT
Constructing Religio-Ritual Heritage: The New Shrine of Shekhsê Batê in Khetar, Northern Iraq 353
ZSUZSANNA RENNER
Delhi, Old and New: Changing Cityscapes and the Cultural Heritage of India’s Capital City 357
FELD ISTVÁN
Pszeudovár vagy történeti rekonstrukció? 364
ILON GÁBOR
A velemi régészeti témaparkról 371
WOLLÁK KATALIN
Örökség alapú fejlesztés Kölkeden 374
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S
Places of Memory / Az emlékezet helyei
JÁNOS BAK
Nádor 20 Capriccio 380
SZENTPÉTERI JÓZSEF
Pilistől Tételig. Elektronikus levélféle a 60 esztendős Laszlovszky Józsefnek 382
RICHARD HODGES
Scarlino in the 1980s, Forty Years On 386
KLANICZAY GÁBOR
Egy hozzászólás Kremsben 390
The Mongol Empire’s Northern Border:
Re-evaluating the Surface Area of the
Mongol Empire
Stephen pow*
In making a contribution to the Festschift for founded by pastoral nomads delineated the bor-
József Laszlovszky, a scholar who characteristi- ders of its state. Three considerations help make
cally takes big perspectives, asks broad ques- better sense of the issue. Firstly, we need to in-
tions, and sees patterns between widely dispa- vestigate modern historical scholarship to trace
rate medieval topics, it is fitting to explore a how this northern border was initially deter-
topic with similar horizons. Thus, the issue of mined. Secondly, we must revisit the primary
sweeping proportions investigated here is the sources to see what they say about Mongol con-
borders of the Mongol Empire, particularly the quests in the north. Thirdly, we must take the
question of its northern border. We often read Mongols’ own ideology and political philosophy
that the Mongols in the thirteenth century pos- into account, considering how they perceived the
sessed “the largest historical empire in terms of extent of their own state and defined a popula-
contiguous territory,” and its maximum size is tion’s or geographical region’s inclusion in it.
set at 24 million km2.1 A distinction is made be- Taking all these perspectives into account, I con-
tween the British Empire as the largest histori- tend that we ultimately reach the conclusion that
cal empire at 35.5 million km2 (in 1920) and the the Mongol Empire’s northern borders are mis-
Mongol Empire, listed as the second largest, al- represented. Based on the Mongols’ claims of
beit one not divided over several continents. The rulership and their recorded interference in
consistent reinforcement of these numbers and northern regions, it appears that representations
rankings on popular online sources like Wiki- of the Mongol Empire on maps have depressed
pedia, 2 or Worldatlas,3 makes them something the actual extent of its real and claimed control;
like official, canonical facts. it was in fact the world’s largest empire.
Ever since modern scholarship began trying In the first issue pertaining to modern map
to quantify and depict the extent of the Mongol depictions, it appears that the northern border
Empire, map representations have apparently is drawn today based on earlier maps that placed
been constructed based on primary sources. it somewhat arbitrarily. A standard map of the
While much primary source material is available
to outline the Mongol Empire’s limits to the south,
west, and east,4 the situation becomes much less
clear for the northern borders owing to sparse
records. Thus, how exactly are historians deter-
mining the Mongols’ northernmost extent, and
more significantly, are current representations
accurate? After all, if the northernmost extent of
the Mongol Empire is not accurately depicted it
certainly calls into question the standard approx-
imation of its total land area.
Answers are seldom clear-cut when dealing
with questions of how a medieval administration
► Fig. 1. A standard depiction of the Mongol Empire on
* Central European University, Department of Medieval Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, accessed: October 22, 2018,
Studies https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mongols-map.png.
THE MONGOL EMPIRE’S NORTHERN BORDER 9
► Fig. 2. The Mongol Empire’s northern border. Attribution: Jeremiah Curtin, The Mongols: A History (Boston: Little, Brown, and
Company, 1908).
Mongol Empire on Wikipedia (Fig. 1) shows that raise some suspicion for today’s historians that
with the exception of a deviation along the Amur the most defined sections of the Mongols’ border
River, the Mongol Empire’s northern border ap- occur in a region where their northern neighbor
pears to be more or less a straight line, as though is listed as “Unknown Countries.” William R.
the Mongols established their border from the Shepherd’s Historical Atlas (1923) made another
Amur to Moscow along a parallel of latitude – early twentieth-century map of the Mongol
something that is, of course, anachronistic. The Empire in which its northern border is basically
Encyclopædia Britannica gives an alternative straight, lacking any undulations along the
approach, featuring a suspiciously detailed and boundary of the Ob and Amur; in fact, Mongol
undulating northern border, dropping south- dominion stretches far north of the Amur here
ward along the Ob River for some unknown (Fig. 3). Modern depictions, such as that found
reason and then rising precipitously northward on Wikipedia, represent hybrids between these
in the region west of Lake Baikal.5 It appears that two earlier, basically arbitrary approaches. It is
such modern depictions owe something to the telling that D’Ohsson and Bretschneider were
map in a popular work of the last century, The experts who closely consulted the primary
Mongols: A History (1908), written by American sources and while they did provide detailed
folklorist and celebrated author, Jeremiah Curtin maps of Eurasia in the front matter of their re-
(Fig. 2). A talented enthusiast with varied inter- spective works, they conspicuously avoided
ests rather than a specialized historian of the drawing any northern borders of the Mongol
Mongols, his northern border features these Empire.6 Maps with such borders appear to have
same characteristic undulations, but it should originated in general works.
10 STEPHEN POW
labor instead of goods.11 The Parrosites appear to
be the Permians (Permiaks), well-documented in
medieval source material and termed Barrosites
by al-Idrisi in the twelfth century.12 The Samoyed
people (Nenets) are also well-documented Uralic-
speaking people dwelling near the Arctic Ocean.
Even Carpini’s far-fetched tales of Parrosite eating
habits seem to have their origin in truth. The
Syrian al-Umari reported the account of a Muslim
visitor that Finno-Ugric people of the “farthest
northern regions” gathered bones and boiled
them repeatedly, drinking the broth to extract
► Fig. 3. The Mongol Empire’s border in William R. Shepherd,
Historical Atlas (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1911, any nutrients whatsoever.13 The Russian term
2nd ed.1923) Source: University of Texas Libraries, accessed “Samoyed” is thought to stem from the derogatory
October 22, 2018, http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/
shepherd/mongol_dominions.jpg.
“self-eater,” suggesting hunger was a by-word
among the northern tribes.
It should be no surprise that the Mongols sub-
Thus, the second consideration is exploring the jugated northern tribes up to the White Sea, par-
textual evidence to determine if a remapping of ticularly considering that Novgorod had subju-
the Mongol Empire’s northern frontier is in or- gated the area before the Mongol conquest.
der. Meager though it is, the evidence does sug- Novgorodians had permanent stations on the
gest that Mongol control extended far north of Northern Dvina in 1137, were taxing the people
where modern conventions have established it. on the Pechora River by 1187, and they had a hold
Carpini detailed that after their conquest of the over the Kola Peninsula and the Yughra on the
Volga Bulgars and Magna Hungaria the Mongols Arctic Ocean by the early 1200s.14 Since Novgorod
campaigned northward against people called itself submitted to the Mongols and paid taxes
“Parrosites” who lived on steam inhaled from (something seldom reflected in recent maps), it
meat broth, and then the Samoyeds “who live seems improbable the Mongols would have
entirely on their hunting,” until finally they simply ignored the Novgorodians’ own subject
reached the shores of the Arctic Ocean, populat- peoples. Norse sources support the view that the
ed by monsters including men who bark like Mongols conquered up to the Arctic. The mid-thir-
dogs.7 In a separate passage, Carpini listed the teenth-century Saga of King Haakon tells of how
Parrosites and Samoyeds among the Mongols’ he Christianized and settled “many Bjarmir” in
subject peoples,8 though C. de Bridia, repeating Malangen after they “fled from the east for the
Carpini’s narrative about these northern peo- strife of the Tatars.”15 Previously the Norwegian
ples, added that the Mongols despised them for
their poverty or monstrousness.9 He also im-
plies the conquests reached the Arctic Ocean in
the north.10
It is tempting to dismiss these stories as out-
growths of the Alexander Romance-type of medi-
eval literature that envisioned a world beyond
Latin Christendom peopled by dog-headed men
and other monsters, but that approach is short-
sighted. The Franciscan William of Rubruck’s
remarkably sober report on his journey to Mon-
golia in the 1250s noted that Mongols told him ► Fig. 4. A free depiction of the Mongol Empire that appears
these “poor tribes stretching as far north as the to be using as a template the map found at Ulan Bator air-
port. Wikipedia. Wikimedia Commons, accessed: October 22,
cold permits” were not actually monsters, but 2018, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mongo-
were so poor that the Mongols made them supply lia_1500_AD.jpg.
THE MONGOL EMPIRE’S NORTHERN BORDER 11
► Fig. 5. A reimagined bordering of the Mongol Empire according to source evidence and the Mongols’ own stated imperial
ideology. Created by S. Pow. Map data © 2018 Google.
king had been making war or trading with Bjar- east of Russia to rob the inhabitants. Reaching
maland.16 During the reign of Haakon (1217–1263), these settlements, the Mongols would “rob the
datable Norwegian expeditions to Bjarmaland people of everything they can lay their hands on,”
ceased abruptly, with the trade route from the far before cleverly having their mares lead them back
north to the Volga permanently abandoned.17 to foals that the Mongols had intentionally left on
Moreover, a mid-thirteenth-century Icelandic the borders.23
geographical treatise suddenly lists Tartararíki The Mongol willingness to push far north even
(Tartar kingdom) as being located north of into uninhabited regions is not surprising; it all
Rúzaland (Russia).18 It seems obvious based on relates to the third point, above, which relates to
this data that we have to change what we think Mongol imperial ideology. The wording in Güyüg
we know about Mongol conquests in the far north, Khan’s letter to the pope in 1246 concisely trans-
but other historians have chosen to argue that mits the underlying premise: “From the rising of
there must have been no direct Mongol-Permian the sun to its setting, all the lands have been made
contacts,19 or to advance the absurd notion that subject to me.”24 Beyond language, this funda-
Tartararíki meant Russia in the Norse sources.20 mental belief was also conveyed in symbols – a
Mongol penetration of the far north extended powerful symbolism that was missed by an out-
eastward judging from Russian folklore about a sider like Carpini. As the “solemn court” to en-
Mongol bogatyr’ (hero) from Veliky Ustyug21 and throne Güyüg began, when the Mongol leaders
Marco Polo’s account that when the Great Khan and foreign ambassadors gathered together
(Khubilai) wished to obtain peregrine falcon nest- around an enormous palisade and tent, Carpini
lings, he sent men north of Mongolia, and even noted that on the first day the Mongol chiefs all
far north of the Merkit lands in the forest zone, wore white velvet, then red on the second day,
until they reached uninhabited mountains bor- blue on the third, and brocade (baldaquin) on the
dering the Ocean Sea (Arctic Ocean). They even fourth day.25 In the medieval Turkic directional
obtained gerfalcons from islands in the Arctic system, white represented the west, red the south,
Ocean.22 Polo also describes how Mongols peri- blue the east, and black the north, while in the
odically entered the Land of Darkness (Siberia) Mongolian system yellow (gold) could imply the
12 STEPHEN POW
center or north.26 Certainly three of the cardinal Mongol Empire’s borders according to the source
directions were symbolized in this ceremony, so evidence and reflecting the Mongols’ own impe-
presumably the brocade was in keeping with the rial ideology. It comes out to 36.5 million km2 (Fig.
symbolic program, be it gold or black. The north 5), a full million square kilometers larger than
was also part of the Mongol mandate of conquest the British Empire. A case can and should be
in so far as it had value in resources and people. made that the Mongol Empire was not simply the
Al-Umari stated that the Golden Horde’s dominion largest contiguous empire, but rather the largest
stretched along the Irtysh and to the Yughra of empire, full stop.
the Arctic Circle – Islamic traders visited them.27
A Georgian chronicle records that when Batu de- Notes
cided to find out how many troops he could draft, 1
Peter Turchin, Jonathan M. Adams, and Thomas D. Hall,
his officials journeyed “down to the Dark,” taking “East-West Orientation of Historical Empires and Modern
a census of his entire dominion.28 The “Land of States,” Journal of World Systems Research 12, no. 2 (2006):
220, 222.
Darkness” was part of the Jochi Khan’s patrimony 2
“List of largest empires,” Wikipedia, accessed October 20,
– according to sources Chinggis Khan had origi- 2018, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_em-
pires.
nally ordered his eldest son to “bring under con- 3
“Largest Empires in Human History by Land Area,” Worl-
trol all the lands to the north, from Ibir-Siber … datlas, accessed October 20, 2018, https://www.worldatlas.
to the Caspian straits.”29 If the Mongol imperial com/articles/largest-empires-in-human-history-by-land-
area.html.
ideology claimed all lands – even uninhabited 4
Sources from Mamluk historians, the Delhi Sultanate, and
regions to the north – and if nobody was effec- even Java, besides copious official sources composed in
Chinggisid courts, detail the Mongols’ southernmost con-
tively challenging their claims to authority, why quests. For Mongol expansion in the West, much material
do we not give them the benefit of the doubt and by anxious observers in Latin Christendom and the
ascribe that territory to them? Is that merely a Levant help to define clear borders. The question of why
the Mongols invaded and then withdrew from Hungary
prerogative granted to later empires? in 1241-1242 so that it formed the Mongols’ westernmost
To conclude, there is not enough evidence to neighbor is still a topic of lively debate in scholarship. See:
Zsolt Pinke, László Ferenczi, Beatrix F. Romhányi, József
precisely and reliably reconstruct a northern Laszlovszky, and Stephen Pow, “Climate of doubt: a
border for the Mongol Empire. There is admit- re-evaluation of Büntgen and Di Cosmo’s environmental
tedly a degree of facetiousness in my proposal to hypothesis for the Mongol withdrawal from Hungary,
1242 CE.,” Scientific Reports 7, 12695 (2017). DOI: 10.1038/
remap it, but this exercise has helped expose s41598-017-12128-6. In the East, official dynastic histories
problems with the tendency of modern historians of the Yuan state, the Korean kingdom, and even Japanese
records of the failed invasions of Japan help to draw a
to assign precise surface areas to historic empires. similarly clear picture.
I argue there is enough evidence to suggest that 5
“Mongol empire,” Encyclopædia Britannica, accessed Oc-
the present ways of drawing the Mongols’ tober 20, 2018, https://www.britannica.com/place/Mon-
gol-empire/media/389325/235959.
northern border do not do their empire justice. 6
Constantine D’ohsson, Histoire des Mongols depuis Tchin-
Several years ago, I was in Ulan Bator’s Chinggis guiz-Khan jusqu’à Timour Bey ou Tamerlane vol. 1 (Am-
sterdam: Van Cleef, 1834); Emil Bretschneider, Medieval
Khan International Airport and saw an enormous Researches from Eastern Asiatic Sources vol. 1 (London:
map of the Mongol Empire on the wall. Rather Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. Ltd., 1910).
than displaying a precise northern border, the
7
Christopher Dawson, The Mongol Mission (New York:
Sheed and Ward, 1955), 30–31.
empire seemed to simply stretch upward, its dark 8
Ibid., 41.
color blurring and fading out of sight as the map 9
George Painter, “The Tartar Relation,” in: The Vinland
Map and the Tartar Relation, ed R. Skelton et al. (New
abruptly ended in the Arctic region (Fig. 4). I was Haven: Yale University Press, 1995), 73–74.
skeptical at the time that this was patriotic exag- 10
Ibid., 75.
geration, but as a result of the study here I tend
11
Dawson, Mongol Mission, 170-171. This account rather
agrees with C. de Bridia’s account of their poverty. The
to believe that the map is correct and probably idea that Mongols would put the northern tribes to work
one of the only depictions to ever conceptualize after assessing that they had little to tax seems plausible.
12
Painter, “The Tartar Relation,” 74, no. 1. These people
properly the Mongol polity’s relationship to the are Bjarmians of the Bjarmaland documented in Norse
north. sagas and described in the Old English “Voyage of
To satisfy my curiosity and because the tech- Ohthere” for instance. A Russian account from 1118 tells
of what a Novgorodian experienced among the “Pechera”
nology is widely available, I undertook an admit- people who dwelt in the vicinity of the more northerly
tedly crude and imprecise readjustment of the Yughra, “dwelling in the north with the Samoyeds” by
THE MONGOL EMPIRE’S NORTHERN BORDER 13
the Arctic Ocean. See: Caroline Stone and Paul Lunde appeared behind in the south. There was, it appears, an
(trans.), Ibn Fadlan and the Land of Darkness (London: element of exploration in these sorts of expeditions.
Penguin, 2012), 180. 23
Ibid., 324–325. Marco Polo mentions that this exploitation
13
Stone and Lunde (trans.), Ibn Fadlan, 198-199; Klaus Lech, was driven by the wealth of furs in the region which were
Klaus, trans., Das mongolische Weltreich, Al-‘Umari‘s also traded with people to the south. This sort of regular
Darstellung der mongolischen Reiche in seinem Werk fleecing of the local people can be seen as a form of sub-
Masālik al-abṣār fī mamālik al-amṣār (Wiesbaden: Harras- jugation, even if the Mongols chose not to occupy the
sowitz, 1968), 138, 143. Al-Umari mentions pale-skinned region permanently, and they also evidently viewed the
Siberians habitually boiling bones seven times. uninhabited areas where they collected birds as their
14
Mervi Koskela Vasaru, Bjarmaland (Oulu: University of sovereign territory.
Oulu, 2016), 413. 24
Dawson, Mongol Mission, 86. The message was one that
15
G. W. Dasent, Icelandic Sagas, vol. 4 (London: Eyre and the Mongols claimed to have received from Chinggis
Spottiswoode, 1894), 371. The events described in the saga Khan. Their divine mandate was the conquest of the
are thought to date to around 1240. These Permian refu- entire world – not just the steppe belt and not just Chinggis
gees were settled in Norway’s far north, having fled east Khan’s personal enemies.
– all of which supports that the Mongols were really cam- 25
Ibid., 61; Anastasius van den Wyngaert, ed., Sinica Fran-
paigning in the area of the White Sea. ciscana vol. 1 (Florence: Collegium S. Bonaventura, 1929),
16
Ibid., 73. 117. The term in Latin is baldikinis (baldaquin), a fabric
17
Vasaru, Bjarmaland, 232–233. originally manufactured in Baghdad. The color is not im-
18
Ibid., 218, 223–224. mediately evident. Benedict the Pole claimed 5000 princes
19
Ibid., 237–238. and chiefs wore baldaquin on the first day of this cere-
20
Alan S. C. Ross, The Terfinnas and Beormas of Ohthere (Re- mony rather than the fourth day as Carpini remembered
print: London: Viking Society for Northern Research, it. See: A. van den Wyngaert, Sinica, 139.
26
1981), 46-47. Ross noted that in the 1940s, the prevailing Timothy May, “Color Symbolism in the Turko-Mongolian
view in Russian literature was that Tattarar meant Rus- World,” in The Use of Color in History, Politics, and Art, ed.
sians from Novgorod. I share Ross’s view that this unduly Sungshin Kim (Dahlonega: University of North Georgia
simplified the problem of why the Mongols were reported Press, 2016), 60-61; Omeljan Pritsak, “Qara: Studie zur
to be ruling north of Russia though “Mongol penetration Türkischen Rechtssymbolik,” in Studies in Medieval Eur-
is not usually assumed to have extended nearly as far asian History (London: Variorum Reprints, 1981), 249.
north as ‘Bjarmaland’.” Ross reached the perceptive con- 27
Lech, Das mongolische Weltreich, 145.
clusion that, judging by the evidence, Mongols must have 28
Stephen Jones, Kartlis Tskhovreba: A History of Georgia
been campaigning not far from the Dvina. (Tbilisi: Artanuji Publishers, 2014), 350.
21
Ibid., 48. 29
Wheeler Thackston, Rashiduddin Fazlullah’s Jami’u’ta-
22
Nigel Cliff, trans., Marco Polo: The Travels (London: Pen- warikh: Compendium of Chronicles, 2nd Edition (Cam-
guin, 2015), 76–77. Polo clarified that the region was un- bridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998–1999), 347.
inhabited but for the people of the khan who went to get Thackston notes that this refers to the Middle Irtysh region,
the birds, and that it was so far north that the Pole Star Siberia taking its name from this designation.