Profile

James R. Lance, Esq. brings more than 38 years of experience as a highly successful and respected trial attorney to ADR Services, Inc. Throughout his career Mr. Lance has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in complex, high-stakes disputes, which gives him a unique perspective on the needs, priorities, and pressures facing each party in litigation. His practice included “bet-the-company” commercial cases, catastrophic personal injury/wrongful death claims, real estate/construction disputes, employment cases, professional liability claims and class actions.

Mr. Lance has secured several seven and eight figure verdicts, judgments, and settlements for his plaintiff clients, and many excellent results for his defense clients on high exposure cases. His track record of success, coupled with his ability to analyze complex facts and legal issues from every angle, informs his fair, balanced, and practical approach to alternative dispute resolution.

Mr. Lance’s peers consistently have recognized his excellence. He was selected as a “Top 50” San Diego Attorney from 2019-2024 and has been a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA) since 2013. In 2024, the San Diego ABOTA Chapter selected Mr. Lance to be its President. Mr. Lance served on the CAL-ABOTA Board of Directors from 2023-25 and is honored to be the 2025 selection for the CAL-ABOTA member-at-large position. He also is a Board Member of the William B. Enright Chapter of the American Inns of Court and, in August 2025, the EIOC President appointed him to the Executive Committee.

Deeply committed to the legal community and public service, Mr. Lance has mentored countless young lawyers and students. He also coached youth football and baseball for more than 15 years. Since 2020, Mr. Lance has spearheaded a program at an underserved high school in Southeast San Diego which provides on-campus speakers who encourage students to actively pursue their education/career goals and assure them they can overcome hurdles and negativity. The program also assists students with internships and sponsors oral argument competitions at the school. His decades of advocacy, leadership, and mentorship now fuel Mr. Lance’s dedication to helping parties resolve their disputes efficiently and effectively.

AREAS OF EXPERTISE

  • Complex Commercial
  • Products Liability
  • Class Action
  • Real Estate
  • Investment/  Securities Claims
  • Personal Injury/Wrongful Death
  • Partnership/ Shareholder Disputes
  • Legal Malpractice
  • Jones Act/Maritime
  • Unfair Competition
  • Wildfire Claims
  • Medical Malpractice

Education

  • Washington & Lee University, J.D., magna cum laude, 1986
  • Missouri State University, B.S., summa cum laude, 1983

Legal Career & Prior Experience

  • Neutral, ADR Services, Inc.
  • Mediator, San Diego Superior Court Civil Mediation Panel
  • Pepperdine University-Straus Institute: Mediating the Litigated Case (August 22-26, 2022)
  • Trial Attorney, Noonan Lance (2016-2025)
  • Trial Attorney, Kirby Noonan, Lance & Hoge (2006-2016)
  • Trial Attorney, Post Kirby Noonan & Sweat (1990-2006)
  • Litigation Associate, Thompson & Mitchell (pka Thompson Coburn), St. Louis, MO (1986-1989)

Awards & Recognition

  • America’s Top 100 Bet-the-Company Litigators, 2020-2025
  • Top 50 Southern California Super Lawyers – San Diego Edition, 2019-2024
  • Business Litigation, Super Lawyers, 2007-2010, 2013-2025
  • Commercial Litigation, Best Lawyers, 2013-2026
  • Real Estate Litigation, Best Lawyers, 2019-2026
  • Legal Malpractice Law – Defendants, Best Lawyers, 2020, 2023-2026
  • Construction Litigation Lawyer of the Year, Best Lawyers, 2021
  • Construction Litigation, Best Lawyers, 2021-2026
  • “Best Wrongful Death Lawyers in San Diego,” Forbes Advisor, 2024
  • “Top Rated Lawyers in Real Estate Law,” American Lawyer Media, 2012, 2015
  • “Best of the Bar,” San Diego Business Journal, 2015, 2016
  • “Top Attorney: Corporate Litigation,” San Diego Daily Transcript, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2013
  • “Top Influential,” The San Diego Daily Transcript, 2011, 2015
  • “Top Lawyer” San Diego Magazine, 2014-2018, 2025

Professional Memberships and Activities

  • American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), 2013-Present
    President of San Diego Chapter (2024)
    Vice-President (2023); Treasurer (2022); Secretary (2021); Board Member (2020)
    Membership Committee (2015-2018)
  • CAL-ABOTA, (Leadership Organization for 8 California & Hawaii ABOTA Chapters)
    Board of Directors Representative for San Diego Chapter (2023-2025)
    2025 Selection for CAL-ABOTA Member-at-Large Position on Board of Directors
  • Consumer Attorneys of San Diego, (CASD) (1996-2008, 2024-2025)
    Products Liability Articles Editor – Trial Bar News (1999-2006)
  • William B. Enright Chapter, American Inns of Court, (2015-2025)
    Board Member (2024-Present)
    Secretary/Executive Committee, 2025-2027
  • Association of Business Trial Lawyers (ABTL), (2000-2018)
    Board of Governors (2011-2012)

Representative Cases

Commercial Contract / General Business

  • Business Partner Dispute. Plaintiff sued his former partner in a litigation financing business. The complaint included claims for conversion, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud. Plaintiff also alleged Defendant had failed to repay him for a $530,000 loan. The complaint sought judicial foreclosure and a constructive trust. Defendant disputed each of Plaintiff’s factual allegations and argued that no valid legal claims existed. Defendant also asserted that his cross-complaint for breach of fiduciary duty and fraud against Plaintiff entitled Defendant to judgment in the amount of $120,000.
  • Complex Business Dispute. Multiple parties in which both sides were alleging entitlement to compensatory and punitive damages for fraud, fraudulent inducement and breach of contract related to a series of business transactions related to a financing transaction to raise money for a foreign pharmaceutical manufacturer. Plaintiffs and Defendants both sought attorneys’ fees and asserted the opposing parties’ claims had no merit. Damages claimed were $1,250,000 by one side and $6,050,000 by the other.
  • Loan Dispute/Civil Extortion. A hospitality management company failed to repay money loaned to the company which was arranged by one of three members. Plaintiff approached Defendant, another member of the borrower company, and Defendant signed a promissory note for $250,000 and wired $100,000 to Plaintiff at that time. Plaintiff sued Defendant for breach of contract and interest. Defendant filed a Cross-Complaint alleging that the agreement was not enforceable because it was obtained by civil extortion. Plaintiff contended that the civil extortion claims were false and that two independent witnesses would so testify.

Construction

  • Construction Defect Claim by Condominium Association vs. Condominium Association of Adjacent Property. Plaintiff’s 18-unit condo project was constructed 14 years before the Defendant’s 10-unit project. Plaintiff asserted Nuisance, Trespass and Negligence claims, seeking injunctive relief and sought $5,000,000 for property damages allegedly caused by the excessive discharge of storm and irrigation water onto Plaintiff’s property. Defendant disputed liability and causation, asserting that Plaintiff’s damages was caused by the failure of a slope on its own property. Defendant also argued that the damages were greatly overstated.

Employment

  • Employment Dispute: Digital marketing company and its CEO sued two former employees alleging they stole clients, trade secrets and other company property, and also asserted additional claims for assault, battery, stalking, harassment and intentional infliction of emotional distress and interference with contract. The employees filed a cross-complaint alleging Labor Code violations for failure to pay overtime or provide meal and rest breaks, and asserted they were non-exempt and worked 60-75 hours per week. Employees claimed that their damages, penalties and attorneys’ fees were $725,000.
  • Employment/Wage & Hour Claim. Pre-litigation mediation. Claimant was a caretaker for disabled adults and claimed her Employer failed to pay minimum wages and overtime wages because Claimant was erroneously classified as an exempt employee. Claimant sought $175,000 for unpaid wages, Labor Code penalties, interest and attorneys’ fees. Respondent employer contested liability and that Claimant was owed any additional wages or other damages.

Personal Injury

  • Motor Vehicle Accident – Rear End Impact. Father, mother and adult daughter were passengers in a car struck by defendant driver (18 y.o.). Plaintiffs sued the driver and his father, the owner of the car. Plaintiffs all alleged neck, shoulder and back injuries and that they were still suffering from pain at time of mediation, 20 months after accident. Defense contested causation and the nature and extent of claimed injuries.
  • Assault and Battery. The co-captains of the college soccer team were playing ping pong when a fight broke out. Plaintiff alleged that Defendant was much larger and attacked him, dislocating his shoulder and knocking him unconscious. Plaintiff had shoulder surgery and claimed the shoulder never healed, which significantly inhibited his use of the shoulder. Defendant claimed it was merely a wrestling match started by Plaintiff, and he contested liability, the nature and extent of the injuries, and the amount of damages sought.
  • Personal Injury. Big Box Warehouse Store. Plaintiff (36 y.o. male) alleged an employee ran over his left foot with a pallet jack while Plaintiff was walking next to the employee in an aisle. Plaintiff alleged fracture, physical limitations and economic damages. Defendant claimed Plaintiff suddenly walked into the pallet jack from another aisle, disputed liability and contested the nature and extent of Plaintiff’s injuries and damages.
  • Commercial Trucking Accident. Plaintiff owner/driver of a dump truck filed lawsuit for damages caused to the truck when another dump truck struck the vehicle at a construction site. Repairs cost $40,000. Plaintiff alleged the truck was his sole source of income and it was inoperable for five months during the busy season, which resulted in lost income, consequential damages and pre-judgement interest in excess of $280,000. Defendant disputed the amount of lost income/wages, whether consequential damages and interest could be recovered and argued that Plaintiff failed to mitigate his damages by renting a replacement truck or completing temporary repairs until the busy season ended.

Real Estate / Real Property

  • Residential Lease Dispute. Mother sued church to enforce a below-market lease for her and her three children, which was executed initially so mother and children could escape domestic violence. Plaintiff alleged she was promised she and her children could live at the residence located on church property as long as she needed to live there. Plaintiff also had interpled her monthly rent to the Court. Defendant Church claimed the lease automatically converted to a month-to-month lease in July 2016, that they legally terminated the tenancy several months before the mediation, and that Plaintiff was legally required to vacate immediately and stipulate that all rents held by the Court should be paid to Defendant.
  • Residential Lease Dispute: Plaintiffs (mother & daughter) filed lawsuit asserting Fair Employment & Housing claims alleging Discrimination, Breach of Implied Warranty of Habitability, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, Constructive Eviction, Nuisance, etc. Plaintiffs alleged they evacuated their home due to life and safety issues (mold, flood, toilet malfunction, bugs, etc.) and Defendant landlord served a retaliatory eviction notice thereafter and stalked and harassed Plaintiffs and filed a “fraudulent” eviction action. Plaintiffs also alleged discrimination because tenants and landlord’s family all were Russian and daughter married a Ukrainian, who moved into the unit. Plaintiffs claimed that jury verdict research supported a verdict of $750,000. Defendants alleged Plaintiffs made no complaints for 8 years until daughter married and her husband moved in which violated the lease and landlord justifiably raised the rent. Defendants denied all claims and asserted that Plaintiffs had no damages.
  • Prescriptive Easement. Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against their neighbors claiming a prescriptive easement prohibited construction of a permitted driveway for a new ADU adjacent to Plaintiffs’ property, and a second easement in favor of Plaintiff provided Plaintiffs the right to continue to use a significant portion of their own driveway which encroached on Defendants’ property. Defendants argued that Plaintiff had not met the legal requirements to establish either easement and that one of the alleged easements was in a public right-away which nullified the possibility of an easement being created.

Testimonials

“Jim Lance was very prepared for our mediation. He did a great job of communicating with both sides before mediation to ensure that he was fully apprised of the situation. Jim has great communication skills and clearly understood the issues before him. It was a complicated case with some very personal issues that he had to deal with. Jim did a great job in getting both sides to realize the weaknesses of their case and settling the case. I would certainly use Jim again for a mediation.”


“I have had the privilege of working closely with James  Lance on a complex employment matter with a very difficult client.  I am pleased to provide my strong endorsement for James as a highly skilled and dedicated mediator.”


“He approaches mediation with a sense of integrity and professionalism, ensuring that all parties involved are heard and respected.  His ability to navigate sensitive and contentious issues with tact and diplomacy is remarkable.”


“He had total command of the issues even as new facts and information, which were not a part of the briefs, were being thrown at him during the mediation.”


“Mr. Lance was impartial while providing his honest assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the case.  His impartiality was key to having the client engage with him during the mediation.”


“James consistently demonstrated exceptional mediation skills and a deep understanding of conflict resolution principles throughout the entire case.  His ability to create a neutral and collaborative atmosphere is truly commendable.  His calm demeanor and excellent communication and persuasive skills undoubtedly enable him to guide parties toward mutually beneficial resolutions, making him a resourceful and unique problem solver.”


“Mr. Lance had a plan for getting both sides to explore different options for resolution.  Ultimately, both parties agreed to Mr. Lance issuing a mediator’s proposal, which was accepted by both parties.”


“We think that Jim Lance did an excellent job. He was very patient, very knowledgeable, very insightful, and we don’t believe the deal would’ve been done without him.”


“Mr. Lance was completely professional even when dealing with emotional clients.  This was critical to earning the trust of the client and counsel.”


“He was a clear and effective communicator to all parties who attended the mediation – the client, counsel, and insurance adjusters.”


“Mr. Lance was prepared to hit the ground running.  He spent the time to read the briefs well in advance of the mediation and set up pre mediation calls with both counsel in advance of the mediation so we could hit the ground running.”


“Mr. Lance was impartial while providing his honest assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the case.  His impartiality was key to having the client engage with him during the mediation.”


“We would absolutely use Mr. Lance again.”


“Mr. Lance had total control of the mediation process which allowed the mediation to proceed efficiently.”