IntechOpen

Home > Books > Burnout Syndrome - Recognizing the Signs and Finding Solutions

Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Burnout and Psychological Resilience in Healthcare Professionals: A Protective Psychosocial Resource

Written By

Nilgün Ulutaşdemir and Nevin Günaydın

Submitted: 20 January 2026 Reviewed: 10 February 2026 Published: 10 April 2026

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1014960

Burnout Syndrome IntechOpen
Burnout Syndrome Recognizing the Signs and Finding Solutions Edited by Nilgun Ulutasdemir

From the Edited Volume

Burnout Syndrome - Recognizing the Signs and Finding Solutions

Nilgün Ulutaşdemir

Book Details Order Print

Chapter metrics overview

65 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics
Advertisement

Abstract

Burnout is a prevalent and multidimensional occupational syndrome that arises from unmanaged, chronic, work-related stress and is characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment. Beyond its detrimental effects on individual mental health, burnout poses substantial risks to workforce sustainability, quality of care, patient safety, and the overall resilience of health systems. Due to persistent time pressure, chronic workload, ethical stress, emotional labor, and enduring organizational constraints, health professionals are among the occupational groups at the highest risk for burnout. This book chapter aims to provide a comprehensive perspective on burnout among health professionals by addressing the phenomenon within specific subsections focusing on nurses, physicians, and mental health professionals. The chapter emphasizes the necessity of conceptualizing burnout not merely as an individual-level problem, but as a phenomenon emerging from the dynamic interaction of organizational, individual, and systemic factors. Within this framework, psychological resilience is examined as a key protective psychosocial resource that buffers the development and consequences of burnout and regulates the adverse effects of work-related stress. Rather than being conceptualized as a fixed personality trait, psychological resilience is framed as a dynamic construct shaped by individual resources, organizational conditions, and systemic determinants. To explicate this multidimensional structure, a conceptual model is proposed. The chapter underscores that strategies aimed at reducing and preventing burnout among health professionals should not be confined to individual-level interventions alone, but must be supported by comprehensive approaches at the organizational and systemic levels.

Keywords

  • burnout
  • health professionals
  • psychological resilience
  • work-related stress
  • protective psychosocial resources
  • nursing
  • physicians
  • mental health professionals

1. Introduction

Burnout, characterized by depersonalization (cynicism), emotional exhaustion, and a diminished sense of personal accomplishment, is an occupational syndrome that develops as a result of prolonged and unmanaged work-related stress [1]. The consequences of burnout are wide-ranging, extending from adverse effects on individual mental health (including depression and anxiety disorders) to increased turnover intention, deterioration in the quality of patient care, and a higher incidence of medical errors and occupational injuries [2].

In recent years, growing attention has been directed toward the association between burnout and insufficient protective psychosocial resources. Accordingly, there is an increasing need to examine psychological resilience as a fundamental regulatory resource that enables health professionals to maintain functional capacity in the face of intense job demands [3, 4]. Evidence further suggests that the presence of psychological resilience can significantly mitigate the severity and persistence of burnout’s adverse effects; however, it does not completely eliminate them.

In this chapter, burnout among health professionals will be examined through its systemic, individual, and organizational determinants. In addition, psychological resilience will be discussed as a protective psychosocial resource that regulates both the development and the impact of burnout.

Advertisement

2. Burnout among health professionals

Burnout, a syndrome frequently observed among health professionals, emerges as a consequence of chronic stress inherent to working life. According to the recent international consensus among experts, burnout is defined as “a state of physical and emotional exhaustion experienced by an employee as a result of prolonged struggle with work-related problems” [5, 6]. Due to continuous exposure to human suffering, time pressure, emotional labor, and high workload, health professionals constitute one of the occupational groups at the highest risk for burnout. In other words, unresolved and persistent stressors in the work environment precipitate the development of burnout. However, it has been reported that burnout levels vary among health professionals who are exposed to similar working conditions, indicating the influence of both organizational and individual factors. Within this context, psychological resilience is conceptualized as a key mediating variable that delays or prevents the transformation of chronic work-related stress into burnout [3, 7].

Burnout syndrome manifests across three core dimensions: emotional exhaustion, reduced personal accomplishment, and depersonalization [8–10]. Particularly among health professionals, factors such as long working hours, excessive workload, lack of organizational support, and challenging patient interactions play a decisive role in the development of burnout [9, 11, 12]. Studies conducted during epidemic periods, especially the COVID-19 pandemic, have identified clinical levels of burnout symptoms in a substantial proportion of health professionals – approximately half of the workforce [13, 14]. Burnout prevalence has been reported to be particularly high among those working in emergency departments and intensive care units [15].

Accordingly, the pandemic has demonstrated that psychological resilience among health professionals is not merely an individual attribute but also a capacity shaped by systemic conditions. Evidence suggests that health professionals with higher levels of psychological resilience report better psychological well-being and lower levels of burnout despite exposure to similar traumatic circumstances; however, in environments lacking organizational support, individual resilience alone has been shown to be insufficient [4, 13].

Burnout, which adversely affects the physical and mental well-being of health professionals, also leads to serious consequences for the quality of care, patient safety, and the sustainability of health systems [8, 16, 17]. Research indicates that burnout among health professionals is associated with increased medical errors, higher turnover intentions, and elevated risks to patient safety [12, 18, 19]. Consequently, the prevention and early identification of burnout have become priority issues in health policy at both institutional and individual levels [5, 9, 16].

The etiology of burnout is multifactorial. Excessive workload, long working hours, low professional recognition, inadequate social and organizational support, work–life imbalance, and ineffective leadership are among the primary risk factors [1, 7]. During the pandemic period, additional stressors, such as infection risk, uncertainty, resource shortages, and heightened societal expectations, further exacerbated these risks [2, 13, 14].

2.1 Profession-specific dynamics of burnout

Although the etiology of burnout shares common features across health professions, profession-specific role expectations, organizational positioning, and the inherent nature of the work give rise to distinct risk profiles across occupational groups (see Table 1).

Profession Dominant risk factors Factors strengthening psychological resilience
Physicians High workload, administrative burden, limited autonomy Supportive leadership, sense of meaning, and purpose
Nurses Shift work, ethical stress, workplace violence Team support and collegial collaboration
Mental health professionals Emotional labor, countertransference Clinical supervision

Table 1.

Risk and protective factors for burnout across health professions.

2.1.1 Burnout among physicians

Physician burnout is a structurally embedded workplace syndrome with a global prevalence exceeding 50% in many settings [20–22]. Excessive workload, a heavy bureaucratic and clinical documentation burden, inefficient work processes, work–home conflict, limited professional autonomy, and weak institutional leadership have consistently been identified as the primary determinants of physician burnout [21–23]. Accordingly, physician burnout represents a widespread and chronic condition fueled by the convergence of high job demands, increasing administrative and electronic health record requirements, work–life imbalance, inadequate organizational leadership, and constrained autonomy. Across numerous countries, burnout symptoms have been reported in one-third or more of practicing physicians [11, 21, 23].

Extended working hours, time pressure, on-call duties, and the cognitive and emotional demands of clinical decision-making contribute substantially to emotional exhaustion. Simultaneously, insufficient resources, lack of organizational support, and effort–reward imbalance negatively affect both physicians’ personal well-being and the quality of patient care [11, 24]. Higher burnout rates have been reported among younger and female physicians, particularly those working in high-intensity settings such as intensive care units, emergency departments, and other high-risk clinical environments. These elevated burnout levels have been associated with increased risks of depression, turnover intention, suicidal ideation, and medical errors [25–28]. Beyond its impact on individual physicians, burnout has detrimental consequences for the quality of care, patient safety, and healthcare system costs [21–23, 28].

Recent studies indicate that psychological resilience in physicians is positively associated not only with lower burnout levels but also with a greater intention to remain in the profession, higher-quality clinical decision-making, and improved perceptions of patient safety. Psychological resilience appears to function as a particularly important buffer against physician burnout when considered in conjunction with a sense of meaningful work, supportive leadership, and professional autonomy [22, 23].

2.1.2 Burnout among nurses

Burnout among nurses is defined as a structurally determined risk domain that is strongly associated with adverse working conditions, including long shifts (often exceeding 12 hours), high workloads, inadequate nurse-to-patient ratios, limited professional autonomy, and weak team or institutional climates [16, 29–32]. These conditions, sustained by chronic work-related stress, create a fertile ground for the development of a pervasive and persistent syndrome characterized by emotional exhaustion and a diminished sense of personal accomplishment among nurses [33–36].

Evidence from meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and umbrella reviews consistently demonstrates that the prevalence of emotional exhaustion and low personal accomplishment among nurses is high on a global scale. These patterns appear to be particularly pronounced among nurses working in mental health settings, intensive care units, and oncology departments [27, 32, 35, 37].

Burnout has been robustly linked to absenteeism, reduced job satisfaction, and increased staff turnover. Moreover, it has been consistently shown to compromise patient safety and quality of care, leading to higher rates of adverse events such as medication errors, healthcare-associated infections, and patient falls [16, 27, 29, 32–35].

From a psychosocial and organizational perspective, work–family conflict, lack of managerial support, work–life imbalance, effort–reward imbalance, role conflict, exposure to aggression and violence, and moral or ethical stress – such as providing care under resource constraints and value-based conflicts – constitute central determinants of nurse burnout [16, 23, 24, 27, 29, 36–38]. These organizational stressors are repeatedly identified as core risk factors contributing to burnout among nurses [23, 27, 33, 35, 36].

Against this background, psychological resilience emerges as a critical psychosocial resource that buffers the adverse effects of occupational risks, such as high workload and moral or ethical stress. Nurses with higher levels of self-compassion, perceived social support, and team cohesion have been reported to exhibit significantly lower levels of burnout symptoms compared with their counterparts working under similar conditions [4, 39].

2.1.3 Burnout among other mental health professionals

Burnout among other mental health professionals represents a multidimensional phenomenon arising from the convergence of continuous exposure to traumatic material, work practices requiring intensive emotional labor, complex and demanding caseloads, difficulties in managing countertransference processes, and frequently limited organizational resources [23, 37–39]. These psychosocial and structural factors contribute to sustained work-related stress, thereby creating conditions conducive to the development of burnout among professionals working in mental health settings.

Meta-analyses and systematic reviews indicate that psychologists and other mental health professionals experience relatively high levels of emotional exhaustion, moderate levels of depersonalization, and comparatively preserved levels of personal accomplishment [37, 39, 40]. The relative preservation of personal accomplishment has been interpreted as being associated with profession-inherent resources, such as perceived professional competence, motivation to help others, and a strong sense of meaning derived from therapeutic work [39].

From an organizational perspective, interpersonal difficulties, high workload, role ambiguity, role conflict, limited autonomy, ethical or moral distress, and perceptions of organizational injustice are identified as primary risk factors contributing to burnout among mental health professionals [23, 37–40]. In contrast, professional autonomy and role clarity, fair treatment, a supportive and ethically grounded institutional climate, regular clinical supervision, and work environments that foster professional identity emerge as key protective factors against burnout in this occupational group [23, 37–40].

Among psychotherapists, burnout constitutes a particularly critical and bidirectional risk domain, as it adversely affects not only clinicians’ psychological well-being but also the quality of the therapeutic relationship and client outcomes [37, 39].

In mental health professionals, psychological resilience plays a central role in regulating emotional labor, secondary traumatization, and countertransference processes. Psychological resilience, nurtured by a sense of professional meaning and robust ethical support mechanisms, is therefore considered a critical protective factor against burnout in this population [39].

Advertisement

3. Psychological resilience as a protective factor

Psychological resilience is conceptualized as a regulatory mechanism that modulates the duration, severity, and consequences of burnout when the balance between individual and organizational resources and job demands is disrupted. Psychological resilience is defined as an individual’s capacity to maintain functioning and to adapt to, withstand, and recover from stressful, challenging, and traumatic life events (see Figure 1) [3, 41]. Among health professionals, psychological resilience is positively associated with professional commitment, job satisfaction, and psychological well-being, and is regarded as a key protective factor against burnout [42–44]. In the design of interventions targeting health professionals, the contemporary shift toward conceptualizing psychological resilience not as a static personality trait but as a developable and time-sensitive process represents a paradigmatic transformation in the field [3, 7].

Figure 1.

A relational model of burnout and psychological resilience among health professionals.

Health professionals with higher levels of resilience have been shown to exhibit stronger emotional regulation skills, more effective coping with stress, and a greater ability to preserve a sense of professional meaning. Social support, self-compassion, a positive workplace climate, self-care behaviors, and supportive leadership are among the core factors that strengthen psychological resilience [45, 46].

Advertisement

4. Structural and individual determinants of psychological resilience

Psychological resilience is conceptualized not as an outcome confined to specific intervention programs, but as a dynamic psychosocial resource shaped by individuals’ personal characteristics in continuous interaction with their work context and sense of professional meaning. Recent systematic reviews indicate that psychological resilience is inversely associated with burnout and depressive symptoms through core components such as cognitive flexibility, emotional regulation, and a sense of professional meaning [3, 47].

Rather than constituting an individual attribute in isolation, psychological resilience emerges from the interaction of factors operating at the individual, organizational, and systemic levels. This multilevel structure is summarized in the conceptual model presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Individual and structural components of psychological resilience (a buffering mechanism against burnout).

Self-care orientation, self-compassion, and perceived social support are among the core individual-level components of psychological resilience [45, 46]. At the organizational level, work–life balance, perceptions of supportive leadership, and team-based social support are identified as key determinants shaping psychological resilience within the workplace context [4, 7].

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

Burnout among health professionals is a prevalent and multidimensional problem that directly affects the functioning of health systems. The existing literature indicates that burnout levels vary across professional groups; in particular, physicians and nurses have been reported to exhibit higher levels of burnout and lower levels of psychological resilience compared with other health professionals.

Strengthening psychological resilience has, therefore, emerged as a core strategy for the prevention and reduction of burnout at both individual and organizational levels. Future research should conceptualize psychological resilience not merely as an individual skill but as a protective resource that is shaped through continuous interaction with the organizational context.

From this perspective, psychological resilience should be regarded not as the outcome of standardized interventions, but as a psychosocial state that health professionals develop dynamically throughout their professional lives. Accordingly, initiatives aimed at enhancing psychological resilience should not be limited to individual-level training programs; rather, they should be implemented as multilevel interventions encompassing organizational culture, leadership practices, and working conditions. In parallel, health policies should support these efforts through structural reforms that target working conditions, organizational climate, and leadership practices.

Advertisement

AI use disclosure

The author acknowledges the use of AI for language polishing and refinement of the book chapter. The tables and figures used in the chapter were created by the authors.

References

  1. 1. Bridgeman PJ, Bridgeman MB, Barone J. Burnout syndrome among healthcare professionals. The Bulletin of the American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. 2018;75(3):147–152. DOI: 10.2146/ajhp170460
  2. 2. Leo CG, Sabina S, Tumolo MR, Bodini A, Ponzini G, Sabato E, Mincarone P. Burnout among healthcare workers in the COVID 19 era: A review of the existing literature. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021;9:750529. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.750529
  3. 3. Kunzler AM, Helmreich I, Chmitorz A, Koenig J, Binder H, Wessa M, Lieb K. Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020;2020(7). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012527.pub2
  4. 4. Labrague LJ. Psychological resilience, coping behaviours and social support among health care workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Journal of Nursing Management. 2021;29(7):1893–1905. DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13336
  5. 5. Canu IG, Marca SC, Dell’Oro F, Balázs Á, Bergamaschi E, Besse C, … Wahlen A. Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2021;47(2):95–107. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3935
  6. 6. Schaufeli W. The burnout enigma solved? Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2021;47(3):169–170. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3950
  7. 7. Meredith LS, Bouskill K, Chang J, Larkin J, Motala A, Hempel S. Predictors of burnout among US healthcare providers: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022;12(8):e054243. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054243
  8. 8. Chemali Z, Ezzeddine FL, Gelaye B, Dossett ML, Salameh J, Bizri M, … Fricchione G. Burnout among healthcare providers in the complex environment of the Middle East: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1337. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7713-1
  9. 9. Tang YL, Raffone A, Wong SYS. Burnout and stress: New insights and interventions. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):8335. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92909-6
  10. 10. Yang Y, Hayes JA. Causes and consequences of burnout among mental health professionals: A practice-oriented review of recent empirical literature. Psychotherapy. 2020;57(3):426–436
  11. 11. De Hert S. Burnout in healthcare workers: Prevalence, impact and preventative strategies. Local and Regional Anesthesia. 2020;13:171–183. DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S240564
  12. 12. Gasciauskaite G, Lunkiewicz J, Braun J, Kolbe M, Seelandt J, Spahn DR, … Tscholl DW. Burnout and its determinants among anaesthesia care providers in Switzerland: A multicentre cross‐sectional study. Anaesthesia. 2024;79(2):168–177. DOI: 10.1111/anae.16171
  13. 13. Ghahramani S, Lankarani KB, Yousefi M, Heydari K, Shahabi S, Azmand S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of burnout among healthcare workers during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021;12:758849. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.758849
  14. 14. Jalili M, Niroomand M, Hadavand F, Zeinali K, Fotouhi A. Burnout among healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2021;94(6):1345–1352. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-021-01695-x
  15. 15. Krishna GG, Harbli NMA, Krishnan N, Ghundul LB, Aldhahri R, Aldossary AB, … AlAhmari AD. Burnout among ICU and non-ICU healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia: A comparative cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2025;18:995–1005. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S503896
  16. 16. Cohen C, Pignata S, Bezak E, Tie M, Childs J. Workplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for nurses, physicians and allied healthcare professionals: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2023;13(6):e071203. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071203
  17. 17. Nagarajan R, Ramachandran P, Dilipkumar R, Kaur P. Global estimate of burnout among the public health workforce: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Resources for Health. 2024;22(1):30. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-024-00917-w
  18. 18. de Godoy CCF, Lima AR, Hino P, Taminato M, Okuno MFP, Fernandes H. Burnout syndrome and accidents in primary healthcare nursing workers: A scoping review. BMC Nursing. 2025;24(1):410. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-03004-0
  19. 19. Jachmann A, Loser A, Mettler A, Exadaktylos A, Müller M, Klingberg K. Burnout, depression, and stress in emergency department nurses and physicians and the impact on private and work life: A systematic review. JACEP Open. 2025;6(2):100046. DOI: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100046
  20. 20. Chandawarkar A, Chaparro JD. Burnout in clinicians. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care. 2021;51(11):101104. DOI: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2021.101104
  21. 21. Macaron MM, Segun-Omosehin OA, Matar RH, Beran A, Nakanishi H, Than CA, Abulseoud OA. A systematic review and meta analysis on burnout in physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic: A hidden healthcare crisis. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2023;13:1071397. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1071397
  22. 22. West CP, Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: Contributors, consequences and solutions. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2018;283(6):516–529. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12752
  23. 23. Amiri 3S, Mahmood N, Mustafa H, Javaid SF, Khan MA. Occupational risk factors for burnout syndrome among healthcare professionals: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024;21(12):1583. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121583
  24. 24. Hämmig O. Explaining burnout and the intention to leave the profession among health professionals-a cross-sectional study in a hospital setting in Switzerland. BMC Health Services Research. 2018;18(1):785. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3556-1
  25. 25. Cotobal Rodeles S, Martín Sánchez FJ, Martínez-Sellés M. Physician and medical student burnout, a narrative literature review: Challenges, strategies, and a call to action. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025;14(7):2263. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14072263
  26. 26. Kansoun Z, Boyer L, Hodgkinson M, Villes V, Lançon C, Fond G. Burnout in French physicians: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2019;246:132–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.056
  27. 27. Papazian L, Hraiech S, Loundou A, Herrid4ge MS, Boyer L. High-level burnout in physicians and nurses working in adult ICUs: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Medicine. 2023;49(4):387–400. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07025-8
  28. 28. Williams ES, Rathert C, Buttigieg SC. The personal and professional consequences of physician burnout: A systematic review of the literature. Medical Care Research and Review. 2020;77(5):371–386. DOI: 10.1177/1077558719856787
  29. 29. Aiken LH, Lasater KB, Sloane DM, Pogue CA, Rosenbaum KEF, Muir KJ; US Clinician Wellbeing Study Consortium. Physician and nurse well-being and preferred interventions to address burnout in hospital practice: Factors associated with turnover, outcomes, and patient safety. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4(7):e231809. DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1809
  30. 30. Dall’Ora C, Ball J, Reinius M, Griffiths P. Burnout in nursing: A theoretical review. Human Resources for Health. 2020;18(1):41. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9
  31. 31. Jaber MJ, Bindahmsh AA, Baker OG, Alaqlan A, Almotairi SM, Elmohandis ZE, … Abuzir BM. Burnout combating strategies, triggers, implications, and self-coping mechanisms among nurses working in Saudi Arabia: A multicenter, mixed methods study. BMC Nursing. 2025;24(1):590. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-03191-w
  32. 32. Quesada-Puga C, Izquierdo-Espin FJ, Membrive-Jimenez MJ, Aguayo-Estremera R, Cañadas-De La Fuente GA, Romero-Bejar JL, Gomez-Urquiza JL. Job satisfaction and burnout syndrome among intensive-care unit nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2024;82:103660. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103660
  33. 33. Batista TC, Nappi I, Xavier MVM, Fiuza IO, de Vasconcelos CBM, Enohi RT. Burnout in nursing: Causal factors and impacts on health and professional performance-a systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Do Trabalho. 2025;23(3):e20251432. DOI: 10.47626/1679-4435-2025-1432
  34. 34. Cao Y, Dong Y, Shi L, Chappell K, Jia Z, Yan T, Gao Y. Occupational burnout in nurses is due to long‐term work stress rather than COVID‐19 pandemic event. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/jan.17085
  35. 35. Getie A, Ayenew T, Amlak BT, Gedfew M, Edmealem A, Kebede WM. Global prevalence and contributing factors of nurse burnout: An umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nursing. 2025;24(1):596. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-03266-8
  36. 36. Nogueira LDS, Sousa RMCD, Guedes EDS, Santos MAD, Turrini RNT, Cruz DDALMD. Burnout and nursing work environment in public health institutions. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2018;71(2):336–342. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0524
  37. 37. López‐López IM, Gómez‐Urquiza JL, Cañadas GR, De la Fuente EI, Albendín‐García L, Cañadas‐de la Fuente GA. Prevalence of burnout in mental health nurses and related factors: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2019;28(5):1035–1044. DOI: 10.1111/inm.12606
  38. 38. Kjos AL, Gnacinski SL, Wahl CA. An exploratory model of how ethical indicators predict health professional burnout. Research in Nursing & Health. 2025;48(3):310–323. DOI: 10.1002/nur.22453
  39. 39. O’Connor K, Neff DM, Pitman S. Burnout in mental health professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and determinants. European Psychiatry. 2018;53:74–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.06.003
  40. 40. Claponea RM, Iorga M. Burnout, organizational justice, workload, and emotional regulation among medical and non-medical personnel working in Romanian healthcare units. Behavioral Sciences. 2023;13(3):225. DOI: 10.3390/bs13030225
  41. 41. Bozdağ F, Ergün N. Psychological resilience of healthcare professionals during Covid-19 Pandemic. Psychological Reports. 2021;124(6):2567–2586. DOI: 10.1177/0033294120965477
  42. 42. Alonazi O, Alshowkan A, Shdaifat E. The relationship between psychological resilience and professional quality of life among mental health nurses: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing. 2023;22(1):184. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01346-1
  43. 43. Dhillon PK, Das S. Psychological resilience of frontline healthcare workers in India: A mixed-methods exploratory study during COVID-19 pandemic in India. Preventive Medicine: Research & Reviews. 2024;1(3):121–124. DOI: 10.4103/PMRR.PMRR_56_23
  44. 44. Mcizana T, Adams S, Khan S, Ntatamala I. Sociodemographic and work-related factors associated with psychological resilience in South African healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research. 2024;24(1):979. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11430-0
  45. 45. Pank C, von Boros L, Lieb K, Dalkner N, Egger-Lampl S, Lehr D, … Wessa M. The role of self-care and self-compassion in networks of resilience and stress among healthcare professionals. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):18545. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-01111-1
  46. 46. Hashem Z, Zeinoun P. Self-compassion explains less burnout among healthcare professionals. Mindfulness. 2020;11(11):2542–2551. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-020-01469-5
  47. 47. Heath C, Sommerfield A, von Ungern‐sternberg BS. Resilience strategies to manage psychological distress among healthcare workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(10):1364–1371. DOI: 10.1111/anae.15180

Written By

Nilgün Ulutaşdemir and Nevin Günaydın

Submitted: 20 January 2026 Reviewed: 10 February 2026 Published: 10 April 2026

© 2026 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

View All

Your cart

Discounts available on purchase of multiple copies. View rates

Subtotal €0.00

Local taxes (VAT) are calculated in later steps, if applicable.

Support: orders@intechopen.com