If you rebuilt your firm from scratch tomorrow, knowing what you now know about AI, would it look anything like the one you have?
Most principals, asked honestly, say no. Very few are acting on it because the real decision isn't which tool to buy. It's which parts of legal reasoning you're prepared to move off a person, and what verification you demand in return.
That's the harder conversation, and it's the one I'm having at Lawyers Weekly's Tech Innovate this week.
I'll cover:
1. What changes in research and reasoning when the underlying authority is structured rather than searched,
2. Where professional judgment has to sit, and why "the AI checked it" is not an answer to a court, and
3. What a technology-native firm looks like operationally: how matters are staffed, how work is priced, what stops being a task.
Tech Innovate, Thursday 27 August, my session at 12:25pm AEST. Free and online, alongside Relativity, Go Parachute and Thomson Reuters.
Registration link: https://lnkd.in/g2MVUmFA
Which GC would not want to retain these great senior lawyers supported by cost efficient and value-adding legal ai?