WHY AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH OFTEN FAILS TO REACH FARMERS — A Consultant’s Perspective Having worked with dozens of cooperatives, farmer groups, and agrifood projects across Kenya, I’ve seen a pattern that’s hard to ignore: Agricultural research is abundant. Impact on the ground? Minimal. Why? Research is often academic, not practical. Brilliant findings end up in journals, not in farmers’ hands. Most farmers I work with have never seen or heard of the latest research that could transform their yields or earnings. Top-down approaches dominate. Solutions are designed in labs or research stations with minimal farmer involvement. Yet, farmers are the experts of their own environments. Poor extension linkages. Even when good innovations exist, there’s a huge gap between research institutions and grassroots extension systems. As consultants, we often end up "translating" research that should have been made farmer-friendly from the start. No market lens. Research tends to focus on production. But farmers ask: “Will it sell? Is it profitable?” Without market integration, innovation is just theory. Feedback is ignored. Farmers are rarely involved in evaluating what works or doesn’t. We need more participatory learning, less top-down training. From a consultant’s view, the solution is not just more research—but more relevant, inclusive, and actionable research. Let’s invest in: Co-creating with farmers, Bridging research with market realities, Translating findings into practical guides, audio-visuals, and demos, Strengthening extension and private sector partnerships. The knowledge exists. The gap is in the approach. Farmers don’t need more data—they need results. #Agriculture #FarmersFirst #ResearchToImpact #KenyaFarming #AgriConsulting #FoodSystems #ValueAddition #DairyDevelopment #ExtensionServices #AgriPolicy #AfricanAgriculture
Role of Research and Extension in Modern Agriculture
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
The role of research and extension in modern agriculture refers to the process of developing new farming knowledge (research) and making sure it reaches farmers through education and support (extension). Together, these drive innovation, help farmers adapt to changing conditions, and support productive, sustainable agriculture.
- Connect research to practice: Turn scientific advances into practical tools and advice that farmers can use in their fields every day.
- Build local partnerships: Work directly with farmers and communities to tailor solutions that fit their unique needs and environments.
- Invest in extension services: Support training, advisory programs, and information resources that bridge the gap between research institutions and the people working the land.
-
-
After two decades of working with farmers, FPOs, state governments, and research institutions, I've tried to put one long-held conviction down on paper: India's public agricultural extension system has failed the Indian farmer. Not for lack of effort, but by design. My new discussion paper, Rethinking Agricultural Extension: What Alternative Models from India Teach Us about Participation, Inclusion, and Sustainability, is now published by the Agricultural Extension in South Asia (AESA) Network. The paper argues that extension has drifted from a learning system into a compliance pipeline — measured in trainings conducted and demos organised, rather than income stability, soil health, or inclusion. The cost of that drift has been paid by farmers, season after season. But it is not a paper about failure. It draws on eleven alternative extension models already working across India — CSA, RySS/APCNF, PRADAN, Digital Green, Access Agriculture, The Goat Trust, DDS, NRLM, Paani Foundation, Syngenta Foundation, and others — to show what a next-generation extension ecosystem could look like: → A community cadre layer for inclusion and trust → A service-centre and enterprise layer for sustainability → A digital layer for scale and personalisation → A rights-based agroecological layer for seed sovereignty and climate resilience The critique in the paper is of institutions, not of the thousands of scientists, extension officers, and field functionaries working with commitment inside them. It is written as a partner's critique, not an outsider's complaint. Grateful to the AESA Network and CRISP for publishing this, to the organisations whose work forms the substantive core of the paper, and above all to the farmers, Krishi Sakhis, Pashu Sakhis, CRPs, and sangham members whose practice it draws on. Centre for Sustainable Agriculture Grameen Academy Sahaja Aharam #AgriculturalExtension #Agroecology #FarmerProducerOrganisations #Agriculture #IndianAgriculture #NaturalFarming #RuralDevelopment #AESA Read full paper here https://lnkd.in/grdbaV69
-
Exploring the different values chains in Agriculture (Post 7) Over the past few days, we’ve been breaking down the different sections in agriculture that people can earn from, even if they aren’t directly farming. In our last post, we talked about AgriTech & Innovation, how technology is transforming farming in Nigeria. Today, we’re shifting the spotlight to the people behind the scenes, the ones who train, guide, and support farmers and agribusinesses. “Extension Services & Consultancy”, The Knowledge Carriers of Agriculture Every farmer, no matter how skilled, needs guidance. Every agribusiness needs someone to troubleshoot, advise, and support growth. That’s where extension officers, consultants, and trainers come in. This section includes: • Farm advisory & field support • Capacity building & training programs • Government or NGO agricultural projects • Private farm consultancy • Soil testing & crop recommendation services • Community sensitization & agricultural campaigns Why is it so important? Because knowledge is power. • It helps farmers make better decisions • It improves yield and profit • It promotes sustainable and climate-smart practices • It bridges the gap between research and practice • It empowers rural communities and uplifts food systems Without extension services, many smallholder farmers would be left to guesswork, and that limits agricultural progress. How can you earn from it? If you have knowledge and communication skills, this sector is for you. You can: • Work as a field extension officer for companies or NGOs • Start your own agricultural training hub • Offer farm consultancy services (soil, crop, pest, etc.) • Get paid to organize training or workshops • Collaborate on donor or government projects • Be a freelance advisor to agripreneurs This space is ideal for people who love to teach, travel, and impact lives. Up next: Operations & Farm Management,the behind-the-scenes managers who make farms run like businesses. Lets Keep learning and discovering your place in the agricultural chain 💚
-
Why Agricultural Research Often Fails Farmers in Africa And What We Can Do About It Despite billions poured into agricultural research, many African farmers still struggle with low yields, poor soil, and unpredictable weather. Why? Because research often stays in labs and reports 📄🔬 — not in the hands of farmers 👩🌾👨🏿🌾. Here’s what’s missing: 1. Farmer-Centered Innovation Research is often disconnected from real field conditions 🚜🌾. Farmers need practical, local solutions—not copy-paste models from other regions 🌍. 2. Poor Extension Services There’s a massive gap between knowledge creation and knowledge delivery 🧠➡️👥. We need a strong bridge — trained, equipped extension workers to translate science into practice 🌱🛠️. 3. Lack of Inclusive Participation Farmers — especially women and youth 👩🏿🌾🧑🏽🌾 — are rarely included in designing or testing innovations. Yet they’re the ones who know the land best 💡🌍. 4. One-size-fits-all doesn’t fit Africa is diverse 🌍. What works in Kenya 🇰🇪 might flop in Burkina Faso 🇧🇫. We need context-specific solutions that reflect local reality. It’s time to shift from research for farmers to research with farmers ✊🏿✨. Let’s co-create solutions. Let’s listen. Let’s adapt. #AgResearch #AfricanAgriculture #FarmersFirst #FoodSecurity #ClimateSmartAg #InclusiveInnovation #AgTech #SustainableFarming #ResearchToImpact #SDG2 #RuralDevelopment #FoodSystems #AfricaRising #AgriTransformation
-
What Are the Biggest Barriers for the Industrialization of African Agriculture? Everyone is talking about the potential for Africa to become the next agricultural powerhouse. Tech investors, policymakers, and international organizations are all focusing on the immense potential. But despite this potential, there are still major barriers standing in the way of agricultural industrialization across much of Africa. Energy costs? Machines? Education? Water? Fertilizer? These are all critical components, but one factor seems to be consistently overlooked—the lack of public sector investment in agriculture. Africa has vast agricultural potential, with more than 60% of the world’s uncultivated arable land, but it still lags behind in terms of industrial agriculture. While countries like Egypt and South Africa have made strides in industrializing their agriculture, many others continue to face significant challenges. The biggest obstacle, however, is the lack of investment in research, infrastructure, and extension services. Most African governments simply don't allocate enough resources to agriculture. Research and development are underfunded, and extension services, which play a vital role in educating farmers and disseminating knowledge, are severely lacking. The impact of this can be seen in countries like Kenya, where the Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) in the 1990s led to the dismantling of the extension services network. Without extension services, farmers are left without the necessary training, guidance, and support to modernize their agricultural practices. It’s like laying off all your teachers and then wondering why the next generation is illiterate. To industrialize agriculture, we need a robust, well-funded public sector that invests in the future of farming. Research needs to be prioritized, and extension services must be revitalized to help farmers adopt new technologies, improve productivity, and overcome challenges such as climate change. This isn’t just about providing fertilizer or access to machinery; it’s about creating a sustainable ecosystem that enables farmers to thrive. When governments invest in agriculture, they unlock opportunities for economic growth, job creation, and food security. It’s time for African governments to stop overlooking the agricultural sector and start investing in its industrialization. The future of African agriculture isn’t just about resources; it’s about knowledge, infrastructure, and most importantly, investment. If Africa is to realize its full agricultural potential, we must prioritize the rebuilding of extension services, invest in research, and create an environment where industrial agriculture can flourish. The time to act is now.
-
A packed room and strong engagement at AgriFutures evokeAG for the National AgriTech Strategic Plan. AusAgritech convened this critical discussion alongside the release of the White Paper to outline the opportunity for a future where AgriTech is embedded at the core of agricultural productivity. Over the past five years, Australia has invested approximately $620 million in agricultural innovation, agtech accelerators, smart farms, drought hubs, digital-ag platforms and innovation events. While this investment has catalysed the industry, the AusAgritech White Paper's core message is clear, we don't need to spend more. We need to spend differently, with clearer intent and far greater accountability. That means shifting from funding things that look like progress (digital platforms, accelerators, reports) to funding the mechanisms that actually drive adoption, create free market demand for AgriTech, and build a cycle of extension, trust and new capability. 👩🌾 Make adoption the metric, not innovation theatre. Public investment must shift toward technologies, companies, and ecosystem builders capable of demonstrating verified adoption outcomes. That sounds blunt because it needs to be. Companies created, events hosted and webinars completed are not success measures. On farms change is the measure. Productivity lifted is the measure. Outcomes over optics. 💰 Redirect capital to the "valley of scale," not just the valley of death. Innovation often starts in our research institutions, but it's scaled by commercial companies who need consistent and reliable access to capital. We need a range of public and private capital to fund the messy middle, scaling teams, markets, and products to build the capability and trust that creates a flywheel of adoption. If our capital models don't fund the full cycle, we'll keep exporting our IP and importing the returns. 🚜 Rebuild regional extension capability as core infrastructure. Extension is not a nice-to-have. It's the bridge. The uncomfortable truth is that extension capacity has been steadily eroded, and we keep pretending shiny national platforms will replace trusted humans in the paddock. Better outcomes start by funding regional advisory capability that blends ag and tech literacy, and backing producer-led farming system networks that de-risk adoption through demonstrated ROI. Thank you to everyone who took the time to attend and contribute, and to Meg Lovegrove and Rob Hulme for leading the discussion. The National AgriTech Strategy is being built by industry for industry, and we value your ongoing engagement and support. I'd love to hear your perspectives on the National AgriTech Stategic Plan, White Paper 👇
-
I'm excited to share the publication of my new paper titled "Investigating the Influence of Agricultural Extension Service Providers (AESPs) on Building Inclusive Food Systems Through Underutilised Indigenous Foods Education: A Case Study.* This research delves into the crucial role of agricultural extension services in promoting the production and use of underutilised indigenous food crops (UIFCs) in South Africa. Through a detailed case study across three districts in northern KwaZulu-Natal, I explored how AESPs' influence can either support or hinder the development of more inclusive and sustainable food systems. The findings reveal significant gaps in AESPs’ engagement with UIFCs, with many providers focusing on more mainstream crops rather than traditional indigenous foods, which are key to both food security and cultural preservation. The paper emphasizes the need for greater visibility and active participation of AESPs in communities, and highlights the importance of including UIFCs in their professional development programs. This study adds to the growing body of research on inclusive food systems and calls for a more holistic approach to agricultural extension services, one that recognizes the value of indigenous food knowledge and supports its integration into modern agricultural practices. You can read the full paper here: https://lnkd.in/dqPDg3Jj. I look forward to discussing its findings with those interested in sustainable food systems, agricultural extension, and indigenous knowledge.
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Healthcare
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Event Planning
- Training & Development