On 23/07/14 19:23, Kris Craig wrote: > Wow, looks like the PHP 7 votes are dominating so far. If you want to > avoid the confusion and ridicule that will result from skipping a version > increment, I suggest you remember to cast your vote.
Since PHP6 existed then sorry but using it again is just as confusing ;) There will be ridicule either way, so that is no reason for reusing a version number again. We just tag PHP6 exactly as it is documented - closed in 2010 - a fact that seems to have been dropped again from the arguments in the RFC :( -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
