pgsql-hackers - January 2000

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Jan. 1, 2000

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! Vince Vielhaber 05:10
HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum? Stephen Birch 08:39
Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Don Baccus 18:44
Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Tom Lane 18:48
Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Ed Loehr 19:05

Jan. 2, 2000

Thread Author Time
pgsql y2k bug? Ed Loehr 00:28
Re: [HACKERS] pgsql y2k bug? 📎 Bruce Momjian 01:42
Is DATEDEBUG useful Bruce Momjian 01:53
Re: [HACKERS] pgsql y2k bug? Tom Lane 02:06
Re: [HACKERS] pgsql y2k bug? Bruce Momjian 02:10
Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Don Baccus 03:09
Date calc bug Olivier PRENANT 14:15
Re: [BUGS] Date calc bug Tom Lane 18:02
CVS problems Ansley, Michael 23:48

Jan. 3, 2000

Thread Author Time
RE: [HACKERS] CVS problems Ansley, Michael 00:17
Docs Ansley, Michael 00:20
RE: [HACKERS] Docs Vince Vielhaber 00:51
Re: [HACKERS] Docs Bruce Momjian 00:52
Hmm, almost-a-Y2K-bug in abstime regression test Tom Lane 06:28
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Tom Lane 07:05
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Thomas Lockhart 07:08
Re: [PORTS] RPMS on PostgreSQL.org updated. Thomas Lockhart 07:26
Re: Is DATEDEBUG useful Thomas Lockhart 07:41
Re: [HACKERS] Docs Thomas Lockhart 07:46
Re: [HACKERS] Docs Ed Loehr 07:57
Re: [HACKERS] Docs Thomas Lockhart 08:20
Re: [HACKERS] Hmm, almost-a-Y2K-bug in abstime regression test Thomas Lockhart 08:38
RE: [HACKERS] Docs Ansley, Michael 12:14
date/time type changes Bruce Momjian 13:16
Re: [HACKERS] scanner/parser for FOREIGN KEY Tom Lane 15:21
Re: date/time type changes Bruce Momjian 15:42
Re: date/time type changes Thomas Lockhart 15:45
Re: [HACKERS] scanner/parser for FOREIGN KEY Thomas Lockhart 15:51
Re: [HACKERS] scanner/parser for FOREIGN KEY Bruce Momjian 16:04
Re: [PORTS] RPMS on PostgreSQL.org updated. Lamar Owen 16:51
Re: [HACKERS] Docs Ed Loehr 18:20
Index toasting (was: Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc") Jan Wieck 18:25
replicator Karel Zak - Zakkr 19:23
Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Stephen Birch 19:32
Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian 21:01
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Lamar Owen 21:14
RE: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Ansley, Michael 22:26
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Hannu Krosing 22:56
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Hannu Krosing 23:00
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Jan Wieck 23:18
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian 23:59

Jan. 4, 2000

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Vince Vielhaber 00:15
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote The Hermit Hacker 00:21
Re: Index toasting (was: Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc") Don Baccus 00:51
Re: [HACKERS] replicator Philippe Marchesseault 01:22
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Stephen Birch 01:25
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote D'Arcy J.M. Cain 02:18
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote D'Arcy J.M. Cain 02:22
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote The Hermit Hacker 02:35
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source The Hermit Hacker 02:39
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote D'Arcy J.M. Cain 05:10
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian 05:23
Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Thomas Lockhart 07:24
Re: [HACKERS] Docs Thomas Lockhart 07:27
Re: [BUGS] Date calc bug 📎 Thomas Lockhart 08:11
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Norman Widders 08:29
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Hannu Krosing 08:41
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Joe Brenner 09:11
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Theo Kramer 09:11
Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Vince Vielhaber 10:25
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Jan Wieck 12:25
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source The Hermit Hacker 13:18
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source The Hermit Hacker 14:25
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Jose Soares 15:29
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Tom Lane 15:58
Re: [HACKERS] replicator Karel Zak - Zakkr 16:02
Regression tests Thomas Lockhart 16:33
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Don Baccus 17:19
Error compiling 6.5.3 on Solaris 2.7/x86 with Sun C compiler 5.0 pgsql-hackers 17:40
Re: [BUGS] Date calc bug 📎 Olivier PRENANT 18:07
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Jan Wieck 19:07
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian 19:42
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Bruce Momjian 19:50
Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Bruce Momjian 19:52
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian 19:53
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Don Baccus 20:21
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source The Hermit Hacker 21:07
RE: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Ansley, Michael 21:28
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Bruce Momjian 21:49
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian 21:50
RE: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Ansley, Michael 22:16
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Jan Wieck 22:45
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Stephen Birch 22:53
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source The Hermit Hacker 23:10
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian 23:24
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Scott Beasley 23:41
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian 23:42
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian 23:44
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Jan Wieck 23:47
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian 23:48
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Don Baccus 23:49
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Don Baccus 23:52

Jan. 5, 2000

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian 00:18
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian 00:19
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Scott Beasley 00:19
Thomas! FOREIGN KEY problem! Jan Wieck 00:20
Re: [HACKERS] What does explain show ? Tom Lane 00:30
Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Don Baccus 01:29
Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Thomas Lockhart 04:24
Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Bruce Momjian 04:44
Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Bruce Momjian 04:56
Y2K glitch in pgsql mail list archives Tom Lane 06:56
ECPG and FETCH Tim Kane 07:24
RE: [HACKERS] What does explain show ? Hiroshi Inoue 07:41
RE: [HACKERS] Index corruption Hiroshi Inoue 07:42
Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert 08:13
ordinal decimal number Karel Zak - Zakkr 11:44
Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number J. Roeleveld 12:09
Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Karel Zak - Zakkr 13:51
Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Oliver Elphick 13:55
Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Jan Wieck 14:34
Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG and FETCH Ivo Simicevic 15:04
Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Hannu Krosing 16:00
Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG and FETCH Thomas Lockhart 16:07
InterBase interview on Linux Journal Lamar Owen 16:42
Re: [HACKERS] InterBase interview on Linux Journal Thomas Lockhart 17:30
Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Karel Zak - Zakkr 17:49
Re: ECPG documentation Thomas Lockhart 18:10
Re: [HACKERS] InterBase interview on Linux Journal The Hermit Hacker 18:21
Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG and FETCH Michael Meskes 18:30
Re: [HACKERS] InterBase interview on Linux Journal Bruce Momjian 19:23
RE: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Ansley, Michael 19:38
My response/comments to Inbase Interview ... The Hermit Hacker 19:41
RE: [HACKERS] InterBase interview on Linux Journal Ansley, Michael 20:20

Jan. 6, 2000

Thread Author Time
Proposed cleanup of index-related planner estimation procedures Tom Lane 04:25
UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... The Hermit Hacker 05:08
Re: [HACKERS] UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... Mike Mascari 05:23
Re: [HACKERS] UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... The Hermit Hacker 05:31
Regression tests Thomas Lockhart 07:01
RE: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Peter Mount 10:04
RE: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Karel Zak - Zakkr 10:52
Re: [HACKERS] UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... Vince Vielhaber 11:06
Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Rod Chamberlin 12:49
Re: [HACKERS] UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... The Hermit Hacker 13:15
btree: failed to add item to Adam Walczykiewicz 14:40
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Rod Chamberlin 15:09
Re: [HACKERS] btree: failed to add item to Jan Wieck 15:40
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Tom Lane 15:50
Re: [HACKERS] UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... Tom Lane 15:52
New Search Engine ... UdmSearch The Hermit Hacker 15:57
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Brian E Gallew 16:08
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian 16:08
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian 16:11
Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Oleg Broytmann 16:20
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL The Hermit Hacker 16:36
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Tom Lane 16:40
Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch The Hermit Hacker 16:42
Re: [HACKERS] btree: failed to add item to Tom Lane 16:43
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL The Hermit Hacker 16:46
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Rod Chamberlin 16:46
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Rod Chamberlin 17:09
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus 17:23
Re: [HACKERS] Proposed cleanup of index-related planner estimation procedures Bernard Adrian Frankpitt 18:03
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian 18:12
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian 18:20
Still investigating, but ... CREATE INDEX problem in v6.5.x ... The Hermit Hacker 18:34
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL The Hermit Hacker 18:39
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian 18:44
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL The Hermit Hacker 19:01
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with InformixSQL Thomas Lockhart 19:08
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian 19:16
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with InformixSQL Bruce Momjian 19:17
vacuum problem Patrick Welche,SCC,ext.35710, 20:27
Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Ed Loehr 20:30
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus 20:31
Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Ed Loehr 20:32
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus 20:40
Re: [GENERAL] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Ed Loehr 20:45
pg_dumpall prob Patrick Welche,SCC,ext.35710, 20:48
Re: [HACKERS] Thomas! FOREIGN KEY problem! Jan Wieck 20:52
RE: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Ansley, Michael 21:08
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dumpall prob Bruce Momjian 21:17
Re: [GENERAL] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch The Hermit Hacker 21:30
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian 22:04
pg_dump problem Patrick Welche,SCC,ext.35710, 22:56
RE: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem Ansley, Michael 23:14
[Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] Lamar Owen 23:29
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Hannu Krosing 23:47

Jan. 7, 2000

Thread Author Time
RE: [HACKERS] Proposed cleanup of index-related planner estimation procedures Hiroshi Inoue 00:09
Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] The Hermit Hacker 00:24
Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] Lamar Owen 00:47
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus 02:52
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with InformixSQL Don Baccus 02:57
RE: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus 03:18
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with InformixSQL Bruce Momjian 03:22
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian 03:25
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus 03:32
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL The Hermit Hacker 04:00
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with InformixSQL Thomas Lockhart 06:47
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Thomas Lockhart 06:56
RE: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Ansley, Michael 07:06
Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Thomas Lockhart 07:24
(OT) Linux limits Thomas Lockhart 07:35
please help Shanthala Rao 08:17
Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Adriaan Joubert 09:22

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31