pgsql-hackers - March 2000

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 31

March 1, 2000

Thread Author Time
Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' The Hermit Hacker 01:11
minor bug in 7.0: casting The Hermit Hacker 01:14
RE: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented Hiroshi Inoue 01:35
RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Hiroshi Inoue 02:05
Re: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Bruce Momjian 02:42
select exists (select oid from users) The Hermit Hacker 03:17
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Christopher Sawtell 03:26
Poll: Databases for Linux The Hermit Hacker 04:02
Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux Bruce Momjian 04:20
Re: [HACKERS] minor bug in 7.0: casting Tom Lane 05:42
RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Hiroshi Inoue 05:56
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Thomas Lockhart 06:14
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Bruce Momjian 06:18
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Tom Lane 06:29
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Thomas Lockhart 06:46
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Thomas Lockhart 06:50
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane 06:53
Re: [HACKERS] Compile woes Michael Meskes 07:27
Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux Oleg Broytmann 09:20
RE: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented Karel Zak - Zakkr 09:33
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Moray McConnachie 09:48
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr 10:14
RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Karel Zak - Zakkr 10:38
Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Jose Soares 12:22
Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Jose Soares 13:24
rpms Sergio A. Kessler 13:38
Re: Bugs in Postgres Thomas Lockhart 13:56
Re: [HACKERS] rpms Thomas Lockhart 14:00
patch for plperl Makefile.PL 📎 Mark Hollomon 14:17
Re: [HACKERS] rpms Sergio A. Kessler 14:25
Re: [HACKERS] rpms Sergio A. Kessler 14:39
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut 14:47
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut 14:48
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Peter Eisentraut 15:03
Where's the SQL3 spec? Peter Eisentraut 15:04
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut 15:15
Re: [HACKERS] Where's the SQL3 spec? Kardos, Dr. Andreas 15:35
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bugs in Postgres Tom Lane 15:36
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr 15:44
BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Tom Lane 15:52
PostgreSQL on Solaris/SPARC with gcc Horák Daniel 16:01
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL on Solaris/SPARC with gcc Oleg Broytmann 16:14
Re: [HACKERS] rpms Thomas Lockhart 16:33
Re: [HACKERS] Where's the SQL3 spec? Ross J. Reedstrom 16:35
Re: bit types Bruce Momjian 16:36
Psql and \H option Bruce Momjian 16:45
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Thomas Lockhart 16:49
Re: [HACKERS] rpms Lamar Owen 17:01
Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Ross J. Reedstrom 17:24
Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane 17:50
Locking Jeff MacDonald 18:10
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Peter Eisentraut 18:35
Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Tom Lane 18:46
Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane 19:06
Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Ross J. Reedstrom 19:11
Re: [HACKERS] patch for plperl Makefile.PL Bruce Momjian 19:13
Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Bruce Momjian 19:23
Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Bruce Momjian 19:28
SQL92 standard corrections Ross J. Reedstrom 19:30
empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Willy De la Court 19:58
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Tom Lane 19:58
Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Hannu Krosing 20:13
Re: bit types Adriaan Joubert 20:23
Re: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Tom Lane 20:23
Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Vince Vielhaber 20:24
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Bruce Momjian 20:26
RE: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Willy De la Court 20:43

March 2, 2000

Thread Author Time
RE: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Willy De la Court 00:49
Re: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Tom Lane 03:51
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Tom Lane 04:18
bitten by docs Alfred Perlstein 04:33
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Thomas Lockhart 06:29
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Thomas Lockhart 06:46
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Thomas Lockhart 06:48
AW: [HACKERS] Locking Zeugswetter Andreas SB 08:54
AW: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Zeugswetter Andreas SB 09:03
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Vince Vielhaber 11:14
grant/revoke bug with delete/update 📎 Jerome ALET 11:47
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Alfred Perlstein 11:48
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Peter Eisentraut 14:18
Re: SQL compliance Thomas Lockhart 14:48
Re: AW: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane 15:12
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr 15:12
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr 15:16
Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Bruce Momjian 15:20
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Bruce Momjian 15:24
Re: [HACKERS] rpms Peter Eisentraut 15:58
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL on Solaris/SPARC with gcc Peter Eisentraut 16:13
Re: AW: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Peter Eisentraut 16:23
SPI and qCache and bug? Karel Zak - Zakkr 16:32
Re: [HACKERS] rpms Thomas Lockhart 16:38

March 3, 2000

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] rpms Sergio A. Kessler 12:39
7.0beta bug (or feature)? 📎 Kyle Bateman 18:19
Re: [HACKERS] rpms Henry B. Hotz 18:58
Re: [HACKERS] rpms Lamar Owen 20:46

March 4, 2000

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] rpms Fernando Magari1os Lamas 00:42
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Peter Eisentraut 17:05
Re: [GENERAL] Version 7.0 beta problem Peter Eisentraut 17:06
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Peter Eisentraut 17:06
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Peter Eisentraut 17:06
ACL enhancements (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE) Peter Eisentraut 17:07

March 5, 2000

Thread Author Time
TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime Tatsuo Ishii 01:54
DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tatsuo Ishii 09:09
Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Brian Hirt 09:26
pg_pwd trigger to be removed Peter Eisentraut 13:29
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Peter Eisentraut 13:36
Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime Peter Eisentraut 13:39
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Peter Eisentraut 14:15
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Brian Hirt 21:01

March 6, 2000

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Mike Mascari 01:31
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Mike Mascari 03:03
Re: AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Mike Mascari 05:44
xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. 📎 Alexei Zakharov 06:06
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Peter Eisentraut 06:59
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Peter Eisentraut 07:05
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Philip Warner 07:27
AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Zeugswetter Andreas SB 08:31
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Jerome ALET 09:12
Re: AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Peter Eisentraut 10:08
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Peter Eisentraut 10:10
AW: AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Zeugswetter Andreas SB 10:27
Re: ACL enhancements Karel Zak - Zakkr 13:47
Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Peter Eisentraut 15:59
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ACL enhancements Ross J. Reedstrom 18:38
Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime Thomas Lockhart 23:12

March 7, 2000

Thread Author Time
sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Ross J. Reedstrom 00:37
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Tatsuo Ishii 01:07
Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime Tatsuo Ishii 01:34
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Bruce Momjian 03:31
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Ross J. Reedstrom 05:04
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Thomas Lockhart 05:16
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. yutaka tanida 05:25
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Tom Lane 06:51
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Version 7.0 beta problem Tom Lane 06:55
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Tom Lane 06:58
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane 07:53
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tatsuo Ishii 08:06
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Tom Lane 08:08
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Tom Lane 08:15
pSQL auth Jacopo Silva 08:45
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Jerome ALET 10:05
alter_table.sql Patrick Welche 14:52
library policy question Michael Meskes 14:57
ECPG restructuring Michael Meskes 15:09
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Thomas Lockhart 15:47
How can I create trigger on system table, for on example pg_class ??? Andrzej Mazurkiewicz 16:14
CREATE VIEW fix Thomas Lockhart 16:14
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane 16:19
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Tom Lane 16:34
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Patrick Welche 16:40
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane 16:47
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Thomas Lockhart 16:57
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Lamar Owen 16:57
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane 17:01
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Patrick Welche 17:22
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Michael Meskes 19:25
SCHEMA support (was Re: DROP TABLE inside a transaction block) Ross J. Reedstrom 19:25
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane 19:29
Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VIEW fix Ross J. Reedstrom 19:41
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian 22:50
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question The Hermit Hacker 23:06
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Tom Lane 23:22
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Bruce Momjian 23:24
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Bruce Momjian 23:25
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian 23:35
Re: [HACKERS] pg_pwd trigger to be removed Bruce Momjian 23:39
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian 23:40
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Bruce Momjian 23:48
'LIKE' enhancement JB 23:53
Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update Bruce Momjian 23:53
Casts in 7.0 vs 6.5 (was Re: [SQL] 7.0beta bug (or feature)?) Tom Lane 23:59

March 8, 2000

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Bruce Momjian 00:00
'LIKE' enhancement suggestion JB 00:04
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Bruce Momjian 00:09
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Bruce Momjian 00:13
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Tom Lane 00:15
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian 00:17
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian 00:17
Re: [HACKERS] pg_pwd trigger to be removed Tom Lane 00:22
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion Tom Lane 00:32
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane 00:55
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Tom Lane 01:01
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS The Hermit Hacker 01:08
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane 01:13
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. The Hermit Hacker 01:19
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion JB 01:24
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Tom Lane 01:28
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Bruce Momjian 01:30
Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VIEW fix Bruce Momjian 01:31
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Bruce Momjian 01:35
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian 01:44
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian 01:48
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Bruce Momjian 01:50
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian 01:51
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. D. Jay Newman 02:48
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Lamar Owen 02:57
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Tatsuo Ishii 03:03
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian 04:53
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion Tom Lane 05:07
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion The Hermit Hacker 05:19

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 31