pgsql-hackers - May 2000

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

May 1, 2000

Thread Author Time
Back in town Thomas Lockhart 04:31
RE: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Hiroshi Inoue 04:31
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Bruce Momjian 04:36
Re: gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target page/SUBSYS.o ????????????????? Thomas Lockhart 11:08
Re: Cosmetic bug in 7.0 docs Thomas Lockhart 11:22
Re: CREATE TABLE AS standard? Thomas Lockhart 13:02
Re: How to compile a dynamically loadable object file Thomas Lockhart 13:06
Re: CREATE TABLE AS standard? Bruce Momjian 15:49
Re: CREATE TABLE AS standard? Thomas Lockhart 16:03
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Ross J. Reedstrom 17:44
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Bruce Momjian 17:50
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Bruce Momjian 18:08
Re: FW: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Ross J. Reedstrom 18:45
Re: FW: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Bruce Momjian 18:51
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Tom Lane 19:12
Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Peter Eisentraut 19:49
Re: When malloc returns zero ... Peter Eisentraut 19:50
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Brian E Gallew 20:01
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Ross J. Reedstrom 20:09
Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Tom Lane 21:08
Re: When malloc returns zero ... Tom Lane 21:17
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Tom Lane 21:27
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Ross J. Reedstrom 22:20

May 2, 2000

Thread Author Time
[Fwd: PG 7.0 is great!] Lamar Owen 00:59
RE: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Hiroshi Inoue 01:09
RE: When malloc returns zero ... Hiroshi Inoue 01:42
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart 01:59
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Lamar Owen 02:30
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 02:35
psql \l error SAKAIDA 02:47
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart 03:26
Re: psql \l error Tom Lane 04:34
[No subject] 📎 Billy G. Allie 04:37
Update to FAQ_SCO. 📎 Billy G. Allie 04:44
Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Joachim Achtzehnter 04:50
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart 05:15
Re: Case insensitive collation. Malcontent 05:22
RE: psql \l error Hiroshi Inoue 05:50
Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA 06:58
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 07:51
Re: psql \l error Tatsuo Ishii 07:53
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 08:00
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 08:03
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 08:11
Re: psql \l error Peter Eisentraut 08:26
RE: psql \l error Peter Eisentraut 08:34
Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Peter Eisentraut 08:46
Re: When malloc returns zero ... Peter Eisentraut 08:50
Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA 09:17
Re: psql \l error Hiroshi Inoue 10:15
Re: Update to FAQ_SCO. Bruce Momjian 10:54
Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 10:55
Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Thomas Lockhart 10:55
Re: psql \l error Bruce Momjian 10:59
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 11:01
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 11:02
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart 11:07
Re: PgAccess 0.98.6 , a ugly bug fixed Bruce Momjian 11:11
Re: psql \l error Bruce Momjian 11:14
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart 11:15
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 11:30
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 11:32
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 11:40
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 11:42
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 11:54
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 11:57
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 12:00
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 12:02
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 12:05
postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Anand Raman 12:23
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 12:27
insert new type (object ?) Loïc TREGOUËT 12:31
Re: When malloc returns zero ... Mark Hollomon 12:35
Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Karel Zak 12:54
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 12:59
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart 12:59
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart 13:14
Re: postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Bruce Momjian 13:19
Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA Masaaki 13:21
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 13:25
Re: Patch submission Thomas Lockhart 13:40
Re: insert new type (object ?) Jan Wieck 14:11
Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Tom Lane 14:58
Re: When malloc returns zero ... Tom Lane 15:19
Re: psql \l error Tom Lane 15:39
Re: Patch submission Adam Haberlach 15:45
Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Tom Lane 15:52
Hardcopy docs about ready Thomas Lockhart 15:56
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Tom Lane 16:02
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Don Baccus 16:23
Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane 16:25
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 16:43
Re: [Acs-pg-dev] another milestone! Don Baccus 17:03
Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus 17:19
Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Karel Zak 17:23
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Tom Lane 17:27
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 17:37
Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Joachim Achtzehnter 18:53
Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Karel Zak 21:22
Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 21:24
Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane 21:26
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Bruce Momjian 21:26
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Peter Eisentraut 21:28
Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Peter Eisentraut 21:29
Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Peter Eisentraut 21:35
Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane 21:37
Re: Why Not MySQL? Bruce Momjian 21:55
Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane 22:01
Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent 22:28
Re: Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus 22:59
Re: Why Not MySQL? Tim Uckun 23:00
Re: postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Tom Cook 23:24

May 3, 2000

Thread Author Time
RE: When malloc returns zero ... Hiroshi Inoue 00:20
7.0RC2 compile error ! frank 01:10
Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Bruce Momjian 01:14
Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker 01:19
Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) The Hermit Hacker 01:36
Re: [HACKERS] 7.0RC2 compile error ! Bruce Momjian 02:27
PostgreSQL v7.0 - Release Candidate 3 The Hermit Hacker 03:01
pgtksh Bruce Momjian 03:17
pgtksh Bruce Momjian 03:21
Patch for FAQ_SCO 📎 Billy G. Allie 03:35
Re: Patch for FAQ_SCO Bruce Momjian 03:45
Re: pgtksh Tom Lane 03:46
Re: pgtksh Bruce Momjian 03:52
Re: postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Anand Raman 03:53
Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Bruce Momjian 03:53
RE: psql \l error Hiroshi Inoue 04:02
Re: Why Not MySQL? Thomas Lockhart 04:12
Re: Why Not MySQL? Hannu Krosing 04:12
Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Anand Raman 04:17
Re: When malloc returns zero ... Tom Lane 04:19
Testing something ... The Hermit Hacker 04:19
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart 04:21
Re: [HACKERS] Hardcopy docs about ready Thomas Lockhart 04:25
Re: [HACKERS] Hardcopy docs about ready The Hermit Hacker 04:34
Re: Testing something ... The Hermit Hacker 04:38
Re: [HACKERS] 7.0RC2 compile error ! Thomas Lockhart 04:51
Re: Testing something ... Marc G. Fournier 04:53
Re: Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus 04:55
Re: Why Not MySQL? Thomas Lockhart 05:07
RE: When malloc returns zero ... Hiroshi Inoue 05:44
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 06:36
RE: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Peter Mount 06:58
AW: Why Not MySQL? Zeugswetter Andreas SB 08:58
Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Peter Eisentraut 09:00
RE: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Peter Mount 09:07
Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) Vince Vielhaber 09:30
Re: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Anand Raman 09:35
RE: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Peter Mount 10:06
Re: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Anand Raman 10:53
Re: Why Not MySQL? Hannu Krosing 10:58
plperl is still disabled David Jack Olrik 11:07
RE: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Peter Mount 11:13
RE: Why Not MySQL? Magnus Hagander 11:43
RE: Why Not MySQL? Magnus Hagander 11:45
Re: Why Not MySQL? Hannu Krosing 11:51
Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker 12:27
Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) The Hermit Hacker 12:30
Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA Masaaki 12:30
Re: plperl is still disabled Mark Hollomon 12:43
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Don Baccus 13:03
Re: Why Not MySQL? Bruce Momjian 13:06
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 13:12
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian 13:13
Re: Why Not MySQL? Sergio A. Kessler 13:15
Re: [HACKERS] 7.0RC2 compile error ! frank 13:32
libpq++ build now checks make rc 📎 Zeugswetter Andreas SB 13:33
RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 13:38
Re: [HACKERS] 7.0RC2 compile error ! Lamar Owen 13:54
Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent 14:18
Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) Mitch Vincent 14:27
Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent 14:39
Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) Mitch Vincent 14:44
Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker 14:44
Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) Ed Loehr 14:46
Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) The Hermit Hacker 14:48
Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane 15:12
Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Ross J. Reedstrom 15:17
Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane 15:21
Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent 15:25
Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane 15:28
Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker 15:29
Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker 15:30
Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane 15:43
Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane 15:51
RE: RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount 15:59
Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane 16:15
Re: [HACKERS] 7.0RC2 compile error ! Trond Eivind=?iso-8859-1?q?_Glomsr=F8d?= 16:21
Re: Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus 16:25
Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! The Hermit Hacker 16:32
Re: Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus 16:38
Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! The Hermit Hacker 17:08
Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane 17:31
Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane 17:38
Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent 17:44
Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane 17:53
Re: Why Not MySQL? Marten Feldtmann 17:57
Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! The Hermit Hacker 18:03
Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane 18:33

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31