pgsql-hackers - March 2005

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

March 1, 2005

Thread Author Time
Re: Thread-safe snprintf() vsnprintf() and printf() Bruce Momjian 00:38
Re: Vacuum time degrading Tom Lane 00:53
Re: Development Plans 📎 Joshua D. Drake 01:10
Re: Development Plans Robert Treat 01:37
Execute and PortalSuspended needs explicit transaction to work? Francisco Figueiredo Jr. 02:06
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Serguei A. Mokhov 02:08
Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Francisco Figueiredo Jr. 02:11
Re: Execute and PortalSuspended needs explicit transaction Oliver Jowett 02:12
Re: Development Plans Greg Sabino Mullane 02:47
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian 04:54
mysterious log output Robert Treat 05:32
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian 05:55
Re: mysterious log output Tom Lane 06:05
Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Josh Berkus 06:52
Re: bitmap AM design Tom Lane 07:33
Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Evgen Potemkin 08:28
Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Evgen Potemkin 08:34
Re: bitmap AM design pgsql 13:41
Re: mysterious log output Bruce Momjian 14:18
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar 14:22
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian 14:29
Re: Vacuum time degrading Wes 16:17
Re: Vacuum time degrading Wes 16:22
index file detached from data file Jeff Hoffmann 17:09
Re: mysterious log output Tom Lane 17:46
Re: bitmap AM design Victor Y. Yegorov 17:53
Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch for Postmaster Matthias Schmidt 17:57
Re: bitmap AM design Tom Lane 18:11
Re: bitmap AM design pgsql 18:42
Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch for Postmaster Bruce Momjian 18:51
Re: Execute and PortalSuspended needs explicit transaction Francisco Figueiredo Jr. 18:56
Re: bitmap AM design Tom Lane 18:59
Re: bitmap AM design Tom Lane 19:05
Re: bitmap AM design Victor Y. Yegorov 19:52
Re: bitmap AM design pgsql 19:54
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar 20:19
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression pgsql 20:29
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Tom Lane 20:31
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression pgsql 20:38
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Magnus Hagander 20:44
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar 20:57
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression pgsql 21:20
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane 21:22
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Joerg Hessdoerfer 21:42
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Mark Wong 21:51
Re: [PATCHES] WAL: O_DIRECT and multipage-writer (+ memory leak) Mark Wong 21:53
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane 21:57
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar 21:59
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Mark Wong 22:06
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane 22:13
logging as inserts Joshua D. Drake 22:15
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane 22:17
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression Nicolai Tufar 22:26
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane 22:45
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar 22:57
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail 📎 Nicolai Tufar 23:09
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane 23:15
Re: logging as inserts Gavin Sherry 23:16
Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch Neil Conway 23:18
Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch Thomas F.O'Connell 23:23
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar 23:37
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane 23:53

March 2, 2005

Thread Author Time
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian 00:00
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane 00:28
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail 📎 Bruce Momjian 01:55
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane 02:32
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian 02:38
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian 03:23
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane 04:21
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian 04:23
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian 04:31
Re: logging as inserts Robert Treat 04:44
Re: mysterious log output Robert Treat 05:12
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests 📎 Bruce Momjian 05:22
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane 05:38
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar 06:06
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane 06:33
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Joerg Hessdoerfer 08:24
Re: logging as inserts Christopher Kings-Lynne 08:29
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar 09:13
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode Markus Bertheau ☭ 09:48
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Bernd Helmle 11:47
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail pgsql 12:09
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian 13:31
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Mark Wong 15:21
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian 15:41
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Dave Cramer 15:41
Re: Vacuum time degrading Wes 15:46
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Mark Wong 15:47
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression pgsql 16:00
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Dave Cramer 16:04
Re: logging as inserts Andreas Pflug 17:35
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode Tom Lane 17:54
Re: Vacuum time degrading Tom Lane 18:16
Re: Vacuum time degrading Wes 18:21
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane 18:21
Re: Vacuum time degrading Wes 18:36
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Michael Adler 18:45
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane 20:15
Re: bitmap AM design Hannu Krosing 20:17
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Mark Wong 21:10
Re: Vacuum time degrading Wes 21:31
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression pgsql 21:38
Re: Vacuum time degrading Tom Lane 21:51
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Mark Wong 22:15

March 3, 2005

Thread Author Time
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian 00:03
Re: Execute and PortalSuspended needs explicit transaction Francisco Figueiredo Jr. 00:50
hi all Qu Tianlian 01:23
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane 01:33
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane 01:55
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Bruce Momjian 04:28
Doc correction Christopher Kings-Lynne 04:36
Re: Vacuum time degrading Wes Palmer 04:46
Re: Vacuum time degrading Tom Lane 04:50
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode 📎 Bruce Momjian 05:20
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Josh Berkus 05:57
postgreSQL-8.0.1 compilation with icc-8.1 on Itanium-2 gives "error: asm statements not supported" Vikram Kalsi 07:35
Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 compilation with icc-8.1 on Itanium-2 gives "error: asm statements not supported" Tom Lane 07:48
Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 compilation with icc-8.1 on Itanium-2 gives "error: asm statements not supported" Peter Eisentraut 08:55
Novice Slony User (Was hi all) Thomas F.O'Connell 12:37
Re: hi all Christopher Browne 13:23
cluster table by two-column index ? Oleg Bartunov 15:29
consequent btree index scans optimizations ? Oleg Bartunov 15:43
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Greg Stark 16:08
Re: cluster table by two-column index ? pgsql 16:23
Re: bitmap AM design pgsql 16:41
plperl function has side-effects Joachim Wieland 16:41
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane 16:56
Re: logging as inserts Josh Berkus 17:24
Re: logging as inserts Tom Lane 19:23
unexpected and reproducable crash in pl/pgsql function 📎 Merlin Moncure 19:47
Re: logging as inserts Josh Berkus 21:02
Re: unexpected and reproducable crash in pl/pgsql function Merlin Moncure 21:03
Re: logging as inserts Tom Lane 21:17
Re: unexpected and reproducable crash in pl/pgsql function Tom Lane 21:20
Re: unexpected and reproducable crash in pl/pgsql function Merlin Moncure 21:28
Solving hash table overrun problems Tom Lane 22:05
Re: logging as inserts Josh Berkus 22:14
Re: logging as inserts Andrew Dunstan 22:45
Re: logging as inserts Josh Berkus 23:43

March 4, 2005

Thread Author Time
Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch Neil Conway 00:08
答复: Novice Slony User (Was [HACKERS] hi all) Qu Tianlian 01:18
refactoring fork() and EXEC_BACKEND Neil Conway 05:30
Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 compilation with icc-8.1 on Itanium-2 gives "error: asm statements not supported" Vikram Kalsi 05:57
postgreSQL-8.0.1 configure --enable-thread-safety with icc-8.1 on RHEL-AS3 Itanium-2 gives error Vikram Kalsi 06:01
Re: Solving hash table overrun problems Aaron Birkland 06:05
Re: bitmap AM design Pailloncy Jean-Gerard 08:38
Re: bitmap AM design Neil Conway 09:47
Re: bitmap AM design pgsql 12:29
Re: refactoring fork() and EXEC_BACKEND Magnus Hagander 13:46
Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch Robert Treat 14:12
Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Evgen Potemkin 14:41
Re: Solving hash table overrun problems Tom Lane 14:52
Re: bitmap AM design Tom Lane 14:59
db cluster ? Bostjan Potocnik 15:09
Re: bitmap AM design Tom Lane 15:28
Re: Solving hash table overrun problems Tom Lane 15:42
Re: Solving hash table overrun problems Bruno Wolff III 15:46
Re: Solving hash table overrun problems Tom Lane 16:12
I am in Copenhagen Bruce Momjian 16:20
Re: Solving hash table overrun problems Bruno Wolff III 16:22
Re: bitmap AM design pgsql 17:55
buildfarm issues Andrew Dunstan 18:11
Re: buildfarm issues Darcy Buskermolen 19:06
Re: buildfarm issues Andrew Dunstan 19:28
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Simon Riggs 19:32
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane 19:42
Re: db cluster ? pgsql 19:54
Re: buildfarm issues Jim Buttafuoco 20:32
Re: buildfarm issues Tom Lane 20:42
Re: bitmap AM design Victor Y. Yegorov 23:03

March 5, 2005

Thread Author Time
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Greg Stark 01:10
Indicies work on FreeBSD, not on Linux Christopher Farley 08:18
Re: bitmap AM design Pailloncy Jean-Gerard 08:59
Re: refactoring fork() and EXEC_BACKEND Neil Conway 08:59
Exception ERROR Code Ali Baba 14:03
Re: Exception ERROR Code Michael Fuhr 15:31
Manual vs automatic functionality pgsql 16:05
Re: Manual vs automatic functionality Michael Fuhr 17:05
Explicit Transaction Priority Alex 17:56
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Simon Riggs 18:03
Re: Exception ERROR Code Pavel Stehule 19:06
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Greg Stark 19:17
Re: Explicit Transaction Priority Michael Fuhr 20:16

March 6, 2005

Thread Author Time
Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 compilation with icc-8.1 on Itanium-2 gives "error: asm statements not supported" Vikram Kalsi 01:24
Re: Manual vs automatic functionality Christopher Kings-Lynne 03:26
Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Tom Lane 05:17
Missing coalesce Jim C. Nasby 07:09
Re: Missing coalesce Jim C. Nasby 07:13
Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Heikki Linnakangas 08:24
Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Simon Riggs 10:05
Re: I am in Copenhagen Kaare Rasmussen 11:20
Re: Missing coalesce Robert Treat 17:39
Re: refactoring fork() and EXEC_BACKEND Magnus Hagander 18:44
Speeding up tupledesc copying Tom Lane 19:14
Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables for PL/pgSQL 📎 Pavel Stehule 19:24
Re: Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables for PL/pgSQL Tom Lane 20:05
Re: Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables for Pavel Stehule 20:51
About b-tree usage Ioannis Theoharis 21:33
Re: About b-tree usage Jeff Davis 22:45

Browse Archives

Prev | Next