pgsql-hackers before 1999-06-20 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

June 16, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists Chris Bitmead 06:11
6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Gene Sokolov 06:41
Re: [HACKERS] Q: RI and isolevels ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 08:09
Re: [HACKERS] Q: RI and isolevels Vadim Mikheev 08:38
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists Bruce Momjian 10:11
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists Bruce Momjian 10:12
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists Vince Vielhaber 10:48
Re: [HACKERS] Linux Documentation Project Thomas Good 11:37
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists D'Arcy J.M. Cain 12:00
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Thomas Lockhart 13:03
Savepoints... Vadim Mikheev 13:12
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists The Hermit Hacker 13:19
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Gene Sokolov 13:27
decimal & numeric report bug José Soares 13:37
having bug report José Soares 13:54
Re: [HACKERS] Savepoints... Bruce Momjian 14:00
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Thomas Lockhart 14:03
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Jan Wieck 14:06
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists Tom Lane 14:13
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Thomas Lockhart 14:20
Re: [HACKERS] decimal & numeric report bug Thomas Lockhart 14:25
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Tom Lane 14:37
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Tom Lane 14:52
Re: [HACKERS] having bug report Tom Lane 15:06
RE: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Jackson, DeJuan 15:21
SET QUERY_LIMIT bug report José Soares 15:28
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Thomas Lockhart 15:29
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Tom Lane 15:30
Update of bitmask type 📎 Adriaan Joubert 15:38
Re: [HACKERS] SET QUERY_LIMIT bug report Bruce Momjian 15:40
Re: [HACKERS] having bug report José Soares 15:44
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Thomas Lockhart 15:47
Re: [HACKERS] SET QUERY_LIMIT bug report Tom Lane 15:56
Re: [HACKERS] SET QUERY_LIMIT bug report Bruce Momjian 15:58
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Tom Lane 16:08
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) José Soares 16:12
Postgres error - typeidTypeRelid (AIX, PPC and Alpha) David R. Favor 19:08
Re: [HACKERS] SET QUERY_LIMIT bug report Tatsuo Ishii 22:01
Re: [HACKERS] SET QUERY_LIMIT bug report Bruce Momjian 22:03
Re: [HACKERS] BeOS port Cyril VELTER 22:22
Apparent bug in _make_subplan Tom Lane 23:02
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Jan Wieck 23:20
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists Henry B. Hotz 23:25

June 17, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem Tatsuo Ishii 00:53
Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan Vadim Mikheev 01:49
RE: [HACKERS] Savepoints... Hiroshi Inoue 03:20
Re: [HACKERS] Savepoints... Vadim Mikheev 03:58
RE: [HACKERS] Savepoints... Hiroshi Inoue 04:12
Re: UnixWare Andrew Merrill 04:36
Re: [HACKERS] Savepoints... Vadim Mikheev 05:38
Re: [HACKERS] Re: UnixWare Chris Bitmead 05:56
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem Thomas Lockhart 06:11
Could you help me ? Young-Woo Cho 06:30
Re: [HACKERS] Savepoints... Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 06:55
Re: UnixWare Dmitry Samersoff 07:13
Case tool Kaare Rasmussen 07:29
mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) Oleg Bartunov 07:39
Re: [HACKERS] Case tool Oleg Bartunov 07:43
Re: [HACKERS] Savepoints... Vadim Mikheev 07:50
Re: [HACKERS] Case tool Gene Sokolov 07:51
creating an index on numeric type Hiroshi Inoue 09:30
(don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests gravity 09:33
Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests Tatsuo Ishii 09:49
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( ) Vince Vielhaber 10:47
Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) Vince Vielhaber 10:57
Re: [HACKERS] Re: UnixWare Thomas Good 11:23
Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) The Hermit Hacker 12:21
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists The Hermit Hacker 12:23
Re: [HACKERS] SET QUERY_LIMIT bug report José Soares 13:14
Re: [HACKERS] Re: UnixWare Bruce Momjian 13:32
Re: [HACKERS] Savepoints... Bruce Momjian 13:41
Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests Bruce Momjian 13:44
Re: [HACKERS] Re: UnixWare Thomas Lockhart 13:48
Re: [HACKERS] SET QUERY_LIMIT bug report Bruce Momjian 13:48
Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) Thomas Lockhart 13:54
Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) Vince Vielhaber 13:58
Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) Peter Galbavy 14:07
tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 14:29
Re: [HACKERS] Re: UnixWare Tom Lane 14:33
Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) Thomas Lockhart 14:39
CLI interface Thomas Lockhart 14:43
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan Tom Lane 14:43
Re: [HACKERS] Re: UnixWare Dmitry Samersoff 14:47
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Tom Lane 14:47
Cleaned up CVS repository! Thomas Lockhart 14:49
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 14:51
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 14:53
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan Bruce Momjian 14:56
Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests Tatsuo Ishii 14:58
Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests Bruce Momjian 15:00
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Tom Lane 15:05
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 15:06
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Tom Lane 15:10
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 15:13
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Tom Lane 15:22
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 15:24
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 15:30
New TODO item Bruce Momjian 15:41
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Tom Lane 15:53
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 16:03
Installation procedure wishes Dmitry Samersoff 16:03
Re: important Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items Bruce Momjian 16:12
SOLVED: Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) Oleg Bartunov 16:12
Re: [HACKERS] Case tool Ross J. Reedstrom 16:14
Re: [HACKERS] Savepoints... (row overhead) Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 16:16
Re: SOLVED: Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) Vince Vielhaber 16:21
Re: [HACKERS] Cleaned up CVS repository! D'Arcy J.M. Cain 16:21
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 16:21
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Case tool Oleg Bartunov 16:37
Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) The Hermit Hacker 16:46
Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) The Hermit Hacker 16:47
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 16:59
'idle' processes in v6.5? The Hermit Hacker 17:20
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists Henry B. Hotz 18:35
SCO FAQ changes Dmitry Samersoff 18:51
Off topic-graph layout tools (was Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Case tool) Bruce Stephens 19:19
Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure wishes Tom Lane 20:11
This is weird D'Arcy J.M. Cain 20:40
[No subject] Hub.Org News Admin 20:40
Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item Jan Wieck 21:03
Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item Tom Lane 21:04
Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure wishes Jan Wieck 22:18
Re: [HACKERS] BeOS port Bruce Momjian 22:30
Re: [HACKERS] This is weird Bruce Momjian 22:39
Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item Bruce Momjian 22:40
Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item Bruce Momjian 22:41
Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests gravity 23:01
Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure wishes Bruce Momjian 23:14
Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests Bruce Momjian 23:15
Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests gravity 23:46

June 18, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests Bruce Momjian 00:45
Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests Tatsuo Ishii 01:02
Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests Bruce Momjian 01:21
Re: [HACKERS] 'idle' processes in v6.5? Thomas Lockhart 01:39
RE: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Hiroshi Inoue 01:51
RE: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Hiroshi Inoue 01:52
Re: [HACKERS] SCO FAQ changes Thomas Lockhart 01:55
Re: [HACKERS] 'idle' processes in v6.5? The Hermit Hacker 01:59
Re: [HACKERS] (don't know who else to tell) 6.5 gets build on LinuxPPCR5 but fails a lot of regr. tests Thomas Lockhart 02:09
Re: [HACKERS] 'idle' processes in v6.5? Thomas Lockhart 02:22
Re: [HACKERS] This is weird D'Arcy J.M. Cain 02:28
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 02:30
Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item Thomas Lockhart 02:31
Re: [HACKERS] This is weird Bruce Momjian 02:32
Re: [HACKERS] Re: UnixWare Billy G. Allie 02:55
RE: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Hiroshi Inoue 03:11
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 03:15
RE: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Hiroshi Inoue 03:57
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 04:01
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan Vadim Mikheev 04:10
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan Bruce Momjian 04:43
RE: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Hiroshi Inoue 05:27
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 05:32
RE: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Hiroshi Inoue 06:11
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan Vadim Mikheev 06:28
Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure wishes Dmitry Samersoff 06:55
Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure wishes Jan Wieck 08:12
Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 09:04
Re: [HACKERS] 'idle' processes in v6.5? Sascha Schumann 10:56
Re: [HACKERS] Re: UnixWare Thomas Good 11:04
Re: [HACKERS] Memory problem? Patrick Welche 12:03
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan Tom Lane 14:19
Re: [HACKERS] Memory problem? Tom Lane 14:23
Re: [HACKERS] BeOS port Tom Lane 14:35
Re: [HACKERS] Memory problem? Vince Vielhaber 14:40
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Tom Lane 14:42
Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item Tom Lane 14:44
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Bruce Momjian 16:47
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan Bruce Momjian 16:47
Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure wishest Bruce Momjian 16:48
Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure wishest Tom Lane 17:36
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Ole Gjerde 18:25
has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Jeff Hoffmann 19:13
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Tom Lane 22:57
Where in the world is [email protected]?? adrian 23:09
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Tom Lane 23:35

June 19, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Bruce Momjian 00:16
RE: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Stupor Genius 00:27
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Bruce Momjian 01:04
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Thomas Lockhart 02:11
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Thomas Lockhart 02:20
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Tom Lane 02:36
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Bruce Momjian 02:55
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Tom Lane 02:57
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Bruce Momjian 03:11
Re: commits Tom Lane 04:16
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Don Baccus 04:18
Re: commits Bruce Momjian 04:19
Re: [HACKERS] Re: commits Thomas Lockhart 04:50
Re: [HACKERS] Re: commits Bruce Momjian 04:57
Re:, A, patch, for, FATAL, 1:btree, BTP_CHAIN, flag, was, expected Wayne Piekarski 07:18
Update on my 6.4.2 progress Wayne Piekarski 07:39
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Hannu Krosing 09:36
Re: [HACKERS] Update on my 6.4.2 progress Hannu Krosing 10:17
Re: [HACKERS] Update on my 6.4.2 progress Bruce Momjian 12:03
Re: [HACKERS] BeOS port Bruce Momjian 12:08
Re: [HACKERS] BeOS port Cyril VELTER 13:32
Re: [HACKERS] Update on my 6.4.2 progress Tom Lane 18:17
Re: [HACKERS] BeOS port Adam Haberlach 18:49
Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? Bernard Frankpitt 21:12

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30