pgsql-hackers before 2004-10-10 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

Oct. 6, 2004

Thread Author Time
Re: Two-phase commit Tom Lane 21:46
Re: Re: PITR question simon 21:50
pgindent complaint of the day Tom Lane 22:05
Re: Re: Re: PITR question Tom Lane 22:09
Re: Two-phase commit Oliver Jowett 22:36
Re: Two-phase commit Tom Lane 22:50
Re: Two-phase commit Oliver Jowett 22:59
Re: Two-phase commit Rod Taylor 23:06
Re: Two-phase commit Tom Lane 23:07
Re: Two-phase commit Alvaro Herrera 23:33
Re: Two-phase commit Oliver Jowett 23:38
Re: Two-phase commit Tom Lane 23:46

Oct. 7, 2004

Thread Author Time
Re: Two-phase commit Oliver Jowett 00:01
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Gavin Sherry 01:14
initdb crash 📎 Euler Taveira de Oliveira 01:42
Re: pgindent complaint of the day Bruce Momjian 02:26
Hypothetical Indexes Marcos A Vaz Salles 02:40
Re: SRF/dropped column bug Tom Lane 02:54
Re: SRF/dropped column bug Bruce Momjian 02:54
Re: pgindent complaint of the day Tom Lane 02:59
Re: pgindent complaint of the day Bruce Momjian 03:02
Re: pgindent complaint of the day Tom Lane 03:19
Re: initdb crash Gavin Sherry 03:51
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Josh Berkus 04:17
Re: initdb crash 📎 Euler Taveira de Oliveira 04:35
Re: database constraints David Garamond 04:43
Re: database constraints David Garamond 04:47
Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 Greg Stark 05:23
Re: initdb crash Gavin Sherry 05:27
Re: Two-phase commit Fabien COELHO 06:38
Re: PITR question Simon Riggs 07:38
Re: Two-phase commit Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD 08:26
Re: database constraints Greg Stark 09:30
Re: Two-phase commit Heikki Linnakangas 10:57
Re: Two-phase commit Heikki Linnakangas 11:15
Re: Two-phase commit Heikki Linnakangas 11:24
Re: database constraints Marco Colombo 11:53
Re: [HACKERS] open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore 📎 Reini Urban 12:48
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Gavin Sherry 14:07
Re: pgindent complaint of the day Bruce Momjian 14:17
Re: Two-phase commit Tom Lane 14:33
Reading from a text file into PostgreSQL Eyinagho Newton 14:45
Re: Reading from a text file into PostgreSQL Peter Eisentraut 14:50
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Peter Eisentraut 14:51
Re: FunctionCall2 performance Mark Wong 15:39
Re: Reading from a text file into PostgreSQL Chester Kustarz 15:43
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Tom Lane 15:56
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Andrew Dunstan 16:03
Re: signal 11 on AIX: 7.4.2 Andrew Sullivan 17:20
Re: Insecurity in MD5 authentication (again) Bruce Momjian 17:28
Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston Mark Wong 18:24
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Josh Berkus 18:24
Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston Bruce Momjian 18:28
Re: [PATCHES] HP-UX PA-RISC/Itanium 64-bit Patch and HP-UX Bruce Momjian 19:22
Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston David Fetter 19:26
Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston Bruce Momjian 19:29
Re: open item: tablespace handing in Bruce Momjian 19:31
Re: [PATCHES] HP-UX PA-RISC/Itanium 64-bit Patch and HP-UX Tom Lane 19:32
DDL triggers [was Re: database constraints] David Fetter 19:40
Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston David Fetter 19:47
plans for bitmap indexes? Yann Michel 19:55
Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston Josh Berkus 20:21
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Reini Urban 20:41
Re: DDL triggers [was Re: database constraints] Tom Lane 20:43
Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston Tom Lane 20:46
Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston Tom Lane 20:55
Re: Pl/perl broken on Windows Dave Page 20:59
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Gaetano Mendola 22:51
Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston Bruce Momjian 22:53
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Bruce Momjian 22:54
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Gaetano Mendola 22:58
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Gavin Sherry 23:30
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Gavin Sherry 23:42
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Gavin Sherry 23:43
Re: [HACKERS] DDL triggers [was Re: database constraints] Gavin Sherry 23:48

Oct. 8, 2004

Thread Author Time
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Gaetano Mendola 00:09
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released) Bruce Momjian 00:27
Re: APR 1.0 released Bruce Momjian 00:36
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN Bruce Momjian 00:38
Security implications of config-file-location patch Tom Lane 01:55
Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch Andrew Dunstan 02:22
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN 📎 Reini Urban 02:42
Re: [PATCHES] HP-UX PA-RISC/Itanium 64-bit Patch and HP-UX 📎 Shinji Teragaito 03:26
Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch Bruce Momjian 04:21
Re: [PATCHES] HP-UX PA-RISC/Itanium 64-bit Patch and HP-UX Tom Lane 04:26
Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch Tom Lane 04:28
Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch Bruce Momjian 04:35
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Gavin Sherry 05:01
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Josh Berkus 05:02
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Tom Lane 05:15
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Gavin Sherry 05:19
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Tom Lane 05:19
Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch Tom Lane 05:38
Re: Two-phase commit Oliver Jowett 06:01
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Yann Michel 07:26
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Yann Michel 07:27
compact database Yui Hiroaki 08:55
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Dave Page 09:09
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Yann Michel 09:45
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Hannu Krosing 10:06
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Oleg Bartunov 10:09
Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD 11:36
Re: initdb crash 📎 Euler Taveira de Oliveira 13:25
Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch Tom Lane 14:18
Problem with CIDR data type restrictions Bruce Momjian 14:34
Re: Log line prefix on win32 Bruce Momjian 15:42
Re: APR 1.0 released Marc G. Fournier 15:42
Re: APR 1.0 released Bruce Momjian 15:47
Re: Rollback on Error Bruce Momjian 15:51
Re: APR 1.0 released Neil Conway 15:52
Re: Log line prefix on win32 Andreas Pflug 15:53
Re: Rollback on Error Tom Lane 15:54
Re: Rollback on Error Bruce Momjian 15:55
Re: APR 1.0 released Bruce Momjian 15:56
Re: Problem with CIDR data type restrictions Tom Lane 16:37
Re: Log line prefix on win32 Andrew Dunstan 16:37
Re: Log line prefix on win32 Tom Lane 16:50
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Josh Berkus 16:59
Re: Log line prefix on win32 Bruce Momjian 17:02
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Yann Michel 17:10
Re: Log line prefix on win32 Tom Lane 17:13
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Josh Berkus 17:18
Re: Log line prefix on win32 Bruce Momjian 17:38
Re: Log line prefix on win32 Andreas Pflug 17:40
Re: Log line prefix on win32 Tom Lane 17:53
Re: Log line prefix on win32 Michael Paesold 18:33
Re: Rollback on Error Michael Paesold 18:40
Re: [HACKERS] Rollback on Error Alvaro Herrera Munoz 18:57
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Yann Michel 19:13
Re: Rollback on Error Michael Paesold 19:31
Re: Problem with CIDR data type restrictions Andrew Dunstan 19:48
Re: initdb crash Tom Lane 19:53
Thank you ... James Robinson 20:02
Re: APR 1.0 released Mike Rylander 20:18
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released) Gaetano Mendola 21:05
Re: APR 1.0 released Dann Corbit 21:13
First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Josh Berkus 21:43
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released) Reini Urban 21:53
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, J. Andrew Rogers 22:13
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Tom Lane 22:21
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, Tom Lane 22:32
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, Steinar H. Gunderson 22:39
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, Josh Berkus 23:08
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Josh Berkus 23:31
Re: APR 1.0 released Sailesh Krishnamurthy 23:53
Re: APR 1.0 released Sailesh Krishnamurthy 23:59

Oct. 9, 2004

Thread Author Time
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Sailesh Krishnamurthy 00:01
Inability to cast regclass is too restrictive Oliver Elphick 00:25
Re: Rollback on Error Bruce Momjian 00:32
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released) Bruce Momjian 00:36
Re: APR 1.0 released Dann Corbit 00:41
Re: [HACKERS] Log line prefix on win32 📎 Bruce Momjian 01:29
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Christopher Browne 02:10
Re: Inability to cast regclass is too restrictive Joe Conway 03:13
Re: Allow change of kerberos service name without recompilation Bruce Momjian 03:20
Re: Allow change of kerberos service name without recompilation Bruce Momjian 03:22
Re: patch for temporary view from TODO list Bruce Momjian 03:24
Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Version numbering patch Bruce Momjian 04:04
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1270: stack overflow in thread in fe_getauthname Bruce Momjian 04:14
Re: Inability to cast regclass is too restrictive Tom Lane 04:35
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released) Tom Lane 04:45
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1270: stack overflow in thread in fe_getauthname Tom Lane 05:06
Re: Inability to cast regclass is too restrictive Oliver Elphick 06:18
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1270: stack overflow in thread in fe_getauthname Peter Davie 06:45
SSL with Beta3 - "could not load root certificate file" G Reina 09:03
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Kevin Brown 11:20
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN Reini Urban 11:34
Two-phase commit patch updated Heikki Linnakangas 11:48
compact PostgreSQL Yui Hiroaki 13:03
Re: compact PostgreSQL Shahbaz Javeed 13:12
beta3 on unixware 714 ohp 14:13
Re: compact PostgreSQL Christopher Browne 14:31
Re: SSL with Beta3 - "could not load root certificate file" Tom Lane 14:52
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some Matthew 15:02
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Tom Lane 15:07
Re: beta3 on unixware 714 Tom Lane 15:19
Re: beta3 on unixware 714 ohp 15:37
Re: beta3 on unixware 714 Tom Lane 15:46
Re: beta3 on unixware 714 ohp 15:49
Notes on config-file-locations patch Tom Lane 16:34
Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch Peter Eisentraut 17:07
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Peter Eisentraut 17:09
Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch Tom Lane 17:11
Re: Notes on config-file-locations patch Peter Eisentraut 17:16
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Tom Lane 17:19
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Chris Browne 17:31
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Chris Browne 17:36
Re: SSL with Beta3 - "could not load root certificate file" Tony and Bryn Reina 18:28
Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 Peter Eisentraut 19:26
postgres vulnerability Gaetano Mendola 19:27
Re: postgres vulnerability Stephan Szabo 20:07
Re: postgres vulnerability Stephan Szabo 20:20
Re: postgres vulnerability Gaetano Mendola 20:30
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Kevin Brown 20:37
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Kevin Brown 21:01
Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch Bruce Momjian 21:56
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1270: stack overflow in thread in fe_getauthname Bruce Momjian 22:09
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Tom Lane 23:05
Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch Tom Lane 23:13
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1270: stack overflow in thread in fe_getauthname Tom Lane 23:23

Browse Archives

Prev | Next