pgsql-hackers before 2010-08-07 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Aug. 5, 2010

Thread Author Time
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Tom Lane 15:25
Re: GROUPING SETS revisited Pavel Stehule 15:29
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Pavel Stehule 15:31
Re: MERGE Specification Simon Riggs 15:35
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Richard 15:38
Re: MERGE Specification Robert Haas 15:40
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Thom Brown 15:40
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Nicolas Barbier 15:43
Concurrent MERGE Simon Riggs 15:43
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Tom Lane 15:47
Re: MERGE Specification Merlin Moncure 15:47
Re: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Richard 15:50
Re: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname Alvaro Herrera 15:55
Re: Concurrent MERGE Robert Haas 15:57
Re: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname Boszormenyi Zoltan 16:24
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Alvaro Herrera 16:28
Re: Needs Suggestion Tom Lane 16:33
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Tom Lane 16:36
Re: Concurrent MERGE Heikki Linnakangas 16:39
Re: Concurrent MERGE Heikki Linnakangas 16:43
Re: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname Tom Lane 16:45
Re: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup cause boot failure,anyone know why? Andrew Dunstan 16:47
[email protected] 37% OFF on Pfizer! pgsql-hackers 16:54
[email protected] 50% OFF on Pfizer! pgsql-hackers 16:55
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Alvaro Herrera 16:57
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 16:57
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Chris Browne 16:59
Re: Concurrent MERGE Chris Browne 17:10
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Tom Lane 17:19
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Merlin Moncure 17:26
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Tom Lane 17:28
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Pavel Stehule 17:30
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 17:31
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Chris Browne 17:35
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 17:36
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 17:40
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Alvaro Herrera 17:41
remove upsert example from docs 📎 Merlin Moncure 17:44
Re: Performance Enhancement/Fix for Array Utility Functions Kevin Grittner 17:52
Re: pg_stat_user_functions' notion of user Josh Berkus 17:58
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Tom Lane 18:01
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Robert Haas 18:02
Re: remove upsert example from docs Kevin Grittner 18:03
Re: Performance Enhancement/Fix for Array Utility Functions Mike Lewis 18:06
Re: remove upsert example from docs Greg Sabino Mullane 18:06
Re: remove upsert example from docs Tom Lane 18:09
Re: remove upsert example from docs Andrew Dunstan 18:24
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 18:25
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Alvaro Herrera 18:28
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Peter Eisentraut 18:32
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 18:38
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) David E. Wheeler 18:39
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Thom Brown 18:42
CommitFest 2010-07 week three progress report Kevin Grittner 18:42
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Alex Hunsaker 18:43
Re: remove upsert example from docs Merlin Moncure 18:44
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 18:45
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) David E. Wheeler 18:47
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) David E. Wheeler 18:47
Re: remove upsert example from docs Tom Lane 18:53
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Josh Berkus 18:59
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 19:16
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Robert Haas 19:18
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) David E. Wheeler 19:20
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 19:23
Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Josh Berkus 19:27
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 19:33
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 19:45
Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 19:50
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 20:07
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Heikki Linnakangas 20:08
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Tom Lane 20:29
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Peter Eisentraut 20:31
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 20:37
PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown Heikki Linnakangas 20:48
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown Pavel Stehule 20:56
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 20:59
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 21:02
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown Tom Lane 21:11
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown Andrew Dunstan 21:31
Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output 📎 Florian Pflug 22:05
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown Tom Lane 22:13
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 22:16
Re: Concurrent MERGE Tom Lane 22:41
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 22:49
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Mike Fowler 22:56
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Tom Lane 23:05
Re: Concurrent MERGE Mark Kirkwood 23:06
Re: Concurrent MERGE Andres Freund 23:07
Re: Concurrent MERGE Tom Lane 23:08
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 23:24

Aug. 6, 2010

Thread Author Time
Re: MERGE Specification Boxuan Zhai 01:39
LockDatabaseObject vs. LockSharedObject Robert Haas 02:11
Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding xpath_exists function Alvaro Herrera 02:29
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Greg Stark 02:44
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 03:11
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Andrew Dunstan 03:37
[email protected] 81% OFF on Pfizer! pgsql-hackers 03:44
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 03:57
Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function Peter Eisentraut 04:38
[email protected] 21% OFF on Pfizer! pgsql-hackers 06:15
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch David Fetter 06:18
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 06:29
Re: MERGE Specification Heikki Linnakangas 07:03
Re: MERGE Specification Simon Riggs 07:12
Re: MERGE Specification Heikki Linnakangas 07:28
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown 📎 Heikki Linnakangas 07:36
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown 📎 Heikki Linnakangas 07:40
Re: MERGE Specification Simon Riggs 07:41
Re: Concurrent MERGE Simon Riggs 07:42
Re: Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs Dean Rasheed 07:49
Re: MERGE Specification Simon Riggs 07:53
Re: Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs Naveed Alam 07:56
Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function Mike Fowler 08:04
Re: MERGE Specification Boxuan Zhai 08:23
Re: MERGE Specification Boxuan Zhai 08:26
Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Mike Fowler 08:28
Re: MERGE Specification Simon Riggs 08:51
Moderator on Committers? Simon Riggs 09:40
Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Robert Haas 11:31
default of max_stack_depth Fujii Masao 12:54
postgres 9.0 crash when bringing up hot standby Alanoly Andrews 13:10
Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Mike Fowler 13:43
Re: default of max_stack_depth Tom Lane 14:02
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Andrew Dunstan 14:08
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Mike Fowler 14:12
Re: default of max_stack_depth Fujii Masao 14:22
Re: postgres 9.0 crash when bringing up hot standby Fujii Masao 14:31
Re: CommitFest 2010-07 week three progress report Kevin Grittner 14:31
BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg Marcelo Mas 14:39
Re: default of max_stack_depth Tom Lane 14:53
refactoring comment.c 📎 Robert Haas 15:02
Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle Florian Pflug 15:13
Re: postgres 9.0 crash when bringing up hot standby Alanoly Andrews 15:17
Re: refactoring comment.c Alvaro Herrera 15:36
Re: BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg Kevin Grittner 15:37
Re: refactoring comment.c Robert Haas 16:08
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Tom Lane 16:15
Re: refactoring comment.c Simon Riggs 16:26
Re: refactoring comment.c Robert Haas 16:46
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch 📎 Pavel Stehule 16:50
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Andrew Dunstan 16:51
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Tom Lane 17:01
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Robert Haas 17:02
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Tom Lane 17:14
Re: BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg Michael Meskes 17:22
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 17:46
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Robert Haas 17:50
Cost of AtEOXact_Buffers in --enable-cassert Andres Freund 17:50
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Robert Haas 17:52
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Tom Lane 17:56
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Tom Lane 18:07
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 18:10
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Jaime Casanova 18:12
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Tom Lane 18:13
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Tom Lane 18:16
Re: Cost of AtEOXact_Buffers in --enable-cassert Tom Lane 18:23
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Robert Haas 18:30
Surprising dead_tuple_count from pgstattuple Gordon Shannon 18:31
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Tom Lane 18:32
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Robert Haas 18:36
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Tom Lane 18:43
Re: Cost of AtEOXact_Buffers in --enable-cassert Andres Freund 18:53
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Tom Lane 19:00
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch David Fetter 19:17
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Tom Lane 19:30
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 19:31
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Robert Haas 19:32
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Robert Haas 19:47
Re: [HACKERS] postgres 9.0 crash when bringing up hot standby Heikki Linnakangas 19:53
Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function Peter Eisentraut 19:55
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch David E. Wheeler 20:05
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Alvaro Herrera 20:14
Update hstore % Doc 📎 David E. Wheeler 20:45
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Peter Eisentraut 20:45
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Peter Eisentraut 20:48
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 20:49
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 20:50
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 20:52
Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Peter Eisentraut 20:52
Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Peter Eisentraut 20:55
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch David E. Wheeler 20:57
Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY 📎 Peter Eisentraut 21:02
Re: patch for contrib/isn Peter Eisentraut 21:08
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 21:12
Re: MERGE Specification Peter Eisentraut 21:13
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch David E. Wheeler 21:25
Re: gincostestimate 📎 Tom Lane 21:46
Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Robert Haas 21:46
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Tom Lane 22:01
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Tom Lane 22:13
Re: Update hstore % Doc Tom Lane 22:16
Re: Update hstore % Doc David E. Wheeler 22:21
Re: GROUPING SETS revisited Joshua Tolley 22:30
Re: Update hstore % Doc Tom Lane 22:32
Re: Update hstore % Doc Tom Lane 22:38
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch David Fetter 22:39
Re: Update hstore % Doc David E. Wheeler 22:49
Re: Update hstore % Doc Robert Haas 23:29
Re: [HACKERS] Trouble with COPY IN 📎 Kris Jurka 23:31

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31