pgsql-hackers since 1999-02-03 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Feb. 3, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgres for Sunos 4.1.4 Tom Lane 00:37
Re: [HACKERS] PL/TCL bug (?) Marcus Mascari 05:45
template/alpha_cc Tatsuo Ishii 07:02
ecpg patch 📎 Michael Meskes 07:57
Re: [HACKERS] PL/TCL bug (?) Jan Wieck 09:54
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Hannu Krosing 10:17
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Hannu Krosing 10:38
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Jan Wieck 11:07
Blob BUG Since 6.4.2 Nicolas Prochazka 13:27
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch The Hermit Hacker 15:38
Minor change for UPDATE Daniele Orlandi 16:36
Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc Tom Lane 16:53
Compiling on DEC Alpha OSF1 Dmitry Samersoff 17:43
Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc The Hermit Hacker 17:48
preprocessor question: prepare statement Michael Meskes 18:29
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Hannu Krosing 18:42
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Bruce Momjian 18:46
DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Dmitry Samersoff 18:51
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Bruce Momjian 19:12
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Jan Wieck 19:37
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Tom Lane 20:06
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Bruce Momjian 20:10
Re: [GENERAL] Cost: Big Tables vs. Organized Separation of Data Bruce Momjian 21:27

Feb. 4, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc Tatsuo Ishii 01:01
cleanup of optimizer Bruce Momjian 02:12
Re: [HACKERS] preprocessor question: prepare statement Thomas G. Lockhart 02:47
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart 02:52
Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc The Hermit Hacker 03:15
Re: Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Bruce Momjian 03:22
RE: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch Hiroshi Inoue 03:48
Re: [HACKERS] ecpg patch The Hermit Hacker 04:58
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Dmitry Samersoff 09:25
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Pedro J. Lobo 10:00
Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc Pedro J. Lobo 10:29
Re: [HACKERS] preprocessor question: prepare statement Michael Meskes 10:30
small bug fix for ecpg 📎 Michael Meskes 10:52
Re: [HACKERS] preprocessor question: prepare statement Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 11:47
Re: [HACKERS] preprocessor question: prepare statement Michael Meskes 12:13
Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc Tatsuo Ishii 14:13
Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Tatsuo Ishii 14:14
Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Bruce Momjian 14:52
Re: [HACKERS] small bug fix for ecpg Bruce Momjian 17:15
Re: [HACKERS] preprocessor question: prepare statement Michael Meskes 18:28
strange behaviour on pooled alloc Jan Wieck 21:40
Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc Bruce Momjian 21:55
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian 21:58
Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Ian Grant 22:50
where to declare system operators Jackson, DeJuan 23:06
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian 23:28

Feb. 5, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Tatsuo Ishii 01:05
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart 03:24
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Bruce Momjian 03:38
Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Tom Lane 04:11
Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Bruce Momjian 04:26
SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane 04:53
Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Bruce Momjian 05:26
Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Bruce Momjian 05:27
Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane 06:13
Re: [HACKERS] small bug fix for ecpg Michael Meskes 07:53
Email change Michael Meskes 07:54
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes 12:32
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems geek+ 13:28
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart 13:51
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart 14:02
Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Bruce Momjian 17:20
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Bruce Momjian 17:24
Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres Limitations Tom Lane 17:36
Re: postgres bug? Bruce Momjian 17:48
Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane 18:07
Bugs in snapshot Jackson, DeJuan 18:54
char(n) default '' crashes server Erich Stamberger 19:30
Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres Limitations Peter T Mount 22:19
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian 22:23
Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 gjerde 23:07

Feb. 6, 1999

Thread Author Time
Ignore me :) Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 gjerde 02:27
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Thomas Reinke 06:46
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 The Hermit Hacker 09:03
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes 11:47
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Hannu Krosing 12:37
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian 12:49
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Thomas G. Lockhart 14:21
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Tom Lane 17:06
Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Tom Lane 17:27
Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc Jan Wieck 17:28
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian 17:51
Re: [HACKERS] Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane 20:41

Feb. 7, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Tom Lane 01:13
One I've never seen before: The Hermit Hacker 06:24
Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: The Hermit Hacker 06:39
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Jan Wieck 11:44
Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: Bruce Momjian 12:33
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 13:20
Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc (fwd) Jan Wieck 14:08
Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: The Hermit Hacker 14:55
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 14:57
v6.4.3 ? Jan Wieck 17:30
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Tom Lane 17:44
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane 18:03
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane 18:23
RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Stupor Genius 18:39
Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Tom Lane 18:46
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes 19:04
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 19:41
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 19:42
Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: Bruce Momjian 20:08
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Jan Wieck 20:30
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 20:33
Re: [HACKERS] Problems building some libraries in 6.4.2 Tom Lane 20:35
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Bruce Momjian 20:36
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? The Hermit Hacker 20:45
RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 21:02
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Jan Wieck 21:06
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Jan Wieck 21:30
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Tom Lane 22:02
libpq++ Oliver Elphick 22:29
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Tom Lane 22:32
RE: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber 22:33
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane 22:51
RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 gjerde 23:01
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 23:10
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 23:40
RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 📎 Peter T Mount 23:43

Feb. 8, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane 00:06
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 D'Arcy J.M. Cain 00:14
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 00:14
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Sascha Schumann 00:15
Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Sascha Schumann 00:28
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Hannu Krosing 00:35
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Jan Wieck 01:07
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Taral 01:19
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 02:01
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 02:41
Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Marc Howard Zuckman 02:42
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 02:45
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian 02:53
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane 03:04
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Bruce Momjian 03:07
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Bruce Momjian 03:09
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane 03:09
Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc (fwd) Vadim Mikheev 03:12
Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Tom Lane 03:18
Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Bruce Momjian 03:48
Added \p\g to psql Bruce Momjian 04:29
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 06:35
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Michael Meskes 07:45
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Michael Meskes 07:47
Re: [HACKERS] Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Oleg Broytmann 08:45
Embedded SQL question Michael Meskes 10:28
sequence dump/reload Oleg Broytmann 10:29
writing a JAVA interface for postgres Pascal GEND 10:56
Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc (fwd) Jan Wieck 11:03
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 12:00
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 12:05
VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann 12:37
Keywords Michael Meskes 12:59
libpq questuion Dmitry Samersoff 13:08
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Cary O'Brien 13:15
Version numbering Cary O'Brien 13:20
Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Terry Mackintosh 13:32
Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Jan Wieck 14:11
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questuion Jan Wieck 14:46
RE: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Dan Gowin 14:52
Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Thomas Reinke 14:56
Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Nick Bastin 15:06
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Bruce Momjian 15:16
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian 15:20
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart 15:44
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Thomas G. Lockhart 15:56
Commercial support, things considered Terry Mackintosh 16:00
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Tom Lane 16:02
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane 16:18
Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane 16:21
TIME QUALIFICATION Jan Wieck 16:25
RE: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Dan Gowin 16:26
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 16:31
Re: [HACKERS] Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Thomas G. Lockhart 16:33
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Tom Lane 16:34
Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Jan Wieck 16:43
Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane 16:56
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 17:05
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian 17:26
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian 17:33
Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Thomas G. Lockhart 17:35
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? The Hermit Hacker 17:50
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 18:12
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 18:13
Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Bruce Momjian 18:15
Optimizer problems Bruce Momjian 18:23
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes 18:53
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 19:16
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 19:19
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer problems Bruce Momjian 19:31
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer problems Jan Wieck 19:32
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 20:25
samekeys Bruce Momjian 21:28
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Thomas Reinke 21:34
A mistake generates strange result Ricardo J.C.Coelho 22:21
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane 23:55

Feb. 9, 1999

Thread Author Time
HAVING bug in 6.4.2 Oliver Elphick 00:02
Re: [HACKERS] samekeys Tom Lane 00:02

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28