pgsql-hackers since 1999-02-05 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

Feb. 5, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Backend problem with large objects Tatsuo Ishii 01:05
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart 03:24
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Bruce Momjian 03:38
Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Tom Lane 04:11
Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces Bruce Momjian 04:26
SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane 04:53
Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Bruce Momjian 05:26
Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Bruce Momjian 05:27
Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane 06:13
Re: [HACKERS] small bug fix for ecpg Michael Meskes 07:53
Email change Michael Meskes 07:54
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes 12:32
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems geek+ 13:28
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart 13:51
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart 14:02
Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Bruce Momjian 17:20
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Bruce Momjian 17:24
Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres Limitations Tom Lane 17:36
Re: postgres bug? Bruce Momjian 17:48
Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane 18:07
Bugs in snapshot Jackson, DeJuan 18:54
char(n) default '' crashes server Erich Stamberger 19:30
Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres Limitations Peter T Mount 22:19
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian 22:23
Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 gjerde 23:07

Feb. 6, 1999

Thread Author Time
Ignore me :) Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 gjerde 02:27
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Thomas Reinke 06:46
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 The Hermit Hacker 09:03
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes 11:47
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Hannu Krosing 12:37
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian 12:49
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Thomas G. Lockhart 14:21
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Tom Lane 17:06
Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Tom Lane 17:27
Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc Jan Wieck 17:28
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins) Bruce Momjian 17:51
Re: [HACKERS] Re: SELECT INTO TABLE busted? Tom Lane 20:41

Feb. 7, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Tom Lane 01:13
One I've never seen before: The Hermit Hacker 06:24
Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: The Hermit Hacker 06:39
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Jan Wieck 11:44
Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: Bruce Momjian 12:33
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 13:20
Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc (fwd) Jan Wieck 14:08
Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: The Hermit Hacker 14:55
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 14:57
v6.4.3 ? Jan Wieck 17:30
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Tom Lane 17:44
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane 18:03
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane 18:23
RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Stupor Genius 18:39
Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Tom Lane 18:46
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes 19:04
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 19:41
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 19:42
Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: Bruce Momjian 20:08
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Jan Wieck 20:30
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 20:33
Re: [HACKERS] Problems building some libraries in 6.4.2 Tom Lane 20:35
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Bruce Momjian 20:36
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? The Hermit Hacker 20:45
RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 21:02
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Jan Wieck 21:06
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Jan Wieck 21:30
Re: [HACKERS] equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Tom Lane 22:02
libpq++ Oliver Elphick 22:29
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Tom Lane 22:32
RE: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber 22:33
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane 22:51
RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 gjerde 23:01
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 23:10
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 23:40
RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 📎 Peter T Mount 23:43

Feb. 8, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane 00:06
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 D'Arcy J.M. Cain 00:14
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 00:14
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Sascha Schumann 00:15
Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Sascha Schumann 00:28
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Hannu Krosing 00:35
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Jan Wieck 01:07
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Taral 01:19
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 02:01
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 02:41
Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Marc Howard Zuckman 02:42
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 02:45
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian 02:53
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane 03:04
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Bruce Momjian 03:07
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Bruce Momjian 03:09
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane 03:09
Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc (fwd) Vadim Mikheev 03:12
Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Tom Lane 03:18
Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Bruce Momjian 03:48
Added \p\g to psql Bruce Momjian 04:29
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 06:35
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Michael Meskes 07:45
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Michael Meskes 07:47
Re: [HACKERS] Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Oleg Broytmann 08:45
Embedded SQL question Michael Meskes 10:28
sequence dump/reload Oleg Broytmann 10:29
writing a JAVA interface for postgres Pascal GEND 10:56
Re: [HACKERS] strange behaviour on pooled alloc (fwd) Jan Wieck 11:03
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 12:00
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 12:05
VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann 12:37
Keywords Michael Meskes 12:59
libpq questuion Dmitry Samersoff 13:08
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Cary O'Brien 13:15
Version numbering Cary O'Brien 13:20
Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Terry Mackintosh 13:32
Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Jan Wieck 14:11
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questuion Jan Wieck 14:46
RE: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Dan Gowin 14:52
Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Thomas Reinke 14:56
Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Nick Bastin 15:06
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Bruce Momjian 15:16
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian 15:20
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Thomas G. Lockhart 15:44
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Functional Indexes Thomas G. Lockhart 15:56
Commercial support, things considered Terry Mackintosh 16:00
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Tom Lane 16:02
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane 16:18
Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane 16:21
TIME QUALIFICATION Jan Wieck 16:25
RE: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Dan Gowin 16:26
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 16:31
Re: [HACKERS] Oops, I seem to have changed UNION's behavior Thomas G. Lockhart 16:33
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Tom Lane 16:34
Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Jan Wieck 16:43
Re: Commercial support, was Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane 16:56
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 17:05
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian 17:26
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian 17:33
Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Thomas G. Lockhart 17:35
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? The Hermit Hacker 17:50
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck 18:12
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 18:13
Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Bruce Momjian 18:15
Optimizer problems Bruce Momjian 18:23
Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems Michael Meskes 18:53
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 19:16
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 19:19
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer problems Bruce Momjian 19:31
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer problems Jan Wieck 19:32
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 20:25
samekeys Bruce Momjian 21:28
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Thomas Reinke 21:34
A mistake generates strange result Ricardo J.C.Coelho 22:21
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Tom Lane 23:55

Feb. 9, 1999

Thread Author Time
HAVING bug in 6.4.2 Oliver Elphick 00:02
Re: [HACKERS] samekeys Tom Lane 00:02
Datetime input-parsing shortcoming Tom Lane 01:34
How do I unsubscribe? Joel Parker Henderson 01:57
Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Vadim Mikheev 02:17
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Thomas G. Lockhart 02:49
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 03:01
Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Thomas G. Lockhart 03:02
Optimizer fix Bruce Momjian 03:56
Using As with Inheritance? Clark Evans 04:40
samekeys Bruce Momjian 06:44
Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION Vadim Mikheev 06:57
RE: [HACKERS] libpq questuion Hiroshi Inoue 08:03
Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann 08:13
Re: [GENERAL] A mistake generates strange result Stéphane Dupille 08:55
AW: [HACKERS] Embedded SQL question Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 09:14
AW: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 09:46
Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Michael Meskes 09:48
Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION Jan Wieck 09:49
Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION Vadim Mikheev 12:08
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Hannu Krosing 12:33
Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION Jan Wieck 12:58
Timestamp fileds into index Ricardo J.C.Coelho 13:35
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 13:56
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Thomas G. Lockhart 14:51
Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Thomas G. Lockhart 14:55
RE: [HACKERS] Timestamp fileds into index Dan Gowin 14:59
Re: [HACKERS] Datetime input-parsing shortcoming 📎 Thomas G. Lockhart 15:06
Error dropping indexes Chris Williams 15:14
Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp fileds into index Thomas G. Lockhart 15:20
Re: RES: [HACKERS] Timestamp fileds into index Thomas G. Lockhart 15:52
Re: [HACKERS] samekeys Tom Lane 16:04
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Tom Lane 16:26
Re: [HACKERS] samekeys Bruce Momjian 16:35
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Bruce Momjian 16:38
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Jan Wieck 18:38
Re: [HACKERS] Embedded SQL question Michael Meskes 19:09
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 Peter T Mount 21:07
Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Hannu Krosing 23:16

Feb. 10, 1999

Thread Author Time
NEXTSTEP porting problems Tatsuo Ishii 02:02
Re: [HACKERS] Keywords Thomas G. Lockhart 02:28
Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION Vadim Mikheev 02:28
cannot cast bpchar and varchar Tatsuo Ishii 02:43
PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? 📎 Daryl W. Dunbar 03:00
PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? 📎 Daryl W. Dunbar 03:18
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? The Hermit Hacker 03:21
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? The Hermit Hacker 03:22
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Tatsuo Ishii 04:01
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? Thomas G. Lockhart 04:09
RE: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar 04:16
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? The Hermit Hacker 04:16

Browse Archives

Prev | Next