pgsql-hackers since 2002-10-05 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

Oct. 5, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching Greg Copeland 00:17
Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching Giles Lean 00:49
Re: Improving backend startup interlock Joe Conway 01:14
Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching Tom Lane 03:13
Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching Curtis Faith 03:16
Re: [GENERAL] Small patch for PL/Perl Misbehavior with John Worsley 03:41
Re: [GENERAL] Small patch for PL/Perl Misbehavior with Runtime Error Reporting Tom Lane 03:51
Re: Threaded Sorting Bruce Momjian 03:53
Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching Tom Lane 04:07
Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching Bruce Momjian 04:17
Re: [SQL] [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP Bruce Momjian 04:29
Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching Curtis Faith 06:11
Re: [HACKERS] Advice: Where could I be of help? Mario Weilguni 06:31
Re: [HACKERS] Advice: Where could I be of help? Thomas O'Dowd 06:53
Use of sync() [was Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching] Mats Lofkvist 08:46
Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN 📎 Alvaro Herrera 08:46
Branch prediction Gavin Sherry 09:44
Re: [SQL] [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP Manfred Koizar 09:58
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Bruce Momjian 11:49
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Bruce Momjian 12:01
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large PerformanceGain in WAL synching Curtis Faith 13:01
Anyone else having list server problems? Curtis Faith 13:41
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Hannu Krosing 13:44
Re: Threaded Sorting Curtis Faith 14:39
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching Tom Lane 15:15
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching Doug McNaught 15:28
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Tom Lane 15:32
Re: [SQL] [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP Tom Lane 15:36
Re: Use of sync() [was Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching] Tom Lane 16:07
Re: Use of sync() [was Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching] Doug McNaught 16:29
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching Curtis Faith 16:33
Re: Use of sync() [was Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching] Tom Lane 16:55
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Curtis Faith 17:22
Re: Use of sync() [was Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching] Doug McNaught 17:53
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Bruce Momjian 18:26
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Hannu Krosing 18:29
Re: [SQL] [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP 📎 Bruce Momjian 19:02
Re: Anyone else having list server problems? Jeff Davis 19:22
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Curtis Faith 19:46
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Bruce Momjian 20:06
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Curtis Faith 21:02
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Bruce Momjian 21:44
Implicit Lock Row Antoine Lobato 21:56
Implicit Lock Row Antoine Lobato 22:05
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Tom Lane 23:03
Mailing list unsubscribe - hackers isn't there? Mitch 23:31
Correction re existing WAL behavior Tom Lane 23:45
Re: New lock types Alvaro Herrera 23:53

Oct. 6, 2002

Thread Author Time
Analysis of ganged WAL writes Tom Lane 00:16
Re: New lock types Tom Lane 00:25
Re: Threaded Sorting Tom Lane 00:48
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Hannu Krosing 05:37
Parallel Executors [was RE: Threaded Sorting] Curtis Faith 09:17
Re: Improving speed of copy Curt Sampson 15:06
Re: [HACKERS] Performance while loading data and indexing Curt Sampson 15:52
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Greg Copeland 16:06
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Tom Lane 16:46
Re: New lock types Alvaro Herrera 20:04
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Greg Copeland 20:21
Re: New lock types Tom Lane 20:48
Naming convention Alvaro Herrera 21:58
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Tom Lane 23:07
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Greg Copeland 23:35

Oct. 7, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Rod Taylor 00:59
Moving to PostGres Benjamin Stewart 02:00
Re: Large databases, performance Curt Sampson 02:27
Re: Large databases, performance Curt Sampson 02:30
Re: Moving to PostGres ellis 02:37
cross-posts (was Re: Large databases, performance) Tom Lane 03:20
Re: Naming convention Tom Lane 03:34
pg_filedump Alvaro Herrera 04:42
Re: [SQL] [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP Yury Bokhoncovich 05:00
Re: [SQL] [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP Bruce Momjian 05:13
Re: [HACKERS] Advice: Where could I be of help? Karel Zak 07:24
Re: Bad rules Steve King 08:02
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 08:42
Re: Large databases, performance Shridhar Daithankar 09:37
Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance Hans-Jürgen Schönig 10:01
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Hannu Krosing 11:01
Re: [HACKERS] cross-posts (was Re: Large databases, Larry Rosenman 11:50
Re: [HACKERS] cross-posts (was Re: Large databases, Michael Paesold 12:01
Re: [HACKERS] cross-posts (was Re: Large databases, Larry Rosenman 12:04
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Tom Lane 12:05
Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] Shridhar Daithankar 13:25
Re: Implicit Lock Row Shridhar Daithankar 13:46
Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] Hans-Jürgen Schönig 13:52
Re: Large databases, performance Manfred Koizar 14:10
Re: Large databases, performance Shridhar Daithankar 14:18
Re: pg_filedump Tom Lane 14:21
Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance Tom Lane 14:30
Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] Shridhar Daithankar 14:32
Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance Shridhar Daithankar 14:39
Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] Hans-Jürgen Schönig 14:49
Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] Shridhar Daithankar 15:01
Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] Tom Lane 15:14
Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance Tom Lane 15:21
Re: Large databases, performance Manfred Koizar 15:22
Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] Hans-Jürgen Schönig 15:23
Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] Jim Buttafuoco 15:29
Re: Case insensitive columns Michelle Konzack 15:31
Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] Hans-Jürgen Schönig 15:36
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Antti Haapala 15:38
Re: [HACKERS] Large databases, performance Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 15:42
Re: Moving to PostGres Neil Conway 16:18
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Greg Copeland 16:20
reminder for those working on docs Vince Vielhaber 16:20
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Neil Conway 16:35
Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] Michael Paesold 17:12
BTree metapage lock and freelist structure Alvaro Herrera 17:13
Hot Backup Sandeep Chadha 17:21
Re: Parallel Executors [was RE: Threaded Sorting] Jan Wieck 17:42
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Tom Lane 17:42
Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup Neil Conway 17:48
Re: Parallel Executors [was RE: Threaded Sorting] Curtis Faith 18:29
Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme] Curtis Faith 18:31
Re: BTree metapage lock and freelist structure Tom Lane 18:31
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Hannu Krosing 18:32
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Hannu Krosing 19:00
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Curtis Faith 19:12
Re: 7.2.3 patching done Peter Eisentraut 19:22
Re: v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ... Peter Eisentraut 19:23
Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup Sandeep Chadha 19:28
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Hannu Krosing 19:32
Statistical Analysis, Vacuum, and Selectivity Restriction (PostGIS) (fwd) Bruce Momjian 20:22
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Tom Lane 20:27
Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme] Bruce Momjian 20:28
Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme] Curtis Faith 20:43
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Curtis Faith 21:06
inline newNode() 📎 Neil Conway 21:15
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Greg Copeland 21:18
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Justin Clift 21:23
Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme] Greg Copeland 21:28
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Tom Lane 21:28
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Greg Copeland 21:32
Re: inline newNode() Tom Lane 21:43
Re: 7.2.3 patching done Alvaro Herrera 21:45
Re: inline newNode() Neil Conway 22:29
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Curtis Faith 23:04

Oct. 8, 2002

Thread Author Time
Where to call SetQuerySnapshot Tom Lane 00:39
Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme] Neil Conway 00:42
Re: Where to call SetQuerySnapshot Joe Conway 00:53
Re: inline newNode() Tom Lane 01:08
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large Ken Hirsch 01:30
Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme] Curtis Faith 02:45
Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme] Bruce Momjian 03:08
Re: inline newNode() Neil Conway 04:58
Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance Shridhar Daithankar 05:44
Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup Shridhar Daithankar 05:47
Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance Martijn van Oosterhout 07:20
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Hannu Krosing 07:36
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 09:15
pg_dump file question Robert Partyka 09:57
Little note to php coders Sir Mordred The Traitor 09:58
Re: Little note to php coders Nigel J. Andrews 10:11
Re: Little note to php coders Vince Vielhaber 10:34
Rép. : Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup Erwan DUROSELLE 10:35
Re: Rép Martijn van Oosterhout 10:45
Re: Little note to php coders Sir Mordred The Traitor 10:57
Re[2]: [GENERAL] Rйp Timur V. Irmatov 11:00
Re: v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ... Marc G. Fournier 11:54
Re: Hot Backup Erwan DUROSELLE 12:17
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Greg Copeland 12:34
Re: Hot Backup Shridhar Daithankar 12:58
Re: Little note to php coders Robert Treat 13:27
Re: Pinning a table into memory Jan Wieck 13:32
Re: Hot Backup Robert Treat 13:40
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Tom Lane 13:45
Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance Ron Johnson 13:50
Re: Hot Backup 📎 Shridhar Daithankar 13:51
Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme] Curtis Faith 13:53
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Curtis Faith 14:00
Re: Hot Backup Justin Clift 14:04
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Curtis Faith 14:15
Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance Tom Lane 14:38
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Tom Lane 14:41
Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance Shridhar Daithankar 14:41
Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme] Tom Lane 14:50
Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme] Greg Copeland 14:55
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Curtis Faith 14:57
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Tom Lane 15:08
Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance Ron Johnson 15:16
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Curtis Faith 15:17
Re: CHAR, VARCHAR, TEXT (Was Large Databases) Josh Berkus 15:33
Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance Tom Lane 15:51
Re: inline newNode() Tom Lane 15:53
Re: Where to call SetQuerySnapshot Tom Lane 16:01
Re: inline newNode() Bruce Momjian 16:04
Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 16:06
Re: inline newNode() Tom Lane 16:08
genetic query optimization iafmgc 16:22
Re: pg_dump file question Neil Conway 16:49
Re: Where to call SetQuerySnapshot Tom Lane 17:21
Re: CHAR, VARCHAR, TEXT (Was Large Databases) Ron Johnson 17:42
Re: Where to call SetQuerySnapshot Joe Conway 18:33
Re: inline newNode() Peter Eisentraut 21:41
Re: inline newNode() Peter Eisentraut 21:41
Re: v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ... Peter Eisentraut 21:42
Re: CHAR, VARCHAR, TEXT (Was Large Databases) Josh Berkus 22:44
Re: [HACKERS] Large databases, performance Martijn van Oosterhout 22:51
Re: inline newNode() Neil Conway 22:59

Browse Archives

Prev | Next