pgsql-hackers since 2009-04-22 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

April 22, 2009

Thread Author Time
Re: [PATCH] unalias of ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE KaiGai Kohei 00:00
Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format Pavel Stehule 00:13
Re: [PATCH] unalias of ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE Robert Haas 01:31
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df tomas 03:44
Re: New trigger option of pg_standby Fujii Masao 05:09
Re: New trigger option of pg_standby Simon Riggs 07:43
Re: Why isn't stats_temp_directory automatically created? 📎 Fujii Masao 07:57
The last WAL segment of the old timeline is not archived for a while after archive recovery 📎 Fujii Masao 09:20
Workaround for bug #4608? Robert Campbell 12:18
Synch Replication: Synchronization of files between Primary & Standby K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore) 12:21
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df Bruce Momjian 12:32
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Bruce Momjian 12:33
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Robert Campbell 12:35
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Bruce Momjian 12:43
Re: BUG #4768: FATAL:could not reattach to shared memory:487 Ghislain ROUVIGNAC 12:44
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Robert Campbell 12:50
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Bruce Momjian 13:00
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Robert Campbell 13:04
Re: [BUGS] BUG #4768: FATAL:could not reattach to shared memory:487 Bruce Momjian 13:26
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df tomas 13:28
Re: [NOVICE] Workaround for bug #4608? Bruce Momjian 13:28
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df Bruce Momjian 13:34
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Obe, Regina 13:36
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Obe, Regina 13:40
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Robert Campbell 13:55
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Obe, Regina 14:02
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Robert Campbell 14:36
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df Tom Lane 14:40
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df Alvaro Herrera 14:44
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df Tom Lane 14:47
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df 📎 Bruce Momjian 15:00
BUG #4774: Bug with use execute+xml+xml_encode_special_chars Nickolay 15:00
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Robert Campbell 15:03
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Bruce Momjian 15:04
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Rainer Bauer 15:11
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Tom Lane 15:11
Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT 15:21
Re: BUG #4774: Bug with use execute+xml+xml_encode_special_chars Tom Lane 15:26
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Robert Campbell 15:29
Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax Tom Lane 15:34
Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax Robert Haas 15:52
Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax Simon Riggs 15:52
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Obe, Regina 16:07
Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format Brendan Jurd 16:19
Re: BUG #4774: Bug with use execute+xml+xml_encode_special_chars Tom Lane 16:33
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Robert Campbell 16:50
Re: trouble with to_char('L') Mikko 17:06
Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Tom Lane 17:48
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Alvaro Herrera 17:53
Re: trouble with to_char('L') Alvaro Herrera 17:58
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Joshua D. Drake 18:00
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Heikki Linnakangas 18:22
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Tom Lane 18:27
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Greg Sabino Mullane 18:28
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Tom Lane 18:30
Re: trouble with to_char('L') Tom Lane 18:35
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Andrew Dunstan 18:37
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Heikki Linnakangas 18:40
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Jeff Davis 18:43
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Tom Lane 18:48
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Tom Lane 18:53
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Jeff Davis 18:55
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Heikki Linnakangas 18:58
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Jeff Davis 19:03
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Heikki Linnakangas 19:08
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Tom Lane 19:49
Re: The last WAL segment of the old timeline is not archived for a while after archive recovery Heikki Linnakangas 19:51
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Joshua D. Drake 19:53
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Tom Lane 20:26
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Robert Haas 21:15
Re: trouble with to_char('L') 📎 Hiroshi Inoue 21:35
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Tom Lane 21:44
pg_restore -j <nothing> Alvaro Herrera 22:26
Re: pg_restore -j <nothing> Bruce Momjian 22:29
Re: pg_restore -j <nothing> Andrew Dunstan 22:33
Re: pg_restore -j <nothing> Tom Lane 22:46
Re: pg_restore -j <nothing> Peter Eisentraut 22:49
GCC 4.4 compiler warnings 📎 Peter Eisentraut 23:00
Re: GCC 4.4 compiler warnings Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 23:13

April 23, 2009

Thread Author Time
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Robert Haas 00:49
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Tom Lane 00:58
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Robert Haas 01:21
Re: pg_restore -j <nothing> Stephen Frost 01:27
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Robert Haas 02:14
Re: 8.4b1 regression? Tom Lane 02:47
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Tom Lane 03:04
Re: The last WAL segment of the old timeline is not archived for a while after archive recovery Fujii Masao 04:09
citex regression fails with de.UTF8 locale Zdenek Kotala 06:27
Re: citex regression fails with de.UTF8 locale Heikki Linnakangas 07:22
Re: New trigger option of pg_standby Heikki Linnakangas 07:49
Re: citex regression fails with de.UTF8 locale Zdenek Kotala 08:13
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Jasen Betts 10:38
RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Sam Halliday 11:43
Re: New trigger option of pg_standby 📎 Fujii Masao 12:15
Re: Workaround for bug #4608? Robert Campbell 13:46
Re: Synch Replication: Synchronization of files between Primary & Standby Fujii Masao 14:29
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields tomas 14:35
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again Kevin Grittner 14:36
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Bill Moran 14:38
PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Zdenek Kotala 14:50
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Tom Lane 15:11
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Peter Eisentraut 15:11
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Zdenek Kotala 15:14
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields tomas 15:21
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Bill Moran 15:23
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Zdenek Kotala 15:32
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Zdenek Kotala 15:35
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields tomas 15:40
Copyright waiver from Helios (fix for non-BSD copyright) Bruce Momjian 15:40
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Tom Lane 15:42
Re: Copyright waiver from Helios (fix for non-BSD copyright) Tom Lane 15:46
Re: Copyright waiver from Helios (fix for non-BSD copyright) Alvaro Herrera 15:49
Re: Copyright waiver from Helios (fix for non-BSD copyright) Bruce Momjian 15:53
Re: Copyright waiver from Helios (fix for non-BSD copyright) Tom Lane 16:04
Re: citex regression fails with de.UTF8 locale David E. Wheeler 16:29
Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Tom Lane 17:46
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Heikki Linnakangas 18:09
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Zdenek Kotala 18:14
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Bill Moran 18:46
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Tom Lane 18:47
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Andrew Dunstan 18:50
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Tom Lane 18:52
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Heikki Linnakangas 18:54
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Greg Stark 18:59
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Tom Lane 19:00
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Andrew Dunstan 19:06
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Bill Moran 19:07
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Tom Lane 19:10
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Andrew Dunstan 19:27
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? David E. Wheeler 19:32
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Zdenek Kotala 20:16
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Marc Munro 20:31
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Peter Eisentraut 21:31
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Peter Eisentraut 21:33
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Peter Eisentraut 21:40
Re: 8.4b1 regression? Eric B. Ridge 21:41
Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? Tom Lane 22:59

April 24, 2009

Thread Author Time
Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS Zdenek Kotala 04:48
Re: cs_CZ vs regression tests, part N+1 Zdenek Kotala 04:53
Re: cs_CZ vs regression tests, part N+1 Heikki Linnakangas 05:17
Re: cs_CZ vs regression tests, part N+1 Zdenek Kotala 05:48
Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby Heikki Linnakangas 06:20
Synchronous replication: psqlODBC driver compilation K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore) 06:54
Re: cs_CZ vs regression tests, part N+1 Zdenek Kotala 07:29
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Explicitly bind gettext to the correct encoding on Windows. Magnus Hagander 08:44
Re: GCC 4.4 compiler warnings Tom Lane 16:15
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Bill Moran 19:45
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields tomas 19:45
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Bill Moran 19:48
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields tomas 19:50
Re: GCC 4.4 compiler warnings 📎 Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 20:58

April 25, 2009

Thread Author Time
Re: HashJoin w/option to unique-ify inner rel 📎 Tom Lane 00:09
Re: HashJoin w/option to unique-ify inner rel Robert Haas 02:37
Re: HashJoin w/option to unique-ify inner rel Tom Lane 02:49
Re: HashJoin w/option to unique-ify inner rel Robert Haas 03:52
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields tomas 04:52
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields tomas 05:17
Re: HashJoin w/option to unique-ify inner rel Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 10:42
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Sam Halliday 10:43
Re: Copyright waiver from Helios (fix for non-BSD copyright) Bruce Momjian 15:53
Randomly placed definition of S_ISDIR() in psql/copy.c Tom Lane 20:35

April 26, 2009

Thread Author Time
Re: Randomly placed definition of S_ISDIR() in psql/copy.c David Fetter 00:39
Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format 📎 Brendan Jurd 01:38
Re: HashJoin w/option to unique-ify inner rel 📎 Robert Haas 01:49
Re: HashJoin w/option to unique-ify inner rel Robert Haas 04:14
Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format Pavel Stehule 04:24
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields tomas 06:05
Re: Randomly placed definition of S_ISDIR() in psql/copy.c Magnus Hagander 06:51
Patch to add support for text/int arrays for plpythonu 📎 Valtonen, Hannu 10:00
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Sam Halliday 10:54
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Sam Halliday 11:40
Re: GCC 4.4 compiler warnings Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 14:33
Re: GCC 4.4 compiler warnings Tom Lane 15:22
Re: Patch to add support for text/int arrays for plpythonu Tom Lane 15:23
Re: Patch to add support for text/int arrays for plpythonu Valtonen, Hannu 16:05
Re: GCC 4.4 compiler warnings Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 16:25
A couple of gripes about the gettext plurals patch Tom Lane 18:29
Restore deleted rows Anton Egorov 18:41
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Andrej 19:03
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Sam Mason 19:54
Multiple parameters with the same name for functions. Gevik Babakhani 20:32
To know what a macro does Werner Echezuria 20:50
Re: Multiple parameters with the same name for functions. Jaime Casanova 21:06
Re: Multiple parameters with the same name for functions. Gevik Babakhani 21:14
Re: To know what a macro does Martijn van Oosterhout 21:15
Re: Multiple parameters with the same name for functions. Tom Lane 21:31
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Sam Halliday 22:13
Open source and diagramming survey chung 23:12

April 27, 2009

Thread Author Time
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Gurjeet Singh 00:54
Re: To know what a macro does Werner Echezuria 01:03
bug #4662 (mingw) in 8.4 beta1 hernan gonzalez 02:14
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields tomas 04:30
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields tomas 04:43
Re: To know what a macro does Martijn van Oosterhout 06:21
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields tomas 06:58
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Sam Halliday 08:24
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Sam Halliday 08:28
Re: RFE: Transparent encryption on all fields Martijn van Oosterhout 09:34
Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby Fujii Masao 11:28
Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby Heikki Linnakangas 11:43

Browse Archives

Prev | Next