pgsql-hackers since 2010-09-20 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

Sept. 20, 2010

Thread Author Time
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Josh Berkus 02:31
Re: wip: functions median and percentile Hitoshi Harada 03:47
Re: So where did that $Id$ come from? Bruce Momjian 03:47
Re: compile/install of git Matthew D. Fuller 04:21
Re: Basic JSON support 📎 Joseph Adams 04:38
pg_comments 📎 Robert Haas 04:53
Re: pg_comments Tom Lane 05:07
Re: [HACKERS] wip: functions median and percentile David Fetter 05:11
Re: Progress indication prototype Mark Kirkwood 06:14
Re: [HACKERS] wip: functions median and percentile Pavel Stehule 06:22
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Heikki Linnakangas 06:27
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Heikki Linnakangas 06:29
Postgres Licensing Vaibhav Kaushal 06:48
Re: Postgres Licensing Heikki Linnakangas 06:58
Re: Postgres Licensing Dave Page 07:03
Re: Postgres Licensing Vaibhav Kaushal 07:05
Re: pgxs docdir question Dimitri Fontaine 09:12
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Simon Riggs 09:17
Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion Magnus Hagander 11:35
Re: pg_comments Robert Haas 11:45
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Heikki Linnakangas 12:16
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Simon Riggs 12:50
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Heikki Linnakangas 13:08
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Robert Haas 13:15
Configuring Text Search parser? jesper 14:01
Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation Kevin Grittner 14:09
What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal? Colin 't Hart 14:29
Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal? Andrew Dunstan 14:54
Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Heikki Linnakangas 14:55
Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements Markus Wanner 15:03
Do we need a ShmList implementation? Kevin Grittner 15:12
Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements Markus Wanner 15:30
Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal? Colin 't Hart 15:31
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Heikki Linnakangas 15:37
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Markus Wanner 15:40
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Kevin Grittner 16:04
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Kevin Grittner 16:09
Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Tom Lane 16:17
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Simon Riggs 16:20
Re: compile/install of git Mark Wong 16:24
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Kevin Grittner 16:25
Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Simon Riggs 16:26
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Heikki Linnakangas 16:28
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Tom Lane 16:35
Re: compile/install of git Robert Haas 16:38
Re: compile/install of git Andrew Dunstan 16:42
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Simon Riggs 16:44
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Kevin Grittner 16:47
Git conversion status Magnus Hagander 16:49
work_mem / maintenance_work_mem maximums Stephen Frost 16:51
Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements Robert Haas 16:57
Re: compile/install of git Mark Wong 17:16
Re: Git conversion status Bruce Momjian 17:27
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 17:34
Re: compile/install of git Andrew Dunstan 17:35
Re: Git conversion status Magnus Hagander 17:43
Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements Markus Wanner 17:45
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 17:49
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Markus Wanner 17:50
Serializable snapshot isolation error logging Dan S 17:56
Re: Git conversion status Magnus Hagander 17:57
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 18:00
Re: Git conversion status Magnus Hagander 18:05
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Kevin Grittner 18:06
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 18:07
Re: Git conversion status Magnus Hagander 18:09
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Markus Wanner 18:13
Re: Git conversion status Stefan Kaltenbrunner 18:14
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 18:15
Re: Git conversion status Andres Freund 18:17
Re: Git conversion status Magnus Hagander 18:19
Re: Serializable snapshot isolation error logging Kevin Grittner 18:20
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 18:21
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 18:22
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 18:25
Re: Git conversion status Andres Freund 18:26
Re: Git conversion status Stefan Kaltenbrunner 18:29
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 18:33
Re: Git conversion status Stefan Kaltenbrunner 18:40
Re: Git conversion status Bruce Momjian 18:47
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 19:06
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 19:09
Re: Git conversion status Peter Eisentraut 19:20
Re: Git conversion status Stefan Kaltenbrunner 19:24
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 19:30
Re: Serializable snapshot isolation error logging Dan S 19:50
Re: Git conversion status Bruce Momjian 19:57
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Dimitri Fontaine 20:10
Re: Git conversion status Magnus Hagander 20:10
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Robert Haas 21:14
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Thom Brown 21:42
Re: Serializable snapshot isolation error logging Kevin Grittner 21:49
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Robert Haas 22:24

Sept. 21, 2010

Thread Author Time
Shutting down server from a backend process, e.g. walrceiver fazool mein 00:48
Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements Robert Haas 00:49
Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? Josh Berkus 01:18
Re: Path question Robert Haas 02:57
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 03:38
.gitignore files, take two Tom Lane 04:00
Pg_upgrade performance Mark Kirkwood 04:14
Re: Path question David Fetter 04:29
Re: Shutting down server from a backend process, e.g. walrceiver Fujii Masao 04:44
Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Fujii Masao 04:55
Re: .gitignore files, take two Robert Haas 04:55
Re: .gitignore files, take two Tom Lane 05:06
Re: Pg_upgrade performance Mark Kirkwood 05:44
Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? Heikki Linnakangas 05:59
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Simon Riggs 06:36
Re: .gitignore files, take two Magnus Hagander 07:00
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Fujii Masao 07:58
Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Boszormenyi Zoltan 08:21
Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Boszormenyi Zoltan 08:21
Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements Markus Wanner 08:23
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Dimitri Fontaine 08:24
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Fujii Masao 08:29
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Thom Brown 08:34
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Dave Page 08:37
Re: SHOW TABLES Boszormenyi Zoltan 08:52
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Thom Brown 08:52
Re: ALTER TYPE extensions KaiGai Kohei 08:53
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Fujii Masao 08:59
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Heikki Linnakangas 09:11
Re: Git conversion status Magnus Hagander 10:46
pgsql: git_topo_order script, to match up commits across branches. Robert Haas 11:00
Re: .gitignore files, take two Robert Haas 11:12
Re: SHOW TABLES Robert Haas 11:55
Re: .gitignore files, take two 📎 Magnus Hagander 12:12
Re: Basic JSON support 📎 Itagaki Takahiro 12:38
Re: Basic JSON support Robert Haas 12:54
Re: Basic JSON support Itagaki Takahiro 13:31
Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements Robert Haas 13:46
Re: .gitignore files, take two Peter Eisentraut 14:27
Re: .gitignore files, take two Magnus Hagander 14:31
Re: .gitignore files, take two Peter Eisentraut 14:38
Re: .gitignore files, take two Robert Haas 14:38
Re: .gitignore files, take two Tom Lane 15:02
Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal? Robert Haas 15:03
Re: .gitignore files, take two Robert Haas 15:12
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Tom Lane 15:12
Re: .gitignore files, take two Peter Eisentraut 15:13
Re: .gitignore files, take two Heikki Linnakangas 15:20
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Robert Haas 15:23
Re: .gitignore files, take two Tom Lane 15:27
moving development branch activity to new git repo Kevin Grittner 15:28
Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements Markus Wanner 15:31
Re: Shutting down server from a backend process, e.g. walrceiver David Fetter 15:32
Re: .gitignore files, take two Andrew Dunstan 15:35
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Heikki Linnakangas 15:41
Re: Do we need a ShmList implementation? Kevin Grittner 15:48
Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal? Tom Lane 15:49
Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal? Robert Haas 15:56
Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements Robert Haas 15:59
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Andrew Dunstan 15:59
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Aidan Van Dyk 16:07
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Kevin Grittner 16:08
Re: Serializable snapshot isolation error logging Dan S 16:11
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Elvis Pranskevichus 16:15
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Andrew Dunstan 16:15
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Abhijit Menon-Sen 16:21
Re: .gitignore files, take two Abhijit Menon-Sen 16:26
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 16:31
Re: Git conversion status Robert Haas 16:38
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 16:45
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 16:47
Re: Git conversion status Magnus Hagander 16:51
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 16:55
Re: Serializable snapshot isolation error logging Kevin Grittner 16:57
Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal? Alvaro Herrera 17:02
Re: Serializable snapshot isolation error logging Robert Haas 17:14
Re: english parser in text search: support for multiple words in the same position Sushant Sinha 17:17
Re: .gitignore files, take two 📎 Magnus Hagander 17:18
Re: Git conversion status Alvaro Herrera 17:32
Re: Configuring Text Search parser? Sushant Sinha 17:38
Re: Git conversion status Heikki Linnakangas 17:39
Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal? Tom Lane 17:41
Re: Git conversion status Robert Haas 17:43
Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal? Greg Stark 17:45
Re: .gitignore files, take two Tom Lane 17:46
Re: Shutting down server from a backend process, e.g. walrceiver fazool mein 17:50
Re: Shutting down server from a backend process, e.g. walrceiver fazool mein 17:53
Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal? Robert Haas 17:56
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Kevin Grittner 18:01
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Magnus Hagander 18:04
Re: Configuring synchronous replication Simon Riggs 18:05
Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal? Alvaro Herrera 18:06
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Heikki Linnakangas 18:06
Re: Git conversion status Tom Lane 18:10
Re: .gitignore files, take two Magnus Hagander 18:10
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Kevin Grittner 18:16
Re: Git conversion status Heikki Linnakangas 18:17
Re: .gitignore files, take two Peter Eisentraut 18:21
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Magnus Hagander 18:24
trailing whitespace in psql table output 📎 Peter Eisentraut 18:28
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Peter Eisentraut 18:28
Re: .gitignore files, take two Tom Lane 18:29
Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements Markus Wanner 18:30
Re: Git conversion status Andrew Dunstan 18:30
Re: .gitignore files, take two Magnus Hagander 18:35
Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo Magnus Hagander 18:38
Make tuples_per_page pr. table configureable. 📎 Jesper Krogh 18:44

Browse Archives

Prev | Next