pgsql-hackers since 2011-09-20 00:00
The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!
Search the Archives
Browse Archives
Prev
|
Next
Sept. 20, 2011
Sept. 21, 2011
Thread |
Author |
Time |
Re: EXPLAIN and nfiltered, take two
|
Tom Lane |
00:19 |
Re: WIP: Collecting statistics on CSV file data
|
David Fetter |
00:22 |
Isolation tests still falling over routinely
|
Tom Lane |
00:30 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
karavelov |
00:48 |
Re: WIP: Collecting statistics on CSV file data
|
Alvaro Herrera |
01:00 |
Re: Isolation tests still falling over routinely
|
Kevin Grittner |
01:51 |
[PATCH] POC: inline int4 comparison in tuplesort
|
Dan McGee |
01:54 |
Re: Isolation tests still falling over routinely
|
Alvaro Herrera |
02:04 |
Re: EXPLAIN and nfiltered, take two
|
Robert Haas |
02:18 |
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
|
Fujii Masao |
02:50 |
Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
|
Peter Eisentraut |
03:27 |
Re: Isolation tests still falling over routinely
|
Tom Lane |
03:42 |
Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables
|
Michael Paquier |
03:52 |
Re: Back-branch releases upcoming this week
|
Peter Eisentraut |
04:00 |
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
|
Magnus Hagander |
05:13 |
Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables
|
Shigeru Hanada |
06:11 |
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
|
Fujii Masao |
06:23 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
06:51 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Simon Riggs |
06:55 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Simon Riggs |
07:01 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
07:08 |
Shared sequence-like objects in PostgreSQL
|
Vlad Arkhipov |
07:19 |
Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables
|
Michael Paquier |
07:20 |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Jeff Davis |
07:23 |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Jeff Davis |
07:29 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Peter Geoghegan |
07:38 |
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
|
Magnus Hagander |
08:34 |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Florian Pflug |
11:24 |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Robert Haas |
12:00 |
Re: Shared sequence-like objects in PostgreSQL
|
Greg Stark |
12:33 |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Florian Pflug |
12:41 |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Robert Haas |
12:47 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Greg Stark |
12:47 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Robert Haas |
13:34 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Peter Geoghegan |
14:20 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
14:31 |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Tom Lane |
14:41 |
Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load
|
Linas Virbalas |
14:44 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Tom Lane |
14:50 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Andrew Dunstan |
15:03 |
sequence locking
|
Andres Freund |
15:15 |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Florian Pflug |
15:20 |
BUG #6218: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(owner->nsnapshots == 0)", File: "resowner.c", Line: 365)
|
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
15:22 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Tom Lane |
15:22 |
Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
|
Susanne Ebrecht |
15:34 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Peter Geoghegan |
15:43 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Tom Lane |
15:46 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
15:56 |
Re: BUG #6218: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(owner->nsnapshots == 0)", File: "resowner.c", Line: 365)
|
Tom Lane |
15:58 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Greg Stark |
16:04 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Tom Lane |
16:13 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
16:13 |
DECLARE CURSOR must not contain data-modifying statements in WITH
|
Andres Freund |
16:19 |
Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load
|
Euler Taveira de Oliveira |
16:22 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Tom Lane |
16:23 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Tom Lane |
16:27 |
unaccent contrib
|
Daniel Vázquez |
16:28 |
Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load
|
Florian Pflug |
16:34 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Greg Stark |
16:35 |
Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
|
Alvaro Herrera |
16:49 |
Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
|
Dave Page |
16:50 |
Re: sequence locking
|
Kevin Grittner |
16:51 |
Remastering using streaming only replication?
|
Josh Berkus |
16:52 |
Re: sequence locking
|
Merlin Moncure |
16:54 |
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
|
Josh Berkus |
16:55 |
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
|
Robert Haas |
16:57 |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Jeff Davis |
17:00 |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Jeff Davis |
17:02 |
Re: sequence locking
|
Kevin Grittner |
17:03 |
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
|
Josh Berkus |
17:03 |
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
|
Robert Haas |
17:07 |
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
|
Josh Berkus |
17:08 |
Re: [PERFORM] Constraint exclusion on UNION ALL subqueries with WHERE conditions
|
Tom Lane |
17:11 |
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
|
Robert Haas |
17:13 |
Re: sequence locking
|
Andres Freund |
17:15 |
Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load
|
Robert Haas |
17:23 |
Re: sequence locking
|
Tom Lane |
17:24 |
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
|
Aidan Van Dyk |
17:34 |
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
|
Aidan Van Dyk |
17:39 |
Re: sequence locking
|
Andres Freund |
17:40 |
Re: unaccent contrib
|
Euler Taveira de Oliveira |
17:47 |
HeapTupleSatisfiesToast not setting XMIN_COMMITTED?
|
Alvaro Herrera |
18:03 |
Re: sequence locking
|
Kevin Grittner |
18:03 |
Re: sequence locking
|
Merlin Moncure |
18:09 |
Re: unaccent contrib
|
Daniel Vázquez |
18:23 |
Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
|
Robert Haas |
18:33 |
Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
|
Kevin Grittner |
18:48 |
Re: HeapTupleSatisfiesToast not setting XMIN_COMMITTED?
|
Merlin Moncure |
19:02 |
Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
|
Robert Haas |
19:08 |
Re: HeapTupleSatisfiesToast not setting XMIN_COMMITTED?
|
Alvaro Herrera |
19:14 |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
|
Simon Riggs |
19:21 |
Re: HeapTupleSatisfiesToast not setting XMIN_COMMITTED?
|
Merlin Moncure |
19:25 |
Re: WIP: SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
19:38 |
Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
|
Kevin Grittner |
19:39 |
Re: unaccent contrib
|
Euler Taveira de Oliveira |
19:47 |
Re: HeapTupleSatisfiesToast not setting XMIN_COMMITTED?
|
Tom Lane |
20:02 |
Re: HeapTupleSatisfiesToast not setting XMIN_COMMITTED?
|
Tom Lane |
20:05 |
Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
|
Gurjeet Singh |
20:19 |
Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
|
Robert Haas |
20:21 |
Re: unaccent contrib
|
Devrim GÜNDÜZ |
20:38 |
Re: unaccent contrib
|
Tom Lane |
20:40 |
Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
|
Robert Haas |
20:40 |
Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
|
Kevin Grittner |
21:07 |
Re: EXPLAIN and nfiltered, take two
|
Tom Lane |
21:49 |
Re: Double sorting split patch 📎
|
Alexander Korotkov |
21:56 |
citext operator precedence fix
|
Josh Berkus |
23:52 |
Sept. 22, 2011
Browse Archives
Prev
|
Next