pgsql-hackers since 2011-10-20 00:00
The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!
Search the Archives
Browse Archives
Prev
|
Next
Oct. 20, 2011
Oct. 21, 2011
Thread |
Author |
Time |
Re: ProcessStandbyHSFeedbackMessage can make global xmin go backwards
|
Alvaro Herrera |
01:07 |
Re: [v9.2] make_greater_string() does not return a string in some cases
|
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
01:36 |
Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication
|
Fujii Masao |
01:51 |
Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication
|
Robert Haas |
03:01 |
funny lock mode in DropTrigger
|
Alvaro Herrera |
03:40 |
Re: funny lock mode in DropTrigger
|
Alvaro Herrera |
04:01 |
Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks
|
Kohei KaiGai |
09:08 |
psql \set vs \copy - bug or expected behaviour?
|
Richard Huxton |
11:24 |
Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks
|
Robert Haas |
13:02 |
Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem
|
Kohei KaiGai |
14:36 |
Re: pg_dumpall Sets Roll default_tablespace Before Creating Tablespaces
|
Phil Sorber |
14:42 |
Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped
|
Robert Haas |
14:46 |
Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem
|
Robert Haas |
14:47 |
Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables
|
Kohei KaiGai |
14:53 |
Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Tom Lane |
15:36 |
Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query v3 📎
|
Marti Raudsepp |
15:45 |
Re: ProcessStandbyHSFeedbackMessage can make global xmin go backwards
|
Merlin Moncure |
15:50 |
Re: pg_comments (was: Allow \dd to show constraint comments)
|
Marti Raudsepp |
15:57 |
Re: ProcessStandbyHSFeedbackMessage can make global xmin go backwards
|
Tom Lane |
15:59 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Florian Pflug |
16:05 |
Re: funny lock mode in DropTrigger
|
Tom Lane |
16:19 |
Re: funny lock mode in DropTrigger
|
Tom Lane |
16:20 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Andrew Dunstan |
16:37 |
So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Robert Haas |
16:37 |
Re: [v9.2] Object access hooks with arguments support (v1)
|
Kohei KaiGai |
16:44 |
Re: [v9.2] Object access hooks with arguments support (v1)
|
Robert Haas |
16:56 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Tom Lane |
17:06 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Tom Lane |
17:09 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Tom Lane |
17:18 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Robert Haas |
17:18 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Robert Haas |
17:20 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Florian Pflug |
17:40 |
Re: pg_dumpall Sets Roll default_tablespace Before Creating Tablespaces
|
Florian Pflug |
17:41 |
Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query v3
|
Robert Haas |
17:41 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Robert Haas |
17:47 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Andrew Dunstan |
17:59 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Florian Pflug |
18:06 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Tom Lane |
18:08 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Tom Lane |
18:10 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Robert Haas |
18:11 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Robert Haas |
18:14 |
psql command for bytea output
|
Andrew Dunstan |
18:21 |
Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
|
Tom Lane |
18:30 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Tom Lane |
18:33 |
Re: psql command for bytea output
|
Pavel Stehule |
18:44 |
Re: psql command for bytea output
|
Andrew Dunstan |
18:46 |
Re: psql command for bytea output
|
Pavel Stehule |
18:51 |
Re: psql command for bytea output
|
Andrew Dunstan |
19:07 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Robert Haas |
19:07 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Robert Haas |
19:52 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Tom Lane |
19:55 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Tom Lane |
20:05 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Robert Haas |
20:24 |
Re: psql command for bytea output
|
Tom Lane |
20:27 |
Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query v3
|
Tom Lane |
20:37 |
Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query v3
|
Robert Haas |
20:40 |
Re: psql command for bytea output
|
Pavel Stehule |
20:43 |
Re: psql command for bytea output
|
Andrew Dunstan |
21:21 |
Re: psql \set vs \copy - bug or expected behaviour?
|
Robert Haas |
21:31 |
Re: psql command for bytea output
|
Tom Lane |
21:35 |
Oct. 22, 2011
Oct. 23, 2011
Oct. 24, 2011
Thread |
Author |
Time |
autovacuum and orphaned large objects
|
Euler Taveira de Oliveira |
04:56 |
Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load
|
Florian Pflug |
06:05 |
Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load
|
Florian Pflug |
06:13 |
Re: Silent failure with invalid hba_file setting
|
Thom Brown |
08:13 |
[9.1] unusable for large views
|
Omar Bettin |
08:57 |
Re: [9.1] unusable for large views
|
Pavel Stehule |
10:13 |
Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
10:15 |
Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
10:40 |
Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)
|
Alexander Korotkov |
11:05 |
Re: TABLE tab completion
|
Magnus Hagander |
11:25 |
Re: EXECUTE tab completion
|
Magnus Hagander |
11:25 |
Re: [9.1] unusable for large views
|
desmodemone |
11:31 |
Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables 📎
|
Shigeru Hanada |
11:40 |
Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
11:46 |
R: [9.1] unusable for large views (SOLVED)
|
Omar Bettin |
11:56 |
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby 📎
|
Fujii Masao |
12:29 |
Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog
|
Magnus Hagander |
12:40 |
Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication
|
Fujii Masao |
12:40 |
Re: termination of backend waiting for sync rep generates a junk log message
|
Robert Haas |
13:48 |
Re: [9.1] unusable for large views
|
Robert Haas |
13:54 |
Re: autovacuum and orphaned large objects
|
Robert Haas |
13:57 |
Re: termination of backend waiting for sync rep generates a junk log message
|
Tom Lane |
14:05 |
Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog
|
Jaime Casanova |
14:12 |
Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog
|
Magnus Hagander |
14:16 |
Re: autovacuum and orphaned large objects
|
Euler Taveira de Oliveira |
14:25 |
R: [9.1] unusable for large views (SOLVED)
|
Omar Bettin |
14:29 |
Re: autovacuum and orphaned large objects
|
Tom Lane |
14:36 |
Re: [9.1] unusable for large views
|
Tom Lane |
14:46 |
Re: Inserting heap tuples in bulk in COPY 📎
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
14:46 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Robert Haas |
14:51 |
R: [9.1] unusable for large views (SOLVED)
|
Omar Bettin |
15:04 |
Re: termination of backend waiting for sync rep generates a junk log message
|
Robert Haas |
15:10 |
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
15:24 |
Re: autovacuum and orphaned large objects
|
Robert Haas |
15:28 |
Re: autovacuum and orphaned large objects
|
Euler Taveira de Oliveira |
15:29 |
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
|
Heikki Linnakangas |
15:33 |
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
|
Robert Haas |
15:38 |
Re: ALTER TABLE ONLY ...DROP CONSTRAINT is broken in HEAD.
|
Robert Haas |
16:20 |
Re: [PATCH] Use new oom_score_adj without a new compile-time constant
|
Robert Haas |
16:23 |
Re: [9.1] unusable for large views
|
Jan Urbański |
16:55 |
Unreproducible bug in snapshot import code 📎
|
Gurjeet Singh |
16:55 |
Re: [9.1] unusable for large views (SOLVED)
|
Pavel Stehule |
17:02 |
Re: Unreproducible bug in snapshot import code
|
Tom Lane |
17:05 |
Re: Unreproducible bug in snapshot import code
|
Alvaro Herrera |
17:08 |
Monster query
|
Omar Bettin |
17:16 |
Re: [PATCH] Use new oom_score_adj without a new compile-time constant
|
Tom Lane |
17:17 |
Re: Monster query
|
Jan Urbański |
17:18 |
Re: termination of backend waiting for sync rep generates a junk log message
|
Kevin Grittner |
17:23 |
Re: [PATCH] Use new oom_score_adj without a new compile-time constant
|
Robert Haas |
17:29 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Kevin Grittner |
17:38 |
Re: Unreproducible bug in snapshot import code
|
Gurjeet Singh |
17:41 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Tom Lane |
17:51 |
Re: (PATCH) Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations
|
Erik Rijkers |
17:52 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Kevin Grittner |
18:15 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Kevin Grittner |
18:21 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Robert Haas |
18:37 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Tom Lane |
19:35 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Josh Berkus |
19:46 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Robert Haas |
20:01 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Kevin Grittner |
20:07 |
Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
|
Tom Lane |
20:23 |
Idea: Always consistent in-database cache using SSI mechanisms
|
Alexander Korotkov |
21:28 |
Re: Idea: Always consistent in-database cache using SSI mechanisms
|
Kevin Grittner |
21:46 |
Re: SSI implementation question
|
Kevin Grittner |
21:51 |
Re: Idea: Always consistent in-database cache using SSI mechanisms
|
Alexander Korotkov |
22:00 |
Oct. 25, 2011
Browse Archives
Prev
|
Next