pgsql-hackers since 2012-05-03 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

May 3, 2012

Thread Author Time
Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane 00:19
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Robert Haas 00:41
Re: Temporary tables under hot standby Josh Berkus 00:57
Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap Josh Berkus 01:01
Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() Noah Misch 01:06
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Tom Lane 03:42
Re: [HACKERS] Features of Postgresql and Postgres-xc with MySQL Vivek Singh Raghuwanshi 04:00
Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() Daniel Farina 04:01
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Robert Haas 04:11
Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() Tom Lane 04:16
Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby) Jim Nasby 04:24
Re: Future In-Core Replication Jim Nasby 05:58
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Heikki Linnakangas 06:14
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Simon Riggs 08:43
Re: PL/Python result set slicing broken in Python 3 Jan Urbański 09:04
Re: Temporary tables under hot standby Simon Riggs 09:11
Re: Modeling consumed shmem sizes, and some thorns Simon Riggs 09:23
Re: Modeling consumed shmem sizes, and some thorns Daniel Farina 09:33
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Magnus Hagander 09:56
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Hannu Krosing 10:19
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Pavel Stehule 12:13
"unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander 12:26
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Simon Riggs 12:31
ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Magnus Hagander 12:31
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander 12:33
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Vik Reykja 12:34
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander 12:36
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Kevin Grittner 12:46
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Simon Riggs 12:48
Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() Robert Haas 12:54
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Magnus Hagander 13:01
outdated comment in heapam.c Andres Freund 13:08
Re: Temporary tables under hot standby Merlin Moncure 13:19
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Merlin Moncure 13:31
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Pavel Stehule 13:43
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Andrew Dunstan 14:01
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Tom Lane 14:13
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane 14:17
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Merlin Moncure 14:18
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Magnus Hagander 14:22
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Tom Lane 14:26
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Magnus Hagander 14:28
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Tom Lane 14:33
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Pavel Stehule 14:42
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Andrew Dunstan 14:44
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander 14:48
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander 14:49
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Tom Lane 14:50
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane 14:53
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Merlin Moncure 14:56
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander 14:58
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian 14:59
Re: pgsql: Remove dead ports Bruce Momjian 15:01
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Pavel Stehule 15:05
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane 15:06
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Tom Lane 15:12
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Alvaro Herrera 15:20
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Robert Haas 15:33
Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() Tom Lane 15:34
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane 15:39
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Robert Haas 15:46
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Kevin Grittner 15:46
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane 16:04
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Merlin Moncure 16:04
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Eisentraut 16:11
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Simon Riggs 16:12
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Merlin Moncure 16:12
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian 16:21
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane 16:25
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane 16:30
CLOG extension Robert Haas 16:37
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Geoghegan 16:39
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Robert Haas 16:41
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane 16:46
Re: outdated comment in heapam.c Heikki Linnakangas 16:46
Re: Future In-Core Replication Josh Berkus 16:56
Re: CLOG extension Tom Lane 16:59
Re: Future In-Core Replication Josh Berkus 17:03
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander 17:04
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane 17:09
Re: extending relations more efficiently Stephen Frost 17:11
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Josh Berkus 17:14
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Kevin Grittner 17:16
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane 17:20
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander 17:21
Re: Future In-Core Replication Simon Riggs 17:22
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Robert Haas 17:22
Re: CLOG extension Simon Riggs 17:27
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane 17:28
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages 📎 Magnus Hagander 17:36
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Kevin Grittner 17:44
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane 17:48
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Andres Freund 18:19
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane 18:25
Re: CLOG extension Robert Haas 18:50
Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap Josh Berkus 18:52
Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby) Josh Berkus 19:05
Re: Temporary tables under hot standby Josh Berkus 19:06
Re: CLOG extension Robert Haas 19:18
Re: CLOG extension Simon Riggs 19:20
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander 19:26
Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby) Kevin Grittner 19:31
Re: Uppercase tab completion keywords in psql? Bruce Momjian 19:47
Re: Have we out-grown Flex? james 19:51
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane 19:52
Re: Have we out-grown Flex? james 19:53
Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby) Josh Berkus 19:54
Re: Have we out-grown Flex? Daniel Farina 19:56
Re: Have we out-grown Flex? james 20:03
Re: CLOG extension Robert Haas 20:56
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Robert Haas 21:01
Re: CLOG extension Daniel Farina 21:04
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane 21:08
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane 21:18
Re: CLOG extension Alvaro Herrera 21:26
Re: CLOG extension Daniel Farina 21:28
Re: CLOG extension Tom Lane 21:34
Re: Have we out-grown Flex? Jeff Janes 21:36
Re: CLOG extension Daniel Farina 21:42
Re: Features of Postgresql and Postgres-xc with MySQL Josh Berkus 21:52
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. 📎 Peter Geoghegan 23:49

May 4, 2012

Thread Author Time
Re: Future In-Core Replication Greg Smith 00:22
Re: CLOG extension Simon Riggs 07:35
Re: index-only scans vs. Hot Standby, round two Simon Riggs 08:57
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing 10:39
Re: Future In-Core Replication Hannu Krosing 12:32
Re: CLOG extension Robert Haas 12:59
Re: Future In-Core Replication Robert Haas 13:01
Re: Future In-Core Replication Robert Haas 13:03
Re: CLOG extension Simon Riggs 13:11
Re: Future In-Core Replication Simon Riggs 13:16
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Robert Haas 13:17
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane 13:25
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Tom Lane 13:52
Re: CLOG extension Robert Haas 14:04
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Robert Haas 14:17
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane 14:21
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Robert Haas 14:32
Re: Future In-Core Replication Greg Smith 15:06
Re: Future In-Core Replication Robert Haas 16:29
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Andrew Dunstan 16:30
Re: Beta time? Josh Berkus 16:34
c-function variants running time 📎 Armando 16:41
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Tom Lane 16:56
Re: Beta time? Tom Lane 16:58
Re: Future In-Core Replication Andres Freund 16:59
Re: Future In-Core Replication Robert Haas 17:26
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Robert Haas 17:43
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Eisentraut 17:45
Re: Uppercase tab completion keywords in psql? Peter Eisentraut 17:46
Re: PL/Python result set slicing broken in Python 3 Jan Urbański 18:00
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing 19:44
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing 19:49
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Robert Haas 19:59
Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby) Jim Nasby 20:04
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Tom Lane 20:12
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing 20:40
Re: remove dead ports? Marko Kreen 21:11
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? David Johnston 21:24
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian 22:16
Re: remove dead ports? Tom Lane 22:25
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian 22:33

May 5, 2012

Thread Author Time
Documentation for temp_file_limit Bruce Momjian 02:25
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing 06:06
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing 06:07
Re: Documentation for temp_file_limit Peter Eisentraut 08:44
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Eisentraut 08:49
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Eisentraut 08:59
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Peter Eisentraut 09:06
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Peter Eisentraut 09:13
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Peter Eisentraut 09:16
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian 12:22
Re: Uppercase tab completion keywords in psql? Bruce Momjian 13:03
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing 13:27
Re: remove dead ports? Tom Lane 15:26
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian 15:37
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Tom Lane 15:49
Re: remove dead ports? Tom Lane 16:08
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Geoghegan 16:23
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian 16:37
Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown) Fujii Masao 16:41
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian 16:44
Re: PL/Python result set slicing broken in Python 3 📎 Jan Urbański 20:45

May 6, 2012

Thread Author Time
Re: remove dead ports? Robert Haas 00:06
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Geoghegan 00:59
What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ? Hannu Krosing 10:13
more possible dead ports cleanup Peter Eisentraut 13:04
Re: remove dead ports? Tom Lane 14:23
Re: What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ? Tom Lane 17:17
Re: What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ? Hannu Krosing 20:55

May 7, 2012

Thread Author Time
Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown) Albe Laurenz 07:33
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander 08:06
Re: Temporary tables under hot standby Merlin Moncure 14:04
9.2 Beta release notes Bruce Momjian 14:36
Re: more possible dead ports cleanup Robert Haas 14:50
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane 15:15
Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown) Robert Haas 15:59
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander 16:39
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Tom Lane 17:09
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Robert Haas 17:18

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31