pgsql-hackers since 2014-06-10 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

June 10, 2014

Thread Author Time
Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Naoya Anzai 00:35
Re: updated emacs configuration Peter Eisentraut 01:04
Re: tests for client programs Peter Eisentraut 01:12
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Tom Dunstan 01:19
Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins Jeff Janes 01:53
Re: tests for client programs Noah Misch 02:06
Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins Tom Lane 02:19
Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink Amit Kapila 04:27
Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller b8flowerfire 05:13
Re: pg_receivexlog add synchronous mode 📎 furuyao 08:01
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Hannu Krosing 08:19
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Tom Dunstan 09:02
Re: pg_xlogdump --stats furuyao 09:04
Re: BUG #8673: Could not open file "pg_multixact/members/xxxx" on slave during hot_standby Serge Negodyuck 09:26
Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink 📎 MauMau 09:57
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Hannu Krosing 10:18
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels 📎 Gurjeet Singh 11:56
Re: Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Robert Haas 12:17
Re: updated emacs configuration Noah Misch 13:29
Re: BUG #8673: Could not open file "pg_multixact/members/xxxx" on slave during hot_standby Alvaro Herrera 13:48
Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Robert Haas 13:53
Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink Robert Haas 14:00
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane 14:02
Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Robert Haas 14:02
Re: BUG #8673: Could not open file "pg_multixact/members/xxxx" on slave during hot_standby Serge Negodyuck 14:06
Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Tom Lane 14:18
Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Kevin Grittner 14:19
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas 14:21
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh 14:22
Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Tom Lane 14:27
Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Robert Haas 14:30
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund 14:32
Re: updated emacs configuration Tom Lane 14:36
Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Robert Haas 14:37
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas 14:42
Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Tom Lane 14:42
Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Robert Haas 14:45
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh 14:45
Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Tom Lane 14:46
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund 14:46
Re: Compression of full-page-writes Rahila Syed 14:49
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane 14:51
Re: NUMA packaging and patch Robert Haas 14:54
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas 14:56
Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Robert Haas 14:58
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane 15:04
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund 15:09
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane 15:14
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane 15:20
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund 15:24
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane 15:29
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund 15:33
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas 15:35
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas 15:39
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane 15:40
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund 15:45
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh 15:45
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane 15:46
Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction Robert Haas 15:47
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund 15:49
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas 15:51
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane 15:52
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh 15:55
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane 15:56
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund 15:57
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh 15:58
Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Stephen Frost 15:58
Re: Proposing pg_hibernate Robert Haas 16:02
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane 16:05
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas 16:08
branch for 9.5? Robert Haas 16:30
Re: branch for 9.5? Tom Lane 16:46
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels David G Johnston 16:57
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Joshua D. Drake 17:05
Re: NUMA packaging and patch Josh Berkus 17:07
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels David G Johnston 17:13
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Magnus Hagander 17:20
Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh 17:23
Re: NUMA packaging and patch Kevin Grittner 17:34
Getting “make: Entering an unknown directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform shreesha21 17:41
Re: Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Jeff Janes 17:43
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Adam Brightwell 17:46
Re: Getting “make: Entering an unknown directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform Tom Lane 18:00
make check For Extensions David E. Wheeler 18:02
Re: Why is it "JSQuery"? David E. Wheeler 18:04
Re: Getting “make: Entering an unknown directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform shreesha21 18:07
Re: Re: Getting “make: Entering an unknown directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform Tom Lane 18:11
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Tom Lane 18:19
Re: Getting “make: Entering an unknown directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform shreesha21 18:21
Re: Re: Getting “make: Entering an unknown directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform Tom Lane 18:58
Re: Why is it "JSQuery"? Oleg Bartunov 19:06
Re: Why is it "JSQuery"? Oleg Bartunov 19:31
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Brightwell, Adam 20:28
Question about partial functional indexes and the query planner Brian Dunavant 21:29
Re: Why is it "JSQuery"? David E. Wheeler 21:46
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Vik Fearing 22:21
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Craig Ringer 23:18
Re: [GENERAL] Question about partial functional indexes and the query planner Tom Lane 23:19
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Tom Lane 23:24
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Craig Ringer 23:26
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Tom Lane 23:32

June 11, 2014

Thread Author Time
Re: Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Robert Haas 00:12
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Andres Freund 00:26
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Tom Lane 00:39
Re: Compression of full-page-writes Michael Paquier 01:05
Re: branch for 9.5? Tom Lane 01:42
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Tom Dunstan 02:01
Re: Proposing pg_hibernate Gurjeet Singh 02:03
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Tom Dunstan 02:11
Re: Proposing pg_hibernate Gurjeet Singh 02:29
Re: Proposing pg_hibernate Amit Kapila 04:25
Re: 9.4 release notes 📎 Noah Misch 04:42
Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink Amit Kapila 04:44
Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink Tom Lane 05:16
Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink Amit Kapila 05:52
Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins David Rowley 08:53
Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins David Rowley 09:03
Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins Marti Raudsepp 09:17
Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins Marti Raudsepp 09:32
Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins David Rowley 09:43
replication commands and log_statements Fujii Masao 10:34
Re: Compression of full-page-writes Fujii Masao 10:49
Re: Compression of full-page-writes Pavan Deolasee 11:05
Re: replication commands and log_statements Andres Freund 11:32
Re: replication commands and log_statements Magnus Hagander 11:42
Re: replication commands and log_statements Andres Freund 12:17
Re: replication commands and log_statements Magnus Hagander 12:22
Re: replication commands and log_statements Andres Freund 12:35
Re: tests for client programs Andres Freund 12:43
Re: replication commands and log_statements Magnus Hagander 12:50
Re: Inaccuracy in VACUUM's tuple count estimates Andres Freund 12:54
Re: replication commands and log_statements Andres Freund 12:56
Re: pg_receivexlog add synchronous mode Fujii Masao 12:59
Re: Inaccuracy in VACUUM's tuple count estimates Kevin Grittner 13:24
Re: [HACKERS] Question about partial functional indexes and the query planner Robert Haas 13:39
Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins Tom Lane 14:26
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Robert Haas 14:26
Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement 📎 Heikki Linnakangas 14:51
Re: replication commands and log_statements Tom Lane 14:55
Re: Proposing pg_hibernate Robert Haas 14:56
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Stephen Frost 15:40
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Stephen Frost 15:48
[GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED 📎 Fabrízio de Royes Mello 16:19
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Stephen Frost 16:23
Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins Greg Stark 16:52
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Tom Lane 18:47
Re: wrapping in extended mode doesn't work well with default pager Peter Eisentraut 18:52
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Robert Haas 19:26
view reloptions Alvaro Herrera 19:46
Re: wrapping in extended mode doesn't work well with default pager Greg Stark 19:59
Re: wrapping in extended mode doesn't work well with default pager Greg Stark 20:00
Re: view reloptions Tom Lane 22:00
Re: view reloptions Fabrízio de Royes Mello 22:27
Re: [GENERAL] Question about partial functional indexes and the query planner 📎 Tom Lane 23:24
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Stephen Frost 23:46

June 12, 2014

Thread Author Time
Re: [patch] build issues on Win32 Noah Misch 00:53
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Stephen Frost 00:59
Re: wrapping in extended mode doesn't work well with default pager Noah Misch 01:34
Re: wrapping in extended mode doesn't work well with default pager Tom Lane 02:16
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Robert Haas 02:37
Re: Re: Hot standby 9.2.6 -> 9.2.6 PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages Michael Paquier 03:14
Few observations in replication slots related code Amit Kapila 03:25
Re: postgresql.auto.conf read from wrong directory Amit Kapila 03:36
lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq Tom Lane 03:57
Re: Proposing pg_hibernate Gurjeet Singh 04:01
Re: Proposing pg_hibernate Gurjeet Singh 04:17
Re: lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq Tatsuo Ishii 04:22
Re: Something flaky in the "relfilenode mapping" infrastructure Noah Misch 04:38
Re: lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq Noah Misch 04:54
Re: lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq Pavel Stehule 05:01
Re: lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq Pavel Stehule 05:08
Re: lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq Tom Lane 05:08
Re: Something flaky in the "relfilenode mapping" infrastructure Tom Lane 05:18
Re: lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq Pavel Stehule 05:19
Re: Something flaky in the "relfilenode mapping" infrastructure Andres Freund 06:38
Re: Something flaky in the "relfilenode mapping" infrastructure Tom Lane 06:44
Re: Few observations in replication slots related code Andres Freund 07:15
Re: Shared memory changes in 9.4? Christoph Berg 09:07
Re: Shared memory changes in 9.4? Andres Freund 09:41
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Jochem van Dieten 09:46
Re: wrapping in extended mode doesn't work well with default pager 📎 Sergey Muraviov 09:49
Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Naoya Anzai 10:09
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Ian Barwick 10:25
Re: Few observations in replication slots related code Andres Freund 11:32
Re: replication commands and log_statements 📎 Fujii Masao 11:37
Re: Inaccuracy in VACUUM's tuple count estimates Andres Freund 11:40
Audit of logout Fujii Masao 11:51
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Jochem van Dieten 11:58
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Andres Freund 12:20
Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Ian Barwick 12:23
Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Kevin Grittner 13:13
Re: Shared memory changes in 9.4? 📎 Christoph Berg 13:39
Re: replication commands and log_statements Robert Haas 13:55
Re: postgresql.auto.conf read from wrong directory Fujii Masao 13:56
Re: Few observations in replication slots related code Amit Kapila 14:38
Re: lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq Tom Lane 14:48
Re: lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq Andres Freund 14:50
Re: lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq Alvaro Herrera 14:56
Re: Shared memory changes in 9.4? Robert Haas 15:08
Re: lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq Robert Haas 15:11

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30