pgsql-hackers since 2018-08-28 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)

Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

Aug. 28, 2018

Thread	Author	Time
Re: simplehash.h comment	Thomas Munro	00:36
First steps to being a contributer	Daniel Wood	00:39
Why hash OIDs?	Thomas Munro	01:50
Re: Why hash OIDs?	Andres Freund	02:12
Re: Why hash OIDs?	Tom Lane	02:26
Re: Postmaster doesn't send SIGTERM to bgworker during fast shutdown when pmState == PM_STARTUP	Michael Paquier	02:34
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module	Michael Paquier	02:38
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash	Michael Paquier	02:44
Re: Why hash OIDs?	Thomas Munro	02:45
Re: Refactor textToQualifiedNameList()	Kyotaro HORIGUCHI	02:49
Re: Why hash OIDs?	Andres Freund	03:41
Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take	Haribabu Kommi	03:48
RE: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module 📎	Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan GCS Delivery)	03:55
typcache.c typos 📎	David Rowley	04:40
Re: typcache.c typos 📎	David Rowley	04:42
Re: typcache.c typos	Amit Langote	04:57
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash	Andres Freund	05:08
Re: Flexible configuration for full-text search	Aleksandr Parfenov	05:40
Re: First steps to being a contributer	Heikki Linnakangas	05:45
Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	hubert depesz lubaczewski	06:02
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash	Alexander Kukushkin	06:21
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	Alexander Kukushkin	06:33
Re: some more error location support	Fabien COELHO	06:58
Re: Copy function for logical replication slots	Masahiko Sawada	07:14
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Andres Freund	07:52
pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes	Peter Eisentraut	09:21
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	hubert depesz lubaczewski	09:38
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] kNN for SP-GiST	Alexander Korotkov	09:50
Re: Stored procedures and out parameters	Peter Eisentraut	10:30
Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP 📎	Kyotaro HORIGUCHI	10:34
Dimension limit in contrib/cube (dump/restore hazard?)	Andrew Gierth	11:29
Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option 📎	Surafel Temesgen	12:14
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash	Stephen Frost	12:21
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash	Stephen Frost	12:23
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	Stephen Frost	12:32
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash	Michael Paquier	12:59
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes	Michael Banck	13:02
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes	Michael Paquier	13:13
Re: typcache.c typos	Michael Paquier	13:21
Re: Stored procedures and out parameters	David G. Johnston	13:29
Re: Copy function for logical replication slots	Michael Paquier	13:34
Re: Fix help option of contrib/oid2name	Michael Paquier	13:36
Re: Why hash OIDs?	Tom Lane	13:37
Re: typcache.c typos	Tom Lane	13:39
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes	Amit Kapila	14:03
Re: Why hash OIDs?	Robert Haas	14:09
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	David Steele	14:27
Catalog corruption	Mariel Cherkassky	14:36
Re: Something's busted in plpgsql composite-variable handling	Jonathan S. Katz	14:38
Re: typcache.c typos	Chapman Flack	14:40
Re: Something's busted in plpgsql composite-variable handling	Pavel Stehule	14:45
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes	Bernd Helmle	15:03
Re: Something's busted in plpgsql composite-variable handling	Jonathan S. Katz	15:04
Re: Dimension limit in contrib/cube (dump/restore hazard?)	Andrey Borodin	15:20
Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.	Jonathan S. Katz	15:21
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash	Alexander Kukushkin	15:32
logical decoding: ABI break in 10.5 et al	Alvaro Herrera	15:38
Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP 📎	Alexander Korotkov	15:50
Re: Something's busted in plpgsql composite-variable handling	Pavel Stehule	16:06
Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option	Erik Rijkers	16:33
Re: logical decoding: ABI break in 10.5 et al	Christoph Berg	16:38
Re: csv format for psql 📎	Daniel Verite	16:45
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	Stephen Frost	17:08
Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction 📎	Ashutosh Bapat	17:13
Re: Dimension limit in contrib/cube (dump/restore hazard?)	Alexander Korotkov	17:18
Re: Some pgq table rewrite incompatibility with logical decoding?	Jeremy Finzel	17:41
Re: pg_dump test instability 📎	Tom Lane	18:47
Re: csv format for psql	Fabien COELHO	18:54
Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance 📎	Dean Rasheed	19:05
Re: More parallel pg_dump bogosities	Tom Lane	19:11
Re: Dimension limit in contrib/cube (dump/restore hazard?) 📎	Andrey Borodin	19:30
Re: More parallel pg_dump bogosities	Alvaro Herrera	19:30
Re: Catalog corruption	Asim R P	19:34
pg_dump --load-via-partition-root vs. parallel restore	Tom Lane	19:53
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	Andrey Borodin	20:01
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	Stephen Frost	20:07
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	Andrey Borodin	20:34
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	Stephen Frost	20:41
Re: Some pgq table rewrite incompatibility with logical decoding?	Jeremy Finzel	20:46
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	Andrey Borodin	21:04
some pg_dump query code simplification 📎	Peter Eisentraut	21:12
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	David Steele	21:15
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	Stephen Frost	21:20
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification	Tom Lane	21:43
Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?	Michael Paquier	21:44
Re: Some pgq table rewrite incompatibility with logical decoding?	Tomas Vondra	21:49
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification	Stephen Frost	21:56
Re: Some pgq table rewrite incompatibility with logical decoding?	Tomas Vondra	22:01
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification	Tom Lane	22:05
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification	Stephen Frost	22:10
Re: More parallel pg_dump bogosities	Tom Lane	22:22
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification	Tom Lane	22:25
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification	Stephen Frost	22:28
Re: Why hash OIDs?	Thomas Munro	23:03
Re: Why hash OIDs?	Thomas Munro	23:05
Re: Postmaster doesn't send SIGTERM to bgworker during fast shutdown when pmState == PM_STARTUP	Michael Paquier	23:24
Re: Why hash OIDs?	Thomas Munro	23:45

Aug. 29, 2018

Thread	Author	Time
Re: Why hash OIDs?	Tom Lane	00:02
Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP	Kyotaro HORIGUCHI	00:17
Re: Copy function for logical replication slots	Masahiko Sawada	00:39
Re: BUG #15182: Canceling authentication due to timeout aka Denial of Service Attack	Michael Paquier	01:34
Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP	Kyotaro HORIGUCHI	02:04
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Andres Freund	02:56
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Andres Freund	03:13
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Tom Lane	03:18
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes 📎	Andres Freund	03:27
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Andres Freund	03:29
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Tom Lane	03:32
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Andres Freund	03:51
Re: dsa_allocate() faliure 📎	Sand Stone	04:44
Re: Refactor textToQualifiedNameList() 📎	Yugo Nagata	04:50
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash	Michael Paquier	06:17
Re: "Write amplification" is made worse by "getting tired" while inserting into nbtree secondary indexes (Was: Why B-Tree suffix truncation matters)	Peter Eisentraut	06:32
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash	Alexander Kukushkin	06:59
Re: Postmaster doesn't send SIGTERM to bgworker during fast shutdown when pmState == PM_STARTUP 📎	Alexander Kukushkin	07:09
Re: Catalog corruption	Mariel Cherkassky	07:28
Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join	Ashutosh Bapat	07:32
Re: logical decoding: ABI break in 10.5 et al	Christoph Berg	08:26
Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option)	Daniel Gustafsson	08:28
A strange GiST error message or fillfactor of GiST build 📎	Kyotaro HORIGUCHI	08:32
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes 📎	Andres Freund	08:37
Re: Flexible configuration for full-text search	Aleksandr Parfenov	08:38
Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP	Alexander Korotkov	09:01
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes 📎	Amit Kapila	09:09
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes	Yugo Nagata	09:25
PL/Python: Remove use of simple slicing API 📎	Peter Eisentraut	09:37
Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.	Etsuro Fujita	09:40
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes	Yugo Nagata	10:00
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes	Dilip Kumar	10:09
Use C99 designated initializers for some structs	Peter Eisentraut	10:13
Re: Use C99 designated initializers for some structs 📎	Peter Eisentraut	10:14
Re: Stored procedures and out parameters	Vladimir Sitnikov	10:18
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes	Amit Kapila	10:31
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes	Dilip Kumar	10:34
Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes	Yugo Nagata	11:10
Re: Catalog corruption	Andrew Gierth	11:31
pg_verify_checksums vs windows 📎	Amit Kapila	11:31
Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option) 📎	Yugo Nagata	11:33
Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows	Magnus Hagander	11:35
Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option)	Michael Banck	11:37
Re: Two proposed modifications to the PostgreSQL FDW	Etsuro Fujita	11:38
Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows	Amit Kapila	11:44
Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option)	Magnus Hagander	11:46
Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows	Magnus Hagander	11:47
speeding up planning with partitions 📎	Amit Langote	12:06
Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option) 📎	Yugo Nagata	12:09
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash	Michael Paquier	12:10
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification	Andrew Dunstan	12:46
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification	Andrew Dunstan	12:51
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash 📎	Alexander Kukushkin	13:05
Re: some more error location support	Peter Eisentraut	13:08
Re: some more error location support 📎	Peter Eisentraut	13:11
Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench	Peter Eisentraut	13:24
Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API	Peter Eisentraut	13:27
Re: A strange GiST error message or fillfactor of GiST build	Andrey Borodin	13:42
10.5 but not 10.4: backend startup during reindex system: could not read block 0 in file "base/16400/..": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Justin Pryzby	14:01
Is child process of postmaster able to access all the databases?	Hubert Zhang	14:04
Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option) 📎	Yugo Nagata	14:25
Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench	Fabien COELHO	14:35
Re: some more error location support	Fabien COELHO	14:39
Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench	Chapman Flack	14:41
Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench	Alvaro Herrera	14:45
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification 📎	Peter Eisentraut	14:54
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Tom Lane	15:30
Re: Is child process of postmaster able to access all the databases?	Tom Lane	15:33
Re: 10.5 but not 10.4: backend startup during reindex system: could not read block 0 in file "base/16400/..": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Tom Lane	15:35
rare crash - FailedAssertion snapbuild.c Line: 580	Erik Rijkers	15:43
Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API	Sergei Kornilov	15:43
Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench	Tom Lane	15:59
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification	Tom Lane	16:15
Re: Something's busted in plpgsql composite-variable handling	Jonathan S. Katz	16:38
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Tom Lane	16:56
Re: FailedAssertion on partprune	Robert Haas	17:38
Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench	Fabien COELHO	17:45
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Tom Lane	18:00
pg_upgrade fails saying function unaccent(text) doesn't exist	Gunnlaugur Thor Briem	18:09
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables	Fabien COELHO	18:10
Re: FailedAssertion on partprune	Robert Haas	18:23
Re: pg_upgrade fails saying function unaccent(text) doesn't exist	Bruce Momjian	19:06
Re: rare crash - FailedAssertion snapbuild.c Line: 580	Andres Freund	19:15
Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench	Fabien COELHO	19:42
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Andres Freund	19:45
Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench	Andres Freund	19:48
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Andres Freund	20:16
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Tom Lane	20:38
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes	Tom Lane	20:41
Re: Use C99 designated initializers for some structs	David Steele	20:51
Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash	Michael Paquier	20:54
Re: Use C99 designated initializers for some structs	Andres Freund	20:56
Re: Use C99 designated initializers for some structs	Thomas Munro	21:41
Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes 📎	Tom Lane	21:58
Re: "Write amplification" is made worse by "getting tired" while inserting into nbtree secondary indexes (Was: Why B-Tree suffix truncation matters)	Peter Geoghegan	22:15
Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling	Jerry Jelinek	22:18
Re: speeding up planning with partitions	David Rowley	22:27
Re: Use C99 designated initializers for some structs	Tom Lane	22:51

Aug. 30, 2018

Thread	Author	Time
Re: Postmaster doesn't send SIGTERM to bgworker during fast shutdown when pmState == PM_STARTUP	Michael Paquier	00:13
Re: Use C99 designated initializers for some structs	Chapman Flack	00:35
RE: speeding up planning with partitions	Tsunakawa, Takayuki	01:09
Re: speeding up planning with partitions	Amit Langote	01:10
Re: speeding up planning with partitions	Amit Langote	01:33

Browse Archives

Prev | Next