Re: Facing a problem with SPI

From: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Facing a problem with SPI
Date: 2006-12-04 15:32:50
Message-ID: [email protected]
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/4/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > we should remember the CurrentResourceOwner
> > across BIST() and RARCST() calls!
>
> As indeed the current callers of them do...
>

Thanks. I missed that piece of code in pl/pgsql exception handling!!!

So, if I use kludge the code like:

oldResourceOwner = CurrentResourceOwner;
BIST();
... do stuff ...
RARCST();
CurrentResourceOwner = oldResourceOwner;

it would be a standard way of doing it.

Best regards,

--
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2006-12-04 16:40:42 Re: Notify enhancement
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-04 15:23:19 Re: Facing a problem with SPI