Contents:
 Ecological pyramids
 Types of ecological pyramids
 Pyramid of numbers
- Evaluating a pyramid of number
 Pyramid of biomass
- Evaluating a pyramid of biomass
 Pyramid of energy
- Evaluating a pyramid of energy
 Conclusion
 References
What are Ecological Pyramids?
 Ecological pyramids are graphical
representations of the trophic structure of
ecosystems.
 Trophic levels are the feeling position in a
food chain such as primary producers,
herbivores, primary carnivores, etc.
Types of ecological pyramid
 Three types of ecological pyramids can
usually be distinguished namely:
1. Pyramid of Numbers
2. Pyramid of Biomass
3. Pyramid of Energy
Pyramid of Numbers
 Is the graphical
representation of
number individuals per
unit area of various
trophic levels
 Large numbers of
producers tend to form
the base
 Lower numbers of top
carnivores occupy the top
Pyramid of numbers
 The shape of the pyramid of
numbers vary from
ecosystem to ecosystem.
 In aquatic ecosystems and
grassland communities,
autotrophs are present in
large numbers per unit
area.
 A lesser number of
herbivores, which in turn
support fewer carnivores.
inverted + spindle-shaped pyramids
Evaluating the pyramid of numbers
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
 Simple easy method
(number counting) of
giving an overview
 Good for comparing
changes to the ecosystem
at different times of year
e.g. between seasons
 Numbers of a specific
species can be too great to
measure accurately
 Does not take into account
‘juvenile’ or immature
forms
 All organisms are included
regardless of size, hence
‘inverted’ pyramids
Pyramid of biomass
 Is the graphic representation
of biomass present per unit
area of different trophic levels,
with producers at the base
and top carnivores at the tip.
 Biomass is calculated by the
mass of each individual x
number of individuals at each
trophic level (gm-2 or gm-3)
Inverted pyramid of biomass
 In an aquatic habitat the
pyramid of biomass is
inverted or spindle-shaped
where the biomass of
trophic level depends upon
the reproductive potential
and longevity of the
member.
Evaluating a pyramid of biomass
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
 Overcomes the problems of
pyramids of number
 Only uses samples from
population, so difficult to
measure biomass exactly
 Time of year that biomass is
measured influences result
e.g. trees in summer
 Organisms of the same size do
not necessarily have the same
energy content
 Inverted pyramids may result
from producers with high
turnover rate
Pyramid of energy
 Is the graphic representation
of the flow of energy
through each trophic level of
food chain over a fixed time
period.
 It is also known as “pyramid
of productivity”
 The input of solar energy
may be indicated as an extra
layer at the base.
Pyramid of energy
 Only 10% of the energy is
available to next trophic level (as
per Lindemann’s ten percent rule)
 The energy level of each trophic
level has two arts i.e. Net
Production (NP) and Respiration
(R) and measured in KJ m-2 yr-1
Evaluating a pyramid of energy
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
 No inverted pyramids are
obtained
 Shows actual energy
transferred and allows
for rate of production
 Can compared different
ecosystems based on
relative energy flows
 It is difficult and complex
to collect energy data
(rate of biomass
production over time)
 Problem always exists inj
assigning a species to a
specific trophic level
Conclusion
 From the above content it was clear that the
ecological pyramid gives information about the
trophic structures and also provides a framework
for the study of ecosystem energetics along with
the study of number and biomass of the
organisms in the ecosystem.
 Along with the brief knowledge about the trophic
structures, it also allows us to observe the
changes in the ecosystem due to several factors.
References
 Ecology and Ecosystem, P D Sharma
 Environmental Sciences, Dr. Santilata Swain
 Fath, Brian & C. Killian, Megan. (2007). The
relevance of ecological pyramids in community
assemblages. Ecological Modelling - ECOL
MODEL. 208. 286-294.
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.06.001.
Ecological pyramids ppt

Ecological pyramids ppt

  • 2.
    Contents:  Ecological pyramids Types of ecological pyramids  Pyramid of numbers - Evaluating a pyramid of number  Pyramid of biomass - Evaluating a pyramid of biomass  Pyramid of energy - Evaluating a pyramid of energy  Conclusion  References
  • 3.
    What are EcologicalPyramids?  Ecological pyramids are graphical representations of the trophic structure of ecosystems.  Trophic levels are the feeling position in a food chain such as primary producers, herbivores, primary carnivores, etc.
  • 4.
    Types of ecologicalpyramid  Three types of ecological pyramids can usually be distinguished namely: 1. Pyramid of Numbers 2. Pyramid of Biomass 3. Pyramid of Energy
  • 5.
    Pyramid of Numbers Is the graphical representation of number individuals per unit area of various trophic levels  Large numbers of producers tend to form the base  Lower numbers of top carnivores occupy the top
  • 6.
    Pyramid of numbers The shape of the pyramid of numbers vary from ecosystem to ecosystem.  In aquatic ecosystems and grassland communities, autotrophs are present in large numbers per unit area.  A lesser number of herbivores, which in turn support fewer carnivores.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Evaluating the pyramidof numbers ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES  Simple easy method (number counting) of giving an overview  Good for comparing changes to the ecosystem at different times of year e.g. between seasons  Numbers of a specific species can be too great to measure accurately  Does not take into account ‘juvenile’ or immature forms  All organisms are included regardless of size, hence ‘inverted’ pyramids
  • 9.
    Pyramid of biomass Is the graphic representation of biomass present per unit area of different trophic levels, with producers at the base and top carnivores at the tip.  Biomass is calculated by the mass of each individual x number of individuals at each trophic level (gm-2 or gm-3)
  • 10.
    Inverted pyramid ofbiomass  In an aquatic habitat the pyramid of biomass is inverted or spindle-shaped where the biomass of trophic level depends upon the reproductive potential and longevity of the member.
  • 11.
    Evaluating a pyramidof biomass ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES  Overcomes the problems of pyramids of number  Only uses samples from population, so difficult to measure biomass exactly  Time of year that biomass is measured influences result e.g. trees in summer  Organisms of the same size do not necessarily have the same energy content  Inverted pyramids may result from producers with high turnover rate
  • 12.
    Pyramid of energy Is the graphic representation of the flow of energy through each trophic level of food chain over a fixed time period.  It is also known as “pyramid of productivity”  The input of solar energy may be indicated as an extra layer at the base.
  • 13.
    Pyramid of energy Only 10% of the energy is available to next trophic level (as per Lindemann’s ten percent rule)  The energy level of each trophic level has two arts i.e. Net Production (NP) and Respiration (R) and measured in KJ m-2 yr-1
  • 14.
    Evaluating a pyramidof energy ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES  No inverted pyramids are obtained  Shows actual energy transferred and allows for rate of production  Can compared different ecosystems based on relative energy flows  It is difficult and complex to collect energy data (rate of biomass production over time)  Problem always exists inj assigning a species to a specific trophic level
  • 15.
    Conclusion  From theabove content it was clear that the ecological pyramid gives information about the trophic structures and also provides a framework for the study of ecosystem energetics along with the study of number and biomass of the organisms in the ecosystem.  Along with the brief knowledge about the trophic structures, it also allows us to observe the changes in the ecosystem due to several factors.
  • 16.
    References  Ecology andEcosystem, P D Sharma  Environmental Sciences, Dr. Santilata Swain  Fath, Brian & C. Killian, Megan. (2007). The relevance of ecological pyramids in community assemblages. Ecological Modelling - ECOL MODEL. 208. 286-294. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.06.001.