Embed presentation
Download to read offline




















![How can we measure
societal impact? UK REF
Wilsdon et al., 2015
“[…] for the impact component
of the REF, it is not currently
feasible to use quantitative
indicators in place of narrative
impact case studies, or the
impact template”](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciondts-socialimpact-161112180948/85/Presentacion-SocietalImpact-Daniel-Torres-21-320.jpg)
![Altmetrics and the ‘broader’
impacts of science
Wilsdon et al., 2015
“[…] wider use of quantitative
indicators, and the emergence of
alternative metrics for societal
impact, could support the
transition to a more open,
accountable and outward-facing
research system”](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciondts-socialimpact-161112180948/85/Presentacion-SocietalImpact-Daniel-Torres-22-320.jpg)

![Case: societal impact
indicators at UGR
Multidimensional evaluation using biplot.
Research at the University of Granada
Source: Milanes-Guisado, Y. (2015). Multidimensional evaluation of research. Micro analysis
at the university of Granada during the period 2009-2013 [doctoral thesis]. Universidad de
Granada. Supervisors: Daniel Torres-Salinas, José Navarrete, Francisco Solis
Research questions:
• ¿What is the metric
profile of research
groups taking into
account bibliometric
and non-bibliometric
indicators?
Methodology:
• Time frame: 2009-2013
• Analysis unit:
161 research groups = 2216 res.
• Methods:
Correlations
biplot analysis](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciondts-socialimpact-161112180948/85/Presentacion-SocietalImpact-Daniel-Torres-24-320.jpg)


















![European Summer School | September 8, 2016
Especial thanks to Yusnelkis Milanés
for providing data from her PhD thesis
www.ingenio.upv.es
Source: Milanes-Guisado, Y. (2015). Multidimensional evaluation of research. Micro analysis
at the university of Granada during the period 2009-2013 [doctoral thesis]. Universidad de
Granada. Supervisors: Daniel Torres-Salinas, José Navarrete, Francisco Solis](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciondts-socialimpact-161112180948/85/Presentacion-SocietalImpact-Daniel-Torres-43-320.jpg)

The document discusses measuring societal impact of research. It defines societal impact as social, environmental, cultural or economic benefits from academic activities. Measuring societal impact is challenging due to attribution problems. The UK REF attempted to allocate funding based on non-academic impact using impact case studies. Altmetrics were discussed as a potential way to measure broader impacts, though they may be more related to scientific impact. A case study at the University of Granada used bibliometric and non-bibliometric indicators across nine dimensions, finding some research groups with clear societal impact orientation. Potential applications of altmetrics include analyzing social networks and identifying research communities. Both qualitative and quantitative assessments have limitations in measuring societal impact.




















![How can we measure
societal impact? UK REF
Wilsdon et al., 2015
“[…] for the impact component
of the REF, it is not currently
feasible to use quantitative
indicators in place of narrative
impact case studies, or the
impact template”](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciondts-socialimpact-161112180948/85/Presentacion-SocietalImpact-Daniel-Torres-21-320.jpg)
![Altmetrics and the ‘broader’
impacts of science
Wilsdon et al., 2015
“[…] wider use of quantitative
indicators, and the emergence of
alternative metrics for societal
impact, could support the
transition to a more open,
accountable and outward-facing
research system”](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciondts-socialimpact-161112180948/85/Presentacion-SocietalImpact-Daniel-Torres-22-320.jpg)

![Case: societal impact
indicators at UGR
Multidimensional evaluation using biplot.
Research at the University of Granada
Source: Milanes-Guisado, Y. (2015). Multidimensional evaluation of research. Micro analysis
at the university of Granada during the period 2009-2013 [doctoral thesis]. Universidad de
Granada. Supervisors: Daniel Torres-Salinas, José Navarrete, Francisco Solis
Research questions:
• ¿What is the metric
profile of research
groups taking into
account bibliometric
and non-bibliometric
indicators?
Methodology:
• Time frame: 2009-2013
• Analysis unit:
161 research groups = 2216 res.
• Methods:
Correlations
biplot analysis](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciondts-socialimpact-161112180948/85/Presentacion-SocietalImpact-Daniel-Torres-24-320.jpg)


















![European Summer School | September 8, 2016
Especial thanks to Yusnelkis Milanés
for providing data from her PhD thesis
www.ingenio.upv.es
Source: Milanes-Guisado, Y. (2015). Multidimensional evaluation of research. Micro analysis
at the university of Granada during the period 2009-2013 [doctoral thesis]. Universidad de
Granada. Supervisors: Daniel Torres-Salinas, José Navarrete, Francisco Solis](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciondts-socialimpact-161112180948/85/Presentacion-SocietalImpact-Daniel-Torres-43-320.jpg)