Ladies, check your wardrobe. Inspect your clothing tags. Chances are, you’ll find a spectrum of sizes across your clothes.
That could be because your body has changed over time, which is completely normal. But just as likely, it is because sizing isn’t consistent across fashion labels. A size M in one brand might fit completely differently from the size M in another label.
To understand how clothing sizes work in Singapore, we started by collecting size charts from eight brands, then spoke to fashion designers and product developers about how those numbers came to be.
To test how different sizes fit in practice, we asked five female colleagues to try on dresses and jeans from five brands. To hear directly from consumers, we surveyed 105 women about their frustrations and workarounds.
These insights reveal why shopping for clothes can feel so confusing – and how consumers might better navigate it.
You’ve probably seen sizes like US6, UK10 or EU38 – standardised systems developed in those regions. In Singapore, there is no regional standard, meaning each fashion brand has its own sizing system, which can also differ by product type.
Dresses and tops might use alpha sizes like S, M or L. Flexible bottoms, such as those with elastic waistbands, might also use alpha sizes, whereas structured pieces like jeans may use numerical systems like UK or US sizing.
Shopping is sometimes a very mentally draining experience as I have to try on a lot of clothes before I get the right fit.
Size information also varies. Some brands provide general body measurement sizing guides for all products, others list garment measurements for each item, and some offer both. Since general body measurements are easier to compare with our own, we collected body measurement charts from eight popular brands in Singapore – Uniqlo, H&M, Cotton On, Sandro, COS, Lululemon, Love & Bravery and Love, Bonito – which publish them online.
Most sizing guides often provide bust, waist and hip measurements, but bodies are more complex than a set of numbers, and that’s part of why finding a good fit can be tricky.

Let’s look at a hypothetical example inspired by our survey responses.
Meet Shannon. She wears different sizes across brands. Even within the same label, she owns clothes in more than one size.
Inside her wardrobe, she has clothes from Love, Bonito, H&M, Cotton On and Uniqlo. The sizes on the tags range from M to XXL. Why?
By translating each brand’s bust, waist and hip measurements into a common scale and averaging them, we can see where Shannon fits across brands. Her measurements land her in M at Cotton On and XL at Uniqlo.
And the mismatch is even clearer when broken down by bust, waist and hip. Using H&M’s size chart as an example, Shannon’s pear-shaped proportions mean her closest sizes are XS for bust, M for waist and XL for hips.
Take Cotton On as another example. Her measurements place her in XXS for bust and XL for hips. Overall, the mismatch between top and bottom sizing can make choosing sizes for one-piece outfits like dresses a challenge.
To make sizing differences easier to see – and feel...
We 3D-printed the size charts into mini mannequins.
This 3D model is a bit more bottom heavy than... At least I think it's a bit more bottom heavy. The hips are a bit wider and the thighs are a bit bigger. I think I have a pear-shaped body so I think this fits me the most.
I picked that one because it's rectangular. It's a rectangular-shaped body which is my type. Basically shapeless with narrow shoulders, not too broad.
Okay, I'll just stick with this one now although I'm not very sure. I think the shoulders are a bit more narrower. I feel this is quite small. I don't know if I should have picked the bigger one.
I feel this one by the side profile looks similar to me more. I was choosing between this and another one but they all had a bit more protruding chest which I think I don't have. So this one is mine.
The one that I chose I think I over compensated a bit for the mid-riff area like this is a bit bigger than the ones that you have picked out for me. I don't know if I look like this though but I'm surprised because these sizes look smaller than I envisioned myself to be but overall it makes sense because these are the sizes I wear if that makes sense.
The one that I chose is a smaller rectangle the one that you've picked for me is a larger rectangle as in broader rectangle.
The one that I picked I realised was smaller so now when I'm looking at the correct ones it seems right but I don't know when I was comparing the XXL and the XL earlier they look the same.
Okay I feel like this one I was considering also but like I said the thigh area was not representative like I don't think this is my lived experience you know what I mean like this is like if it's for pants I usually have issues with the thigh area because I have wide thighs so this one makes me feel like it's not very accurate.
What we found: Most of our five colleagues could identify mannequins that matched their body shapes. However, when selecting sizes, some chose dolls bigger than their actual size, while others picked smaller ones.
Sizing confusion isn’t just about inconsistent labels across brands – it also starts with how we view our own bodies. And because every woman’s body is different, in ways not always captured by size charts, figuring out where you fit within a label’s sizing system can become complicated.
Where you might fall on the brands’ size charts – and why the sizes you wear don’t tell the whole story.
Enter your bust, waist and hip measurements (in cm) to discover where you land on the various brands’ body measurement size guides.
Note: Bust, waist and hip measurements do not capture full body proportions, so this model is a general guide, not an exact representation. Fit predictions are based only on body measurements and do not account for garment sizing and other factors that affect fit. See the methodology at the end of this page for details.
So if your usual size doesn’t always fit – it’s not you.
Each brand creates its own charts based on different body shapes, target markets, or design intentions.
Brands make sizing decisions based on who they believe their customers are. According to local brand Love, Bonito’s lead product developer Diana Taufik Sim, women in Singapore typically have a pear-shaped body – meaning wider hips and a smaller bust.
Like Shannon, more than half of the women we surveyed said they wore at least three different sizes across multiple brands.
Most brands start with a “fit model”– a person who is used by a designer or manufacturer to check the fit, drape and look of an item – whose measurements reflect those of their target customer. They then grade the pattern up or down to create other sizes. While bigger brands can afford to test on different fit models, smaller brands may be limited by resources to test on just one.
The simplest approach is linear grading, says Ms Sim, where each size increases by the same fixed amount – for example, adding 5cm per size. Love, Bonito, however, chooses to apply a non-linear approach, adjusting the jumps between sizes based on a garment’s design, stretchability and how it fits on different body types.
Designing larger sizes isn’t just about increasing length, width or volume, says Ms Sim. Each size increment is carefully calculated to ensure the garment fits properly as well as provides the necessary support and maintains its shape. For example, strap-length increments are reduced for larger bust sizes so that the straps provide the wearer with comfort, support and structural stability.
Fit-testing on bodies of different shapes is also crucial to ensure garments drape well and feel comfortable, says Ms Eunyce Yap, founder of local brand Love & Bravery. “No two women are built the same, even if they wear the same size,” she adds.
Women’s bodies are diverse, and across brands, the same size label may apply to very different proportions.
Industry challenges and limited resources are also practical concerns for apparel businesses. It is costly to test on many fit models, and smaller brands with less bargaining power may be subject to the whims of their manufacturers’ predetermined sizing systems.
For Love & Bravery, sizing charts start with the brand’s own fit models and base measurements, which it then collaboratively adjusts with factories, mostly in China, to fine-tune grading across sizes. “Because body proportions in China and Singapore differ, we customise our charts to better reflect the Singaporean woman’s fit,” says Ms Yap.
Size charts can help shoppers gauge how a garment might fit before they try it on, reducing guesswork and potential returns. But not every brand presents them the same way.
Some provide general guidelines that apply across all products, others list specific measurements for each garment, and some offer both.
There are pros and cons to the approaches, says Ms Rebekah Ong, head of product at home-grown womenswear brand Good Addition. Having an individualised size chart for every product helps each design reach its full potential, but it can become confusing for consumers browsing online.
On the other hand, a generic size chart helps with consistency and is more user-friendly from an e-commerce perspective – but it can backfire on more unique body silhouettes. “You’re limiting yourself to a specific type of consumer who is that size – whom you might lose if her body type changes,” says Ms Ong.
Additionally, some charts give a range for each size, whereas others provide exact measurements.
Even with a size chart in hand, numbers do not capture how a garment drapes, stretches, or moves on your body – and those details are hard to gauge from a screen.
Pants for women who are not standard-sized are simply uncomfortable. Life is too short to wear ill-fitting, uncomfortable clothes.
To see how the sizing approaches play out in real life, we asked our colleagues to try on two items of clothing – a dress and a pair of jeans – from five brands: Uniqlo, H&M, Good Addition, Love, Bonito and Love & Bravery.
For the selected designs, we asked them to check the product pages to choose the size they thought would fit them best.
So the top is pretty loose. It's not just the bust area, I think it's the entire neckline. Since knowing that I can tie this, I would probably go for an S size to see if it fits better. But yeah, I think this is fine. I would wear this.
This was a size S, and I was actually quite concerned that the hips wouldn't fit very well because I'm not a size S hip size. But I feel like because it's so stretchy, and maybe after a few washes, it will be a bit looser. Like I'm okay with this. And the cutting itself is quite forgiving. Like if it was tighter, like a bodycon, it might feel too constricting.
If it fits, I think I wouldn't size up or down because then it would compromise something. The chest is fine. Maybe the armholes here. I think when I try to stretch like this, it kind of presses in this way because again, I have broader shoulders. I would personally go for something where it's a bit more cinched in the waist so that the silhouette is a bit nicer. I did like the pleats designs here because then again, it gives this layer at the bottom which is flattering for my body shape.
I had to button up my cardigan because it's a bit too low. So I realised with the two dresses, the hemline was a bit too wide for me. And I've experienced that in my own shopping as well. And I can't really foresee that. So I guess hemline measurements could help but then I would have to measure my own hemline as well, which is extra work.
This is the Uniqlo J.W. Anderson jeans in size 30. The gaping from the waist is very big here. So if I go any bigger to make this more comfortable maybe, then the waist is probably going to be a lot bigger there. But if I went smaller, then I probably won't be able to pull it up.
I don't usually wear jeans because I don't know if I can pull them off. And sometimes I can't get them in the right size. I think this is fine, but for cutting-wise, I usually try to get something that tapers down.
All the jeans sizes fit me. In general, I like loose fit and also high waist, which means a longer crotch length for comfort and a certain amount of roomy feel.
The way I can tell if I would like a jeans is if I would wear it on a plane. So this is something I would wear up the plane because it's so comfortable and baggy. Though I think I might have made the wrong choice sizing up because it is quite loose. But then again, I think I chose to size up to account for the fluctuations of my weight across the month. So I think if you give me two more weeks, I'll say it fits well. So I think I can live with that, it's fine.
We also surveyed women about the challenges they face when shopping for tops and pants.
For tops, the most common challenge is that they are often tight at the bust. Other pain points include tightness around the shoulders, sleeves that are too snug, hemlines that are too short and necklines that feel constricting.
The most common issue for pants is that pant legs are often too long. Another frequent problem is the fit around the hips and waist – often, if one part fits well, the other does not.
What we learnt: Sizing isn’t just a question of whether something fits or not.
Even when a garment technically fits, factors like fabric stretch, cut, armhole depth, shoulder width, or rise in pants can determine whether it feels comfortable or restrictive.
Personal preferences and factors like modesty, comfort and style also influence what feels wearable.
It’s hard for us with hijab to find modest clothing that is not too tight and not too short but still looks pretty.
This is where product design comes in. Adding details such as elastic panels or adjustable features can help those who don’t fit the “standard” body shape wear the clothes comfortably, says Love, Bonito’s Ms Sim.
Other strategies employed by brands include designing clothes with more forgiving silhouettes. At Good Addition, roomy fits are the blueprint for its target audience of “young, stylish mums”, says Ms Ong. “We target women who are quite active and who want to move in their clothing – to be comfortable without revealing themselves in unnecessary ways; people who don’t have the perfect body but still want to look good.”
Design-wise, that translates to extra buttons at the bust, more room at the waistline and hemline, and styles that cover a woman’s natural belly or postpartum body. Good Addition also adds extra seam allowance so customers can alter their clothes if needed.
Fit and fabric go hand in hand with sizing, says Love & Bravery’s Ms Yap. Stiffer materials give structure, while stretchy or drapey fabrics allow more room for movement. “A sleek, tailored piece will naturally feel more fitted, while a flowy dress is meant to be looser – even though both follow our size chart,” she adds.
Know your measurements, but be flexible with them.
Having your bust, waist and hip measurements on hand is useful when shopping online, but remember that bodies naturally change – even from week to week due to factors like one’s menstrual cycle.
Measurements are a guide, not a guarantee.
Just because your numbers match a size chart doesn’t mean the garment will fit exactly as you like. Fabric type, cut and construction all affect the final fit.
Check the brand’s product details before you buy.
Look at the fabric composition, the intended fit (slim, relaxed or oversized) and customer reviews. For example, if a silhouette is more fitted, you may prefer to size up; if it is looser or made of stretch fabric, you may want to size down. Product videos, when available, can help you see how a garment moves.
There have been more size-inclusive brands, but … more diversity in models can help customers better imagine what fit looks good on someone with more curves.
Try it on in-store.
If a brand has retail locations, visit the store and try the piece on to see how it fits. Even when items are online-only, testing sizes in-store can give you a gauge for future purchases from the same brand.
Consider altering your clothes.
Investing in a simple alteration can make an item that is slightly ill-fitting, perfect – especially if – it has extra seam allowance.
Don’t let the size you wear define you.
Clothing sizes are tools, not judgments. Garment sizing is just a number, says Ms Sim. When you age, your body and bone structure change. “You choose the garment; it’s not the garment choosing you. You can wear whatever size you want, as long as you feel confident in it,” says Ms Sim.
Clothes are supposed to fit you, instead of you fitting the clothes.
WATCH MORE
See our five colleagues’ full reactions and fit experiences in this feature video.