Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1501.07637

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory

arXiv:1501.07637 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Jan 2015 (v1), last revised 4 Jul 2018 (this version, v2)]

Title:Simple Mechanisms for a Subadditive Buyer and Applications to Revenue Monotonicity

Authors:Aviad Rubinstein, S. Matthew Weinberg
View a PDF of the paper titled Simple Mechanisms for a Subadditive Buyer and Applications to Revenue Monotonicity, by Aviad Rubinstein and S. Matthew Weinberg
View PDF
Abstract:We study the revenue maximization problem of a seller with n heterogeneous items for sale to a single buyer whose valuation function for sets of items is unknown and drawn from some distribution D. We show that if D is a distribution over subadditive valuations with independent items, then the better of pricing each item separately or pricing only the grand bundle achieves a constant-factor approximation to the revenue of the optimal mechanism. This includes buyers who are k-demand, additive up to a matroid constraint, or additive up to constraints of any downwards-closed set system (and whose values for the individual items are sampled independently), as well as buyers who are fractionally subadditive with item multipliers drawn independently. Our proof makes use of the core-tail decomposition framework developed in prior work showing similar results for the significantly simpler class of additive buyers [LY13, BILW14].
In the second part of the paper, we develop a connection between approximately optimal simple mechanisms and approximate revenue monotonicity with respect to buyers' valuations. Revenue non-monotonicity is the phenomenon that sometimes strictly increasing buyers' values for every set can strictly decrease the revenue of the optimal mechanism [HR12]. Using our main result, we derive a bound on how bad this degradation can be (and dub such a bound a proof of approximate revenue monotonicity); we further show that better bounds on approximate monotonicity imply a better analysis of our simple mechanisms.
Comments: Updated title and body to version included in TEAC. Adapted Theorem 5.2 to accommodate η-BIC auctions (versus exactly BIC)
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
Cite as: arXiv:1501.07637 [cs.GT]
  (or arXiv:1501.07637v2 [cs.GT] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1501.07637
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Matt Weinberg [view email]
[v1] Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:12:55 UTC (29 KB)
[v2] Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:51:51 UTC (58 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Simple Mechanisms for a Subadditive Buyer and Applications to Revenue Monotonicity, by Aviad Rubinstein and S. Matthew Weinberg
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.GT
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2015-01
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Aviad Rubinstein
S. Matthew Weinberg
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack