dbo:abstract
|
- Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U.S. 172 (1899), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that the use of a struck jury did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 3977 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-10-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Brown v. New Jersey, (en)
|
dbp:concurrence
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-11-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:findlaw
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- James K. Brown, Plff. in Err. v. State of New Jersey (en)
|
dbp:holding
|
- The state has full control over court procedure consistent with constitutional guarantees. A New Jersey law limiting the number of peremptory challenges to five in cases of a struck jury did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Fuller, Gray, Brown, Shiras, White, Peckham, McKenna (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
| |
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:openjurist
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
|
- Error to the Court of Oyer and Terminer of Hudson County, New Jersey (en)
|
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U.S. 172 (1899), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that the use of a struck jury did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- James K. Brown, Plff. in Err. v. State of New Jersey (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |