Buchler v Talbot [2004] UKHL 9 is a UK insolvency law case, concerning the priority of claims in a liquidation. Under English law at the time the expenses of liquidation took priority over the preferred creditors, and the preferred creditors took priority over the claims of the holder of a floating charge. However, a crystallised floating charge theoretically took priority over the liquidation expenses. Accordingly the courts had to try and reconcile the apparent triangular conflict between priorities.
Property | Value |
---|---|
dbo:abstract |
|
dbo:thumbnail | |
dbo:wikiPageID |
|
dbo:wikiPageLength |
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
|
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
|
dbp:citations |
|
dbp:court | |
dbp:dateDecided |
|
dbp:fullName |
|
dbp:judges |
|
dbp:keywords |
|
dbp:name |
|
dbp:opinions |
|
dbp:priorActions |
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
dcterms:subject | |
gold:hypernym | |
rdf:type | |
rdfs:comment |
|
rdfs:label |
|
owl:sameAs | |
prov:wasDerivedFrom | |
foaf:depiction | |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |