Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. International Journal of Automation and Computing
  3. Article

Inferring functional connectivity in fMRI using minimum partial correlation

  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 June 2017
  • Volume 14, pages 371–385, (2017)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
International Journal of Automation and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Inferring functional connectivity in fMRI using minimum partial correlation
Download PDF
  • Lei Nie  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1115-50271,
  • Xian Yang1,
  • Paul M. Matthews2,
  • Zhi-Wei Xu3 &
  • …
  • Yi-Ke Guo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-21611,4 
  • 1471 Accesses

  • 9 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Functional connectivity has emerged as a promising approach to study the functional organisation of the brain and to define features for prediction of brain state. The most widely used method for inferring functional connectivity is Pearson-s correlation, but it cannot differentiate direct and indirect effects. This disadvantage is often avoided by computing the partial correlation between two regions controlling all other regions, but this method suffers from Berkson-s paradox. Some advanced methods, such as regularised inverse covariance, have been applied. However, these methods usually depend on some parameters. Here we propose use of minimum partial correlation as a parameter-free measure for the skeleton of functional connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The minimum partial correlation between two regions is the minimum of absolute values of partial correlations by controlling all possible subsets of other regions. Theoretically, there is a direct effect between two regions if and only if their minimum partial correlation is non-zero under faithfulness and Gaussian assumptions. The elastic PC-algorithm is designed to efficiently approximate minimum partial correlation within a computational time budget. The simulation study shows that the proposed method outperforms others in most cases and its application is illustrated using a resting-state fMRI dataset from the human connectome project.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Using the Partial Directed Coherence to Understand Brain Functional Connectivity During Movement Imagery Tasks

Chapter © 2018

Functional Brain Imaging and OCD

Chapter © 2021

Modeling brain connectivity dynamics in functional magnetic resonance imaging via particle filtering

Article Open access 29 September 2021

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Brain Mapping
  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • Functional clustering
  • Non-parametric Inference
  • Parametric Inference
  • Quantum Correlation and Entanglement
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. K. J. Friston. Functional and effective connectivity: A review. Brain Connectivity, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–36, 2011.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. R. L. Buckner, F. M. Krienen, B. T. T. Yeo. Opportunities and limitations of intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Nature Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 832–837, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. C. Craddock, S. Jbabdi, C. G. Yan, J. T. Vogelstein, F. X. Castellanos, A. D. Martino, C. Kelly, K. Heberlein, S. Colcombe, M. P. Milham. Imaging human connectomes at the macroscale. Nature Methods, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 524–539, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. J. Hawellek, J. F. Hipp, C. M. Lewis, M. Corbetta, A. K. Engel. Increased functional connectivity indicates the severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 47, pp. 19066–19071, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. W. R. Shirer, S. Ryali, E. Rykhlevskaia, V. Menon, M. D. Greicius. Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cerebral Cortex, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 158–165, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. M. Smith, K. L. Miller, G. Salimi-Khorshidi, M. Webster, C. F. Beckmann, T. E. Nichols, J. D. Ramsey, M.W. Woolrich. Network modelling methods for fMRI. NeuroImage, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 875–891, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. K. J. Friston, L. Harrison, W. Penny. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1273–1302, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. M. Hermundstad, D. S. Bassett, K. S. Brown, E. M. Aminoff, D. Clewett, S. Freeman, A. Frithsen, A. Johnson, C. M. Tipper, M. B. Miller, S. T. Grafton, J. M. Carlson. Structural foundations of resting-state and task-based functional connectivity in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 15, pp. 6169–6174, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. B. Turk-Browne. Functional interactions as big data in the human brain. Science, vol. 342, no. 6158, pp. 580–584, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Marrelec, A. Krainik, H. Duffau, M. Pélégrini-Issac, S. Lehéricy, J. Doyon, H. Benali. Partial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI. NeuroImage, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 228–237, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Lee, D. S. Lee, H. Kang, B. N. Kim, M. K. Chung. Sparse brain network recovery under compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1154–1165, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Ryali, T. W. Chen, K. Supekar, V. Menon. Estimation of functional connectivity in fMRI data using stability selection-based sparse partial correlation with elastic net penalty. NeuroImage, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 3852–3861, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. M. Smith, D. Vidaurre, C. F. Beckmann, M. F. Glasser, M. Jenkinson, K. L. Miller, T. E. Nichols, E. C. Robinson, G. Salimi-Khorshidi, M. W. Woolrich, D. M. Barch, K. Uğurbil, D. C. Van Essen. Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 666–682, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. M. Smith, T. E. Nichols, D. Vidaurre, A. M. Winkler, T. E. J. Behrens, M. F. Glasser, K. Ugurbil, D. M. Barch, D. C. Van Essen, K. L. Miller. A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior. Nature Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1565–1567, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Berkson. Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data. Biometrics Bulletin, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 47–53, 1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 432–441, 2008.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, J. B. Poline, B. Thirion. Brain covariance selection: Better individual functional connectivity models using population prior. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 2334–2342, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Hinne, L. Ambrogioni, R. J. Janssen, T. Heskes, M. A. J. van Gerven. Structurally-informed Bayesian functional connectivity analysis. NeuroImage, vol. 86, pp. 294–305, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K. P. Murphy. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective, Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, 2012.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Huang, J. Li, L. Sun, J. P. Ye, A. Fleisher, T. Wu, K. W. Chen, E. Reiman. Learning brain connectivity of Alzheimers disease by sparse inverse covariance estimation. NeuroImage, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 935–949, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. G. G’Sell, J. Taylor, R. Tibshirani. Adaptive testing for the graphical lasso, [Online], Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.4765, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Lockhart, J. Taylor, R. J. Tibshirani, R. Tibshirani. A significance test for the lasso. The Annals of Statistics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 413–468, 2014.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Spirtes, C. Glymour, R. Scheines. Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd ed., Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. S. M. Smith, C. F. Beckmann, J. Andersson, E. J. Auerbach, J. Bijsterbosch, G. Douaud, E. Duff, D. A. Feinberg, L. Griffanti, M. P. Harms, M. Kelly, T. Laumann, K. L. Miller, S. Moeller, S. Petersen, J. Power, G. Salimi-Khorshidi, A. Z. Snyder, A. T. Vu, M. W. Woolrich, J. Q. Xu, E. Yacoub, K. Ugŭrbil, D. C. Van Essen, M. F. Glasser. Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage, vol. 80, pp. 144–168, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Nie, X. Yang, P. M. Matthews, Z. X. Xu, Y. K. Guo. Minimum partial correlation: An accurate and parameterfree measure of functional connectivity in fMRI. In Proceedings of International Conference on Brain Informatics and Health, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 125–134, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Pearl. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. J. A. Mumford, J. D. Ramsey. Bayesian networks for fMRI: A primer. NeuroImage, vol. 86, pp. 573–582, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Bielza, P. Larra˜naga. Bayesian networks in neuroscience: A survey. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol.8, Article number 131, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. L. Lauritzen. Graphical Models, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. R. A. Fisher. The distribution of the partial correlation coefficient. Metron, vol. 3, pp. 329–332, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Cheng, R. Greinera, J. Kelly, D. Bell, W. R. Lius. Learning Bayesian networks from data: An information-theory based approach. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 137, no. 1–2, pp. 43–90, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. I. Tsamardinos, L. E. Brown, C. F. Aliferis. The maxmin hill-climbing Bayesian network structure learning algorithm. Machine Learning, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 31–78, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Z. X. Wang, L. W. Chan. Learning Bayesian networks from Markov random fields: An efficient algorithm for linear models. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), vol. 6, no. 3, Article number 10, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. P. Iyer, I. Shafran, D. Grayson, K. Gates, J. T. Nigg, D. A. Fair. Inferring functional connectivity in MRI using Bayesian network structure learning with a modified PCalgorithm. NeuroImage, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 165–175, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. R. Han, L. Nie, M. M. Ghanem, Y. K. Guo. Elastic algorithms for guaranteeing quality monotonicity in big data mining. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Big Data, IEEE, Silicon Valley, USA, pp. 45–50, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  36. D. Colombo, M. H. Maathuis. Order-independent constraint-based causal structure learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3741–3782, 2014.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. S. Feizi, D. Marbach, M. Médard, M. Kellis. Network deconvolution as a general method to distinguish direct dependencies in networks. Nature Biotechnology, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 726–733, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. B. Barzel, A. L. Barabási. Network link prediction by global silencing of indirect correlations. Nature Biotechnology, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 720–725, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. M. Jenkinson, C. F. Beckmann, T. E. J. Behrens, M. W. Woolrich, S. M. Smith. FSL. NeuroImage, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 782–790, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. A. M. Dale, B. Fischl, M. I. Sereno. Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 179–194, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. D. S. Marcus, M. P. Harms, A. Z. Snyder, M. Jenkinson, J. A.Wilson, M. F. Glasser, D.M. Barch, K. A. Archie, G. C. Burgess. Human connectome project informatics: Quality control, database services, and data visualization. NeuroImage, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 202–219, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. L. Griffanti, G. Salimi-Khorshidi, C. F. Beckmann, E. J. Auerbach, G. Douaud, C. E. Sexton, E. Zsoldos, K. P. Ebmeier, N. Filippin, C. E. Mackay, S. Moeller, J. Q. Xu, E. Yacoub, G. Baselli, K. Ugurbil, K. L. Miller, S. M. Smith. ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging. NeuroImage, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 232–247, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. G. Salimi-Khorshidi, G. Douaud, C. F. Beckmann, M. F. Glasser, L. Griffanti, S. M. Smith. Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. NeuroImage, vol. 90, pp. 449–468, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. M. F. Glasser, S. N. Sotiropoulos, J. A. Wilson, T. S. Coalson, B. Fischl, J. L. Andersson, J. Q. Xu, S. Jbabd. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the human connectome project. NeuroImage, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 105–124, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. N. Tzourio-Mazoyer, B. Landeau, D. Papathanassiou, F. Crivello, O. Etard, N. Delcroix, B. Mazoyer, M. Joliot. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 273–289, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. M. L. Stanley, M. N. Moussa, B. M. Paolini, R. G. Lyday, J. H. Burdette, P. J. Laurienti. Defining nodes in complex brain networks. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 7, Article number 169, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  47. S. B. Eickhoff, B. Thirion, G. Varoquaux, D. Bzdok. Connectivity-based parcellation: Critique and implications. Human Brain Mapping, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 4771–4792, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. S. M. Smith. The future of fMRI connectivity. NeuroImage, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 1257–1266, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. C. Y.Wee, P. T. Yap, D. Q. Zhang, L. H.Wang, D. G. Shen. Group-constrained sparse fMRI connectivity modeling for mild cognitive impairment identification. Brain Structure and Function, vol. 219, no. 2, pp. 641–656, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. M. R. Xia, J. H. Wang, Y. He. BrainNet Viewer: A network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 7, Article number e68910, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Z. N. Fu. A Study of Dynamic Functional Brain Connectivity Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Method and Applications, Ph. D. dissertation, The University of Hong Kong, China, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. E. S. Finn, X. L. Shen, D. Scheinost, M. D. Rosenberg, J. Huang, M. M. Chun, X. Papademetris, R. T. Constable. Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nature Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1664–1671, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. L.Y. Chen, J. Yang, G. G. Xu, Y. Q. Liu, J. T. Li, C. S.Xu. Biomarker identification of rat liver regeneration via adaptive logistic regression. International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 191–198, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Data were provided by the human connectome project, WU-Minn Consortium (Principal Investigators: David Van Essen and Kamil Ugurbil, 1U54MH091657) funded by the 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that support the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research, and by the McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University. Paul M. Matthews gratefully acknowledges support from the Imperial College NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and personal support from the Edmond Safra Foundation and Lily Safra.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

    Lei Nie, Xian Yang & Yi-Ke Guo

  2. Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

    Paul M. Matthews

  3. Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China

    Zhi-Wei Xu

  4. School of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China

    Yi-Ke Guo

Authors
  1. Lei Nie
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xian Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul M. Matthews
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhi-Wei Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yi-Ke Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-Ke Guo.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Hong Qiao

Lei Nie received the B. Sc. degree in information and computing science from Sichuan University, China in 2009, and received the Ph.D. degree in computer science and technology from University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China in 2015. He was a visiting Ph.D. student in the Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK from 2012 to 2014. He is currently a research associate in the Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK.

His research interests include neuroimaging and machine learning.

Xian Yang received the B. Eng. degree in electronic information engineering from Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China in 2008, received the M. Sc. degree in digital communication from University of Bath, UK in 2009, and received the Ph. D. degree in computing from Imperial College London, UK in 2016. She is currently a research associate in the Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK.

Her research interests include bioinformatics, system biology, neuroimaging, data mining and health informatics.

Paul M. Matthews received the B.A. degree in chemistry from University of Oxford, UK in 1978, the D.Phil degree in biochemistry from University of Oxford, UK in 1982, and the M.D. degree from Stanford University School of Medicine, USA in 1987. He is the Edmond and Lily Safra Chair and head of the Division of Brain Sciences at Imperial College London, UK. Amongst other external activities, he is chair of the Imaging Enhancement Working Group and a member of the steering group for UK Biobank (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/), which has initiated a programme to image the brain, heart, carotids, bones and body of 100 000 people to understand disease risk in later life. He was the founding director of the Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB) (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/) and of the GSK Clinical Imaging Centre at the Hammersmith Hospital, for which he was a lead in spinning out Imanova Ltd., which is run as a public-private partnership between Imperial College, UCL, Kings College and the Medical Research Council (http://www.imanova.co.uk/).

His research interests include innovative translational applications of clinical imaging for the neurosciences. His broad area of research interest has been in molecular and functional neuroimaging and in neurological therapeutics development. A particular focus of his work has involved close collaboration with colleagues in computing and engineering to encourage effective translation of advanced imaging data to information.

Zhi-Wei Xu received the B. Sc. degree from University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, in 1982, received the M. Sc. degree from Purdue University, USA in 1984, and received the Ph.D. degree from the University of Southern California, USA in 1987. He is a professor and CTO of the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). His prior industrial experience included chief engineer of Dawning Corporation (now Sugon as listed in Shanghai Stock Exchange), a leading high-performance computer vendor in China. He currently leads “Cloud-Sea Computing Systems”, a strategic priority research project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences that aims at developing billion-thread computers with elastic processors.

His research interests include high-performance computer architecture and network computing science.

Yi-Ke Guo received the B. Sc. degree, the M. Sc. degree in computer science and technology from Tsinghua University, China in 1985, and the Ph.D. degree in computational logic from Imperial College London, UK in 1993. He is the founding director of the Data Science Institute, Imperial College London, UK. He is also a professor in the Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK. During last 15 years, he has been leading a data science group to carry out many research projects, including discovery net on grid based data analysis for scientific discovery, MESSAGE on wireless mobile sensor network for environment monitoring, BAIR on system biology for diabetes study, iHealth on modern informatics infrastructure for healthcare decision making, UBIOPRED on large informatics platform for translational medicine research, digital city exchange on sensor information-based urban dynamics modelling, IC Cloud system for large scale collaborative scientific research. He is now the principal investigator of the eTRIKS project, a 23M Euro project in building a cloud-based translational informatics platform for global medical research.

His research interests include data mining, machine learning and bioinformatics

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nie, L., Yang, X., Matthews, P.M. et al. Inferring functional connectivity in fMRI using minimum partial correlation. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 14, 371–385 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-017-1084-9

Download citation

  • Received: 20 August 2016

  • Accepted: 21 February 2017

  • Published: 13 June 2017

  • Issue date: August 2017

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-017-1084-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Functional connectivity
  • functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
  • network modelling
  • partial correlation
  • PC-algorithm
  • resting-state networks

Profiles

  1. Xian Yang View author profile
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature