Abstract
Background
With the accumulation of phylogenomic data and the growing demand for bioinformatics analyses, it has become increasingly important and complex to construct evolutionary relationships for different research purposes. Therefore, the ability to support multiple scenarios has become an essential need for phylogenetic visualization.
Results
In this study, we present PhyloScape, a web-based application for interactive visualization of phylogenetic trees that can be used stand-alone or as a toolkit deployed on the users’ website. The platform supports customizable multiple visualization features and is equipped with a flexible metadata annotation system, providing researchers with publishable, interactive views of trees. PhyloScape extensions include views of amino acid identity, geometry, and protein structure, which are applicable to various areas such as microbial taxonomy, pathogen phylogeny, and plant conservation. Trees published on the website can be efficiently shared and integrated into the users’ own system via a unique address.
Conclusions
As a scalable platform, PhyloScape provides a variety of online plug-ins that users can easily combine for specific scenarios. PhyloScape is freely available at http://darwintree.cn/PhyloScape.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
Phylogenetic analyses are commonly used to infer the relationships among genes, proteins, species, or organisms [1,2,3,4,5,6]. These analyses have proven efficient in predicting gene function [7], identifying protein–protein interactions [8, 9], discovering natural products [10], classifying cell types [11], exploring evolutionary processes [12] and establishing taxonomy [13]. More recently, phylogenetics has also played a crucial role during the COVID-19 epidemic [14,15,16], with the aim of identifying the origin of virus outbreaks, tracking the virus evolution, and comprehending the mechanism of the pathogenic virus.
As the complexity of data increases, effectively visualizing data, especially within specific scenarios, has become critical for phylogenetic analysis. One of the core challenges is the joint display of phylogenetic trees and complementary charts. While some traditional tools can offer scenario extensions, further development is still needed. Therefore, an online platform is needed to integrate these visualizations through intuitive interfaces and straightforward parameter controls.
In light of this, we present PhyloScape, a web-based application for scalable visualizing, editing, and annotating phylogenetic trees (Fig. 1). PhyloScape features composable plug-ins that allow users to freely combine and customize visualization components on the page. In addition to common tree settings, layouts, and styles, PhyloScape is designed to be user-friendly and publication-ready, tailored with metadata annotations for specific scenarios. Notably, we have developed a plug-in ecosystem that serves as a versatile toolkit for users. This ecosystem enables users to conveniently select and combine plug-ins to meet the demands of different scenarios via PhyloScape.
Additionally, we introduce the design and architecture of PhyloScape, along with the optimizations made to improve the user experience. We present the user interface and use cases of PhyloScape, illustrating how it supports a wide range of applications in phylogenetic analysis. We then discuss the advantages and limitations of PhyloScape and provide a comparison with other visualization software. All the use cases were implemented on the PhyloScape web platform, allowing users to access and interact with the data directly.
Implementation
Architecture
The PhyloScape web application enables users to perform real-time tree editing, achieve interactivity between different charts, and leverage composable plug-ins for customizable visualizations. The major part of the platform is the PhyloScape JavaScript library. The PhyloScape JavaScript library was created using the d3.js v7 framework, which is both lightweight and fast. This makes it easy to integrate PhyloScape into other web-based applications. PhyloScape uses built-in callback functions as configurable features that developers can reuse. One such function, named “formatter”, can be configured for tree nodes. This function accepts two inputs: a d3.js instance used to modify the display of the node, and a JSON formatted configuration containing specific information, such as branch length, node name, and bootstrap value. The function is invoked to draw each node and can be customized to meet developers' needs.
Annotation system
With the increase in the number of tree features, editing the annotation files becomes a challenge. The PhyloScape application enables users to display and manage tree annotations effectively. Users can start by inputting files in csv or txt format, with the first column of the file defined as leaf names, and other columns corresponding to other features. For trees, features in the input files include node signs, leaf settings, metadata signs and tooltips (Fig. 2). In PhyloScape, we design two modes: simple and detailed. The setting of metadata and node signs is initially automatically assigned a default value, and users can specify those features according to their needs by re-editing the control panel or using table settings. For detailed annotation, common settings include the font, position, and color. Each symbol has corresponding settings for the width, height, and value.
Tree annotation. A phylogenetic tree of artificial data with multiple annotation types. The table displays the input formats of the tree annotations, either in simple or detailed mode. a Annotation of tree leaf types illustrates visualization using different node symbols. With the simple mode, only the first column of the input table is used as group information. b Leaf settings allow modification of font size and color for various annotations, and the background color is set when the Leaf Mask annotation is on. c Hovering over the leaf names displays a tooltip. d Annotation of metadata information via diverse labels and symbols. Each parameter included in the code can be set by the table and the table is set by the long annotation format
Different scenarios correspond to different inputs. The input for plug-ins has been redesigned for integration with the annotation system. As the features in plug-ins correspond with the tree features, the leaf name is placed in the first column of both the data and the tree input for an interactive view with the trees. In cases where features exist in both trees and plug-ins, priority is given to the tree features.
Tree visualization optimization
There are several challenges to visualizing trees, especially for trees with extreme branch length variation. PhyloScape addresses these problems through built-in functions, including a reshaping method to enhance branch visibility. Specifically, we design a multi-classification-based branch length reshaping method, which resolves branch length heterogeneity by grouping branches into multiple classes using adaptive length intervals and injective functions. Each class maps original branch lengths to normalized scales, improving the interpretability of evolutionary relationships in trees with heterogeneous branch lengths.
Dependencies
PhyloScape is written primarily in JavaScript and Python. The PhyloScape library was developed with d3.js. For large tree visualization, PhyloScape adjusts and implements Phylocanvas.gl [17], a WebGL-based library capable of efficiently rendering hundreds of thousands of nodes. For the dynamic integration of plug-ins, Vue is used for the front-end display, whereas an iframe is employed to enable the integration. Specific extensions for PhyloScape, include a heatmap plugin for demonstrating pairwise correlations and ACMap, which is designed for antigenic cartography on the basis on Racmacs [18]. For 3D protein structure visualization, the pdbe-molstar library [19] was employed. For map visualization, OpenLayers is used in conjunction with the Tile Python package for tile rendering. Additionally, Echarts (https://echarts.apache.org/zh/index.html) is utilized for other statistical charts.
General workflow
The general workflow of the PhyloScape web application can be divided as follows: panel selection, tree upload, tree styles editing, plug-in selection, plug-in file upload, plug-in styles, visualization editing, and tree sharing (Fig. 3).
Data input and output
The PhyloScape web interface imports common tree formats, including Newick [20], NEXUS [21], PhyloXML [22], and NeXML [23], and also supports a PhyloScape JSON format. The visualization of the tree part can be exported in PNG or SVG formats, and specific subtrees can be selected and exported. Users can edit input tree and annotation data on the webpage and make adjust to the values without reuploading the files.
Shared results
The PhyloScape application supports sharing results. We also provide a gallery page where users can communicate and share their results with other users. On this page, basic information and styles of the trees can be shared, and users can copy, edit, download, and reuse the styles. A unique web address is given for sharing and reuse on the user’s own webpage.
Results
User interface
The PhyloScape web application interface can be divided into four main parts (Fig. 4): the layout panel, the tree control panel, the plug-in control panel, and the drawing panel. The layout panel is designed to divide the main drawing panel into different layouts. The tree control panel is used to upload tree files and edit settings such as branch patterns, leaf patterns, tree layouts, and metadata annotations. The plug-in control panel allows users to define and select different plug-ins from the PhyloScape plug-in ecosystem, and we currently provide three different themes of plug-ins: geographic maps, statistical diagrams and protein structures. Finally, the drawing panel jointly displays the tree and the selected plug-ins.
Overview of the PhyloScape web application. a Panel selection for different layouts. b Control panels for tree settings, including the common tree and large tree views. c Plug-in control panels allow the editing of the selected plug-in. d A partial phylogenetic tree of the West Nile virus transmission shown on the drawing panel, visualized in rectangular views with plug-ins of MapTransmission and FreqStack [24, 25]. The color represents different lineages
Case study of pathogen phylogeny
Acinetobacter pittii, a gram-negative bacterial species, is a pathogen that causes opportunistic infections [26]. In this case, we included a total of 149 strains to visualize the phylogenetic inference of the pathogen. The analysis represented sample metadata through differentiated symbols for attributes like isolation source, host, country, disease, collection date, and genome length, enabling a comprehensive overview of its evolutionary characteristics. As shown in Fig. 5, the main hosts of A.pittii include humans, animals, plants, food and the environment. The strains were isolated from tissue samples from blood, urinary system, respiratory system and digestive system. A complete display has been provided in the gcPathogen database (https://nmdc.cn/gcpathogen/species?taxonid=48296) [27].
A phylogenetic tree of the A.pittii with multiple annotation types visualized using the PhyloScape JS library. The tree is annotated with metadata including the host, disease, country, isolation source, and time. With interactive views, the tooltip can associate the rings with their corresponding legends
Case study of Ruegeria taxonomy
In taxonomic studies, the average amino acid identity (AAI) is a crucial metric for evaluating protein similarity between taxa. We designed an interactive heatmap plug-in to display pairwise AAI values corresponding to a phylogenetic tree. The genome of Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 (Alphaproteobacteria group, accession number GCF_000011965.2) [28] was chosen to demonstrate the Heatmap plug-in's functionality (Fig. 6). The phylogenomic tree was generated via the TYGS genome server (https://tygs.dsmz.de) [29] for strain level resolution. Pairwise AAI values were calculated using the EzAAI tool [30] and formatted into a CSV matrix as input for the heatmap. The selection of a heatmap grid cell highlights the phylogenetic tree tips that correspond to the AAI value, thereby elucidating the values and relationships. In Fig. 6a, the tips of the input genome and Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3, which share an AAI value of 100% on the same branch, are highlighted in red. Upon clicking on a clade of the tree, the display of the AAI heatmap automatically zooms in on the specified taxa. Figure 6b shows that the selection of the branch corresponding to input genome, Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3, and Ruegeria alba 1NDH52C results in the regeneration of a focused heatmap for these three taxa.
Visualization of microbial taxonomy with pairwise average amino acid identity. The tree was produced via TYGS with the input of the whole genome sequence (GCF_000011965.2). a When a grid cell in the heatmap of average amino acid identity is selected, the corresponding tree tips are highlighted. In this case, the input genome and Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 are highlighted in red. b If a clade is selected, the relevant section of the heatmap is displayed for the pairwise average amino acid identities. This figure is visualized with a PhyloScape Heatmap
Case study of the Chinese vascular plant tree of life
Research on plant resources will facilitate the planning of conservation, especially by identifying hotspots of phylogenetic diversity and discovering the areas of high species richness [31]. Here we present the visualization of the tree of life for 13,663 Chinese vascular plants (http://darwintree.cn/index.shtml) from a large tree view, colored with the plant distribution at both the provincial and county levels. The total species covered a 44.0% of all native Chinese vascular plants [32, 33]. The visualization started with the input of a Newick format file with 15,092 tips, with the MapColor plug-in chosen to show the geographical distribution of the plant species. In general, the distribution of vascular plants varies from region to region. Among them, Yunnan Province has the most species of vascular plant collected, ranging from 2521 to 2802, followed by other southwestern regions of China (Fig. 7a). When zooming in, the above pattern can be visualized at the county level. Areas around the Qinling Mountains, i.e. southern Shaanxi province, have a greater distribution than northern regions (Fig. 7b).
Visualization of Chinese vascular plant trees. a Visualization of tree and plant distributions at the province level. b Plant distribution at the county level (zoom in). c Amaranthaceae Suaeda corniculate distribution with a subset of trees of life. This figure is visualized with PhyloScape MapColor
The plug-in also supports the rebuilding trees for specific regions or the recoloring of regions by plant lineages. For example, if a species in the Amaranthaceae family, Suaeda corniculata is selected, its distribution will be displayed on a map and the northwestern region of China will be highlighted, which is in accordance with the known knowledge that the plant can grow on saline-alkaline soils (Fig. 7c). The results have been implemented in the gallery page with the title of the Chinese vascular plant tree of life.
Discussion
Advantages and shortcomings of PhyloScape
Phylogenetic tree visualization serves as a powerful analytical tool for evolutionary studies. As technologies and applications continue to advance, the demand for effective phylogenetic tree visualization is growing. In addition to simply displaying tree topologies, integrating and visualizing associated biological or evolutionary data presents an additional challenge.
We present PhyloScape, an intuitive online platform designed for phylogenetic tree visualization and analysis. Unlike conventional tools, PhyloScape not only displays tree topologies but also integrates common data types with different scenarios, enabling dynamic and interactive visualizations. Its user-friendly graphical interface allows seamless online operation without requiring high-performance local hardware, making it accessible to users unfamiliar with command-line tools. For developers, PhyloScape also supports customization and integration through APIs and modular extensions.
PhyloScape allows users to visualize extremely large trees and also provides an optimization for the display of trees with extreme branch length variation. It offers a range of application scenario visualizations, having developed and integrated plugins for the display of common scenarios such as maps, charts, and protein structures. PhyloScape supports the online combination and display of plug-ins. It has also simplified complex metadata annotations, offering two data upload formats to facilitate simplified annotations based on user needs. Additionally, the platform supports the sharing of constructed phylogenetic trees, facilitating collaborative research and downstream visualization development.
PhyloScape has several limitations. It only supports prebuilt trees and does not cover the entire analysis pipeline. For visualization, supports for processing multiple trees simultaneously or comparing trees is currently lacking. Additionally, while optimized for common use cases, its plug-in ecosystem remains limited, and continuous development of new plugins will be necessary to address this.
A comparison with other available visualization tools
As the primary data type of phylogenetic analyses, phylogenetic trees can be visualized and annotated using several existing tools. Among them, PhyloScape has unique features (Table 1). Desktop applications such as FigTree [17], MEGA4 [18] and CamlTree [19] are well-suited for local use, but they lack features for complex tree visualizations. The R library ggtree [20, 21] and the Python package ETE3 [22] offer multiple features and support various tree formats, but these tools often require some level of programming skills to utilize all their features. In contrast to those tools, PhyloScape supports most tree features and requires no additional installation. The web applications iTol [23] and Evolview [24] provide easy online access, supporting multiple input formats and dynamic interactions. PhyloScape enables the visualization of more features. As the amount of genomic data analyzed increases, efficiently visualizing large trees becomes a major challenge. Several tools, including Dendroscope [25], are specifically designed for large tree visualization. However, these tools lack the ability to integrate with web applications. Tools developed with JavaScript, such as phylotree.js [27], Archaeopteryx.js [28], PhyD3 [29] and IcyTree [30], are easy to use in a web browser and support interactive annotations, but they require additional development to adapt to different scenarios. Nextstrain [31] provides one-stop visualization output after data curation and analysis, but it is optimized primarily for pathogen evolution. In contrast, PhyloScape allows the combination of the tree view and scenario views, and is suitable for composable visualization on the platform.
Conclusions
This study introduces PhyloScape, a multifunctional online platform that supports the interactive visualization of phylogenetic trees in various scenarios. It enables the combination and joint display of multiple application scenarios along with the tree view on a single page, thereby simplifying and accelerating the analysis and mining of data. The platform reduces usage complexity by enabling parameter modification through the control panel. PhyloScape also offers online sharing capabilities and API interfaces to support collaborative research and system integration.
Availability of data and materials
The cases presented in the manuscript are available on the PhyloScape application’s demos http://darwintree.cn/PhyloScape/#/applicationtwo and gallery page http://www.darwintree.cn/PhyloScape/#/gallery. Scripts are available at https://github.com/SciDataLab/PhyloScape.
References
Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AW. Phylogenetic analysis. Models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet. 1967;19(3 Pt 1):233–57.
Kapli P, Yang Z, Telford MJ. Phylogenetic tree building in the genomic age. Nat Rev Genet. 2020;21(7):428–44.
Balaji S, Srinivasan N. Use of a database of structural alignments and phylogenetic trees in investigating the relationship between sequence and structural variability among homologous proteins. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2001;14(4):219–26.
Iwabe N, Kuma K, Hasegawa M, Osawa S, Miyata T. Evolutionary relationship of archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes inferred from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1989;86(23):9355–9.
Feng D-F, Doolittle RF. [23] Progressive alignment and phylogenetic tree construction of protein sequences. In: Methods in Enzymology, vol. 183. New York: Academic Press; 1990. p. 375–87.
Takezaki N, Nei M. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics. 1996;144(1):389–99.
Eisen JA. Phylogenomics: improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis. Genome Res. 1998;8(3):163–7.
Sjölander K. Phylogenomic inference of protein molecular function: advances and challenges. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(2):170–9.
Pazos F, Valencia A. Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Eng. 2001;14(9):609–14.
Adamek M, Alanjary M, Ziemert N. Applied evolution: phylogeny-based approaches in natural products research. Nat Prod Rep. 2019;36(9):1295–312.
Domcke S, Shendure J. A reference cell tree will serve science better than a reference cell atlas. Cell. 2023;186(6):1103–14.
Pazos F, Valencia A. Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions. Embo J. 2008;27(20):2648–55.
Thompson CC, Chimetto L, Edwards RA, Swings J, Stackebrandt E, Thompson FL. Microbial genomic taxonomy. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1):913.
Mittal A, Manjunath K, Ranjan RK, Kaushik S, Kumar S, Verma V. COVID-19 pandemic: insights into structure, function, and hACE2 receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(8): e1008762.
Attwood SW, Hill SC, Aanensen DM, Connor TR, Pybus OG. Phylogenetic and phylodynamic approaches to understanding and combating the early SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23(9):547–62.
Theys K, Lemey P, Vandamme AM, Baele G. Advances in visualization tools for phylogenomic and phylodynamic studies of viral diseases. Front Public Health. 2019;7:208.
Abudahab K, Underwood A, Taylor B, Yeats C, Aanensen D: Phylocanvas.gl: A WebGL-powered JavaScript library for large tree visualisation; 2021.
Smith DJ, Lapedes AS, de Jong JC, Bestebroer TM, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus ADME, Fouchier RAM. Mapping the antigenic and genetic evolution of influenza virus. Science. 2004;305(5682):371–6.
Sehnal D, Bittrich S, Deshpande M, Svobodova R, Berka K, Bazgier V, Velankar S, Burley SK, Koca J, Rose AS. Mol* Viewer: modern web app for 3D visualization and analysis of large biomolecular structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W431–7.
Retief JD. Phylogenetic analysis using PHYLIP. In: Misener S, Krawetz SA, editors. Bioinformatics methods and protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1999. p. 243–58.
Maddison DR, Swofford DL, Maddison WP. Nexus: an extensible file format for systematic information. Syst Biol. 1997;46(4):590–621.
Han MV, Zmasek CM. phyloXML: XML for evolutionary biology and comparative genomics. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10(1):356.
Vos RA, Balhoff JP, Caravas JA, Holder MT, Lapp H, Maddison WP, Midford PE, Priyam A, Sukumaran J, Xia X, et al. NeXML: rich, extensible, and verifiable representation of comparative data and metadata. Syst Biol. 2012;61(4):675–89.
Hadfield J, Megill C, Bell SM, Huddleston J, Potter B, Callender C, Sagulenko P, Bedford T, Neher RA. Nextstrain: real-time tracking of pathogen evolution. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(23):4121–3.
Sagulenko P, Puller V, Neher RA. TreeTime: maximum-likelihood phylodynamic analysis. Virus Evol. 2018;4(1):1042.
Wang R, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Yu S, Zhuo H, Huang Y, Lyu J, Lin Y, Zhang X, Mi Z, et al. Identification and characterization of the capsule depolymerase Dpo27 from phage IME-Ap7 specific to Acinetobacter pittii. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;14:1373052.
Guo C, Chen Q, Fan G, Sun Y, Nie J, Shen Z, Meng Z, Zhou Y, Li S, Wang S, et al. gcPathogen: a comprehensive genomic resource of human pathogens for public health. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(D1):D714–23.
Wirth JS, Bush EC. Automating microbial taxonomy workflows with PHANTASM: PHylogenomic ANalyses for the TAxonomy and Systematics of Microbes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(7):3067–77.
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D801-d807.
Kim D, Park S, Chun J. Introducing EzAAI: a pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J Microbiol. 2021;59(5):476–80.
Lu LM, Mao LF, Yang T, Ye JF, Liu B, Li HL, Sun M, Miller JT, Mathews S, Hu HH, et al. Evolutionary history of the angiosperm flora of China. Nature. 2018;554(7691):234–8.
Chen ZD, Yang T, Lin L, Lu LM, Li HL, Sun M, Liu B, Chen M, Niu YT, Ye JF. Tree of life for the genera of Chinese vascular plants. J Syst Evol. 2016;54(4):277–306.
Hu HH, Liu B, Liang YS, Ye JF, Saqib S, Meng Z, Lu LM, Chen ZD. An updated Chinese vascular plant tree of life: Phylogenetic diversity hotspots revisited. J Syst Evol. 2020;58(5):663–72.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Wenyu Shi (China Agricultural University), Yangjun Lai and Zhiduan Chen (Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for the advice on PhyloScape.
Funding
This study is supported by grants from the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA0460101, XDB38030300, XDB31030000) and Informatization Plan of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS-WX2023ZX01-11).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JW, BZ, LZ, ZM, XW and YZ conceived the work. LZ, BZ and JW designed and developed the PhyloScape JS library. JW, YC and CZ designed and developed the PhyloScape platform. GL tested the system. JW and BZ wrote the paper, and all the authors have contributed to its final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Zhang, B., Zheng, L. et al. PhyloScape: interactive and scalable visualization platform for phylogenetic trees. BMC Bioinformatics 26, 172 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-025-06203-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-025-06203-3








