Feature parity for storage related fields across REST API and Java SDK

[sumeetgajjar]

Thanks for stopping by to let us know something could be better!

PLEASE READ: If you have a support contract with Google, please create an issue in the support console instead of filing on GitHub. This will ensure a timely response.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The BigQuery REST API supports the followings fields in its response.

{
  "numTimeTravelPhysicalBytes": "23083567",
  "numTotalLogicalBytes": "222712206",
  "numActiveLogicalBytes": "222712206",
  "numLongTermLogicalBytes": "0",
  "numTotalPhysicalBytes": "83798234",
  "numActivePhysicalBytes": "83798234",
  "numLongTermPhysicalBytes": "0"
}

However, the corresponding getters are not available in the JAVA client: com.google.cloud.bigquery.Table

Describe the solution you'd like
Add the above fields in TableInfo class of the JAVA client.

Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A

Additional context
N/A

[Neenu1995]

@sumeetgajjar , Thanks for looking into this.
There is a known issue between the type of casing of these fields and we have team working on fixing this at the root.