Skip to content

Conversation

@mattab
Copy link
Member

@mattab mattab commented Apr 19, 2018

100 is too limited when it comes especially to tracking event names by event action or event category. 500 will cover a lot more use cases without compromising performance.

100 is too limited when it comes especially to tracking event names by event action or event category. 500 will cover a lot more use cases without compromising performance.
@mattab mattab added the Needs Review PRs that need a code review label Apr 19, 2018
@mattab mattab added this to the 3.5.0 milestone Apr 19, 2018
@sgiehl sgiehl merged commit 9c6cd3c into 3.x-dev Apr 21, 2018
@sgiehl sgiehl deleted the events_500 branch April 21, 2018 19:26
InfinityVoid pushed a commit to InfinityVoid/matomo that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2018
100 is too limited when it comes especially to tracking event names by event action or event category. 500 will cover a lot more use cases without compromising performance.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Review PRs that need a code review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants