Skip to content

Allow omitting implementation for abstract overloads #18882

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2025

Conversation

ilevkivskyi
Copy link
Member

Fixes #11488

This is a little quality of life improvement. Implementation is straightforward. I also update mypyc to give an error instead of crashing.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2025

According to mypy_primer, this change doesn't affect type check results on a corpus of open source code. ✅

@ilevkivskyi ilevkivskyi merged commit e867132 into python:master Apr 5, 2025
18 checks passed
@ilevkivskyi ilevkivskyi deleted the no-impl-abstract branch April 5, 2025 00:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

@overloads on @abstractmethods shouldn't need an implementation
2 participants